Julian Assange being dragged out of Ecuadorian Embassy

Julian Assange who helped setup Wikileaks and in one of the first set of leaks revealed the murderous campaign of the US military against innocent civilians in Iraq amongst many other leaks showing the systematic criminality and inhumanity of the US government was betrayed this morning by the right wing corrupt president Lenin Moreno of Ecuador. Former Ecuadorian President Rafael Correa – whose government granted Assange asylum in 2012 – branded his more pro-US successor Lenin Moreno the “greatest traitor in Ecuadorian history” for rescinding the asylum claim and allowing British officers to enter his country’s embassy.

At the moment in a damage limitation exercise to try and shutdown support for Assange the corporate press is saying if charged, he could face up to 5 years in prison. This is to make it not so bad, but we can be 100% sure if deported to the USA, they will have a long list of dubious charges and most likely will give him a prison sentence that will more than easily cover the rest of his lifespan for that is the way of such regimes.

Other Coverage Worldwide outrage over arrest of WikiLeaks publisher Julian Assange | Former UK ambassador Craig Murray denounces arrest and conviction of Julian Assange | Amid corruption scandals and deals with IMF and Washington, Ecuador’s government betrays Assange | Exposing ‘collateral murder’ and mass surveillance: Why the world should be grateful to Assange | Every charge against Julian Assange, explained | Ecuador SITREP: How Corrupt History Repeats Itself | 'Our property now': (Most) US lawmakers rejoice over Assange arrest | Roaming Charges: Tongue-Tied and Twisted | Hillary Clinton shows signature style as she chuckles over Assange’s arrest | Toe the line or go to jail: Tulsi Gabbard (2020 candidate) says Assange arrest is a message to Americans | The Martyrdom of Julian Assange | Daniel Ellsberg on the Importance of Julian Assange | Citing Assange's Work Exposing US 'Atrocities,' UK Labour Leaders Speak Out Against Extradition Effort | Why Julian Assange’s Extradition Must Be Opposed at All Costs | The Assange Arrest is a Warning From History
Some previous Indymedia coverage: OCCUPY MEDIA VID (14 mins) solidarity with Julian Assange at Supreme Court | LONDON - Julian Assange speaks from balcony of Ecuadoran embassy marking 6 months. | Julian Assange Has Been Nominated for Nobel Peace Prize of 2019 | We Will Not Be Gagged: Wikileaks |

The trial of two Mayo men accused of violent disorder and damaging property at the Shell Corrib gas project tunneling site in June 2013 continues in Castlebar circuit court.
On Friday four Shell security guards gave evidence to the court and were cross examined by the defence.

Related Links: ShellToSea.com | Radio reporter claims he lost his job over coverage of Corrib Gas controversy | Irish Times: Top criminologist calls for inquiry into Corrib policing | Archbishop Tutu calls for independent inquiry into policing of Corrib gas project | Court Report On “rape-tape” Sergeant Being Awarded €33,0000 | Business as usual for Gardaí – trying to smear women in ‘rape tape’ controversy | Join the continuous protests against Shell | 22 TDs gather at gates of Dail to demand reversal of Corrib pipeline consents

A worrying undermining of our democracy??

The coming referendum on the abolishment of Seanad Éireann would, if passed, remove the existing constitutional right of the President to refer proposed Bills to the people for a referendum. It would pass the initial responsibility of passing Bills into law onto the Dáil alone - a dangerous development, particularly where any ruling party might hold an overall majority.

A vote to abolish the Seanad would in fact pass most law making decisions that impact upon the people to the Dáil alone, passing such responsibility to a single parliamentary body, thus removing existing safeguards meant to protect against the introduction of unconstitutional or politically or otherwise motivationally biased law.

Abolition of the Seanad would mean that a single body, the Dáil, will be responsible for passing any new laws through parliament, which must then be signed into law by the President.

However, the existing constitutional right of the President to refer any Bill to the people for referendum will be removed from the Constitution.

Related Links:
How much would we save by abolishing the Seanad?
Very cynical misleading FG posters?
A History of Iniquity, II: How Irish Governments behaved unconstitutionally, serving the EU agenda | Memo On The Unconstitutional Use Of Public Money By Irish Governments In Constitutional Referendums | Article 136 TFEU amendment, the ESM and the Fiscal Compact Treaty | The Irish Veto: Why a referendum on one treaty, and not on the other? | Referenda: A Strategy for Success? | NUI Seanad Candidates' Include Secret FFers, FGers, et al | Ronan Mullen: Independent Senator. Liberal? | Ireland in Crisis: Challenging the Consensus |

Foreign media coverage of the reaction here

The anti-abortion movement was not cowed by the outcry over Savita's tragic death nor by the huge popular response marching in November. The Government plans legislation only to allow abortion when the woman's life is danger and the criteria for establishing that are not yet known. All opinion polls on the subject show a huge majority in favour of liberalisation of the laws -- a majority which is also rising over the years. The abortion rights movement has been publicly quiet for some time now while the opposition is loud and in public view. Can the movement for abortion rights summon the necessary militancy to achieve its objectives?

Savita Halappanavar

Two demonstrations have been called in light of this tragic death:

Pro-Choice Ireland have called a demonstration for 6 o'clock this evening Wednesday 14th November outside Leinster House.

Action on X in conjunction with Galway Pro-Choice has called a candle lit vigil for this Saturday the 17th of November beginning at the Garden of Remembrance at 4 o'clock.

UPDATE: National Open Pro-Choice Meeting, Saturday, December 8, 12:00pm until 3:00pm at the Gresham Hotel on O'Connell Street.
see HERE for event notice.

31 year old Savita Halappanavar died last week after being denied a termination after presenting with a miscarriage. Having originally presented at the hospital with a back pain on October 21st, it was discovered that Savita was miscarrying. She was 17 weeks pregnant at the time.

Over the course of 3 days in the hospital the doctors refused to carry out an abortion despite there being no hope of survival of the foetus. Savita had requested and abortion several times over the 3 days due to the severe pain she was suffering. She was refused an abortion on the basis that the foetal heartbeat was still beating and that “this is a Catholic country”. After 3 days the foetal heartbeat stopped and finally the foetus was removed. However Savita developed septicaemia caused by the miscarriage and died on the 28th.

Reaction to news of the death in India - The Times of India 0.11 Mb