New Events

National

no events posted in last week

Blog Feeds

The Saker
A bird's eye view of the vineyard

offsite link Leaked: Smith College memo demands workers admit White privilege Wed Mar 03, 2021 01:04 | amarynth
by Ramin Mazaheri for the Saker Blog As a daily reporter, columnist and author it seems I have developed a reputation for unparalleled bravery in exposing truths which the 1%

offsite link Moveable Feast Cafe 2021/03/02 ? Open Thread Tue Mar 02, 2021 15:30 | Herb Swanson
2021/03/02 15:30:01Welcome to the ‘Moveable Feast Cafe’. The ‘Moveable Feast’ is an open thread where readers can post wide ranging observations, articles, rants, off topic and have animate discussions of

offsite link Bernays and Propaganda ? The Transition to Education and Commerce ? Part 4 Tue Mar 02, 2021 10:16 | amarynth
By Larry Romanoff for the Saker Blog The success of Lippman and Bernays did not go unnoticed in many segments of American society. Universities in particular realised the potential of

offsite link Book review: ?Disintegration? by Andrei Martyanov Tue Mar 02, 2021 02:32 | The Saker
[this book review was written for the Unz Review] This is the third book by Andrei Martyanov that I am reviewing, the first one was ?Book Review – Losing Military

offsite link The ?Cancel Culture? phenomenon: kind of hate-hush all over the world Mon Mar 01, 2021 17:45 | amarynth
by Ghassan and Intibah Kadi for the Saker Blog Who remembers the Herman?s Hermits and their 1967 song ?There?s a Kind of Hush?? The hush the song speaks of is

The Saker >>

Public Inquiry
Interested in maladministration. Estd. 2005

offsite link Mainstream media: Failing to speak truth to power

offsite link David Quinn’s selective tolerance Anthony

offsite link A Woulfe in judges clothing Anthony

offsite link Sarah McInerney and political impartiality Anthony

offsite link Did RTE journalists collude against Sinn Fein? Anthony

Public Inquiry >>

Human Rights in Ireland
A Blog About Human Rights

offsite link Poor Living Conditions for Migrants in Southern Italy Mon Jan 18, 2021 10:14 | Human Rights

offsite link Right to Water Mon Aug 03, 2020 19:13 | Human Rights

offsite link Human Rights Fri Mar 20, 2020 16:33 | Human Rights

offsite link Turkish President Calls On Greece To Comply With Human Rights on Syrian Refugee Issues Wed Mar 04, 2020 17:58 | Human Rights

offsite link US Holds China To Account For Human Rights Violations Sun Oct 13, 2019 19:12 | Human Rights

Human Rights in Ireland >>

Spirit of Contradiction

offsite link The Party and the Ballot Box Sun Jul 14, 2019 22:24 | Gavin Mendel-Gleason

offsite link On The Decline and Fall of The American Empire and Socialism Sat Jan 26, 2019 01:52 | S. Duncan

offsite link What is Dogmatism and Why Does It Matter? Wed Mar 21, 2018 08:10 | Sylvia Smith

offsite link The Case of Comrade Dallas Mon Mar 19, 2018 19:44 | Sylvia Smith

offsite link Review: Do Religions Evolve? Mon Aug 14, 2017 19:54 | Dara McHugh

Spirit of Contradiction >>

Urgent Questions on Restrictions In The Public Interest

category national | rights, freedoms and repression | press release author Wednesday October 07, 2020 21:55author by hfi - Health Freedom IrelandReport this post to the editors

Press Release - Health Freedom Ireland 5th Oct 2020

Given the expectation that the public must accept what restrictions the State imposes, the basis of these decisions are not the exclusive preserve of experts and advisers or even of elected officials. None of these officials was elected with the prospect of severe restriction of personal liberty in view. Yet this power has been arrogated by these officials on the basis of advice of a dire public health emergency, the predictions of which proved wholly exaggerated. It is insufficient at this stage to claim “emergency.” The emergency has passed. The harm has proved far less than advertised. Deaths are few. Yet “recommendations” are still being promulgated, and severe restrictions are again being proposed.

Given the expectation that the public must accept what restrictions the State imposes, the basis of these decisions are not the exclusive preserve of experts and advisers or even of elected officials. None of these officials was elected with the prospect of severe restriction of personal liberty in view. Yet this power has been arrogated by these officials on the basis of advice of a dire public health emergency, the predictions of which proved wholly exaggerated. It is insufficient at this stage to claim “emergency.” The emergency has passed. The harm has proved far less than advertised. Deaths are few. Yet “recommendations” are still being promulgated, and severe restrictions are again being proposed.

The time for experts to recommend without full scrutiny is over. There is no immediate emergency. If the public are expected to accept these recommendations then legitimate questions must be answered. The people subject to restrictions need to know on what basis these restrictions are being imposed, and offered the opportunity to discuss, and to accept or reject the recommendations offered, based on full and accurate information. Below is a list of questions pertinent to the present regime. It is not an exhaustive list. These questions are directed to the Government, and through it to all Cabinet ministers, the Minister for Health, the HSE, and NPHET. It is the responsibility of the Government to provide full and honest answers to these questions.

1. What is the definition of a “case?” What is the difference between a “case” and an “infection?” How many infections are there, and why is this data not reported along with cases?

2. Is the PCR test used to identify cases?

  • If so, on what basis? When was PCR testing first used to detect the presence of a virus in a live subject? What research supports the use of this test for this purpose? How does this differ from the typical procedure for diagnosis of viral respiratory infection, and why is this new procedure warranted, or preferable?
  • What genetic sequence is held to be evidence of the presence of the virus?
  • How many cycles of the PCR test are used to identify a case? What is the basis for this number?
  • What does a positive result indicate? How many people with positive PCR tests have symptoms or develop symptoms?
  • What is the false positive rate? How is the incidence of false positives detected and corrected?
  • Has SARS-CoV-2 been isolated? If not, how can PCR accurately test for it?

3. Are there asymptomatic cases? What percentage of cases are asymptomatic?

4. Are persons with asymptomatic cases capable of spreading the virus? If so, what is the means of spreading and how has this been demonstrated? How many instances of asymptomatic spread have been documented?

5. How is a death attributed to SARS-CoV-2?

6. Have any autopsies been performed on patients identified as SARS-CoV-2 victims? If so, what were the findings? If not, why not?

7. Have any of the patients who have died been identified as SARS-CoV-2 victims by PCR test? If so, please refer to questions 2(a-f) above. Have these questions been addressed with respect to these deaths, and if not, how can these deaths be attributed to SARS-CoV-2?

8. How many of these patients had no other comorbidities?

9. What is the infection rate of the total population?

10. What is the infection fatality rate?

  • How does this compare to the infection fatality rate for influenza?
  • What are the leading causes of death? Where does SARS-CoV-2 infection appear in this list?

11. Was the Imperial College model correct? What was its prediction for deaths in Sweden without restrictions? What was Sweden's actual death rate? What is Sweden's current death rate?

12. What model(s) are being used to project deaths?

  • Has this model been backtested on actual data? If so, how did it perform? If not, why not, and when will it be backtested, so that its accuracy can be demonstrated?
  • Did this model predict the decline in deaths from June onward? If not, what adjustments have been made to improve its accuracy?
  • What are the current projections?
  • Who is responsible for modeling, and what professional oversight is in place to assess the performance of modeling?
  • Have model code and predictions been published? If so, where can they be accessed? If not, why not, and when will they be published so that the public can assess this work?

13. Has any member of NPHET or any cabinet minister received any financial consideration from any pharmaceutical manufacturer or institution promoting the use of vaccines or proprietary medicines?

14. Has any member of NPHET or any cabinet minister received research grant funding from or participated in any research project funded by any pharmaceutical manufacturer or institution promoting the use of vaccines or proprietary medicines?

15. What consideration has been given to the use of prophylactic treatments (such as hydroxychloroquine, zinc and azithromycin or ivermectin) as an alternative to social restrictions?

16. What analysis of the costs to social life, economic activity, and mental health has been performed?

  • Have these costs been weighed against any benefits of the restrictions imposed or proposed?
  • What conclusions have been drawn?
  • Why have these not been published?

17. How many tests, procedures and treatments have been delayed or cancelled due to restrictions in the health service?

  • Has any estimate been made of the increase in mortality and morbidity due to such delays and cancellations?
  • If so, were these increases weighed against expected benefit from the restrictions, and subsequently against actual benefit from the restrictions? If not, why not?

18. Has any analysis been made as to the social costs of restrictions and impositions such as:

  • Restrictions on family contact, including visits to infirm or elderly family members?
  • Restricitions on social contact?
  • Restrictions on attendance at weddings, funerals and other significant social events?
  • Restrictions on hospital visits, including at significant events such as births, deaths, and major procedures and treatments?
  • Personal impositions such as requirements to wear face coverings, particularly those imposed on workers and students for long periods?
  • Have any of these analyses been published? If not, why not, and when will they be published?

19. Can a respiratory virus be eradicated? Can respiratory viral disease be eradicated?

20. Has any proposed restriction, given the decreased incidence of infection and mortality, been proposed after a full and public analysis of the costs against projected benefit, and a retrospective study of the costs already incurred by the public due to past restrictions, particularly by those who have suffered adverse effects to their physical or mental health as a result of the restrictions imposed to date?

If you wish to download and print these questions for distribution you can do this here


https://healthfreedomireland.com/?smd_process_download=1&download_id=1013

Related Link: https://healthfreedomireland.com/urgent-questions-in-the-public-interest/
© 2001-2021 Independent Media Centre Ireland. Unless otherwise stated by the author, all content is free for non-commercial reuse, reprint, and rebroadcast, on the net and elsewhere. Opinions are those of the contributors and are not necessarily endorsed by Independent Media Centre Ireland. Disclaimer | Privacy