North Korea Increases Aid to Russia, Mos... Tue Nov 19, 2024 12:29 | Marko Marjanovi?
Trump Assembles a War Cabinet Sat Nov 16, 2024 10:29 | Marko Marjanovi?
Slavgrinder Ramps Up Into Overdrive Tue Nov 12, 2024 10:29 | Marko Marjanovi?
?Existential? Culling to Continue on Com... Mon Nov 11, 2024 10:28 | Marko Marjanovi?
US to Deploy Military Contractors to Ukr... Sun Nov 10, 2024 02:37 | Field Empty
Anti-Empire >>
Indymedia Ireland is a volunteer-run non-commercial open publishing website for local and international news, opinion & analysis, press releases and events. Its main objective is to enable the public to participate in reporting and analysis of the news and other important events and aspects of our daily lives and thereby give a voice to people.
Fraud and mismanagement at University College Cork Thu Aug 28, 2025 18:30 | Calli Morganite
UCC has paid huge sums to a criminal professor
This story is not for republication. I bear responsibility for the things I write. I have read the guidelines and understand that I must not write anything untrue, and I won't.
This is a public interest story about a complete failure of governance and management at UCC.
Deliberate Design Flaw In ChatGPT-5 Sun Aug 17, 2025 08:04 | Mind Agent
Socratic Dialog Between ChatGPT-5 and Mind Agent Reveals Fatal and Deliberate 'Design by Construction' Flaw
This design flaw in ChatGPT-5's default epistemic mode subverts what the much touted ChatGPT-5 can do... so long as the flaw is not tickled, any usage should be fine---The epistemological question is: how would anyone in the public, includes you reading this (since no one is all knowing), in an unfamiliar domain know whether or not the flaw has been tickled when seeking information or understanding of a domain without prior knowledge of that domain???!
This analysis is a pretty unique and significant contribution to the space of empirical evaluation of LLMs that exist in AI public world... at least thus far, as far as I am aware! For what it's worth--as if anyone in the ChatGPT universe cares as they pile up on using the "PhD level scholar in your pocket".
According to GPT-5, and according to my tests, this flaw exists in all LLMs... What is revealing is the deduction GPT-5 made: Why ?design choice? starts looking like ?deliberate flaw?.
People are paying $200 a month to not just ChatGPT, but all major LLMs have similar Pro pricing! I bet they, like the normal user of free ChatGPT, stay in LLM's default mode where the flaw manifests itself. As it did in this evaluation.
AI Reach: Gemini Reasoning Question of God Sat Aug 02, 2025 20:00 | Mind Agent
Evaluating Semantic Reasoning Capability of AI Chatbot on Ontologically Deep Abstract (bias neutral) Thought
I have been evaluating AI Chatbot agents for their epistemic limits over the past two months, and have tested all major AI Agents, ChatGPT, Grok, Claude, Perplexity, and DeepSeek, for their epistemic limits and their negative impact as information gate-keepers.... Today I decided to test for how AI could be the boon for humanity in other positive areas, such as in completely abstract realms, such as metaphysical thought. Meaning, I wanted to test the LLMs for Positives beyond what most researchers benchmark these for, or have expressed in the approx. 2500 Turing tests in Humanity?s Last Exam.. And I chose as my first candidate, Google DeepMind's Gemini as I had not evaluated it before on anything.
Israeli Human Rights Group B'Tselem finally Admits It is Genocide releasing Our Genocide report Fri Aug 01, 2025 23:54 | 1 of indy
We have all known it for over 2 years that it is a genocide in Gaza
Israeli human rights group B'Tselem has finally admitted what everyone else outside Israel has known for two years is that the Israeli state is carrying out a genocide in Gaza
Western governments like the USA are complicit in it as they have been supplying the huge bombs and missiles used by Israel and dropped on innocent civilians in Gaza. One phone call from the USA regime could have ended it at any point. However many other countries are complicity with their tacit approval and neighboring Arab countries have been pretty spinless too in their support
With the release of this report titled: Our Genocide -there is a good chance this will make it okay for more people within Israel itself to speak out and do something about it despite the fact that many there are actually in support of the Gaza
China?s CITY WIDE CASH SEIZURES Begin ? ATMs Frozen, Digital Yuan FORCED Overnight Wed Jul 30, 2025 21:40 | 1 of indy
This story is unverified but it is very instructive of what will happen when cash is removed
THIS STORY IS UNVERIFIED BUT PLEASE WATCH THE VIDEO OR READ THE TRANSCRIPT AS IT GIVES AN VERY GOOD IDEA OF WHAT A CASHLESS SOCIETY WILL LOOK LIKE. And it ain't pretty
A single video report has come out of China claiming China's biggest cities are now cashless, not by choice, but by force. The report goes on to claim ATMs have gone dark, vaults are being emptied. And overnight (July 20 into 21), the digital yuan is the only currency allowed.
The Saker >>
Interested in maladministration. Estd. 2005
RTEs Sarah McInerney ? Fianna Fail?supporter? Anthony
Joe Duffy is dishonest and untrustworthy Anthony
Robert Watt complaint: Time for decision by SIPO Anthony
RTE in breach of its own editorial principles Anthony
Waiting for SIPO Anthony
Public Inquiry >>
Voltaire, international edition
Will intergovernmental institutions withstand the end of the "American Empire"?,... Sat Apr 05, 2025 07:15 | en
Voltaire, International Newsletter N?127 Sat Apr 05, 2025 06:38 | en
Disintegration of Western democracy begins in France Sat Apr 05, 2025 06:00 | en
Voltaire, International Newsletter N?126 Fri Mar 28, 2025 11:39 | en
The International Conference on Combating Anti-Semitism by Amichai Chikli and Na... Fri Mar 28, 2025 11:31 | en
Voltaire Network >>
View Comments Titles Only
save preference
Comments (5 of 5)
Jump To Comment: 1 2 3 4 5One thing that seems to have been overlooked by those who advocate people saving money by putting their bins out less frequently than once a week is the implications for public health. If I cut down on my waste to such a point where I only need 13 collections a year, that makes a median 4 weeks between collections. So I'm supposed to have rubbish hanging around my dwelling for 4 weeks plus at a time. Hardly progressive in terms of hygiene - as it is if I miss a collection one week the place starts to stink (no garden) and, particularly in Summer, flies and various other disease vectors accumulate around the bags. This is what is actually being advocated by the Greens! Compare this to continental cities where waste is collected on a daily basis in many cities such as Paris for public health reasons.
All these debates and discussions have been had already in Dublin over the past 5 years. Quite frankly I am fucking sick and tired about hygene, bins, only every two week with a tag, do I won my bin? wankology!!
People are in prison for fighting for the working class movement. This is a battle of the working class for taxation justice not about the details of bin collection.
I would agree with Chekov that there are public health issues relating to non-collection / less frequent collection of bins (this is not a new argument - it has been used for 125 years to ensure collection of all bins).
I am confused By Niall's proposals and would appreciate further explanation. What is the 80 paid from central taxation in the long term for? Is this to accept a flat fee and then aim to return responsibility for paying this to central taxation, but not immediately? How do you propose justifying collection of the 80eu from the citizens of Galway, since those proposing the fee believe it should be paid by central taxation? (Or is this a clever tactic to strengthen non-payment by saying it will only be for a while - hold out and we'll get it off the govt. in a bit).
How does charging for something that you want to increase send a signal through the market that this should increase? (increasing price lessens demand, in this case for recycling services, rather than increases). Or is the price differential between grey and green bins supposed to provide the market motivation?
Is this report incomplete or did Niall have proposals on the supply side as well (re. the supply of recycling services?) Zero waste management seems to offer potential here which would be more effective.
Interesting point - even though we are told that everybody in the country has been paying their bin taxes for years and it's only the spongers in Dublin that have a resistance, the PD proposal reveals that ALL bins are collected in Galway and bin tax struggle in Dublin is the first area that has had to deal with the reality of non-collection. Is this the case? (I know non-collection has started / been approved in Cork - where campaigners previously defeated it by having the right to have your bin collected proven in the Supreme Court previously. But this came after Dublin?). Would Niall support the non-collection of untagged bins and the rolling back of the public health rights which were won in the 19th Century?
BTW - thaks for the report Orla.
Niall made more comments, but I picked out what I felt were the most significant. He did not mention incineration in his proposal, and I don't think he mentioned it on the night. He did not mention Zero waste management either, it was Catherine Connolly who brought that up. He did make some remarks about expanding the range of products for bring centres and about ongoing education in relation to recyling.
He obviously does support bin tax. His first sentence on his proposal is
'Broadly I would welcome the proposal on the grounds that is based on the polluter pays principle.'
On the Health Issue, as the Brown bin (food, leaves, and basically things that rot) would not be tagged that would continue to be collected every 2 weeks as it is now. It was on the grounds of health and safety that the non-tagging of this bin was proposed. This might make for an interesting argument in Dublin, if bins which have rotting food are not being collected. Also if Galway implements non-collection for anyone who has not paid the basic Flat Rate I am wondering will non-collection include the brown bin. There is also the issue that certain items in the Grey Bin would have staining from food so could not be put into the clean recyclables bin, but they would still potentially attrack vermin, flies etc.
- What is the 80 paid from central taxation in the long term for? Is this to accept a flat fee and then aim to return responsibility for paying this to central taxation, but not immediately? How do you propose justifying collection of the 80eu from the citizens of Galway, since those proposing the fee believe it should be paid by central taxation? (Or is this a clever tactic to strengthen non-payment by saying it will only be for a while - hold out and we'll get it off the govt. in a bit). -
Niall wanted a phasing out of the flat rate altogether so I think the 80Euro was probably the best he thought he was going to get. He might answer this himself though. Personally I think if he can see the logic of getting funds from Central Government for some of the bin-tax I don't see the logic of looking for funds for only some of the service and not all.
- even though we are told that everybody in the country has been paying their bin taxes for years and it's only the spongers in Dublin that have a resistance, the PD proposal reveals that ALL bins are collected in Galway and bin tax struggle in Dublin is the first area that has had to deal with the reality of non-collection. Is this the case? -
Yes. I know someone who has not paid the tax in years and her bins are being collected. But they have started to send out threatening letters. One part of Nialls proposal gives the impression that he is looking for the council to deal with non-payers - this is not exactly what he is saying but would be the result of what he says.
'That proper and transparent procedures, be put in place for dealing with people who deliberately contaminate their waste, people who refuse to pay for their waste collection and people who dump illegally.'
Whatever else the arguments are, the bottom line is that waste managment is going to be worth hundreds of millions. To suppose that the government and private waste companies are not aware of that is just ludicrous.
If we take the latest census figures for the number of households in Dublin, they reveal that there are 379,372. Rounding this to 380,000 and multiplying by 600 then we get a total of 228 million for income. The 600 figure is considered the upper ceiling for these charges according to the government. The charges are already around 500 euro in Sligo.
Various estimates are knocking around, saying the bin service is only costing for the whole city somewhere between 15 and 30 million. That still leaves an awful lot of profit.