User Preferences

  • Language - en | ga
  • text size >>
  • make this your indymedia front page make this your indymedia front page

Blog Feeds

Irish Left Review
Joined up thinking for the Irish Left

offsite link New Books Worth Reading Mon Sep 19, 2016 23:25 | Seán Sheehan

offsite link 13 Billion ? Lucky for some? Mon Sep 05, 2016 13:04 | Tony Phillips

offsite link Rebuilding Ireland: Long on Promise, Short on Detail Mon Aug 29, 2016 22:20 | Eoin O'Mahony

offsite link Brexit and Other Issues: Comments on the Current Situation Mon Aug 29, 2016 21:52 | Brendan Young

offsite link Bin Charges: From Private Circus to Public Service Tue Jun 21, 2016 12:38 | Michael Taft

Irish Left Review >>

Spirit of Contradiction

offsite link What is Dogmatism and Why Does It Matter? Wed Mar 21, 2018 08:10 | Sylvia Smith

offsite link The Case of Comrade Dallas Mon Mar 19, 2018 19:44 | Sylvia Smith

offsite link Review: Do Religions Evolve? Mon Aug 14, 2017 19:54 | Dara McHugh

offsite link Fake News: The Epistemology of Media Wed Jun 07, 2017 11:52 | Gavin Mendel-Gleason

offsite link Officials and Provisionals Sat Apr 01, 2017 22:54 | James O'Brien

Spirit of Contradiction >>

Public Inquiry
Interested in maladministration. Estd. 2005

offsite link Orwell’s 1984 arrives in 2018 Ireland

offsite link Elaine Byrne: Not speaking full truth to power Anthony

offsite link Israel/Ireland: Corruption comparison Anthony

offsite link Irish cowboy town and fake regulatory agencies Anthony

offsite link Elaine Byrne: Failing to join up the dots on state corruption Anthony

Public Inquiry >>

The Saker
A bird's eye view of the vineyard

offsite link SITREP: A false flag attack on a USN ship next? Sun Apr 22, 2018 01:54 | The Saker
by Nick for the Saker blog The USS Harry S. Truman Carrier Strike Group left the east coast Naval Station Norfolk, VA on 11th April. The aircraft carrier is accompanied

offsite link The Cultural Revolution?s solving of the urban-rural divide Sun Apr 22, 2018 01:46 | The Saker
by Ramin Mazaheri for The Saker Blog If there is one thing the election of Donald Trump showed the United States it’s that there is an enormous urban-rural divide. That?s

offsite link A Curious Incident Part XI Sun Apr 22, 2018 01:43 | The Saker
by Sushi for The Saker blog The Special Relationship If we examine the position of the UK on the world stage, we observe a pattern of prolonged decline from the

offsite link NYT and WaPo get 2018 Pulitzer for reporting about ?Russian election interference? :-) Sat Apr 21, 2018 04:22 | The Saker
Guys, this is not a joke! This is the original page: See for yourself below. These guys really have no shame, no sense of ridicule and no idea of

offsite link Syrian War Report ? April 20, 2018: Operations In Southern Damascus, Eastern Qalamoun Sat Apr 21, 2018 01:43 | Scott On April 19, the Syrian Arab Army (SAA) and its allies supported by warplanes of the Syrian Air Force launched a military operation against ISIS in the Yarmouk refugee

The Saker >>

Irish Water: Killing off conservation and the real agenda behind water charges

category national | bin tax / household tax / water tax | other press author Monday January 18, 2016 12:03author by 1 of Indymedia - Mandate Trade Union and Right2Water/Right2Chang Report this post to the editors

Reposted from Right2Water by D. Gibney, Mandate Trade Union and Right2Water/Right2Chang

This article by David Gibney from the Right2Water website has been republished here in light of the upcoming water charges protest on this Sat 23rd Jan in advance of the election due in the next few weeks. It highlights the scam and lies around Irish Water and how it is fully intended to privatise it. If and when the TIPP agreement is signed between the EU and USA, privatisation will be unstoppable not just for our water but for all services right across the board.

THERE are three obvious agendas behind the imposition of domestic water charges. If you were to believe the government spin, you’d think it was about conservation.

But the three real reasons are:

  1. Shifting the burden of paying for water from commercial enterprises to households;
  2. Giving tax breaks to the wealthy while imposing water charges on everyone else; and
  3. Lining up the future privatisation of our water industry.

There are a number of ways we can prove the conservation argument is a farce. The first and most obvious is through direct comparison with other countries that already have domestic water charges in place.


THERE are three obvious agendas behind the imposition of domestic water charges. If you were to believe the government spin, you’d think it was about conservation.

But the three real reasons are:

  1. Shifting the burden of paying for water from commercial enterprises to households;
  2. Giving tax breaks to the wealthy while imposing water charges on everyone else; and
  3. Lining up the future privatisation of our water industry.

There are a number of ways we can prove the conservation argument is a farce. The first and most obvious is through direct comparison with other countries that already have domestic water charges in place.

According to the UK water supply boards, where they have had domestic water charges in place since the 1980s, the average end user uses 68,405 litres of water per year. Yet, according to Irish Water, that figure in Ireland is 54,750 litres. So the evidence shows that water charges actually increase water consumption by up to 20%.

A SIPTU report from 2011 flagged up the results of international research into the issue. It found that installing domestic water meters was unlikely to make any real difference to the amount of water used by families.

The report stated: “In the UK, Germany, and the Netherlands it has been found that metering each home makes little difference to the amount of water used by families. Researchers have found that while consumption dropped initially following the installation of meters, after a relatively short time, this was more or less reversed with families returning to the pre-metered level of consumption.”

Senior Executive Engineer for Water, Gerry Concannon, estimated that the costs of metering – involving installation, maintenance, administration and replacement – would double our spend on water in the medium term.

That figure has now trebled, and yet the professional body Engineers Ireland stated: “The proposed expenditure on water metering would mean spending more than €1 billion which we don’t have on something we don’t need!"

So if conservation is not the real motivation behind water charges, and we’re spending so much money on a phenomenally-expensive metering programme, what is the real motivation behind water charges?

1. Shift the burden from corporations to households

The EU says that households account for only 10% of all water usage. The biggest users of water are agriculture and commercial companies, using 90% of all water. Yet, a quick look at the breakdown of the new water billing structure shows that householders will initially be expected to pay up to 78% of all costs, and that figure will no doubt rise in the immediate future.

Commercial companies will be expected to pay 22% of the costs for using 90% of the product, yet at this point in time, evidence shows they already have a non-compliance rate of 37% and €50m in water debt has been written off for them.

2. Give tax breaks to the wealthy while imposing water charges on everyone else

In the 2015 Budget, the Government gave a €405m tax break to the top 17% of earners. In the most recent Budget they gave further tax cuts disproportionately benefiting the highest earners. Those political decisions widened the wealth gap by €1,003 in two short years.

At the same time, Minister Alan Kelly has said he expects households to pay €271m in water charges. This is simply a transfer of wealth from the poorest in our society to the wealthiest. The unemployed, underemployed, disabled and pensioners all spend more of their time in the home than those who are lucky enough to be in full-time employment. This means they’ll use more water and when the cap on charges of €260 per year ends in 2019, their water bills will spiral out of control.

3. Lining up the future privatisation of our water industry

Water is one of the most profitable industries in the world. In 2013, in Britain, private water companies made profits of €2.81bn and paid €2.55bn to shareholders while paying only €101m in taxes. Seven water companies paid no corporation tax at all.

The dividends paid out to UK water companies are double that of your average non-financial company. As a result, there is almost no retained profit which is usually used to upgrade infrastructure future.

More than half of all water companies in the UK are owned by Private Equity Consortiums – a group of High Net Worth Individuals who pool their money to strip profits from any industry they can get their hands on. The impact is that for every £100 spent on a water bill in the UK, between £20 and £30 goes directly to the companies.

Anyone who still believes that Irish Water is about conservation should ask themselves why the Irish Government is steadfastly refusing to hold a referendum which would enshrine ownership in the hands of the public. This simple referendum could save the Labour Party and many of the seats for Fine Gael and yet they still stubbornly refuse.

When the Troika visited Portugal and Greece, their bailout terms included the privatisation of water services. That was because they had already metered, meaning there was a revenue stream in place. In Ireland we hadn’t put in place a revenue stream so the Troika played the long game and forced the metering programme into our Memorandum of Understanding first. Next step, full privatisation.

Without a referendum, there will be nothing a future government can do to prevent this.

In lining up this policy, the last two governments have cut spending on water by 65% and then have the neck to complain about the need for further investment after the infrastructure falls apart.

As Noam Chomsky said: “That's the standard technique of privatisation: defund, make sure things don't work, people get angry, you hand it over to private capital.”

That’s why water will continue to be the single most important issue for the upcoming general election. This one policy exposes the priorities for political parties and politicians.

Some are happy to lift the burden on employers, who already benefit from one of the lowest corporation tax rates and lowest employers’ PRSI rates in Europe, and impose that burden on low and middle income households.

They are happy to transfer wealth from some of the poorest in our society to the wealthiest. And they’re happy to line up our water services for future privatisation. They do this unashamedly hiding behind a bogus conservation argument.

It’s our job to hold them accountable, and we can do this by joining and supporting the Right2Change campaign as the election looms. Go to for more.

Right2Water has also announced another set of local demonstrations to take place across the country on Saturday, January 23rd. Please join and share the Facebook event page with all of your friends by clicking here


Related Link:



author by Pearse Monnetpublication date Mon Feb 08, 2016 12:07Report this post to the editors

The introduction of water charges (aka the Rain Tax) is another enclosure of the commons.

author by Hibernian Scribe - Freelancepublication date Wed Feb 10, 2016 09:57Report this post to the editors

I reside on Gorumna Island, Lettermore, Co Galway.

The reservoir lake, Loch Illauntrasna, is replete with algae and one septic tank is located in this lake another five septic tanks are located above the same lake and empty into it daily. The algae in the lake is complemented by five barrels of chlorine added at bizarre intervals (it is not measured) to the water exiting this lake for human consumption which results in a toxic water supply which everyone boils or filters. Algal water plus chlorine generates a carcinogen which causes bladder cancer. I have the specific references, however, I expect you will disregard all scientific evidence.

I do not use the water from Loch Illauntrasna, Gorumna Island, Co Galway. I harvest rain water and I buy water from Galway Water, Headford Road, Galway every two weeks. I retain the receipts. The electricity supply was interrupted 35 times in the 7 years I have lived here which automatically reduces the water flow, this is important. The amount of leaks from the water pipes within 1 and 2 km of Loch Illauntrasna is alarming. The road surfaces are poorly repaired and are re-visited by local operatives to dig up and fill in with comic regularity. The complete shut off of the water supply irregularly for many hours makes me feel so very welcome to Lettermore! Irish Water will inherit this serious public health issue.

I remind you that you seek submissions prior to May 16, 2014. I wrote to all of the Galway TDs. I received an excellent written reply in response to a question in Dail Eireann to an Taoiseach as to the future water supply in this area from Casla, Co Galway.

I do not now provide or ever will provide permission for Irish Water to install a water meter. Irish Water are in contravention of the 1995 Consumer Protection Law on this lack of consent issue alone. Irish Water have no right to impose water meters installed on public land and charge private owners of land for water which falls freely from the air.

I expect nothing from the Commission for Energy Regulation thus and therefore I will not be disappointed.

© 2001-2018 Independent Media Centre Ireland. Unless otherwise stated by the author, all content is free for non-commercial reuse, reprint, and rebroadcast, on the net and elsewhere. Opinions are those of the contributors and are not necessarily endorsed by Independent Media Centre Ireland. Disclaimer | Privacy