A bird's eye view of the vineyard
Anglo-Zionism and the Confederation of Europe Tue Feb 07, 2023 19:13 | The Saker
By Batiushka for the Saker blog Introduction: The Origins of Anglo-Zionism When I discovered the Saker in 2014, I at once discovered his term of genius ?Anglo-Zionism?. That, after all,
Let?s talk about nuclear war Tue Feb 07, 2023 19:05 | The Saker
by Ruben Bauer Naveira for the Saker blog The United States and Russia ? the two greatest nuclear powers on the planet ? have embarked on a wide-ranging ?indirect war?.
Moveable Feast Cafe 2023/02/06 ? Open Thread Mon Feb 06, 2023 22:00 | cafe-uploader
2023/02/06 22:00:02Welcome to the ‘Moveable Feast Cafe’. The ‘Moveable Feast’ is an open thread where readers can post wide ranging observations, articles, rants, off topic and have animate discussions of
Why Shinzo Abe Was Assassinated: Towards a ?United States of Europe? and a League of Nations Mon Feb 06, 2023 20:48 | The Saker
By Cynthia Chung for the Saker blog As already discussed in my paper ?Is Japan Willing to Cut its Own Throat in Sacrifice to the U.S. Pivot to Asia??, to
How can we stay in touch? (a repeat and summary) Mon Feb 06, 2023 17:25 | The Saker
Dear friends, The tsunami of emails expressing their support and understanding has not abated at all! Many also express sadness, which I very much share. For me the blog was
The Saker >>
Interested in maladministration. Estd. 2005
RTE in breach of its own editorial principles Anthony
Waiting for SIPO Anthony
Formal complaint against Robert Watt Anthony
RTE bias complaint Anthony
Fergus Finlay and the maternity hospital ‘gotcha’ trap Anthony
Public Inquiry >>
Voltaire, international edition
Use of chemical weapons by a Ukrainian unit Tue Feb 07, 2023 12:14 | en
?360° Cooperation with Libya.? But Which Libya?, by Manlio Dinucci Tue Feb 07, 2023 07:29 | en
Voltaire International Newsletter N°26 Sat Feb 04, 2023 05:43 | en
EU mulls ways to censor Russian views Thu Feb 02, 2023 04:34 | en
Zelensky's sponsor and Hunter Biden fall from grace Wed Feb 01, 2023 03:30 | en
Voltaire Network >>
Lisbon: Round Two - A bosses charter, with or without 'guarantees'
Sunday June 21, 2009 07:19 by Joe Higgins MEP - Socialist Party info at joehiggins dot eu
The genuine left has a key role to play in fighting Lisbon II
Joe says "NO"
Joe Higgins MEP on why he'll be campaigning against the rerun of the Lisbon Treaty and how this provides a real challenge and opportunity for the left.
Less than two weeks after the Euro Election campaign a Euro related charade is about to be visited on the Irish people. We are now being told that the FiannaFail/Green Party Coalition Government will present us with the Lisbon Treaty for a vote in late September or early October as soon as the EU Heads of State agree ‘legal guarantees’ apparently clarifying what the Treaty really means.
Lest anybody forgot, we voted on this Treaty in June of last year and by a convincing majority the Irish electorate rejected it. However, that did not please the Euro elite which was shocked at our insolence in daring to take a view different to what it has determined in our interests.
The Euro elite is comprised of the corporate or big business establishment within the European Union and the political establishment which represents it in the parliaments of Member States and in the Euro Parliament also.
The corporate establishment wields enormous influence over the Member State governments and the EU Commission as well as over other EU institutions. It has really determined the neo liberal direction that EU economic policy has been driven in over the last two decades, driving policies such as the privatisation of public enterprises and deregulation.
Initially presented as an exercise in tidying up the structures and workings of the EU, the Lisbon Treaty is now seen, correctly, as far more than that. In fact it encapsulates the strategy of the Euro elite to increase its economic and political influence across the globe. That is why we are being pressurised to vote again so that we facilitate its goal. And of course, the Irish corporate and political establishments are using the same script as their European counterparts.
Only two years ago we had another vote in this State in the form of a General Election. And considering what the major political parties promised to the voters in the economic arena contrasted with the disaster that has befallen us, there could certainly be grounds for a rerun of that election. That’s not on offer however!
Much ado is now being made of the so called legal guarantees that the Irish Government is about to secure so as to make the second coming of Lisbon palatable. It is a cruel deception of course.
Nothing is being changed in the Lisbon Treaty. It is exactly the same document that we voted on first time around. We are told that the guarantees will relate to issues such as ‘abortion, neutrality, tax and workers’ rights.’ I have news for the government. Those of us who opposed the Lisbon Treaty from the perspective of the left never raised the big majority of the issues that we are now being told we are to be reassured about.
They may have been raised by some others in opposition but they were always red herrings. What this means is that debate leading up to the second vote on Lisbon may be more narrowly focused around key issues that are intrinsic to the Treaty. This is to be welcomed as it means that we can have a serious examination of issues such as protection of public services and EU militarisation.
We have only had sight of the proposed text of the guarantees for a very short time. However, the fundamental text on which the future direction of the European Union will be based is the essential text of the Lisbon Treaty itself. This is what will count when the European Court of Justice comes to make decisions on controversial issues such as workers’ right to organise and mobilise against predatory contractors who would abuse migrant workers in undercutting agreed wage levels and working conditions in a particular industry.
Press reports indicate that there are serious objections within a number of EU Member States to giving any assurances on the question of strengthening workers’ rights. This is not surprising.
We pointed out in the course of the first Lisbon Treaty campaign that many false claims were being made by its supporters to the effect that it would rule out automatically the exploitation of workers and that judgements that were given by the European Court of Justice giving contractors the right to undermine agreed wages and conditions could not happen post Lisbon.
In fact the legal guarantees cannot address this issue to the benefit of workers’ rights since the fundamental treaties of the EU and the Charter of Fundamental Rights itself,a give priority to the rights of business to make a profit even where this means undercutting agreed norms for workers’ pay and conditions. We should not be asked to vote again only a year after we gave our verdict first time but if we must we will certainly insist that clarity rules with regard to the real meaning of Lisbon.
- "No EU Guarantees Can Change Thrust Toward Militarisation in Lisbon Treaty", Article by Joe Higgins on 29th May 09: http://www.indymedia.ie/article/92511
- Campaign against the EU Constitution (broad left anti-Lisbon campaign): http://www.caeuc.org/
- Joe Higgins' MEP Website: http://www.joehiggins.eu
- Joe Higgins extended article from Lisbon I arguing for a no vote: http://www.socialistparty.net/pub/pages/viewspring08/5.html
Caption: Video Id: A4SuZu6w5s0 Type: Youtube Video
Joe Higgins discusses how he will use the MEP seat to fight Lisbon
Caption: Video Id: ZXhvkfqrbX4 Type: Youtube Video
Joe Higgins on RTE outlines why he opposes Lisbon (from Lisbon I)