User Preferences

  • Language - en | ga
  • text size >>
  • make this your indymedia front page make this your indymedia front page

Blog Feeds

The Saker
A bird's eye view of the vineyard

offsite link Moveable Feast Cafe 2017/09/20 ? Open Thread Wed Sep 20, 2017 05:30 | Herb Swanson
2017/09/20 04:30:01Welcome to the ‘Moveable Feast Cafe’. The ‘Moveable Feast’ is an open thread where readers can post wide ranging observations, articles, rants, off topic and have animate discussions of

offsite link As a dog returns to its vomit, so a fool repeats his foolishness Wed Sep 20, 2017 00:58 | The Saker
In 1938 we had the House Committee on Un-American activities. In 2017 we now have the Committee to Investigate Russia. And here is their message:

offsite link Listening to The Donald at the UN Tue Sep 19, 2017 20:40 | The Saker
This article was written for the Unz Review Late this morning, outraged emails started pouring in.  My correspondents reported “getting sick” and having their “heart ache”.  The cause of all

offsite link Comments section reform ? request for comments Tue Sep 19, 2017 17:01 | The Saker
Dear friends, As promised, I am now sharing with you the reasons which prompted my decision to initiated a reform the comments section and the solutions I am thinking of. 

offsite link After Charlottesville Tue Sep 19, 2017 04:45 | The Saker
by Jimmie Moglia In a previous related article, (http://thesaker.is/the-two-americas-... I said there were still some unclear issues about the events at Charlottesville, especially regarding the death of the 32-year old

The Saker >>

Cedar Lounge
For lefties too stubborn to quit

offsite link What you want to say ? 20th September, 2017 03:59 Wed Sep 20, 2017 | WorldbyStorm

offsite link Please do it Theresa May, go on? you?d be doing everyone a favour. 21:02 Tue Sep 19, 2017 | WorldbyStorm

offsite link More warlike rhetoric from you know who? 19:54 Tue Sep 19, 2017 | WorldbyStorm

offsite link Labour under Corbyn 11:43 Tue Sep 19, 2017 | WorldbyStorm

offsite link Fianna Fáil are calling SF cult-like? the Dáil break must be over! 10:48 Tue Sep 19, 2017 | WorldbyStorm

Cedar Lounge >>

Dublin Opinion
Life should be full of strangeness, like a rich painting

offsite link Notes for a Book on Money and the Irish State - The Marshall Aid Program 15:10 Sat Apr 02, 2016

offsite link The Financial Crisis:What Have We Learnt? 19:58 Sat Aug 29, 2015

offsite link Money in 35,000 Words or Less 21:34 Sat Aug 22, 2015

offsite link THE WRATH OF KANE: BANKING CRISES AND POLITICAL POWER 09:32 Fri Jan 30, 2015

offsite link ALWAYS THE ARTISTS: WEEK THREE OF THE BANK INQUIRY 23:11 Thu Jan 22, 2015

Dublin Opinion >>

Bin charges referred to Supreme Court

category dublin | bin tax / household tax / water tax | other press author Tuesday March 21, 2006 16:59author by Slimes Reader Report this post to the editors

Article from todays Irish Times, reposted in full because the Slimes is paid-restricted.

Bin charges referred to Supreme Court
No byline

A Supreme Court ruling on the validity of bin collection charges under Dublin City Council's Waste Management Plan could cost the local authority millions of euro.

Circuit Court president Mr Justice Matthew Deery yesterday agreed to refer to the Supreme Court a number of questions raised in an appeal against charges by a city householder.

Paul O'Higgins SC, counsel for George Williams, Rutland Grove, Crumlin, Dublin, argued that the city council's charges were invalid having regard to the "polluter pays" principle.

Mr Williams is appealing against a District Court order which gave Dublin City Council a decree for €241.26 in respect of the provision of a household waste collection service charge.

His case is grounded on the basis that there is an objective in the waste management plan whereby charges would be levied on the basis of pay by weight or volume allowing an incentive to waste producers to reduce waste.

Mr Williams claims that because his bill was a fixed charge and it was unrelated to weight or volume that it offended the principle of the polluter pays or he with the most waste pays most.

Mr Justice Deery told Paul Murray SC, and James Connolly SC, who appeared with Ms Carol O'Farrell, for the City Council that he was satisfied there were a number of issues to be determined arising out of the express terms of the plan.

He said the issues should be determined by the Supreme Court and he agreed to refer a number of questions to it by way of case stated on whether the charge offends the provisions of the plan and particularly the polluter pays principle.

© The Irish Times

Related Link: http://www.ireland.com/newspaper/ireland/2006/0321/4943....html
© 2001-2017 Independent Media Centre Ireland. Unless otherwise stated by the author, all content is free for non-commercial reuse, reprint, and rebroadcast, on the net and elsewhere. Opinions are those of the contributors and are not necessarily endorsed by Independent Media Centre Ireland. Disclaimer | Privacy