User Preferences

  • Language - en | ga
  • text size >>
  • make this your indymedia front page make this your indymedia front page

Blog Feeds

Spirit of Contradiction

offsite link Electoralism vs Abstentionism (Or: Why You Should Run For Office) Fri Aug 26, 2016 17:07 | Slyvia Smith

offsite link Centrism extremism: how horseshoe-politics silences brutality Sat Jul 02, 2016 18:25 | yeksmesh

offsite link Of Tankies, Trots and Social Democrats Thu May 12, 2016 23:41 | Gavin Mendel-Gleason

offsite link Avatars of the Advanced-Capitalist Psyche – Capitain America: Civil War Mon May 09, 2016 00:07 | Gavin Mendel-Gleason

offsite link Wailings about Left Unity Sat Feb 13, 2016 01:13 | James O'Brien

Spirit of Contradiction >>

Public Inquiry
Interested in maladministration. Estd. 2005

offsite link Formal complaint against RTE for bias

offsite link Water protester convicted on trumped up charge Anthony

offsite link The people now know what you are Mr. Ross Anthony

offsite link Independents must decide: The people or the corrupt political system Anthony

offsite link Independent Alliance TDs must decide: The people or the corrupt regime Anthony

Public Inquiry >>

The Saker
A bird's eye view of the vineyard

offsite link The U.S. Removed the Truce in Syria Sun Sep 25, 2016 22:55 | The Saker
by Anna Jaunger On Monday, Sep 19, there was an attack on a joint convoy of the UN and the Syrian Arab Red Crescent (SARC) near the area of Urum

offsite link A Muslim police officer dies a hero?s death and receives Russia?s highest honorary title ?Hero of Ru... Sun Sep 25, 2016 21:00 | The Saker
The video below is an excerpt of a recent one hour long tribute on Russia TV to a 30 year old officer of the Ministry of Internal Affairs, Magomed Nurbagandov. 

offsite link Moves and Counter Moves Sun Sep 25, 2016 13:17 | Saker-Admin
This comment was chosen by Mod-FK from the post “Why the recent developments in Syria show that the Obama Administration is in a state of confused agony” Mod-FK had this

offsite link The US and Syria SitRep September 24th, 2016 by Auslander Sat Sep 24, 2016 19:51 | Scott
The war in Syria is in fact a war between US and RF in microcosm. Russia Armed Forces have demonstrated masterful tactical skill and her diplomats have shown they are

offsite link Russia Defense Report: Army-2016 Sat Sep 24, 2016 19:47 | The Saker
https://southfront.org/russia-defense...

The Saker >>

Human Rights in Ireland
www.humanrights.ie

offsite link Benefit Sanctions and Coercion Within the Irish Welfare System Thu Sep 22, 2016 13:38 | Cliodhna Murphy

offsite link The rights of the unborn: a troubling decision from the High Court? Wed Aug 10, 2016 12:42 | Máiréad Enright

offsite link Progress Report on the Northern/Irish Feminist Judgments Project. Mon Jul 11, 2016 13:40 | admin

offsite link The UN and the Eighth Amendment Thu Jun 23, 2016 09:46 | admin

offsite link Call for Papers: State Accountability for Vulnerability Mon Jun 20, 2016 12:29 | admin

Human Rights in Ireland >>

Statement from Workers Solidarity Movement - why we are leaving Campaign Against Home and Water Taxes

category national | bin tax / household tax / water tax | press release author Tuesday July 02, 2013 22:00author by wsm Report this post to the editors

WSM Press Release 26th June 2013

The Workers Solidarity Movement has decided to withdraw from the Campaign Against Home and Water Taxes. Please see statement below. We have made a donation of €1,000 towards paying off the debts of CAHWT.

1. It is now clear that the boycott of the property tax has collapsed and with it, any chance of defeating it in the coming period. The tactic of boycott was enough to defeat the household tax, but with draconian powers handed over to revenue to collect the property tax, much more was required.

2. The tactics pursued by the Campaign against Home and Water Taxes (CAHWT), to build a boycott, mobilise to protest on the streets and to argue for a campaign of industrial action by workers implementing the tax, was the only approach that had any chance of success. But for that to happen, mass participation was necessary.

3. The principal reason that the campaign was not successful was that not enough people got involved. If protests were to have an impact, tens of thousands were needed on the streets. Occupations of government buildings needed to be more than the tokenistic acts of a few dedicated activists with the ability to cause a real and sustained disruption to the business of the state.

4. Participation at local level never took on a mass character. In some areas campaigns were organised on a local basis. In most cases, however, only regional campaigns existed with activists working hard for the campaign, but burning themselves out due to the high level of activity required to cover large areas. Even where campaigns existed in a locality, the numbers were not sufficient to sustain a struggle of that duration.

5. We live in an era where clientelism dominates the political landscape. For many reasons - pressure of long commutes, no real extant sense of community/trade union solidarity, no tradition of self-organisation etc etc - most people's sense of getting involved in politics amounts to supporting 'someone else' to do it. Not enough people felt that they needed to get involved to make a difference. Instead they held off on registering but when the hoped-for response from 'someone else' didn't emerge they were easily intimidated into paying by government propaganda.

6. Talk of posing an electoral challenge to put the frighteners on Labour could only increase the hope for many people that ‘someone else’ would defeat the property tax. It should be obvious that Labour is not afraid of electoral oblivion. Even from an electoral perspective, a focus on elections to local councils that have no power to revoke the tax, elections that, at the time were over a year away, made no sense. Very quickly the argument for electoral participation turned from the idea that running candidates would defeat the property tax to the elections being an opportunity to punish Labour for their ‘betrayal’. But revenge is not a political tactic ever likely to win. While it might give lots of people pleasure to see the Labour party wiped out, the property tax would still remain in place. We are not saying that the stampede towards electoralism was the cause of the campaign’s defeat but perhaps the reason why political parties adopt the electoralist position is that it's so much easier to ask people to 'support me' or even 'support' a particular idea than it is to challenge people along the lines of 'If you don't get involved we can't win.'

7. Even after it became clear that at least half of the CAHWT campaigns were vehemently opposed to this tactic, the Socialist Party insisted on continuing to pursue it. The effect was to cause a major rift in the campaign at a crucial time in the battle. Some local campaigns, mainly ones dominated by the Socialist Party, are continuing to pursue this tactic.

8. Other political parties involved in the Campaign e.g. the SWP/People before Profit Alliance did not support the SP’s push to turn the CAHWT into an electoral platform but made it clear that nearer the election their candidates would be seeking ‘endorsement’ from the Campaign – which in effect amounts to another, if softer, version of acquiescing to the clientelist approach to politics.

9. All of this raises questions over the viability of CAHWT as a united national campaign in the future, particularly in the battle against the water charge. It is impossible to imagine a situation where a few candidates and politicians will be accepted by the majority of activists as spokespeople and representatives for the campaign. It will also be impossible for local campaign groups who are not pursuing an electoral path to disassociate themselves from the politicians and candidates who will be presumed by the media and others to be speaking on behalf of the entire campaign when in fact no democratic controls of candidates are possible. We feel, therefore, it is crucial for those activists and local groups who are serious about building a campaign based on direct action, participatory democracy and autonomy from political institutions to regroup for the next fight.

10. The water charge will only be defeated if a campaign of mass participation can be built. More people will need to be involved than even at the high points of the campaign against the household tax. People will need to be prepared to, not only boycott the charge, but obstruct the installation of water meters and to sabotage ones that have already been installed.

11. For the reasons outlined above, we no longer feel that CAHWT, is the appropriate vehicle for this purpose. The divisions between those who advocate a representative approach and those who advocate direct action have grown too wide. We hope to work with many of the activists that were part of CAHWT in this campaign and to help mobilise our communities in resistance.

12. We are not suggesting that there are any easy answers. The failure of the CAHWT to mobilise large numbers on protests against the property tax, plus the success of the majority of the public sector trade union leadership in frightening members into voting for the slightly modified version of Croke Park 2, suggests that the task of prompting, encouraging and motivating mass participation in actions designed to prevent the installation of water meters and defeat the imposition of the water tax will not be easy. The task of moving a significant section of the working class from the clientelist approach of wanting ‘someone else’ to do politics for them to a participatory approach where they see a role for themselves in bringing about change is what faces us.

Workers Solidarity Movement
26th June 2013

author by Johnpublication date Fri Jul 05, 2013 23:15Report this post to the editors

The above seems fair assessment of the position. Can anyone clarify if the often repeated claim that enforced opening up of competition will arise once a revenue stream is opened up via water charges ? If this is 100 % correct it should form the basis of a fight back however unlikely that seems at the moment.

The energy and water companies in Britain are soaking (pardon the pun) the populace. Sentrica, the favourite for buying Bord Gais furnished a 5 million bonus to its CEO this year. The old and poor are shuffling off this mortal coil in winter with the cold and the penny is dropping about the avarice of Sentrica and associated players in the market accross the water. Of course our own are dying of cold too approx 2000 per year.

The retail arm of bord gais would appear to be going to market as we write and not a squeak from unions or those playing opposition, except from SIPTU, apparently to claim 70 000 euros worth of share ownership per worker.

But the penny might drop and reach critical mass on the water issue if the mandatory opening up to the market is correct ?

author by Fat Freddy's catpublication date Mon Jul 08, 2013 00:04Report this post to the editors

Mass mobilisation of people to campaign for or against something seems to be the crux. The Irish public doesn't do mass mobilisations. It is very difficult to get the people out and agitate on anything. The WSM statement hits home hard. Recognising a lost cause is a brave act of realism.

 
© 2001-2016 Independent Media Centre Ireland. Unless otherwise stated by the author, all content is free for non-commercial reuse, reprint, and rebroadcast, on the net and elsewhere. Opinions are those of the contributors and are not necessarily endorsed by Independent Media Centre Ireland. Disclaimer | Privacy