no events posted in last week
Interested in maladministration. Estd. 2005
Robert Watt complaint: Time for decision by SIPO Anthony
RTE in breach of its own editorial principles Anthony
Waiting for SIPO Anthony
Formal complaint against Robert Watt Anthony
RTE bias complaint Anthony
Public Inquiry >>
A Blog About Human Rights
UN human rights chief calls for priority action ahead of climate summit Sat Oct 30, 2021 17:18 | Human Rights
5 Year Anniversary Of Kem Ley?s Death Sun Jul 11, 2021 12:34 | Human Rights
Poor Living Conditions for Migrants in Southern Italy Mon Jan 18, 2021 10:14 | Human Rights
Right to Water Mon Aug 03, 2020 19:13 | Human Rights
Human Rights Fri Mar 20, 2020 16:33 | Human Rights
Human Rights in Ireland >>
Is BBC Verify Britain?s Answer to the Disinformation Governance Board? Mon May 29, 2023 13:00 | Tony Morrison
For Tony Morrison, there is something familiar about Marianna Springs and the BBC's new anti-disinformation project. She's Britain's answer to Nina Jankowicz, ex-head of the short-lived Disinformation Government Board.
The post Is BBC Verify Britain?s Answer to the Disinformation Governance Board? appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
Jane Fonda Says White Men to Blame For ?Climate Crisis? and Calls For Them ALL to be Jailed! Mon May 29, 2023 11:04 | Toby Young
Movie star Jane Fonda, formerly married to billionaire Ted Turner, tells audience at Cannes Film Festival that white men are to blame for the 'climate crisis' and they should all be arrested and jailed.
The post Jane Fonda Says White Men to Blame For ?Climate Crisis? and Calls For Them ALL to be Jailed! appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
Just Stop Oil?s Hollywood Patron Has Holiday Home in Ireland That he Jets Off to ?When the Going Get... Mon May 29, 2023 09:00 | Toby Young
Adam McKay, a Hollywood director who helps fund Just Stop Oil, has a holiday home 5,000 miles away from his house in Malibu where he jets off to ?when the going gets tough?. It's one rule for him...
The post Just Stop Oil?s Hollywood Patron Has Holiday Home in Ireland That he Jets Off to ?When the Going Gets Tough? appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
As More and More Patients Opt For Private Healthcare, the NHS Continues to Sink into the Mire Mon May 29, 2023 07:00 | In-house doctor
Recent data reveal that record numbers of patients are opting for private healthcare because they can't get the treatment they need on the NHS. The Daily Sceptic's in-house doctor thinks things will only get worse.
The post As More and More Patients Opt For Private Healthcare, the NHS Continues to Sink into the Mire appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
News Round-Up Mon May 29, 2023 01:08 | Toby Young
A summary of the most interesting stories in the past 24 hours that challenge the prevailing orthodoxy about the virus and the vaccines, the ?climate emergency? and the supposed moral defects of Western civilisation.
The post News Round-Up appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
Lockdown Skeptics >>
Voltaire, international edition
Armenia cedes Nagorno-Karabakh to Azerbaijan Fri May 26, 2023 04:36 | en
Voltaire, International Newsletter, n°41 Wed May 24, 2023 07:15 | en
Armenia ready to abandon Nagorno-Karabakh Tue May 23, 2023 09:14 | en
The Growing War Cost on Our Shoulders, by Manlio Dinucci Tue May 23, 2023 08:40 | en
The moment of truth in Ukraine, by Thierry Meyssan Tue May 23, 2023 07:02 | en
Voltaire Network >>
rights, freedoms and repression |
Thursday February 11, 2010 16:40 by Seán Ryan
Animal rights activist, Robert evcik, walks out of court a free man yet again. For the third waste of time, to be precise.
Sergeant Eamon Lynch of Pearse St Garda station, with the aid of the DPP, brought a prosecution against Mr evcik, stemming from a protest and a work of obvious fiction that was composed in November of 2008.
First Waste of Time: http://www.indymedia.ie/article/93510
Second Waste of Time: http://www.indymedia.ie/article/95068
Sitting Rob up
On Wednesday, Feb 3rd, Robert evcik and myself, his McKenzie Friend, walked into Court 17, in Dublin's new and modern facility at Parkgate st beside the Phoenix Park. This was the third time that Robert has had to go through the pillory of justice's medieval system, each journey culminating in a hearing where he has resolutely assured that his good name would not be marred with the stigma of criminalisation.
The truth has its worth. But in a courtroom, it is uncertain. Even when you can prove a truth beyond any doubt, you might still lose, you might be a criminal.
Rob is an animal rights campaigner and a vegan. I'm neither. Yet we have become good friends. I say that to disabuse anyone of the notion that he is some sort of indoctrinated and indoctrinating robot. If he sees some wrong, he'll not be quiet about it, it's as simple as that. He's open to discussion and will not manufacture offence just because someone disagrees with him. He's very passionate about fur. So is Barnado's Furriers, at the bottom of Grafton st, near the Molly Malone statue. I suppose the difference between the two to be in the passion. That difference is well exhibited by this case, the result of these passions. The passion of the gardaí, for what they're doing, might give pause for reflection too.
Under cross-examination, Marie Corbett, who was 66 at the time of the alleged incident, at the end of 2008, immediately refused Rob's generous offer to have her to withdraw the allegation. The allegation being that he had approached her and had screamed "animal abuser!" right into her face. Ms Corbett was happy to chat and present her imaginings as facts to the court, she seemed oblivious to the fact that her testimony had just been placed on the edge of a precipice, and if Rob could produce (and produce it he did) the evidence that he'd challenged her with, it would be flung downwards and shattered. Rob had put it to her that his video evidence and indeed, video evidence gathered by a garda inspector, showed that there was no incident. On top of that, during the cross-examination, she contradicted most of her statement and testimony.
Next on the stand was Sgt Lynch. Sgt Lynch claimed that Ms Corbett had walked up to him, told him of her allegation and had identified Rob to him. He then swore that he walked over to Rob and began the interaction that would lead to his arresting the young man. Rob's video evidence tells a different story. When Ms Corbett was allegedly making a complaint to the sergeant, Rob was a few yards behind them, filming them. The Sergeant walked over to Robert by walking directly away from him, and Ms Corbett waited until she was sure that the sergeant was approaching the correct gentleman (in both her evidence and statement she claimed to have watched the sergeant approach Rob) by leaving the immediate area, without once casting so much as a glance in Rob's direction. Of course the sergeant waited until she'd left, the only person who could confirm that he'd selected the right man, before walking over to and away from Rob. On the stand, the sergeant claimed that the one and only description he had of Rob was that he had long hair, a ponytail. He told the Judge that there were very few protesters present that night with ponytails, maybe only two. The sergeant was unable to explain how he was able to identify Rob from Ms Corbett's description. In other words how could he be sure that it wasn't a second guy with a ponytail that he was looking for?
One would think that that would have been the end of it. Not so, the allegation, a section 6 of the Public Order Act allegation, wasn't even a charge before the court. Rob was up for failing to provide his name and address to the sergeant, under the Public Order Act, and failing to produce identification, like a passport, when required to do so, under the Immigration Act. Two sets of charges for the single offence of keeping the sergeant ignorant as to Robert's identity and thus frustrating his otherwise non-existent investigation into the complaint that he hadn't even bothered to record in his notebook. The allegation provided the necessary reasonable suspicion, that enabled the sergeant to demand details. In other words, the DPP and the Gardaí hung Ms Corbett out to dry. This wasn't about protecting an elderly lady or affording her justice, it was about sending a message to Robert and the other activists. The message being: the Gardaí are very willing to abuse the justice system in order to stop public shows of dissent. Sure, if you have a one-off protest, there's no problem, you'll be forgotten about by tomorrow. If you make a regular thing of it though, well that's unacceptable, and it will be stopped.
Anyway, the sergeant also claimed that Rob had fallen to the ground when he was arrested and that he and some other other gardaí had tried to put the activist into a sitting position, but he had refused to allow this, so they rolled him onto his side to await his transportation to Pearce st garda station. The video evidence tells a different story. Rob was dragged to the ground by the sergeant. The sergeant and two lackeys couldn't put Rob into a sitting position as your spine does not facilitate such a degree of freedom when the gardaí have you pinned face-down, with their knees planted into that very same spine. When they noticed that Mr Edmund Long was filming their alleged attempts to put Mr evcik into a sitting position, they called for the prone figure to stop resisting.
Inspector McMenamin, as expected, provided much useful information. A stenographer was hired and brought into the court with this man's testimony and answers to Rob's questions, in mind. The stenographer, who wired the judge, the DPP, Rob and the witness box for sound, was money well spent. I'll not go into too much of what the inspector had to say at this point as such information has other uses. But I will say this: his video evidence was not continuous, despite his claims and the claims of the DPP. He was not the person who transferred the footage from the 8mm tape, to the DVD that was presented to Rob, as part of his precis and later, played in court as evidence in this trial. That person wasn't in court. The inspector could not explain how footage that was not recorded by his camera, ended up, added into the footage shown in court. He'd sworn earlier that this was the unedited video evidence that he'd filmed on the night in question. His testimony was akin to watching someone with multiple-personality disorder arguing with himself. He did agree though, even with himself, Rob had not appeared in the part of the footage he'd shot of Ms Corbett and her colleagues closing the shop. In Rob's precis of evidence, he had received no notice of Inspector McMenamin as a witness, neither did he receive a summary of the inspector's evidence. The inspector's evidence made things a lot more complex or convoluted than the simplicity contained in the sergeant's precis. This was very unfair to Rob. Rob was by law, entitled to a proper summary of the evidence and he was entitled, again by law, to a full and unedited copy of the inspector's video evidence. But once again, for the innocents out there, this was never about fairness and it was never a search for the truth. It was about using an obviously false allegation, to harass, intimidate, assault, prosecute and criminalise a man for exercising his right to dissent.
It is Rob's belief and mine, the audio and video evidence points to it too, that Inspector Patrick McMenamin of Pearse st garda station, told Sergeant Lynch to demand Rob's details, after Rob had blatantly filmed him in plain clothes, filming the activists. I might add that the inspector's testimony supports this too. Sergeant Lynch can be heard on Rob's audio to demand what right Rob had to film and then demanding his details. The sergeant ignored Rob's request that he identify himself and that he inform Rob as to why he was stopping him (there is nothing unlawful about filming in public as the inspector confirmed under cross-examination). Though in fairness, Rob had recorded the sergeant's shoulder number earlier, when he was filming. The sergeant went on to tell Robert that he was making his demands under Section 24 of the Public Order Act and that he would arrest him, if he didn't provide his name and address. Now here's where things get a bit iffy. Up until this point, the sergeant had said nothing whatsoever about Ms Corbett's allegation or the Immigration Act. The audio is of poor quality and it's hard to tell what happens next (any audio experts out there?). Rob says that the sergeant proceeded to arrest him without ever mentioning the allegation (indeed the custody record makes no mention of it either - this being strange, the gardaí would have us believe that the allegation was being actively investigated at the time) and without making any demands under the Immigration Act. The sergeant swore blind that he went into both. Another garda, who didn't appear in court, can be seen on Ed's video, telling Ed that he had heard what had been said. He tells Ed that Rob has been arrested under the Public Order act. He makes no mention of the allegation or the Immigration Act.
The Judge, a gentleman, believed the sergeant and found the facts to be proven. He asked Rob if there were any mitigating facts before he decided what to do next. Robert answered that he had never intended to break a law on that evening and that he was still of the firm belief that he hadn't. Hearing this, the Judge binned the two charges under the Probation Act and ensured that Robert's record remains unblemished.
Before we left the courtroom, there was one more stomach churning moment. I watched the discredited Ms Corbett make her way over to the sergeant and the DPP, arms outstretched and a look of religious ecstasy on her face, as she gushed her thanks and congratulated both. I didn't wait to see how the sergeant and the DPP responded, life's too short. Let it be enough that it is most likely that neither has initiated a proceeding with regard to false and malicious complaints.
Ms Corbett allegedly makes a complaint to the Sergeant
Sergeant approaches Rob who'd just been identifed to him the hard way
Inspector McMenamin doesn't look too peased at being filmed
View Comments Titles Only
Comments (13 of 13)Jump To Comment: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
...that Tara St. Garda station is the workplace of one Supt. Joseph '48 hours' Gannon, notorious nationwide for his 'handling' of the protests against Shell's Corrib Gas project in 2006 and 2007. It's interesting to see how he has transferred his 'experience' in policing protest from Mayo to Dublin.
Is Gannon not attached to the Press Office these days? I'm sure that he was on RTE as the Press Officer recently.
Most of the gardaí that these activists deal with say that Gannon is their superintendent.
Many former Erris pigs have moved on to bigger and better things. Joe Gannon now works in pearse street Garda station, while John gilligan ( not the crim) works in the press office.
This is O'Reilly, who was/is chief (brass) button pusher.
Photo aken in 2007 outside the refinery in Bellinaboy..
© the poster. 2007
Doe's it surprise any body the way that these ''baboons'' are behaving , we dont have to look at our ''global friends '' to see
the carry on in regard to corruption and the like , we only have to look closely , at home .
Congrats Robert and thanks to Sean Ryan yet again giving his time and energy to assist in defence of activists.
Thank you,well done .
Well done to all for your exposing the inherent indemic corrupt goings on daily in this once beautiful country, turned into a kip by these same bastards and the rest of them who swear privately to uphold unjustice where ever anything resembling justice, rears its head....
Well done Rob and Sean. It's about time they stopped wasting your time like this but I guess that's their tactic, seeing as they have no legitimate way of stopping people exercising their right to freedom of speech.
Another animal rights protester got arrested a few hours ago. Not sure if he is in Pearse or Kevin street as the cops won't say! Apparently the cops think it's illegal to film them while they deprive citizens of their rights to free speech!
On Saturday Rob was stopped by Sgt Paul Tallon, under Section 30 of the Offences Against The State Act.
Sgt Tallon demanded to know why Rob was filming the movements of the gardaí, he informed the young man that he had grave concerns for the safety of both gardaí and civilians. Activist Ed Long was arrested for obstructing (under the Public Order Act) the sergeant. He was, at that time, attempting to film the sergeant in his alleged bid to safeguard the security of the State.
When Ed had been handed over to another garda to be bundled away to some secret detention centre, Sgt Tallon went back to the suspected terrorist and continued to interrogate him. He would not accept Rob's example of his current dealing with the sergeant and the arrest a few moments before as being the reason as to why the gardaí and their movements should be filmed. The sergeant brushed this away by claiming that this was "different."
Sergeant Tallon continued to make his demands for some more minutes but was given no more information. So he did what anyone with grave concerns for the safety of his fellow officers and other human beings would do, he demanded that the suspected terrorist leave the immediate area of Grafton st, under Section 8 of the Public Order Act.
I received a phone call at around this time and made my way to the scene. The remaining activists decided to cut short the demonstration as some wanted to come with me to attempt to ascertain Ed's whereabouts. It took some time to shut down as, per usual, their table was very busy, with folks signing letters, supporting the activists' views on fur.
Myself and two more of Ed's friends went to Harcourt. When we got there, the member in charge refused to confirm or deny as to whether Ed was in custody at the station. We left. Some hours later, Ed was released and confirmed that he had been held at Harcourt.
Where are the ICCL in all of this have they been apprised about what is going on ?
Remember the UN Declaration of Human Rights Article 19 : Everyone has the right to freedom of expression, this shall include the right to receive and impart information without interference by public authority.
That is roughly the quotation it was fashioned after the experience of barbarism in WW II.
Why don't we make the ICCL get off it 's behind and walk the talk ?
More Reading on this case