North Korea Increases Aid to Russia, Mos... Tue Nov 19, 2024 12:29 | Marko Marjanovi?
Trump Assembles a War Cabinet Sat Nov 16, 2024 10:29 | Marko Marjanovi?
Slavgrinder Ramps Up Into Overdrive Tue Nov 12, 2024 10:29 | Marko Marjanovi?
?Existential? Culling to Continue on Com... Mon Nov 11, 2024 10:28 | Marko Marjanovi?
US to Deploy Military Contractors to Ukr... Sun Nov 10, 2024 02:37 | Field Empty Anti-Empire >>
Indymedia Ireland is a volunteer-run non-commercial open publishing website for local and international news, opinion & analysis, press releases and events. Its main objective is to enable the public to participate in reporting and analysis of the news and other important events and aspects of our daily lives and thereby give a voice to people.
Fraud and mismanagement at University College Cork Thu Aug 28, 2025 18:30 | Calli Morganite UCC has paid huge sums to a criminal professor
This story is not for republication. I bear responsibility for the things I write. I have read the guidelines and understand that I must not write anything untrue, and I won't.
This is a public interest story about a complete failure of governance and management at UCC.
Deliberate Design Flaw In ChatGPT-5 Sun Aug 17, 2025 08:04 | Mind Agent Socratic Dialog Between ChatGPT-5 and Mind Agent Reveals Fatal and Deliberate 'Design by Construction' Flaw
This design flaw in ChatGPT-5's default epistemic mode subverts what the much touted ChatGPT-5 can do... so long as the flaw is not tickled, any usage should be fine---The epistemological question is: how would anyone in the public, includes you reading this (since no one is all knowing), in an unfamiliar domain know whether or not the flaw has been tickled when seeking information or understanding of a domain without prior knowledge of that domain???!
This analysis is a pretty unique and significant contribution to the space of empirical evaluation of LLMs that exist in AI public world... at least thus far, as far as I am aware! For what it's worth--as if anyone in the ChatGPT universe cares as they pile up on using the "PhD level scholar in your pocket".
According to GPT-5, and according to my tests, this flaw exists in all LLMs... What is revealing is the deduction GPT-5 made: Why ?design choice? starts looking like ?deliberate flaw?.
People are paying $200 a month to not just ChatGPT, but all major LLMs have similar Pro pricing! I bet they, like the normal user of free ChatGPT, stay in LLM's default mode where the flaw manifests itself. As it did in this evaluation.
AI Reach: Gemini Reasoning Question of God Sat Aug 02, 2025 20:00 | Mind Agent Evaluating Semantic Reasoning Capability of AI Chatbot on Ontologically Deep Abstract (bias neutral) Thought
I have been evaluating AI Chatbot agents for their epistemic limits over the past two months, and have tested all major AI Agents, ChatGPT, Grok, Claude, Perplexity, and DeepSeek, for their epistemic limits and their negative impact as information gate-keepers.... Today I decided to test for how AI could be the boon for humanity in other positive areas, such as in completely abstract realms, such as metaphysical thought. Meaning, I wanted to test the LLMs for Positives beyond what most researchers benchmark these for, or have expressed in the approx. 2500 Turing tests in Humanity?s Last Exam.. And I chose as my first candidate, Google DeepMind's Gemini as I had not evaluated it before on anything.
Israeli Human Rights Group B'Tselem finally Admits It is Genocide releasing Our Genocide report Fri Aug 01, 2025 23:54 | 1 of indy We have all known it for over 2 years that it is a genocide in Gaza
Israeli human rights group B'Tselem has finally admitted what everyone else outside Israel has known for two years is that the Israeli state is carrying out a genocide in Gaza
Western governments like the USA are complicit in it as they have been supplying the huge bombs and missiles used by Israel and dropped on innocent civilians in Gaza. One phone call from the USA regime could have ended it at any point. However many other countries are complicity with their tacit approval and neighboring Arab countries have been pretty spinless too in their support
With the release of this report titled: Our Genocide -there is a good chance this will make it okay for more people within Israel itself to speak out and do something about it despite the fact that many there are actually in support of the Gaza
China?s CITY WIDE CASH SEIZURES Begin ? ATMs Frozen, Digital Yuan FORCED Overnight Wed Jul 30, 2025 21:40 | 1 of indy This story is unverified but it is very instructive of what will happen when cash is removed
THIS STORY IS UNVERIFIED BUT PLEASE WATCH THE VIDEO OR READ THE TRANSCRIPT AS IT GIVES AN VERY GOOD IDEA OF WHAT A CASHLESS SOCIETY WILL LOOK LIKE. And it ain't pretty
A single video report has come out of China claiming China's biggest cities are now cashless, not by choice, but by force. The report goes on to claim ATMs have gone dark, vaults are being emptied. And overnight (July 20 into 21), the digital yuan is the only currency allowed. The Saker >>
Interested in maladministration. Estd. 2005
RTEs Sarah McInerney ? Fianna Fail?supporter? Anthony
Joe Duffy is dishonest and untrustworthy Anthony
Robert Watt complaint: Time for decision by SIPO Anthony
RTE in breach of its own editorial principles Anthony
Waiting for SIPO Anthony Public Inquiry >>
Parse failure for http://humanrights.ie/feed/. Last Retry Wednesday October 08, 2025 17:27
|
A Cow at my Table - an "Animal Rights July" event.
Week three of Animal Rights July 2009 sees the presentation of a 90-min documentary on the meat business.
The third event in ‘Animal Rights July’ in Dublin takes place at Theatre ‘N’, Newman Building, UCD campus, on Wednesday 15th July, 2009, at 7.00 pm.
A Cow At My Table has never been presented at a public event such as Animal Rights July before in Ireland. It is a powerful documentary about our relations with other animals, filmed over five years, by journalist, media artist and teacher, Jennifer Abbot. What makes A Cow At My Table compelling is that it features voices from both sides of ‘the animal issue,’ and particularly about the issue of using nonhuman animals for food.
With archive and contemporary footage, the film explores issues such as the transition from ‘family farms’ to large-scale ‘factory-farming,’ the role of animal welfare organisations, animal welfare experts, and the critique of animal use by more radical animal protectionists and animal rightists.
Commenting on A Cow At My Table as part of his Animal Rights July agenda, the event organiser said: “Abbot’s documentary raises important issues which are central to my own research in sociology but also addresses everyone’s concerns about how ~and indeed whether~ we should use other animals for our benefit. For example, it looks at the socialisation process, which gives us our first attitudes to our relations with animals; the relationship between social movements and their countermovements; and, most of all, examines the role of the ideology and practice of animal welfarism in society in general and in the animal protection movement.”
“Animal welfarism is the institutionalised means by which we regulate the use of animals. Essentially, it promises ‘non-cruel use’ and suggests that existing problems can be solved with increased regulation and legislation. However, there are several problems with this. For example, in relation to so-called farm animals, animal welfare organisations seem to be forever forced into a ‘never-win’ situation. This can be demonstrated by current events that affect Ireland. At the moment a European ‘farm animal’ welfare group with a branch in Ireland simultaneously lists as its achievements and ‘welcome improvements’ the bringing about of reforms in EU law while publishing exposes of the violations of those same laws and regulations.[1] A three-stage process seems to be in play. Not only do the welfare groups spend years campaigning for change, this is followed by a long period of implementation [much EU legislation on ‘farm animals’ does not take effect until 2013, see: http://www.acompassionateworld.org/post/136386718/lost-...urope ] and then these same groups spend years monitoring the reforms they supported, exposing violations of regulatory laws they were instrumental in creating.”
“A Cow At My Table can be seen as a plea for a new approach to animal advocacy, a call which has been answered in the last few years by a new abolitionist movement in animal rights which sets veganism as its moral baseline and concentrates its attack on animal use rather than animal treatment while being used.”
More details: Roger Yates on 01 716 8586 or 0863912018.
Wikipedia link about the film: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Cow_at_My_Table
Praise for A Cow At My Table…
"...an extraordinarily compelling, powerful and visually stunning documentary."
—Vancouver International Film Festival
"...idiosyncratic and refreshingly unpredictable... may become one of the most persuasive videos of the coming decade."
— Animal People
"... a brilliant documentary."
—Toronto Star
"You should watch and love Abbott’s film ... This work has a sense of vision, reason and direction that make Abbott an admirable documentarian."
— Victoria Independent Film & Video Festival
"...an important film!"
— J. Hunter Todd, Chairman & Founding Director, WorldFest Houston
"[a] startling, even-handed and extremely accomplished documentary."
— Jim Sinclair, Pacific Cinematheque
"Gently pits animal activists against the meat industry in a probing reflection on flesh foods... Like all the best documentaries, this film offers more questions than answers."
— Cameron Baily, NOW Magazine, Toronto
"Stylistically inventive and able to find a visual beauty within this ugly subject, A Cow at My Table uncovers balance and truth in a very complex subject with numerous sides."
— Alex MacKenzie, Blinding Light!! Cinema
"...at once a rigorous exploration of the meat industry and a visually elegant and stylistically compelling work of art."
— Heather Frise, Director, Bones of the Forest
"...expertly reported."
— Willimette Week
"...a compelling and highly acclaimed documentary ... presenting a powerful and thorough inquiry into the institution of meat."
— Animals’ Agenda
[1] The Irish branch of an animal welfare organisation says (currently on its web site – visited 10th July 2009) that it “has been campaigning for better conditions for pigs in Ireland since 1992. Since then, EU law has brought about welcome improvements: tethering of pregnant sows is now illegal; the keeping of pregnant sows in narrow stalls after the first 4 weeks of pregnancy will be illegal from 2013; routine tail-docking is now prohibited under EU law; and EU law requires that fattening pigs must be provided with manipulable enrichment material (such as straw or mushroom compost) that they can root in; from 2013, breeding pigs will also have to be given manipulable enrichment material.” [emphasis added.]
Using material from 2007 and 2008, the British branch of the same organisation writes on Pig welfare and EU legislation: “Tail docking and environmental enrichment: Tail docking: (cutting off the piglets’ tails) is carried out to prevent pigs biting each other’s tails. Routine tail docking is prohibited by EU legislation yet the investigation found the practice to be widespread – up to 100 per cent in some countries. A 2007 European Food Safety Authority report also found that over 90 per cent of EU piglets are tail docked. Tail biting occurs because the pigs are bored and frustrated in their bare, sometimes slatted floored pens and chew and bite each other’s tails.
“Environmental enrichment such as straw would drastically reduce or prevent tail biting and so stop the practice of routine tail docking. Under EU law this must be provided yet the investigation found enrichment materials to be lacking in the vast majority of farms visited. Under EU law the enrichment should consist of straw or some other natural material that enables pigs to engage in their natural behaviours of rooting, foraging and exploring.” [emphasis added.]
|
View Comments Titles Only
save preference
Comments (3 of 3)
Jump To Comment: 3 2 1Lovely article in today's Indo about how some of the "Nonhuman Animals" treat the "Human Animals":
http://www.independent.ie/world-news/europe/baboons-mak....html
.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-82594544083524...dur=3
A Cow at My Table showing at UCD (15th) and Professor Gary Francione (live on the 22nd).
This week's event - and next week's - combine to explore the issue of our use and treatment of nonhuman animals. See A Cow At My Table and hear Gary Francione speaking live for the first time to an Irish audience.
What makes A Cow At My Table compelling is that it features voices from both sides of ‘the animal issue,’ and particularly about the issue of using nonhuman animals for food.
With archive and contemporary footage, the film explores issues such as the transition from ‘family farms’ to large-scale ‘factory-farming,’ the role of animal welfare organisations, animal welfare experts, and the critique of animal use by more radical animal protectionists and animal rightists.
For more details, see: http://www.indymedia.ie/article/93133
Gary Francione is the leading theorist of the abolitionist approach to animal rights. He will draw a distinction between animal welfarism and animal rights advocacy. After speaking for 1 hour, Professor Francione will take questions from the floor.
Are one of those people who really find it really hard to get your head around this new fangled idea called "Animal Rights"?
On what basis is it claimed that nonhuman animals have rights?
Which animals?
Does our use of other animals really amount to rights violations?
Surely, being "humane" to animals is enough to fulfill our moral obligations to them?
Do we even have such obligations and duties?
If these are the sorts of questions we ask yourself when you see an account of "animal rights" advocacy, this event is for you.