New Events

International

no events posted in last week

Blog Feeds

Anti-Empire

Anti-Empire

offsite link Ukraine Shoots Down F-16 With Patriot, A... Sat Aug 31, 2024 11:53 | Anti-Empire

offsite link Surprise Offensive Puts 300 km² of Russ... Fri Aug 09, 2024 08:44 | Marko Marjanović

offsite link The Wholesome Photo of the Month Thu May 09, 2024 11:01 | Anti-Empire

offsite link In 3 War Years Russia Will Have Spent $3... Thu May 09, 2024 02:17 | Anti-Empire

offsite link UK Sending Missiles to Be Fired Into Rus... Tue May 07, 2024 14:17 | Marko Marjanović

Anti-Empire >>

Human Rights in Ireland
Promoting Human Rights in Ireland

Human Rights in Ireland >>

Lockdown Skeptics

The Daily Sceptic

offsite link Value for Money Tsar to Get Equivalent of £250k Salary Thu Oct 31, 2024 19:30 | Will Jones
Labour?s newly appointed 'Value for Money' tsar will be paid the equivalent of a £247,000 annual salary, despite a track record of overseeing projects beset by delays and spiralling costs.
The post Value for Money Tsar to Get Equivalent of £250k Salary appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.

offsite link Ed Miliband?s Net Zero Department Given 22% More Cash to Waste on Green Energy Unicorns ? and Other ... Thu Oct 31, 2024 17:40 | David Turver
David Turver looks at the energy horrors in Labour's Budget, including 22% more cash for Ed Miliband's Net Zero Department to waste on green energy unicorns and billions more in renewable subsidies.
The post Ed Miliband’s Net Zero Department Given 22% More Cash to Waste on Green Energy Unicorns ? and Other Budget Horrors appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.

offsite link Ofcom ?Double Standards?: GB News Fined £100,000 for ?Partiality? ? But Still No Fine for ITV Lettin... Thu Oct 31, 2024 15:26 | Will Jones
Ofcom has been accused of double standards after fining GB News £100,000 for "partiality" in an interview with Rishi Sunak, while ITV is yet to be penalised for allowing Ed Balls to interview his wife, the Home Secretary.
The post Ofcom “Double Standards”: GB News Fined £100,000 for “Partiality” ? But Still No Fine for ITV Letting Ed Balls Interview His Wife the Home Secretary appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.

offsite link Woke Gobbledegook is Losing Kamala the Election, Republicans Believe Thu Oct 31, 2024 13:00 | Will Jones
Woke gobbledegook is losing Kamala Harris the election, Republicans believe, as they launch final push ads attacking the Vice-President for her record on trans issues.
The post Woke Gobbledegook is Losing Kamala the Election, Republicans Believe appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.

offsite link ?Rachel Reeves Has F***ed All Farmers?: Kirstie Allsopp and Jeremy Clarkson Join Condemnation of Bud... Thu Oct 31, 2024 11:24 | Will Jones
Rachel Reeves has been slammed for "destroying the family farm" by imposing inheritance tax on agricultural land, forcing grieving families to sell up to pay the huge bill.
The post “Rachel Reeves Has F***ed All Farmers”: Kirstie Allsopp and Jeremy Clarkson Join Condemnation of Budget That Will “Destroy the Family Farm” appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.

Lockdown Skeptics >>

Voltaire Network
Voltaire, international edition

offsite link In Kazan, the order of the world changed , by Thierry Meyssan Tue Oct 29, 2024 07:01 | en

offsite link Voltaire, International Newsletter N°105 Sat Oct 26, 2024 05:27 | en

offsite link Settlers prepare for 'resettlement in Gaza' Fri Oct 25, 2024 12:46 | en

offsite link XVI BRICS Summit : Kazan Declaration Thu Oct 24, 2024 06:21 | en

offsite link NATO, Migrants in the EU and the Coming War in Moldova , by Thierry Meyssan Wed Oct 23, 2024 06:03 | en

Voltaire Network >>

Obama's Blood Lust

category international | anti-war / imperialism | other press author Wednesday January 21, 2009 19:55author by Miriam Report this post to the editors

The change you will not see - killing business as usual

As if Obama's disgusting and complicit silence about the slaughter in Gaza while it was ongoing were not enough, news is emerging that the great black hope of America will be nothing if not more ruthless than his predecessor. Here's a quote from one of his 'Homeland Security' statements:

"Ensure that our military becomes more stealthy, agile, and lethal in its ability to capture or kill terrorists. Bolster our military's ability to speak different languages, navigate different cultures, and coordinate complex missions with our civilian agencies."

Homeland Security? More like 'Murder Abroad'.

New tone? New era? Not sacrificng our principles in the name of security? This guy is as intent on world-wide plunder and murder as Bush ever was. His inauguration speech sounded as if he believes he is the emperor of the world. Where do US presidents finally get off the idea that any other country is remotely interested in being 'led' by them? We just want them to go home and behave themselves. Their country is not and never was a shining example to us all - at least not since the Native American peoples had the run of the place. No mention of them in his speech, of course.

All the details of his Homeland Security policies here:

http://www.whitehouse.gov/agenda/homeland_security/

author by Miriampublication date Wed Jan 21, 2009 21:24author address author phone Report this post to the editors

This article by Glen Ford, originally published in Black Agenda Report' makes it clear that some black Americans see him as potentially very dangerous - a politician with ambitious and maybe naive ideas for US foreign policy. Probably the most disturbing thing to read about is his alleged plan to wage war on Pakistan - something which Ford says will 'get us all incinerated'.

http://www.zmag.org/znet/viewArticle/14756

BAR's most recent report questions what Obama is likely to achieve for black people around the world, given his support for governments in places like Africa where civil populations continue to be horribly abused by corrupt regimes which are backed by the US out of naked self interest.

http://www.blackagendareport.com/

John Pilger has controversially called him 'a glossy Uncle Tom' -

"Nothing has changed. Barack Obama is a glossy Uncle Tom who would bomb Pakistan. Hillary Clinton, another bomber, is anti-feminist. John McCain's one distinction is that he has personally bombed a country. They all believe the US is not subject to the rules of human behaviour, because it is "a city upon a hill", regardless that most of humanity sees it as a monumental bully which, since 1945, has overthrown 50 governments, many of them democracies, and bombed 30 nations, destroying millions of lives."

http://www.newstatesman.com/north-america/2008/01/pilge...-webb

author by Obama's Skeptical Supporterpublication date Wed Jan 21, 2009 21:27author address author phone Report this post to the editors

'Obama does not have the unqualified support of Black America

Miriam, what race does Obama or any elected leader have 'unqualified support' from?

author by Miriampublication date Thu Jan 22, 2009 00:42author address author phone Report this post to the editors

Nobody has unqualified support, true - I didnt properly express what I meant. Obama's blackness has been carefully exploited in this election to make it seem that a new era of egalitarianism has arrived wherein black people can expect to see a major lessening if not earadication of discrimination and economic disadvantage. No such promise has actually been made but it's implied. Almost certainly the fact that Obama is black will have a significance - there is bound to be a greater consciousness of discrimination and presumably wherever he does not have to rock powerful boats Obama will do what he can - but the caveat will seriously restrict him. He's not comitted to people, he's committed to business like all other US presidents. There is a lot of black opinion in the US that sees and knows this perfectly well, of course, more than is apparent from mainstream coverage of people who are rightly moved to see a black person become president after all they have had to put up with.

author by Miriampublication date Thu Jan 22, 2009 11:11author address author phone Report this post to the editors

An early sign of Obama's duplicity is the great announcement that Guantanamo is to be closed - within 12 months.

There has been no definitive statement that the torture will end during that period. Prisoners will be removed to other facilities and no undertakings have been given about the nature of the legal redress they will have.

Torture and detention as usual, then, seems likely. We are going to have to get used to this.

http://www.uruknet.info/?p=m51084&hd=&size=1&l=e

author by Obama's Skeptical Supporterpublication date Thu Jan 22, 2009 11:36author address author phone Report this post to the editors

Miriam, if you had studied the GTMO issue, you would know that it was never really about the location of the gulag, but about the legal status of the people within it.

Yes, I agree a year is too long. But, as you imply, less than 48 hours and President Obama has not fixed all the problems in the world - shame on him for not living up to your expectations.

US Attorney David Iglesias says:
'Those terrorists that did commit acts will be brought to justice and those that did not, will be released.'
http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/0109/Fired_US_At...owall

author by I Love Barack Obamapublication date Thu Jan 22, 2009 11:41author address author phone Report this post to the editors

Obama pledged to end torture of terrorists suspects and he is going to do that.
However the Al-Qaeda terrorist network must be defeated for all our sakes and Obama has pledge to continue the fight against the enemies of freedom.
Change has come to America.
Yes We Can.

author by Rational Ecologistpublication date Thu Jan 22, 2009 12:28author address author phone Report this post to the editors

Obama is President of the USA and not of America. Brazil, Canada and so on have their own Governments. I think the use of America to describe what is the US is interesting and instructive. A sort of linguistic colonialism, if you like. Please consult your maps. America is the continent, the USA is the country, of which Obama is President.
A wee bit pedantic , I know but it does annoy me so.
' Change has come to America ( US ) ' -PLEASE EXPLAIN.
' Yes we can ' EXPLAIN.
Obama is a brand and has been sold like one.
I long to be proven wrong!

author by Rational Ecologistpublication date Thu Jan 22, 2009 15:21author address author phone Report this post to the editors

There are a numbers of conventions,as you should know from your references, however, you are missing the point, that describing Obama as president of America is a falsehood. I'd leave it at that and agree to disagree on the numbers of continents, lest we induce global boredom.
I am more interested in looking at the language as an indicator of attitudes.
Obama has said that the US is ready to lead, again. No thanks Barrack, we'll be fine. Stick to where you were elected and the world will be a better place. Don't give me this " smart power " nonsense.
Thanks for your contributions. It seems I am not the only pedant.

author by Miriampublication date Thu Jan 22, 2009 16:11author address author phone Report this post to the editors

John Pilger's latest article

"The supply of American weapons used in the massacres was authorised previously by such a margin. These included the Hellfire missile, which sucks the air out of lungs, ruptures livers and amputates arms and legs without the necessity of shrapnel: a "major advance", according to the specialist literature. As a senator, the then President-elect Obama raised no objection to these state-of-the-art [sic] weapons being rushed to Israel - worth $22bn in 2008 - in time for the long-planned assault on Gaza's fenced and helpless population. This is ­understandable; it is how the system works. On no other issue does Congress and the president, Republicans or Democrats, conservatives or liberals, give such absolute support. By comparison, the ­German Reichstag in the 1930s was a treasure of ­democratic and principled debate."

http://www.newstatesman.com/middle-east/2009/01/israel-...-bush

author by Miriampublication date Fri Jan 23, 2009 21:19author address author phone Report this post to the editors

Within 24 hours of appointing Richard Holbrooke as envoy to Afghanistan and Pakistan, Obama's aggression towards Pakistan is realised:

http://english.aljazeera.net/news/asia/2009/01/20091231....html

author by Obama's Skeptical Supporterpublication date Sat Jan 24, 2009 08:50author address author phone Report this post to the editors

{Obama Era - Day 4}

Obama is president now - he is responsible for this slaughter but that doesn't mean he ordered it.

Miriam wants to paint Obama as a blood thirsty man. It is quite likely that most things in his power are on auto-pilot and he has not tried to change yet.

When he send the additional 30,000 troops to Afghanistan, then he will 'own' it.

author by Mark C - Contact.iepublication date Sat Jan 24, 2009 09:50author address author phone Report this post to the editors

Here's an article by John Pilger that I've begun using in my media studies classes about Blair and Obama, in which Pilger says of Obama:

"In the New York Times on 14 July, in an article spun to appear as if he is ending the war in Iraq, Obama demanded more war in Afghanistan and, in effect, an invasion of Pakistan. He wants more combat troops, more helicopters, more bombs. Bush may be on his way out, but the Republicans have built an ideological machine that transcends the loss of electoral power – because their collaborators are, as the American writer Mike Whitney put it succinctly, "bait-and-switch" Democrats, of whom Obama is the prince.

Those who write of Obama that "when it comes to international affairs, he will be a huge improvement on Bush" demonstrate the same wilful naivety that backed the bait-and-switch of Bill Clinton – and Tony Blair. Of Blair, wrote the late Hugo Young in 1997, "ideology has surrendered entirely to ‘values’... there are no sacred cows [and] no fossilised limits to the ground over which the mind might range in search of a better Britain...".

Eleven years and five wars later, at least a million people lie dead. Barack Obama is the American Blair. That he is a smooth operator and a black man is irrelevant. He is of an enduring, rampant system whose drum majors and cheer squads never see, or want to see, the consequences of 500lb bombs dropped unerringly on mud, stone and straw houses."

Related Link: http://www.johnpilger.com/page.asp?partid=497
author by dunkpublication date Sat Jan 24, 2009 11:26author address author phone Report this post to the editors

I agree, Obama has landed into this, and it will take time to change things. We must remember how fucked up Bush has left things, perhaps purposefully to discredit Obama and take the wind from his sail in the first few days. As Cornel West stated: At this moment, the best America could do was Brother Barack Obama. I think we have to criticise where necessary, but also be creative and look at ways to assist Obama bring about change.

I think if you look at the driving forces of the 2 presidents, you can see clear differences:
Obama, a normal enough upbringing, mixed origins etc, doing something for not just himself, but his family, people, blacks, browns, yellows, gays....
Bush, just trying (unsuccessfully with horific effects) to be Daddy´s little cowboy. Coming from a long family line whose main purpose in life was to take power, rob and get rich of it. Remember in, i think it was 1942, the US state had to legally intervene and force his Gran'daddy and co to stop selling steel to the nazis....And he had the gaule to visit auschwitz, cabron! Uuuffffff, I could go on..
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2004/sep/25/usa.secondw...ldwar

Obama is a huge step in a better direction

Perhaps people power can change things, its the only thing that can. So, criticise and educate where necessary, but, be positive, be hopeful that things can change.

From Democracy Now: Noam Chomsky: Obama’s Stance on Gaza Crisis “Approximately the Bush Position”

In a visit to the State Department Thursday, President Obama made his first substantive comments on the Middle East conflict since Israel’s attack on Gaza. Obama first mentioned his commitment to Israel’s security, without affirming his commitment to Palestinian security. He condemned Palestinian rocket attacks on southern Israeli towns, but didn’t criticize the US-backed Israeli bombings of densely populated Gaza. But in a departure from the Bush administration, Obama acknowledged Palestinian suffering and said Gaza’s borders should be opened to aid.

We speak with MIT professor, Noam Chomsky.

Noam Chomsky: Obama’s Stance on Gaza Crisis “Approximately the Bush Position”
http://www.democracynow.org/2009/1/23/noam_chomsky_obam..._gaza

Related post regarding the role we play in this:
Let freedom ring, Let freedom ring, Let freedom ring...MLK`s dream and beyond
http://www.indymedia.ie/article/90745&comment_limit=0&c...43973

author by Centreleftpublication date Sat Jan 24, 2009 14:40author address author phone Report this post to the editors

The article shows nothing frightening up. He's barely taken office and you pounce on an order, the substance of which seems to be 'teach our armed forces to speak different languages'. Outline your objection to this.

Also, why are people still quoting John Pilger? I stopped listening to him in 2004 when he said anti war activists should support 'the resistance' in Iraq. He's a disgusting apologist for the worst forms of bigotry, racism and religious extremism who called Obama an uncle tom. Clearly a black man who happens to not be as right on as Pilger when it comes to support for third world fascist 'resistance' movements must be serving his white paymasters. What a disgrace to the left.

Obama, i think, will be a good president. Or, hey, maybe he wont. Just stop pouncing on everything he says, desperately searching for something scary.

Number of comments per page
  
 
© 2001-2024 Independent Media Centre Ireland. Unless otherwise stated by the author, all content is free for non-commercial reuse, reprint, and rebroadcast, on the net and elsewhere. Opinions are those of the contributors and are not necessarily endorsed by Independent Media Centre Ireland. Disclaimer | Privacy