Freemasonry & Article 34.5.1 of Bunreacht na hEireann

by Observer Sat Sep 16, 2006 13:12

This subject is interesting for several reasons.

For instance, one view from The Vatican (associated with Pope Leo XIII) claims the sect of Freemasons grew with a rapidity beyond conception in the course of a century and a half, until it came to be able, by means of fraud or of audacity, to gain such entrance into every rank of the State as to seem to be almost its ruling power.

Please see:
http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/leo_xiii/encyclicals/....html

by Gaz B -(A)- Sat Sep 16, 2006 14:45

Lay Magistracy and Judiciary have to declare freemason membership in the UK (volutary for the plolice service), then access is decided case by case through the uks freedom of info act. I don't think anything about them has been discussed in the oireachtas. try searching through dail debates, they go back to 1919.

by Fishmonger Sat Sep 16, 2006 15:50

There is reason to believe that President George W. Bush may also be a Freemason.

The stench of it all?

by liam mac consaidin Sat Sep 16, 2006 17:27 mac_consaidin at yahoo dot com

VLPS is the Victims of the Legal Professions Society. I have attended a number of VLPS meetings around the country. The moving human stories of loss of property and loss of peace, perpetrated under our legal system has appalled me. I attended these public meetings because I was forced to take a high court case against a builder/developer when he unjustly enriched himself by gazzumping me out of property that was commissioned by me seven months earlier. The developer's solicitor destroyed the signed contract documents (the evidence), perjured himself in court and then joined the developer in perpetrating a tax fraud using the property. I had thought this was unique or I was unlucky etc etc., until I attended the VLPS meetings. The HORROR stories of marriages , families and businesses plundered and pillaged by lawyers and judges in this country have appalled me. Whether or not these people are FreeMasons or good old fashioned white collar Irish crooks, I can't say and frankly the difference doesn't bother me too much. What does bother me is that they are hiding the abuse behind our laws of defamation and the public's fear of being sued by lawyers. The imbalance between the power lawyers have and the powerlessness of non lawyers has to be corrected and brought back into balance.

I will give three examples of this imbalance of power:
1. A lawyer or judge is immune from being sued for Libel, defamation or falsehood in relation to all utterances in court, verbal or written.
2. There is no written crime of contempt of court. The sitting judge has total power in what he/she regards as contempt or otherwise. He can put a person in jail for picking their nose in court if he wants to. At any particular time there are 10-20 people remanded in Mountjoy or Castlereagh for contempt of court. Never middle class and never lawyers. Meanwhile the same judges make light and laughter of lawyers who lie, mislay or destroy evidence, alter documents and do all kinds of scurrilous actions in the sght of the court.
3 When a lay man swears an affidavit, the standard of proof expected is; it must be facts that he can prove. When a lawyer swears an affidavit the standard is much lower. A lawyer, in an affidavit, only needs to state that he believes something to be true because his client told him so.

There is a general rule in court that a lawyer is always deemed to be honest and truthful. Therefore a lay man has a very difficult task in convinving a judge (himself a lawyer) that the opposite might be true. The system replicates its own myths and abhorrs the truth.

The web sites www.crookedlawyers.com and www.rateyoursolicitor.com are a start to redressing the imbalance of power of access to justice in this country. The sites are currently under attack in the Four Courts and a crucial case is due to be heard on 5th October next. Everyone who believes in truth, real justice and power of the people, needs to support the continued existence of these sites. Free speech may occasionally allow fools to abuse it but the alternative to free speech and open comment on the internet is an Appalling Vista. If you believe in Free speech and people's right to publish their accounts of bad experiences with lawyers and courts, then please stand up for retention of these web sites.

http://www.crookedlawyers.com

by pseudonym Sat Sep 16, 2006 23:41

In reply to:
President George W. Bush
author by Fishmongerpublication date Sat Sep 16, 2006 14:50Report this post to the editors

There is reason to believe that President George W. Bush may also be a Freemason.

The stench of it all?

Related Link: http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&q=Freemasonry%2C...earch

All current and past american presidents happened to be freemasons, excluding JKF, bit strange considering the assasination....

by Mike Sun Sep 17, 2006 00:01

"Is it possible to easily (and lawfully) find out if a particular person is a Freemason?
No nor should it be.

Freemasonary is after all just a religion. Sure its a bit strange but no moreso than any other religion.

Of course freemasons are the subject of all manner of conspiricy theories but then so is Judism and even Roman Catholicism.

Quite frankly Id be more concerned if I thought a judge was a member of the Knights of Columbanus, Opus Dei or somesuch

by Born Again Ejit Sun Sep 17, 2006 11:54

Assuming both George W. Bush and Prime Minister Blair actually are Freemasons, it seems interesting that both apparently believe they were directly instructed by God to unlawfully invade Iraq in March 2003.

Even more interesting is the way friends ("brothers" maybe?) in Dublin appear to have made Shannon Airport available to their cause with the greatest of ease. Did anybody in authority in Dublin consult the people about this? Was the matter ever properly discussed in Dail Eireann with the elected representatives of the people? If not, why not?

"Masonry, a secretive brotherhood, ........ The founding group in Germany (Illuminati – University of Ingolstadt), the American group (Skull and Bones Society – Yale University. NOTE: George H. Bush, William Clinton, and George W. Bush are all members), and the English Group (Cecil Rhodes Scholars – Oxford University. NOTE: The Prime Minister of England, Tony Blair, is a member of this group.) are interrelated. It is not surprising that Clinton and Bush have both been chummy with Blair."

The above text has been taken from "Masonry Exposed" article on the list at:
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&q=Freemasonry%2C...earch

by Welshman Sun Sep 17, 2006 14:05

The internet is a wonderful communication tool but unfortunately any crank can publish the most crazy conspiracy theories as facts and it is amazing how many people will believe them.

Freemasons do NOT take an oath to uphold the principles of Freemasonry above any other. The obligation is to keep secret the modes of recognition (handshakes, signs, words - these are only used in the Lodge during the ceremonies). It is particularly impressed on the candidate that -

"As a Citizen of the World, I next enjoin you to be exlemplary in the discharge of your civil duties, by never proposing or at all countenancing any act which may have a tendency to subvert the peace or good order of Society, by paying due obedience to the Laws of any State which may for a time become the place of you residence....."

Freemasonry is NOT a religion - it requires members to believe in a Supreme Being but the God a freemason believes in and how he worships that God are a matter for him alone. No discussion of religion or politics is permitted at masonic Lodges. Roman Catholics can join if they wish. The code of canon law says that a RC may not join any association which plots against the Church. Freemasonry does NOT plot against anyone.

In other words the Freemason must put the needs of his family, religion and State before freemasonry.

Before and on many occasions after joining a candidate is told that he must not try to use his membership for financial or any other personal motives -
"...uninfluenced by mercenary or any other unworthy motives, you freely and voluntarily offer yourself as a candidate....."

There is no World organisation of freemasonry - every Grand Lodge in every country is independent, however an individual freemason may visit Lodges in other countries if they are considered "Regular" that is follow the basic principles of freemasonry. Some countries have so-called "masonic" organisations which are not recognised by the GL's of England or Ireland or Scotland as being "Regular" and members cannot visit them. These organisations for example do get involved in politics or allow atheists to become members.

Freemasonry is NOT a secret society it is a society with secrets. The aim of Freemasonry is "to make good men better". Freemasons are free to tell others that they are members if they wish but some decide not to broadcast their membership because of the prejudice shown by some people due to ignorance - efforts are being made to provide accurate and factual information but some prefer to believe the sensational, hysterical nonsence.

George W Bush or Tony Blair are not Freemasons. 15 presidents have been Freemasons - the last was Gerald Ford.

Have a look at the website of the United Grand Lodge of England (There is a link to the GL of Ireland on the site) If you want the facts. You can download their Book of Constitutions to see for yourself.

by Welshman Sun Sep 17, 2006 14:14

Sorry the UGLE site does not have a link to the Grand Lodge of Ireland.

Here it is

by Jacques De Molay Sun Sep 17, 2006 14:20

Freemasonry has its origins in the mist of time prior to the "flood" when there was a sophisticated civilisation centred in Atlantis where is now Antartica. After the axis of the shifted ice covered much of the planet and most of humanity perished. A few survivors remained in South America, Egypt and the Middle East who retained the old order. This what is meant by "Novus Ordo Secorum" on the US dollar bill.
These masons spread technology and learning to the nations of the earth and because of their strange appearance and "magical crafts" they were worshipped as gods.
But the knowledge of the ages was kept secret as the superstitions and religions hostile to knowledge reacted violently to progress - the best example is the parable in the Bible of the sin of Adam who ate from the tree of knowledge and was punished by God.
It was this craft which Moses learned in Ancient Egypt and fashioned the Arc of the Covenant, a box of wood covered in gold plate inside and out - an electrical capacitor for storing enormous power to be used in war - it was with this weapon that the walls of Jericho fell.
The masons were those who became the high priests of the Temple of Solomon in which the Arc was protected in a gold lined room called the holies of holies - only the priests knew who deactivate the system - anyone else who entered was turned to ash.
Masonry spread in various forms - the Greek philosopher schools reached a level of advancement not seen again until the Renaissace, the Chinese Empire mapped the entire world long before Columbus sailed, Ancient Rome built roads and aquiducts that spanned Europe and the Aztecs built vast cities and temples. Most importantly these kingdoms traded with each other.
It was Plato who described the "mythical Atlantis."
But that did not mean that there was smooth sailing.
In 33 AD Jewish society had become corrupted and a reformer named Yehosuah Bin Joseph, a young member of the Essenes, a desert sect of Judaism who lived austere lives in the desert came to Jerusalem and open critcised the Sadduces and Pharisees. He was crucifed but his revolutionary organisation led by his brother James and allies in the Zealot movement finally revolted and led Israel to defeat against Rome. The Temple was destroyed but the Arc of the Covenant and the Holy Grail were hidden beneath to be retrieved later.
In the 11th century First Crusade began launched by descendents of the freemasons who had passed their traditions from father to son and infiltrating the Christian Church and the Royal families of Europe. Ostensively the crusades were to retrieve the Holy Lands from the Muslims but in fact they were to retrieve the ancient treasures and secrets of Freemasonry and enlightenment lost since AD 70 when Jerusalem was destroyed. The knights who discovered the treasure formed the Knights Templar, an organisation which later gained immense wealth and power and were on the cusp of putting one of their own priest in the papacy before their entire order was arrested and burned at the stake on the orders of the French King Philip the Fair.
Many of the Templars fled to America where they built settlements and trade modern technology for gold from the Incas, which later sparked the tales of Eldorado which drew the Spanish to America or the fled East where they has traded along the old silk road.
But in England the Templars survived - indeed the white flag with the red cross that was the symbol of the crusades and the flag of the Templars became the flag of England. The Arc and the Grail were housed in Rosslyn chapel for safe keeping.
Templars taught the English science and technology and it was with this that they built their Navy that ruled the waves and so the sun never set on their empire.
With the European expansion into America the freemasons saw their chance to establish a new Jerusalem and a new order in America - the fabled land in the west in many legends had been called Merica.
George Washington and his followers were all masons and in 1776 they broke with England and created the United States and brought the Arc and the Grail with them to found the city of Washington.
Since then Freemasons have ruled the world from their capital Washington DC.
9/11 was orchestrated so that the leader of the freemasons today George W. Bush could spread their power worldwide to create once again the new Atlantis.
But on Dec 25, 2012, according to the ancient Mayans the axis will shift once again.
An old order of the ages will be born anew.

by M3 Watcher Sun Sep 17, 2006 20:19

In an article published by "International Currency Review" (dated October 12th 2005) it is claimed that unhealthy and evidently pervasive Masonic links exist between European Community officials and contractors, resulting in corrupt and unhealthy ‘business relationships’.

Might this explain why the M3 toll road is now scheduled to go through the Tara / Skreen Valley? - which is possibly the most important archaeological landscape in the whole of Ireland.

The International Currency Review article, by Christopher Story, is titled "E.U. TREATIES PROCURED BY PAYOLA CORRUPTION", and it can be viewed at:
http://www.worldreports.org/news/6_brussels_accounts_ar

by ... Sun Sep 17, 2006 23:35

Welshman, you forgot to say that you are a) a Freemason, or b) writing on their behalf, because your statement "Freemasonry is NOT a secret society it is a society with secrets" is Freemason speak.

by Welshman Mon Sep 18, 2006 09:37

I thought it would be fairly obvious I am a Freemason - but to dispell any doubt yes I am. Who better to tell you what freemasons do.

I am also a Roman Catholic and a member of a Golf Club.

by Welshman Mon Sep 18, 2006 09:49

"NOT a Secret Society but a society with secrets"

Have a look at the following news item and consider how can a society be secret when its meeting places are in the telephone book. The book of constituions is available for download. The names of the officers are published for public purchase and every member is at liberty to tell anyone they are a freemason.

If you ever visit London pay a visit to Freemasons Hall where you can freely enter the Museum and have a guided tour of the building. The guides will answer all questions except tell you what signs, handshakes and words are used in the ceremonies - these are the only "secrets" of freemasonry.

by Mandy Mon Sep 18, 2006 11:19

Yes, but you would say that wouldn't you?

by Welshman Mon Sep 18, 2006 11:42

Mandy

Sigh. All I can tell you is the truth, but if you rather not believe me there is not much I can do about it.

I would ask that you read the information on United Grand Lodge of England website (link in my original message) and make up your own mind.

Take no notice of the conspiracy theorists - they can make up any sensational story they like about any group of people and it is almost impossible to disprove - and why should we have to!

Here is a link to a website which tries to present the facts about Freemasonry - don't bother to read it if your mind is totally closed.

by Dave Mon Sep 18, 2006 14:53

The traditions of freemasonry correspond with the traditions of academia, theology, the church and even martial arts clubs with ranks and titles and colored robes to denote the level to which each member has advanced, his learning, experience and authority in the craft.
In university one begins with a certificate, diploma, bachelor, higher diploma, masters, doctorate etc. and at each level there is a new title, robe and ranking - the "secrets" of a academia are confined to those who have the ambition to proceed to a higher learning environment.
In martial arts clubs the more complex more difficult skills are not taught to students until they have fully mastered the basics and so on. A Kung Fu master must have mastered hundreds of complicated movements, meditations, forms, breathing patterns etc. before he recieves the coloured sash that he wears to denote his rank and expertise.
In Freemasonry the emphasis is on good citizens meeting in a league of like minded individuals with the goal of bettering society by works of charity and benevolence. It is not different than the Catholic Church, an Irish Country womens association, a golf club that runs charity matches for charity or a social club where men or women meet and socialise and make friends and seek to help others for the sake of it.
Freemasons may have political connections but so do the members potentially of any group or body of people.
If we want to worry about truly secretive and dangerous groups consider the criminal mafias in many countries or terrorist or extremist organisations.
There is nothing to fear from the freemasons - you can contact the various lodges on the internet, meet with their members, call them on telephone - there is nothing hidden from anybody.

One of the basic human freedoms is the freedom to associate with like minded persons.

Are you suggesting that nobody is allowed to do this?

by Mandy Mon Sep 18, 2006 15:18

Welshman,

I know from my own direct experience that there seems to be many very decent, honest, and upright Freemasons. In addition, Freemasonry appears to have always had its fair share of very talented people.

However, and as most people know and accept I believe, "you cannot tell the book from the cover".

The delicious looking rosy-red apple can sometimes have a big fat worm lurking in the core - can it not?

I also know from my own direct experience that well-run, and very well-intentioned, international organisations can be hi-jacked from within by small cliques who abuse the organisation in very major ways: without the general membership necessarily being aware of it.

So, while I would be happy to accept your descriptions of things as being correct in many respects, I suspect they might not tell the full story.

There is also of course the other old saying about there being "no smoke without fire" - and dismissing EVERYTHING as mere "conspiracy theories" might not wash with everyone?

by Cruton Mon Sep 18, 2006 15:38

Freemasonry is not a religion. To become a freemason one must believe in one god. that means a catholic, muslim, Protestant or a jew can join. All U.S presidents have been freemasons. Even JFK! he wasnt to begin with but once he was elected President he had to be initiated into one of the masonic clubs, probably Skull and bones. As for his assassination, i guess they got angry that he semmed to be a self loathing freemason

by Welshman Mon Sep 18, 2006 17:17

Mandy

There are individuals who do bad things in every organisation - the Church, the Government, the Police, the Scouts, etc. etc. It is not the organisation that is the problem, it is human fallibility.

Freemasonry demands the highest standards from its members. Any person seeking membership must be vouched for as of good character, anyone with a criminal record is not permitted to join. Any Freemason who commits any act which could bring freemasonry into disrepute is expelled. No Freemason is allowed to cover up the misdeeds of another Freemason. We are compelled to comply with the Law of the State before all else.

You can believe all the unsubstantiated gossip if you wish, but it is just not true as far as Freemasonry as it is practised by the regular GLs of England, Wales, Scotland and Ireland and elsewhere in the world.

Here is yet another link to a website which tries to present the facts and also provides links to a more up-to-date BBC page than the one on the top of your Google list

by Mandy Mon Sep 18, 2006 20:48

Welshman,

Are you seriously claiming that the 50 plus pages of reports relating to police corruption linked with Freemasonry available through the first address just below are all nothing more than "unsubstantiated gossip"?

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&q=Freemasonry%2C...earch

Then there are the Judges:
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&q=Freemasonry%2C...earch

The Bankers:
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&q=Freemasonry%2C...earch

The Armed Forces:
http://www.google.com/search?q=Freemasonry%2C+Corruptio...earch

The Governments:
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&q=Freemasonry%2C...earch

The Churches:
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&q=Freemasonry%2C...earch

ALL unsubstantiated gossip you say?

by Welshman Mon Sep 18, 2006 21:16

YES!

by Welshman Mon Sep 18, 2006 21:31

and in fact the fourth link in your police list proves it!

see below

by Nick - None Tue Sep 19, 2006 03:12

Pardon my ignorance, but what exactly do Freemasons do, and why all the arcane rituals?

by Welshman Tue Sep 19, 2006 09:31

I joined because I was curious and because some friends were members and suggested I would enjoy it - which I do more than I expected.

For detailed information on what Freemasons do follow the link below

by Rose of Tralee Tue Sep 19, 2006 10:04

Question for Welshman:

Is it true that women are prevented from becoming Freemasons - simply because they are women?

If so, is this not sexist in the extreme?

by Welshman Tue Sep 19, 2006 10:29

There are organisations for women to become freemasons.

see below

by Rose of Tralee Tue Sep 19, 2006 10:53

So could I, or any other woman, become a member of your particular Lodge - or of any other Masonic Lodge in Ireland?

by Welshman Tue Sep 19, 2006 11:17

No - our Lodges under under the Grand Lodges of England and of Ireland are for men only.

You can join a Lodge under a Grand Lodge for Women. There are also Grand Lodges that admit both men and women. You can find more info on the page below and the links from that site

But personally I cannot see what is wrong with having a men only or women only organisation. I am sure that there are plenty of women only organisations in Ireland as there throughout the world.

My wife joins me for about 6 to 8 masonic social functions a year and we both really enjoy them, she is not interested in the Lodge stuff.

by number 6 - legalize freedom campaign Tue Sep 19, 2006 11:37

Below is an interesting Article in relation to Freemasonry. I have seen Masonry at work in our Courts , secret words,hand signals and gestures , signs of distress etc., the client being sold down the river right before all in open Court. Any Person who joins the Masons know exactly what it's all about. The Freemasons are also know as 'The silent Destroyers'. They have infested every aspect of Society for their hidden Master,(Lucifer).
No, I'm not A LOON.

'THE BAR ' stands for 'British Accreditation Research'. No one ever asks what this Oath is about. Even members do not know what it stands for. May the above sort that one.
Go digging this stuff up. It makes very interesting reading.
BCNU.

THE TEMPLARS OF THE CROWN

The governmental and judicial systems within the United States of America, at both federal and local state levels, is owned by the "Crown," which is a private foreign power. Before jumping to conclusions about the Queen of England or the Royal Families of Britain owning the U.S.A., this is a different "Crown" and is fully exposed and explained below. We are specifically referencing the established Templar Church, known for centuries by the world as the "Crown." From this point on, we will also refer to the Crown as the Crown Temple or Crown Templar, all three being synonymous.

First, a little historical background. The Temple Church was built by the Knights Templar in two parts: the Round and the Chancel. The Round Church was consecrated in 1185 and modeled after the circular Church of the Holy Sepulchre in Jerusalem. The Chancel was built in 1240. The Temple Church serves both the Inner and Middle Temples (see below) and is located between Fleet Street and Victoria Embankment at the Thames River. Its grounds also house the Crown Offices at Crown Office Row. This Temple "Church" is outside any Canonical jurisdiction. The Master of the Temple is appointed and takes his place by sealed (non-public) patent, without induction or institution.

All licensed Bar Attorneys - Attorners (see definitions below) in the U.S. owe their allegiance and give their solemn oath in pledge to the Crown Temple, realizing this or not. This is simply due to the fact that all Bar Associations throughout the world are signatories and franchises to the international Bar Association located at the Inns of Court at Crown Temple, which are physically located at Chancery Lane behind Fleet Street in London. Although they vehemently deny it, all Bar Associations in the U.S., such as the American Bar Association, the Florida Bar, or California Bar Association, are franchises to the Crown.

The Inns of Court (see below, The Four Inns of Court) to the Crown Temple use the Banking and Judicial system of the City of London - a sovereign and independent territory which is not a part of Great Britain (just as Washington City, as DC was called in the 1800's, is not a part of the north American states, nor is it a state) to defraud, coerce, and manipulate the American people. These Fleet Street bankers and lawyers are committing crimes in America under the guise and color of law (see definitions for legal and lawful below). They are known collectively as the "Crown." Their lawyers are actually Templar Bar Attornies, not lawyers.

The present Queen of England is not the "Crown," as we have all been led to believe. Rather, it is the Bankers and Attornies (Attorneys) who are the actual Crown or Crown Temple. The Monarch aristocrats of England have not been ruling sovereigns since the reign of King John, circa 1215. All royal sovereignty of the old British Crown since that time has passed to the Crown Temple in Chancery.

The U.S.A. is not the free and sovereign nation that our federal government tells us it is. If this were true, we would not be dictated to by the Crown Temple through its bankers and attornies. The U.S.A. is controlled and manipulated by this private foreign power and our unlawful Federal U.S. Government is their pawn broker. The bankers and Bar Attorneys in the U.S.A. are a franchise in oath and allegiance to the Crown at Chancery - the Crown Temple Church and its Chancel located at Chancery Lane - a manipulative body of elite bankers and attorners from the independent City of London who violate the law in America by imposing fraudulent "legal" - but totally unlawful - contracts on the American people. The banks Rule the Temple Church and the Attorners carry out their Orders by controlling their victim's judiciary.

Since the first Chancel of the Temple Church was built by the Knights Templar, this is not a new ruling system by any means. The Chancel, or Chancery, of the Crown Inner Temple Court was where King John was, in January 1215, when the English barons demanded that he confirm the rights enshrined in the Magna Carta. This City of London Temple was the headquarters of the Templar Knights in Great Britain where Order and Rule were first made, which became known as Code. Remember all these terms, such as Crown, Temple, Templar, Knight, Chancel, Chancery, Court, Code, Order and Rule as we tie together their origins with the present American Temple Bar system of thievery by equity (chancery) contracts.

"Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye are like unto whited sepulchres, which indeed appear beautiful outward, but are within full of dead men's bones, and of all uncleanness."
-Matthew 23:27

By what authority has the "Crown" usurped the natural sovereignty of the American people? Is it acceptable that the U.S. Supreme Court decides constitutional issues in the U.S.A? How can it be considered in any manner as being "constitutional" when this same Supreme Court is appointed by (not elected) and paid by the Federal U.S. Government? As you will soon see, the land called North America belongs to the Crown Temple.

The legal system (judiciary) of the U.S.A. is controlled by the Crown Temple from the independent and sovereign City of London. The private Federal Reserve System, which issues fiat U.S. Federal Reserve Notes, is financially owned and controlled by the Crown from Switzerland, the home and legal origin for the charters of the United Nations, the International Monetary Fund, the World Trade Organization, and most importantly, the Bank of International Settlements. Even Hitler respected his Crown bankers by not bombing Switzerland. The Bank of International Settlements in Basel, Switzerland controls all the central banks of the G7 nations. He who controls the gold rules the world.

Definitions you never knew:

ATTORN [e-'tern] Anglo-French aturner to transfer (allegiance of a tenant to another lord), from Old French atorner to turn (to), arrange, from a- to + torner to turn: to agree to be the tenant of a new landlord or owner of the same property. Merriam-Webster's Dictionary of Law 1996.

ATTORN, v.i. [L. ad and torno.] In the feudal law, to turn, or transfer homage and service from one lord to another. This is the act of feudatories, vassels or tenants, upon the alienation of the estate.-Webster's 1828 Dictionary.

ESQUIRE, n [L. scutum, a shield; Gr. a hide, of which shields were anciently made.], a shield-bearer or armor-bearer, scutifer; an attendant on a knight. Hence in modern times, a title of dignity next in degree below a knight. In England, this title is given to the younger sons of noblemen, to officers of the king's courts and of the household, to counselors at law, justices of the peace, while in commission, sheriffs, and other gentlemen. In the United States, the title is given to public officers of all degrees, from governors down to justices and attorneys.-Webster's 1828 Dictionary.

RULE, n. [L. regula, from rego, to govern, that is, to stretch, strain or make straight.] 1. Government; sway; empire; control; supreme command or authority. 6. In monasteries, corporations or societies, a law or regulation to be observed by the society and its particular members. -Webster's 1828 Dictionary

RULE n. 1 [C] a statement about what must or should be done, (syn.) a regulation.

REGULATION n. 1 [C] a rule, statement about what can be done and what cannot. 2 [U] the general condition of controlling any part of human life. -Newbury House Dictionary 1999.

CODE n. 1 [C;U] a way of hiding the true meaning of communications from all except those people who have the keys to understand it. 2 [C] a written set of rules of behavior. 3 [C] a formal group of principles or laws. -v. coded, coding, codes to put into code, (syn.) to encode.ENCODE v. 1 to change written material into secret symbols. -Newbury House Dictionary 1999.

CURTAIN n. [OE. cortin, curtin, fr. OF. cortine, curtine, F. courtine, LL. cortina, also, small court, small inclosure surrounded by walls, from cortis court. See Court.] 4 A flag; an ensign; -- in contempt. [Obs.] Shak. Behind the curtain, in concealment; in secret. -1913 Webster's Revised Unabridged Dictionary.

COURT, n. 3. A palace; the place of residence of a king or sovereign prince. 5. Persons who compose the retinue or council of a king or emperor. 9. The tabernacle had one court; the temple, three. -Webster's 1828 Dictionary.

COURT n. 2 the place where a king or queen lives or meets others. -The Newbury House Dictionary �???�??�?�©1999.

TEMPLAR, n. [from the Temple, a house near the Thames, which originally belonged to the knights Templars. The latter took their denomination from an apartment of the palace of Baldwin II in Jerusalem, near the temple.] 1. A student of the law. -Webster's 1828 Dictionary.

TEMPLE, n. [L. templum.] 1. A public edifice erected in honor of some deity. Among pagans, a building erected to some pretended deity, and in which the people assembled to worship. Originally, temples were open places, as the Stonehenge in England. 4. In England, the Temples are two inns of court, thus called because anciently the dwellings of the knights Templars. They are called the Inner and the Middle Temple. -Webster's 1828 Dictionary.

CAPITOL, n. 1. The temple of Jupiter in Rome, and a fort or castle, on the Mons Capitolinus. In this, the Senate of Rome anciently assembled; and on the same place, is still the city hall or town-house, where the conservators of the Romans hold their meetings. The same name was given to the principal temples of the Romans in their colonies.

INN, n. [Hebrew, To dwell or to pitch a tent.] 2. In England, a college of municipal or common law professors and students; formerly, the town-house of a nobleman, bishop or other distinguished personage, in which he resided when he attended the court. Inns of court, colleges in which students of law reside and are instructed. The principal are the Inner Temple, the Middle Temple, Lincoln's Inn, and Gray's Inn. Inns of chancery, colleges in which young students formerly began their law studies. These are now occupied chiefly by attorneys, solicitors, etc.

INNER, a. [from in.] Interior; farther inward than something else, as an inner chamber; the inner court of a temple or palace. -Webster's 1828 Dictionary.

CROWN, n. 4. Imperial or regal power or dominion; sovereignty. There is a power behind the crown greater than the crown itself. Junius. 19. A coin stamped with the image of a crown; hence, a denomination of money; as, the English crown. -- Crown land, land belonging to the crown, that is, to the sovereign. -- Crown law, the law which governs criminal prosecutions. -- Crown lawyer, one employed by the crown, as in criminal cases. v.t. 1. To cover, decorate, or invest with a crown; hence, to invest with royal dignity and power. -1913 Webster's Revised Unabridged Dictionary.

COLONY, n. 1. A company [i.e. legal corporation] or body of people transplanted from their mother country to a remote province or country to cultivate and inhabit it, and remaining subject to the jurisdiction of the parent state; as the British colonies in America or the Indies; the Spanish colonies in South America. -Webster's 1828 Dictionary.

STATE, n. [L., to stand, to be fixed.] 1. Condition; the circumstances of a being or thing at any given time. These circumstances may be internal, constitutional or peculiar to the being, or they may have relation to other beings. 4. Estate; possession. [See Estate.] -Webster's 1828 Dictionary.

ESTATE, n. [L. status, from sto, to stand. The roots stb, std and stg, have nearly the same signification, to set, to fix. It is probable that the L. sto is contracted from stad, as it forms steti.] 1. In a general sense, fixedness; a fixed condition; 5. Fortune; possessions; property in general. 6. The general business or interest of government; hence, a political body; a commonwealth; a republic. But in this sense, we now use State. ESTATE, v.t. To settle as a fortune. 1. To establish. -Webster's 1828 Dictionary.

PATENT, a. [L. patens, from pateo, to open.] 3. Appropriated by letters patent. 4. Apparent; conspicuous. PATENT, n. A writing given by the proper authority and duly authenticated, granting a privilege to some person or persons. By patent, or letters patent, that is, open letters, the king of Great Britain grants lands, honors and franchises.

PATENT, v.t. To grant by patent. 1. To secure the exclusive right of a thing to a person

LAWFUL. In accordance with the law of the land; according to the law; permitted, sanctioned, or justified by law. "Lawful" properly implies a thing conformable to or enjoined by law; "Legal", a thing in the form or after the manner of law or binding by law. A writ or warrant issuing from any court, under color of law, is a "legal" process however defective. A Dictionary of Law 1893.

LEGAL. Latin legalis. Pertaining to the understanding, the exposition, the administration, the science and the practice of law: as, the legal profession, legal advice; legal blanks, newspaper. Implied or imputed in law. Opposed to actual. "Legal" looks more to the letter, and "Lawful" to the spirit, of the law. "Legal" is more appropriate for conformity to positive rules of law; "Lawful" for accord with ethical principle. "Legal" imports rather that the forms of law are observed, that the proceeding is correct in method, that rules prescribed have been obeyed; "Lawful" that the right is actful in substance, that moral quality is secured. "Legal" is the antithesis of "equitable", and the equivalent of "constructive". - 2 Abbott's Law Dict. 24; A Dictionary of Law (1893).

STATUS IN QUO, STATUS QUO. [L., state in which.] The state in which anything is already. The phrase is also used retrospectively, as when, on a treaty of place, matters return to the status quo ante bellum, or are left in statu quo ante bellum, i.e., the state (or, in the state) before the war.
-1913 Webster's Revised Unabridged Dictionary

The Four Inns of Court to the unholy Temple

Globally, all the legalistic scams promoted by the exclusive monopoly of the Temple Bar and their Bar Association franchises come from four Inns or Temples of Court: the Inner Temple, the Middle Temple, Lincoln's Inn, and Gray's Inn. These Inns/Temples are exclusive and private country clubs; secret societies of world power in commerce. They are well established, some having been founded in the early 1200�???????�??????�?????�????�???�??�?�¢??s. The Queen and Queen Mother of England are current members of both the Inner Temple and Middle Temple. Gray�???????�??????�?????�????�???�??�?�¢??s Inn specializes in Taxation legalities by Rule and Code for the Crown. Lincoln's Inn received its name from the Third Earl of Lincoln (circa 1300).

Just like all U.S. based franchise Bar Associations, none of the Four Inns of the Temple are incorporated - for a definite and purposeful reason: You can not make claim against a non-entity and a non-being. They are private societies without charters or statutes, and their so-called constitutions are based solely on custom and self-regulation. In other words, they exist as secret societies without a public "front door" unless you're a private member called to their Bar.

While the Inner Temple holds the legal system franchise by license to steal from Canada and Great Britain, it is the Middle Temple that has legal license to steal from America. This comes about directly via their Bar Association franchises to the Honourable Society of the Middle Temple through the Crown Temple.

From THE HISTORY OF THE INN, Later Centuries, [p.6], written by the Honourable Society of the Middle Temple, we can see a direct tie to the Bar Association franchises and its Crown signatories in America:

Call to the Bar or keeping terms in one of the four Inns a pre-requisite to Call at King's Inns until late in the 19th century. In the 17th and 18th centuries, students came from the American colonies and from many of the West Indian islands. The Inn's records would lead one to suppose that for a time there was hardly a young gentleman in Charleston who had not studied here. Five of the signatories to the Declaration of Independence were Middle Templars, and notwithstanding it and its consequences, Americans continued to come here until the War of 1812.

All Bar Association licensed Attorneys must keep the terms of their oath to the Crown Temple in order to be accepted or "called to Bar" at any of the King's Inns. Their oath, pledge, and terms of allegiance are made to the Crown Temple.

It is a real eye opener to know that the Middle Inn of the Crown Temple has publicly acknowledged there were at least five Templar Bar Attornies, under solemn oath only to the Crown, who signed what was alleged to be an American Declaration of Independence. This simply means that both parties to the Declaration agreement were of the same origin, the Crown Temple. In case you don�???????�??????�?????�????�???�??�?�¢??t understand the importance of this, there is no international agreement or treaty that will ever be honored, or will ever have lawful effect, when the same party signs as both the first and second parties. It�???????�??????�?????�????�???�??�?�¢??s merely a worthless piece of paper with no lawful authority when both sides to any agreement are actually the same. In reality, the American Declaration of Independence was nothing more than an internal memo of the Crown Temple made among its private members.

By example, Alexander Hamilton was one of those numerous Crown Templars who was called to their Bar. In 1774, he entered King's College in New York City, which was funded by members of the London King's Inns, now named Columbia University. In 1777, he became a personal aide and private secretary to George Washington during the American Revolution.

In May of 1782, Hamilton began studying law in Albany, New York, and within six months had completed a three year course of studies, passed his examinations, and was admitted to the New York Bar. Of course, the New York Bar Association was/is a franchise of the Crown Temple through the Middle Inn. After a year's service in Congress during the 1782-1783 session, he settled down to legal practice in New York City as Alexander Hamilton, Esqr. In February of 1784, he wrote the charter for, and became a founding member of, the Bank of New York, the State's first bank.

He secured a place on the New York delegation to the Federal Convention of 1787 at Philadelphia. In a five hour speech on June 18th, he stated "an Executive for life will be an elective Monarch". When all his anti-Federalist New York colleagues withdrew from the Convention in protest, he alone signed the Constitution for the United States of America representing New York State, one of the legal Crown States (Colonies).

One should particularly notice that a lawful state is made up of the people, but a State is a legal entity of the Crown - a Crown Colony. This is an example of the deceptive ways the Crown Temple - Middle Templars - have taken control of America since the beginning of our settlements.

Later, as President Washington's U.S. Treasury Secretary, Hamilton alone laid the foundation of the first Federal U.S. Central Bank, secured credit loans through Crown banks in France and the Netherlands, and increased the power of the Federal Government over the hoodwinked nation-states of the Union. Hamilton had never made a secret of the fact that he admired the government and fiscal policies of Great Britain.

Americans were fooled into believing that the legal Crown Colonies comprising New England were independent nation states, but they never were nor are today. They were and still are Colonies of the Crown Temple, through letters patent and charters, who have no legal authority to be independent from the Rule and Order of the Crown Temple. A legal State is a Crown Temple Colony.

Neither the American people nor the Queen of Britain own America. The Crown Temple owns America through the deception of those who have sworn their allegiance by oath to the Middle Templar Bar. The Crown Bankers and their Middle Templar Attornies Rule America through unlawful contracts, unlawful taxes, and contract documents of false equity through debt deceit, all strictly enforced by their completely unlawful, but "legal", Orders, Rules and Codes of the Crown Temple Courts, our so-called "judiciary" in America. This is because the Crown Temple holds the land titles and estate deeds to all of North America.

The biggest lie is what the Crown and its agents refer to as "the rule of law". In reality, it is not about law at all, but solely about the Crown Rule of all nations. For example, just read what President Bush stated on November 13, 2001, regarding the "rule of law:"

"Our countries are embarked on a new relationship for the 21st century, founded on a commitment to the values of democracy, the free market, and the rule of law." - Joint Statement by President George W. Bush and President Vladimir V. Putin on 11/13/01, spoken from the White House, Washington D.C.

What happened in 1776?

"Whoever owns the soil, owns all the way to the heavens and to the depths of the earth." - Old Latin maxim and Roman expression.

1776 is the year that will truly live in infamy for all Americans. It is the year that the Crown Colonies became legal Crown States. The Declaration of Independence was a legal, not lawful, document. It was signed on both sides by representatives of the Crown Temple. Legally, it announced the status quo of the Crown Colonies to that of the new legal name called "States" as direct possessive estates of the Crown (see the definitions above to understand the legal trickery that was done).

The American people were hoodwinked into thinking they were declaring lawful independence from the Crown. Proof that the Colonies are still in Crown possession is the use of the word "State" to signify a "legal estate of possession." Had this been a document of and by the people, both the Declaration of Independence and the U.S. Constitution would have been written using the word "states". By the use of "State," the significance of a government of estate possession was legally established. All of the North American States are Crown Templar possessions through their legal document, signed by their representation of both parties to the contract, known as the Constitution of the United States of America.

All "Constitutional Rights" in America are simply those dictated by the Crown Temple and enforced by the Middle Inn Templars (Bar Attorners) through their franchise and corporate government entity, the federal United States Government. When a "State Citizen" attempts to invoke his "constitutional", natural, or common law "rights" in Chancery (equity courts), he is told they do not apply. Why? Simply because a State citizen has no rights outside of the Rule and Codes of Crown "law". Only a state citizen has natural and common law rights by the paramount authority of God's Law.

The people who comprise the citizenry of a state are recognized only within natural and common law as is already established by God's Law. Only a State Citizen can be a party to an action within a State Court. A common state citizen cannot be recognized in that court because he doesn't legally exist in Crown Chancery Courts. In order to be recognized in their State Courts, the common man must be converted to that of a corporate or legal entity (a legal fiction).

Now you know why they create such an entity using all capital letters within Birth Certificates issued by the State. They convert the common lawful man of God into a fictional legal entity subject to Administration by State Rules, Orders and Codes (there is no "law" within any Rule or Code). Of course, Rules, Codes, etc. do not apply to the lawful common man of the Lord of lords, so the man with inherent Godly law and rights must be converted into a legal "Person" of fictional "status" (another legal term) in order for their legal - but completely unlawful State Judiciary (Chancery Courts) to have authority over him. Chancery Courts are tribunal courts where the decisions of "justice" are decided by 3 "judges". This is a direct result of the Crown Temple having invoked their Rule and Code over all judicial courts.

"It is held to be a settled Rule, that our courts can not take notice of any title to land not derived from the State or Colonial government, and duly verified by patent." -4 Johns. Rep. 163. Jackson v. Waters, 12 Johns. Rep. 365. S.P.

The Crown Temple was granted Letters Patent (see definition above) and Charters (definition below) for all the land (Colonies) of New England by the King of England, a sworn member of the Middle Temple (as the Queen is now). Since the people were giving the patent/charter corporations and Colonial Governours such a hard time, especially concerning Crown taxation, a scheme was devised to allow the Americans to believe they were being granted "independence." Remember, the Crown Templars represented both parties to the 1776 Declaration of Independence; and, as we are about to see, the latter 1787 U.S. Constitution.

To have this "Declaration" recognized by international treaty law, and in order to establish the new legal Crown entity of the incorporated United States, Middle Templar King George III agreed to the Treaty of Paris on September 3, 1783, "between the Crown of Great Britain and the said United States". The Crown of Great Britain legally was, then and now, the Crown Temple. This formally gave international recognition to the corporate "United States", the new Crown Temple States (Colonies). Most important is to know who the actual signatories to the Treaty of Paris were. Take particular note to the abbreviation "Esqr." following their names (see above definition for ESQUIRE) as this legally signifies "Officers of the King's Courts", which we now know were Templar Courts or Crown Courts. This is the same Crown Templar Title given to Alexander Hamilton (see above).

The Crown was represented in signature by "David Hartley, Esqr.", a Middle Templar of the King's Court. Representing the United States (a Crown franchise) by signature was "John Adams, Esqr.", "Benjamin Franklin, Esqr." and "John Jay, Esqr." The signatories for the "United States" were also Middle Templars of the King's Court through Bar Association membership. What is plainly written in history proves, once again, that the Crown Temple was representing both parties to the agreement. What a perfect and elaborate scam the people of North America had pulled on them!

It becomes even more obvious when you read Article 5, which states in part,

"to provide for the Restitution of all Estates, Rights, and Properties which have been confiscated, belonging to real British Subjects."

The Crown Colonies were granted to "persons" and corporations of the Crown Temple through Letters Patent and Charters, and the North American Colonial land was owned by the Crown.

Now, here's a real catch-all in Article 4:

"It is agreed that creditors on either side shall meet with no lawful impediment to the recovery of the full value in sterling money of all bona fide debts heretofore contracted."

Since the Crown and its Templars represented both the United States, as the debtors, and the Crown, as the creditors, then they became the creditor of the American people by owning all debts of the former Colonies, now called the legal Crown States. This sounds too good to be true, but these are the facts. The words SCAM and HOODWINKED can't begin to describe what had taken place.

So then, what debts were owed to the Crown Temple and their banks as of 1883? In the Contract Between the King and the Thirteen United States of North America, signed at Versailles July 16, 1782, Article I states,

"It is agreed and certified that the sums advanced by His Majesty to the Congress of the United States under the title of a loan, in the years 1778, 1779, 1780, 1781, and the present 1782, amount to the sum of eighteen million of livres, money of France, according to the following twenty-one receipts of the above-mentioned underwritten Minister of Congress, given in virtue of his full powers, to wit"

That amount equals about $18 million dollars, plus interest, that Hamilton's U.S. Central Bank owed the Crown through Crown Bank loans in France. This was signed, on behalf of the United States, by an already familiar Middle Templar, Benjamin Franklin, Esquire.

An additional $6 million dollars (six million livres) was loaned to the United States at 5% interest by the same parties in a similar Contract signed on February 25, 1783. The Crown Bankers in the Netherlands and France were calling in their debts for payment by future generations of Americans.

The Fiscal Agents of Mystery Babylon

Since its beginnings, the Temple Church at the City of London has been a Knight Templar secret society. It was built and established by the same Temple Knights who were given their Rule and Order by the Roman Pope. It's very important to know how the British Royal Crown was placed into the hands of the Knights Templars, and how the Crown Templars became the fiscal and military agents for the Pope of the Roman Church.

This all becomes very clear through the Concession Of England To The Pope on May 15, 1213.charter was sworn in fealty by England's King John to Pope Innocent and the Roman Church. It was witnessed before the Crown Templars, as King John stated upon sealing the same,

"I myself bearing witness in the house of the Knights Templars."

Pay particular attention to the words being used that we have defined below, especially charter, fealty, demur, and concession:

We wish it to be known to all of you, through this our charter, furnished with our seal, not induced by force or compelled by fear, but of our own good and spontaneous will and by the common counsel of our barons, do offer and freely concede to God and His holy apostles Peter and Paul and to our mother the holy Roman church, and to our lord pope Innocent and to his Catholic successors, the whole kingdom of England and the whole kingdom Ireland, with all their rights and appurtenances, we perform and swear fealty for them to him our aforesaid lord pope Innocent, and his catholic successors and the Roman church, binding our successors and our heirs by our wife forever, in similar manner to perform fealty and show homage to him who shall be chief pontiff at that time, and to the Roman church without demur. As a sign, we will and establish perpetual obligation and concession, from the proper and especial revenues of our aforesaid kingdoms, the Roman church shall receive yearly a thousand marks sterling, saving to us and to our heirs our rights, liberties and regalia; all of which things, as they have been described above, we wish to have perpetually valid and firm; and we bind ourselves and our successors not to act counter to them. And if we or any one of our successors shall presume to attempt this, whoever he be, unless being duly warned he come to his kingdom, and this senses, be shall lose his right to the kingdom, and this charter of our obligation and concession shall always remain firm.

Most who have commented on this charter only emphasize the payments due the Pope and the Roman Church. What should be emphasized is the fact that King John broke the terms of this charter by signing the Magna Carta on June 15, 1215. Remember; the penalty for breaking the 1213 agreement was the loss of the Crown (right to the kingdom) to the Pope and his Roman Church. It says so quite plainly. To formally and lawfully take the Crown from the royal monarchs of England by an act of declaration, on August 24, 1215, Pope Innocent III annulled the Magna Carta; later in the year, he placed an Interdict (prohibition) on the entire British empire. From that time until today, the English monarchy and the entire British Crown belonged to the Pope.

The following definitions are all taken from Webster's 1828 Dictionary since the meanings have not been perverted for nearly 200 years:

FEALTY, n. [L. fidelis.] Fidelity to a lord; faithful adherence of a tenant or vassal to the superior of whom he holds his lands; loyalty. Under the feudal system of tenures, every vassal or tenant was bound to be true and faithful to his lord, and to defend him against all his enemies. This obligation was called his fidelity or fealty, and an oath of fealty was required to be taken by all tenants to their landlords. The tenant was called a liege man; the land, a liege fee; and the superior, liege lord.

FEE, n. [In English, is loan. This word, fee, inland, or an estate in trust, originated among the descendants of the northern conquerors of Italy, but it originated in the south of Europe. See Feud.] Primarily, a loan of land, an estate in trust, granted by a prince or lord, to be held by the grantee on condition of personal service, or other condition; and if the grantee or tenant failed to perform the conditions, the land reverted to the lord or donor, called the landlord, or lend-lord, the lord of the loan. A fee then is any land or tenement held of a superior on certain conditions. It is synonymous with fief and feud. In the United States, an estate in fee or fee simple is what is called in English law an allodial estate, an estate held by a person in his own right, and descendible to the heirs in general.

FEUD, n. [L. fides; Eng. loan.] A fief; a fee; a right to lands or hereditaments held in trust, or on the terms of performing certain conditions; the right which a vassal or tenant has to the lands or other immovable thing of his lord, to use the same and take the profits thereof hereditarily, rendering to his superior such duties and services as belong to military tenure, &c., the property of the soil always remaining in the lord or superior.

By swearing to the 1213 Charter in fealty, King John declared that the British-English Crown and its possessions at that time, including all future possessions, estates, trusts, charters, letters patent, and land, were forever bound to the Pope and the Roman Church, the landlord. Some five hundred years later, the New England Colonies in America became a part of the Crown as a possession and trust named the "United States."

ATTORNING, ppr. Acknowledging a new lord, or transferring homage and fealty to the purchaser of an estate.

Bar Attorneys have been attorning ever since they were founded at the Temple Church, by acknowledging that the Crown and he who holds the Crown is the new lord of the land.

CHARTER, n. 1. A written instrument, executed with usual forms, given as evidence of a grant, contract, or whatever is done between man and man. In its more usual sense, it is the instrument of a grant conferring powers, rights and privileges, either from a king or other sovereign power, or from a private person, as a charter of exemption, that no person shall be empanelled on a jury, a charter of pardon, &c. The charters under which most of the colonies in America were settled, were given by the king of England, and incorporated certain persons, with powers to hold the lands granted, to establish a government, and make laws for their own regulation. These were called charter-governments.

By agreeing to the Magna Carta, King John had broken the agreement terms of his fealty with Rome and the Pope.

The Pope and his Roman Church control the Crown Temple because his Knights established it under his Orders. He who controls the gold controls the world.

The Crown Temple Today

The workings of the Crown Temple in this day and age is moreso obvious, yet somewhat hidden. The Crown Templars have many names and many symbols to signify their private and unholy Temple. Take a close look at the (alleged) one dollar $1 private Federal Reserve System (a Crown banking franchise) Debt Note.

Notice in the base of the pyramid the Roman date MDCCLXXVI which is written in Roman numerals for the year 1776. The words ANNUIT COEPTIS NOVUS ORDO SECLORUM are Roman Latin for ANNOUNCING THE BIRTH OF THE NEW ORDER OF THE WORLD. Go back to the definitions above and pay particular attention to the words CAPITOL, CROWN and TEMPLE. 1776 signifies the birth of the New World Order under the Crown Temple. That's when their American Crown Colonies became the chartered government called the United States, thanks to the Declaration of Independence. Since that date, the United Nations (another legal Crown Temple by charter) rose up and refers to every nation as a State member.

The Wizard of Oz = the Crown Temple

This is not a mere child's story written by L. Frank Baum. What symbol does "Oz" stand for? Ounces.Gold What is the yellow brick road? Bricks or ingot bars of gold.

The character known as the Straw Man represents that fictitious ALL CAPS legal fiction - a PERSON - the Federal U.S. Government created with the same spelling as your Christian birth name. Remember what the Straw Man wanted from the Wizard of Oz? A brain! No legal fiction has a brain because they have no breath of life! What did he get in place of a brain? A Certificate. A Birth Certificate for a new legal creation. He was proud of his new legal status, plus all the other legalisms he was granted. Now he becomes the true epitome of the brainless sack of straw who was given a Certificate in place of a brain of common sense.

What about the Tin Man? Does Taxpayer Identification Number (TIN) mean anything to you? The poor TIN Man just stood there mindlessly doing his work until his body literally froze up and stopped functioning. He worked himself to death because he had no heart nor soul. He's the heartless and emotionless creature robotically carrying out his daily task as if he was already dead. He's the ox pulling the plow and the mule toiling under the yoke. His masters keep him cold on the outside and heartless on the inside in order to control any emotions or heart he may get a hold of.

The pitiful Cowardly Lion was always too frightened to stand up for himself. Of course, he was a bully and a big mouth when it came to picking on those smaller than he was. They act as if they have great courage, but they really have none at all. All roar with no teeth of authority to back them up. When push came to shove, the Cowardly Lion always buckled under and whimpered when anyone of any size or stature challenged him. He wanted courage from the Grand Wizard, so he was awarded a medal of "official" recognition. Now, regardless of how much of a coward he still was, his official status made him a bully with officially recognized authority. He's just like the Attorneys who hide behind the Middle Courts of the Temple Bar.

What about the trip through the field of poppies? They weren't real people, so drugs had no effect on them. The Wizard of Oz was written at the turn of the century, so how could the author have known America was going to be drugged? The Crown has been playing the drug cartel game for centuries. Just look up the history of Hong Kong and the Opium Wars. The Crown already had valuable experience conquering all of China with drugs, so why not the rest of the world?

Who finally exposed the Wizard for what he really was? Toto, the ugly (or cute, depending on your perspective) and somewhat annoying little dog. Toto means "in total, all together; Latin in toto." Notice how Toto was not scared of the Great Wizard's theatrics, yet he was so small in size compared to the Wizard, no-one seemed to notice him. The smoke, flames and hologram images were designed to frighten people into doing as the Great Wizard of Oz commanded. Toto simply went over, looked behind the curtain : the court - (see the definition for curtain above), saw it was a scam, and started barking until others paid attention to him and came to see what all the barking was about.Just an ordinary person controlling the levers that created the illusions of the Great Wizard's power and authority. The veil hiding the corporate legal fiction and its false courts was removed. The Wizard's game was up. It's too bad that people don't realize how loud a bark from a little dog is. How about your bark? Do you just remain silent and wait to be given whatever food and recognition, if any, your legal master gives you?

Let's not forget those pesky flying monkeys. What a perfect mythical creature to symbolize the Bar Association Attorners who attack and control all the little people for the Great Crown Wizard, the powerful and grand Bankers of Oz - Gold.

What is it going to take to expose the Wizard and tear down the court veil for what they really are? Each of us needs only a brain, a heart and soul, and courage. Then, and most importantly, we all need to learn how to work together. Only "in toto," working together as one Body of the King of Kings, can we ever be free or have the freedom given under God's Law.

Mystery Babylon Revealed

There is no mystery behind the current abomination of Babylon for those who discern His Truth:

And upon her forehead was a name written, MYSTERY, BABYLON THE GREAT, THE MOTHER OF HARLOTS AND ABOMINATIONS OF THE EARTH.
-Revelation 17:5

God has reserved His judgment for the great idolatress, Rome, the chief seat of all idolatry, that rules over many nations with whom the kings have committed to the worship of her idols (see Revelation 17:1-4). The Pope and His purported Church; sitting on the Temple throne at the Vatican; ruling the nations of the earth through the Crown Temple of ungodly deities are the Rule and Order of Babylon; the Crown of godlessness and the Code of commerce.

One may call the Rule of the world today by many names: The New World Order (a Bush family favourite), the Third Way (spoken by Tony Blair and Bill Clinton), the Illuminati, Triad, Triangle, Trinity, Masonry, the United Nations, the EU, the US, or many dozens of other names. However, they all point to one origin and one beginning. We have traced this in history to the Crown Temple, the Temple Church circa 1200. Because the Pope created the Order of the Temple Knights (the Grand Wizards of deception) and established their mighty Temple Church in the sovereign City of London, it is the Pope and his Roman Capitols who control the world.

"And the woman was arrayed in purple and scarlet colour, and decked with gold and precious stones and pearls, having a golden cup in her hand full of abominations and filthiness of her fornication"
-Revelation 17:4

This verse appears to be an accurate description of the Pope and His Bishops for the past 1,700 years. The idolatries of commerce in the world: all the gold and silver; the iron and soft metals; the money and coins and riches of the world: All of these are under the control of the Crown Temple; the Roman King and his false Church; the throne of Babylon; attended to by his Templar Knights, the Wizards of abomination and idolatry.

"The seven heads are seven mountains, on which the woman [mother of harlots] sitteth" - Revelation 17:9

The only mention of "seven mountains" within our present-day Bible is at Revelation 17:9, so it is no wonder this has been a mystery to the current Body of Christ. The 1611 King James (who was a Crown Templar) Bible is not the entire canon of the early church (church: in Latin ecclesia; in Greek ekklesia). This in itself is no mystery as history records the existence and destruction of these early church writings; just as history has now proven their genuine authenticity with the appearance of the Dead Sea Scrolls and the coptic library at Nag Hagmadi in Egypt, among many other recent Greek language discoveries within the past 100 years.

The current Holy Bible quotes the Book of Enoch numerous times:

By faith Enoch was taken away so that he did not see death, "and was not found, because God had taken him"; for before he was taken he had this testimony, that he pleased God.
- Hebrews 11:5

Now Enoch, the seventh from Adam, prophesied about these men also, saying, "Behold, the Lord comes with ten thousands of His saints, to execute judgment on all, to convict all who are ungodly among them of all their ungodly deeds which they have committed in an ungodly way, and of all the harsh things which ungodly sinners have spoken against Him."
- Jude 1:14-15

The Book of Enoch was considered scripture by most early Christians. The earliest literature of the so-called "Church Fathers" is filled with references to this mysterious book. The second century Epistle of Barnabus makes much use of the Book of Enoch. Second and Third Century "Church Fathers," such as Justin Martyr, Irenaeus, Origin and Clement of Alexandria, all make use of the Book of Enoch "Holy Scripture". The Ethiopic Church included the Book of Enoch to its official canon. It was widely known and read the first three centuries after Christ. However, this and many other books became discredited after the Roman Council of Laodicea. Being under ban of the Roman Papal authorities, afterwards they gradually passed out of circulation.

At about the time of the Protestant Reformation, there was a renewed interest in the Book of Enoch, which had long since been lost to the modern world. By the late 1400's, rumors began to spread that a copy of the long lost Book of Enoch might still exist. During this time, many books arose claiming to be the lost book but were later found to be forgeries.

The return of the Book of Enoch to the modern western world is credited to the famous explorer James Bruce, who in 1773 returned from six years in Abyssinia with three Ethiopic copies of the lost book. In 1821, Richard Laurence published the first English translation. The now famous R.H. Charles edition was first published by Oxford Press in 1912. In the following years, several portions of the Greek text also surfaced. Then, with the discovery of cave number four of the Dead Sea Scrolls, seven fragmentary copies of the Aramaic text were discovered.

Within the Book of Enoch is revealed one of the mysteries of Babylon concerning the seven mountains she sits upon (underlining has been added):

[CHAPTER 52] 2 There mine eyes saw all the secret things of heaven that shall be; a mountain of iron, a mountain of copper, a mountain of silver, a mountain of gold, a mountain of soft metal, and a mountain of lead.

6 These [6] mountains which thine eyes have seen: The mountain of iron, the mountain of copper, the mountain of silver, the mountain of gold, the mountain of soft metal, and the mountain of lead. All these shall be in the presence of the Elect One as wax: Before the fire, like the water which streams down from above upon those mountains, and they shall become powerless before his feet. 7 It shall come to pass in those days that none shall be saved, either by gold or by silver, and none be able to escape. 8 There shall be no iron for war, nor shall one clothe oneself with a breastplate. Bronze shall be of no service, tin shall be of no service and shall not be esteemed, and lead shall not be desired. 9 All these things shall be denied and destroyed from the surface of the earth when the Elect One shall appear before the face of the Lord of Spirits."

[CHAPTER 24] 3 The seventh mountain was in the midst of these, and it excelled them in height, resembling the seat of a throne; and fragrant trees encircled the throne.

[CHAPTER 25] 3 And he answered saying: "This high mountain which thou hast seen, whose summit is like the throne of God, is His throne, where the Holy Great One, the Lord of Glory, the Eternal King, will sit, when He shall come down to visit the earth with goodness. 4 As for this fragrant tree, no mortal is permitted to touch it until the great judgement when He shall take vengeance on all and bring (everything) to its consummation for ever. 5 It shall then be given to the righteous and Holy. Its fruit shall be for food to the elect: It shall be transplanted to the Holy place, to the temple of the Lord, the Eternal King. 6 Then shall they rejoice with joy and be glad, and into the Holy place shall they enter; its fragrance shall be in their bones and they shall live a long life on earth, such as thy fathers lived: In their days shall no sorrow, or plague, or torment, or calamity touch them."

The present wealth and power of all the world's gold, silver, tin, bronze, pearls, diamonds, gemstones, iron, and copper belonging the Babylon whore, and held in the treasuries of her Crown Templar banks and deep stony vaults, will not be able to save them at the time of the Lord's judgment.

But woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye shut up the kingdom of heaven against men: for ye neither go in [yourselves], neither suffer ye them that are entering to go in.
Matthew 23:13

Where do we go from here?

Now that their false Temple has been exposed, how does this apply to the Kingdom of Heaven? To reach the end, you must know the beginning. For everything ordained of God, there is an imitation ordained of evil that looks like the genuine thing. There is the knowledge of good and the knowledge of evil. The problem is, most believe they have the knowledge of God when what they really have is knowledge of world deceptions operating as gods. The only way to discern and begin to understand the Kingdom of Heaven is to seek the Knowledge that comes only from God, not the knowledge of men who take their legal claim as earthly rulers and gods.

The false Crown Temple and its Grand Wizard Knights have led the world to believe that they are of the Lord God and hold the knowledge and keys to His Kingdom. What they hold within their Temples are the opposite. They claim to be the "Holy Church," but which holy church? The real one or the false one? Are the Pope and his Roman Church the Temple of God, or is this the unholy Temple of Babylon sitting upon the seven mountains?

They use the same words, but alter them to show the true meaning they have applied: The State is not a state; a Certificate is not a certification. The Roman Church is not the church (ekklesia). There is the Crown of the Lord; and a Crown of that which is not of the Lord. All imitations appear to be the genuine article, but they are fakes. Those who are truly seeking the genuine Kingdom of God must allow the Lord to show them the discernment between the genuine and the imitation. Without this discernment by the Holy Spirit, all will remain fooled by the illusions of false deity emanating from the unholy spirits of the Wizards.

Neither shall they say, Lo here! Or, lo there! For behold, the kingdom of God is within you.
- Luke 17:21

Jesus said, "If your leaders say to you, 'Look, the (Father's) kingdom is in the sky,' then the birds of the sky will precede you. If they say to you, 'It is in the sea,' then the fish will precede you. Rather, the FATHER'S kingdom is within you and it is outside you."
Gospel of Thomas 3

Sunday, January 26, 2003

by Welshman Tue Sep 19, 2006 12:03

Well I tried to put forward the facts but the above message has stunned me. That someone has the time to type that amount of claptrap is astonishing.

I will leave you with my messages and the links I have given in the hope that anyone with an open mind can look at the actual evidence

Here is a summary of a report by the UK Government which found no substantiated evidence that freemasonry affects the workings of the judiciary or police

http://www.charlton.demon.co.uk/masonic/report.html

Here is the findings of a trial into whether freemasonry affected a planning decision which also discusses the principles of freemasonry

http://www.province.org.uk/Temp/20060406_dorset_ruling.htm

You will find the truth for yourself if you look for it

Goodbye and good luck to you all

by number 6 - legalize freedom campaign Tue Sep 19, 2006 12:19

Your going now. No time for Tea?

'Substantiated' being the operative Word here.
AND, I have as much Time to write as much 'Claptrap' as Yourself.
I will continue to post as much 'claptrap' as I can on this Site to expose ALL.
I am only beginning. You may remember the old saying,'what is whispered in your Ear , one should shout from the highest Mountain tops'.
Anyway, the Cat's out of the Bag with all this. The link Site below is just one, there are tons more, keep diggin baby.
It's just part of my Job.
BCNU.

by Flynn - agrescon@agrescon.nl Tue Sep 19, 2006 14:42 agrescon at agrescon dot nl 0031102102055

Interesting stuff,however its only the tip of the Iceberg. Roberto Calvi, and Bellasconni were both members of the P2 Masonic Lodge, as was the London Police Chief that found him hanging under Blackfriars Bridge, and past it off as Suicide.Prince Charles resigned his membership shortly after this event.The Bilderberg Group including Mr Major, are certainly aware of the members,if only for the Sponsorship of Political Funds. Cecil Rhodes, asset stripped,Rhodesia, then started the Rhodes Scholarship, there were no Blacks, Jews, Dogs. or Irish allowed, members include Jani Smuts, The Boer leader,who almost defeated the British in the Transval, he went on to sort the troubles in N.Eire, and my Dutch Proffesor Knew him, which is another Chapter on Sea Power Harland and Wolff, and the exclusion of the Catholics.Then theres. Clinton, E, Gould, New Zealand, and run out of the Labour Party by Blair,were Rhodes Scholars,Jani Smuts went on to Stop the first World war as a go between,and was third in Intelligence. to Sir William Stevenson,Canada, in world war 2, the pro Arab T.E. Lawrence being eliminated, before the outset of the War, at Wareham Dorset,where hes buried he would have been no 1. Of course theres, De Beers Diamonds,industrial, used for rifling of Tank Barrels and Oil Exploration Drilling, as well as the Jewish Monopoly on the commodity all from S. Africa. Tie all this in with Britain supplying Plutonium from Sellafield, via Nuclear Submarine,to the Top Secret base at Simonstown. S. Africa, before berthing at Atlit Top Secret Base in Siri Lanka. All under the Thatcher Regime, read my files on Mordenchai Vanunu, who worked at Dimona,from 1976 to 1985, before moving to Australia. Or E Mail me for an unpublished account from the Russian of my Dutch Proffessor, But no one, and I mean no one, can convince me that the Freemasons, werent in on the Great Game, give me your address and I will in no wise cast thee out. FlynnO Flynn

by Vercingetorix Tue Sep 19, 2006 14:43

It seems the Bilderberg group meets secretly to discuss such things as global control of the air, water, public health, utility takeovers, major construction works, and such like.

Although many media power brokers regularly attend these meetings it seems, including representatives of the major TV networks, the public are normally kept completely in the dark as much as possible regarding all such events - in the interests of democracy no doubt?

As far as global politics and finance go, the Bilderberg is the top of the pyramid it appears, the all-seeing eye gazing upon the construction of a New World Order - and possibly the construction of roads such as the M3 toll road through the Bronze Age heritage sites in the Tara / Skreen Valley, the N6 through Kocknadala (Iron Age "Hill of Parliament") in County Galway, and so on.

Please see:
http://www.geocities.com/CapitolHill/8425/BILDER.HTM

by Seamuseen Tue Sep 19, 2006 18:46

The Rossport 5 - and Chief Justice of Ireland (Mr Justice Finnegan) as well maybe? - will probably be interested to learn that Queen Beatrix of the Netherlands, whose family owns Royal Dutch Shell Oil, was among the guests at what was probably the most recent of the formal Bilderberg meetings - which was apparently held on June 6 -11 2006 in Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.

Among the issues discussed it seems, were a future where the Bilderbergers will appoint all world leaders, return to feudalism, and a plan to reduce the world population by 80-90 percent: and this is to name just a few of their plans.

Other guests (thought to total around 300 in all) at the June 2006 Bilderberg Meeting appear to have included Hilary Clinton, George H.W. Bush, David Rockefeller, and Henry Kissinger. (Not sure if Mr Justice Finnegan was there?)

There is a much fuller account of the June 2006 Meeting at: http://www.bilderberg.org/2006.htm#85

by Rose of Tralee Tue Sep 19, 2006 20:27

It looks as though our recently appointed new Tánaiste (and Minister for Justice) Mr Michael McDowell TD wined and dined with Henry Kissinger & Co. in 1992, at that particular year's Bilderberg Meeting.

Please see:
http://theirishbulletin.blogspot.com/2006/05/who-will-m....html

Some other influential Bilderbergers involved in the Irish scene (since 1991) appear to include:

1) Peter D. Sutherland (Goldman-Sachs International, former head of AIB, E.U. bright button and GATT man): 1991, 1992, on steering committee 1993-1998, attended 2000, 2002, 2003... along with Sen. Myles Staunton, Sutherland also features big in the Trilateral Commission;

2) Conor Brady (editor of the Irish Times): 1993 (Irish Times - no surprise here?)

3) John Bruton (then leader of Fine Gael): 1998, 2000, 2001

4) Dermot Gleeson, former Irish Attorney General, now AIB head buckshot: 1995, 2003

5) John A.D. de Chastelain (Chairman, Independent International Commission on Decommissioning, oversaw N.I. decommissioning): 1999

6) Lochlann Quinn, then AIB head: 1997

7) Pat Cox (President of EU Parliament): 2001, got his big job soon after.

Please see:
http://irish-nationalism.net/forum/archive/index.php/t-163.html

by Spinning Quickly Tue Sep 19, 2006 21:28

There is a long tradition of anti-masonic conspiracy theories, but that doesn't mean there is much to them.

Naturally, any member of the Oireachtas or Garda should be required to list membership in a list of interests.

by Seán Ryan Tue Sep 19, 2006 23:49

The following two quotes are taken from a document published last march. The document is titled: ‘The Politics of Conviction’ and was written by Michael Meacher MP. I've quoted the relevant bits as the document itself is very long, but is well worth a read. http://66.102.9.104/search?q=cache:XjHlJ9YYek4J:www.uni...cd=18

Up for mention are a famous investigation titled “Operation Countryman” which is well worth a google, and also up for mention are the Masons. The two are most certainly tied together and show some very sinister practices by Freemasonry.

“Yet another area of growing authoritarianism in British society lies in the increasingly
coercive powers put into the hands of the police, the security services and the
criminal justice system. Building on the deployment of police for violent
confrontation against striking miners at Orgreave in 1984 and the later development
of police Tactical Support Units for violent suppression of civil protest, the role of
the police has shifted away from community policing to hard fire-fighting episodes.
Police action has often been well in excess of a proportional response and the
minimum use of force adequate for the circumstances. Yet redress for citizens
subjected to excessive police force or violence is almost non-existent: no police
officers have been convicted, disciplined or imprisoned for such activities, even
when occasionally ashamed police colleagues have blown the whistle on them. Even
a shoot-to-kill strategy, never sanctioned by public policy and recently deployed
wrongly against a man wielding a table leg and against an innocent man (de
Manezes) after the London bombings, has never led to a conviction or resignation. If
the rule of law is to prevail, then whilst fully resourcing the police for their proper
duties in fighting crime, we also need much more rigorous internal monitoring of
police racism, fraud and corruption (as shown in the Met and West Midlands force
and by the Operation Countryman inquiry) as well as more transparent and
rigorous investigations by the Independent Police Complains Commission…”

“Last but not least, the openness of information is a key factor in a free society. The
Freedom of Information Act 2000, riddled with loopholes in its original draft but
later strengthened after protests by 8 concessions, still remains flawed. Whilst there
are nine exemptions to the Act, the most serious concern is that an absolute right
of Ministerial veto, included in the Act, could be used to block information deemed
too politically embarrassing or sensitive by the Government. Moreover the cloak of
secrecy is being preserved in other ways. More public interest immunity certificates

(PIIs) were signed by Labour Ministers (100) in the first five years of government
1997-2002 than by Tory Ministers (70) in the previous five years. Information which
could give rise to ‘an actionable breach of confidence’ is wholly exempt from
disclosure, and arms manufacturers and others are using this to write legally
enforceable confidentiality agreements into their dealings with Whitehall, with
‘injunction packages’ to threaten officials. There is no requirement on freemasons to
declare themselves, though they are believed to include at least 1200 lay magistrates
and over 260 professional judges. Clearly, if justice is to be transparent, there should
be a compulsory register of Masonic membership for all in the criminal justice
system, both police and judges alike. Equally, the corollary to freedom of
information – the proper protection of privacy – is also deficient. A privacy law is
urgently needed in Britain, though the Government has rejected it because it would
offend the Murdoch press. Research by the independent group, Statewatch, has
shown that interception of phone calls, email and post by police and the intelligence
services has more than doubled since Labour came to power. The Government-
funded Celldar project, ostensibly aimed at anti-terrorism defence, security and road
traffic management, now allows surveillance of anyone, at any time and anywhere
there is a phone signal. Wireless technologies now being installed in everything from
lamp posts to casino chips challenge the entire concept of personal privacy:
snooping is becoming universal.”

by number 6 - legalise freedom campaign Tue Sep 19, 2006 23:58

WITHOUT PREJUDICE

I hereby request, no, demand that all Freemasons be removed from the Benches of OUR Courts, the People's Courts. There will be NO Justice as long as these are infesting Our Courts.
Mc.Dowell is obviously one as he attended Bilderberg some years ago and was wrapped around Criminal Kissinger.

b.c.n.u.

by Seán Ryan Wed Sep 20, 2006 00:32

Here's a recent picture from the Masonic hall in Molseworth St., situated a few hundred yards from Leinster House. The meeting hall is based on the design of the English Parliament.

The seat of Masonic Government in Ireland

by Luigi Corleone Wed Sep 20, 2006 01:11

Why for you all like to rock boat so much?

You realise Mafia may have to lay off hundreds of judges around world when you talk a like this?

Son-a-ma-bitch!

Remember what "Cosa Nostra" mean - "our a thing", "our a business"!!

Capite?

by the digger Wed Sep 20, 2006 11:00

>. They have infested every aspect of Society for their hidden Master,(Lucifer).
No, I'm not A LOON.<

Jaysus.

I beg to differ.

Make sure that tinfoil helmet is on tight, eh?

by W. Finnerty. Thu Sep 21, 2006 09:31

Allowing for Justice Minister McDowell's proven and presumably fond links with the Bilderberg Group, where does this leave him with regard to Bunreacht na hEireann (The Constitution of The Republic of Ireland) I wonder?

"Bilderberg" and "Bunreacht" appear to me to represent two largely incompatible sets of principles.

Meanwhile, I continue to wait for a reply from Minister for Justice McDowell TD to the letter I sent him on August 4th last; and, to avoid being corruptly criminalised in the Republic of Ireland, I also continue to live in forced exile in the Northern Ireland jurisdiction - as I have been doing since December 7th 2004.

As can be seen at the address below, I have pointed out to the new Tánaiste (Deputy Prime Minister) that he and his senior colleagues in Government appear to be violating the Constitution of Ireland in a number of major ways.

I find it VERY interesting that neither Justice Minister McDowell himself, nor any of the other senior public officials the e-mail below was copied to (some of them lawyers like himself), are denying ANY of my allegations regarding their completely outrageous and wholly unlawful behaviour relating to Bunreacht na hEireann. Please see items listed 1) to 4) at following address:
http://www.europeancourtofhumanrightswilliamfinnerty.co...r.htm

According to one Internet report (Wikipedia), Deputy Prime Minister McDowell receives a salary of €222,256 per annum in his new role, which presumably comes from the tax-payers he "serves" in the Republic of Ireland.

One final point: Minister for Justice McDowell appears to have nothing but contempt for Human Rights Law, in so far as I can judge from my dealings with him. As it also seems to me that many of the leaders of the Bilderberg Group are similarly contemptuous of this crucially important area of law, I cannot help wondering if they might have helped him to get his recent promotion?

"Prime Minister" may be job the Bilderberg Group have in mind for Minister McDowell?

by W. Finnerty. Fri Sep 22, 2006 10:09

Information was sent by me yesterday to GRECO, on account of the fact that senior public officials in the Republic of Ireland appear to me to be collectively behaving in an extremely corrupt manner regarding Bunreacht na hEireann (the Constitution of the Republic of Ireland). In my view, those involved include President Mary McAleese, the so called "Guardian" of the Constitution.

As some will know, the word GRECO represents "Group of States Against Corruption", and it comes under the Council of Europe - which is also responsible for the running of the European Court of Human Rights (in Strasbourg).

The GRECO division of the Council of Europe has in fact already produced at least one report on corruption in the Republic of Ireland. It is dated December 12th 2003, and it can be viewed (PDF format) at the following address:
www.coe.int/t/dg1/greco/evaluations/round1/GrecoRC1(2003)14_Ireland_EN.pdf

Among several recommendations made in the above mentioned GRECO report is one for civil servants in the Republic of Ireland to report cases of corruption they discover in the course of their work to the authorities in charge of detecting, investigating and prosecuting corruption offences.

The information sent by me to GRECO yesterday was also copied to several senior public officials, as well as to a number of people who are know to be lawyers: including the Chief Justice of the Republic of Ireland The Hon. Mr. Justice John L Murray SC.

For full details of the e-mail in question please see:
http://www.europeancourtofhumanrightswilliamfinnerty.co...l.htm

by Ascalon Mon Nov 27, 2006 15:35

"Masonic Parliament in Molesworth St."

To the poster of the picture of the grand lodge room, get a grip mate, if you did a modicum of research at all you would have found out that all Masonic meeting rooms are based on the ground plan of the temple of Solomon, whose building most of the craft rituals are based.

Secondly, as has been pointed out, as much conspiracy and underhanded dealing takes place at the counter of the members bar in your average golf club as it does in your average Masonic lodge.

Yes, I am a freemason, here in Ireland and no I am not Catholic, nor Protestant no Muslim or indeed Jewish, though there are members in my own lodges who are and also Hindu, so whoever said that bit about one god, it is left to your conscience and so definitions are decidedly hazy at best. Are many gods merely facets of one?

As for the American presidents, not all are members and certainly the Skull and Bones society is an invention that has nothing to do with masonry at all, apart from a borrowed element of the dramatic.

Interestingly, I think you should note that Prince Charles is one of the first royals, certainly the mot recent not to accept membership on reaching Masonic age, 21, so conspiracy theory that.

Yes there is shocking corruption in this country. Just think of the last time you got a parking ticket quashed or made a fine for drunken conduct go away. That is the beginnings of corruption and it needs no darkened hall or symbols on a veil to happen. We all know bent coppers, drunken judges and unsavoury public officials and what do we do? We ignore them. Or worse, we elect them.
What happened when Haughey finally shuffled his corrupt and criminal little way off this mortal coil? He was eulogised. He should have been publicly showered with blunt market garden vegetables.
We are a nation of begrudgers but we are also a nation of hypocrites. And the sooner we face that reality, as opposed to blaming shadowy cabals, the sooner we mature as a nation and realise we have a job to do in cleaning up public life.

Nullius in Verba

Ascalon

by number 6 - legalise freedom campaign Tue Nov 28, 2006 00:13

I am not familiar with your situation. But under the good friday aggreement , one may invoke their Constitutional rights in all 32 Counties of Ireland.

As for masonic Mc Dowell? Well , he did congradulate the newly elevated Three degree members in Buswells not too long ago.

The Government never ran this Country , the masons did , and still do and the sooner the better People realise the fact. People's perception is steered with the masive support of the media.......all media.

The proposed Referendum is being used to sink a very important ARTICLE 40.

Invoke it while you can.

It may not be around for too long.

by Comeuppance Required Tue Nov 28, 2006 12:13

“If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it. The lie can be maintained only for such time as the State can shield the people from the political, economic and/or military consequences of the lie. It thus becomes vitally important for the State to use all of its powers to repress dissent, for the truth is the mortal enemy of the lie, and thus by extension, the truth is the greatest enemy of the State.”
Joseph Goebbels (Nazi)

Mike said:

“A persons religion (or lack of) is surely their own business”

Why so in this so called ‘secular state (ie non-religious – non Christian? –as opposed to what our Constitution ordains) has Minister ‘Groucho’ O’Dea and Co seen fit to remove what was the Irish Army’s Guard of Honour from it’s role at Corpus Christi parades which was the tradition in Ireland for years before his maculate conception to do so whilst in the same tenure he used his privileged position to officially open the freemason coven in Limerick.

And worse, our predominantly Catholic taxpayers money financed the building through the abuse of FAS?

BUNREACHT NA hÉIREANN - CONSTITUTION OF IRELAND
Religion - Article 44

2.2° The State guarantees not to endow any religion.

NEW NORTH MUNSTER MASONIC CENTRE
http://newsweaver.ie/shannoncalling/e_article000476611....jSN,w

The North Munster Masonic Centre in Limerick was officially opened by the Minister for Defence Mr. William O'Dea T.D. in September 2005. The new Masonic Centre in Limerick is now located in the midst of the tourist and heritage area of the city, directly across the road from King John’s Castle and beside the former Bishop's Lady's Palace (now the headquarters of the City's Civic Trust) and the City Museum.

Heritage and history are very much part of the tradition of Freemasonry which is based on legends that date back to the time of the construction of King Solomon’s Temple. Of the many great buildings erected by the masons in the Middle Ages, attention has focused on the great cathedrals throughout Europe. This magnificant building was constructed by FÁS under their Community Youth Training Programme and contain a public Museum which was fitted out with assistance from Shannon Development under their Tourism & Heritage Innovation Programme to enable them to complete a public museum at their new building in Castle Street. On display are a great many artefacts with particular historical links to Limerick City and surrounding area.

Then we read Welshman when he said-

“I thought it would be fairly obvious I am a Freemason - but to dispell any doubt yes I am. Who better to tell you what freemasons do.

I am also a Roman Catholic and a member of a Golf Club”.

Not True -

Read - MASONS and CHRISTIANITY: at
http://www.religion-cults.com/Secret/Freemasonry/Freema...y.htm

Most Christian and Muslim leaders forbid Freemasonry... because it is a most deceptive secret society, as we shall see next:

Catholics:
Freemasons have been excommunicated from the Catholic Church by 8 Popes: In 1738 by Clement XII "In Eminenti", the first of 20 bulls against Freemasonry. Pius IX issued 6 bulls attacking Masonry. Leo XIII, in 1884, in "Humanum Genus", and endorsed the view that the Freemasons' "real supreme aim" is "to persecute Christianity with untamed hatred, and they will never rest until they see cast to the ground all religious institutions established by the Pope"... and the last one, John Paul II in 1983... you can not be a Catholic and a Mason!

If you want to be a Mason, you are automatically out of the Catholic Church,
excommunicated!... these are the words issued by Cardinal Ratzinger, approved and ordered by John Paul II in Nov. 1983: "The Church's negative judgment in regard to Masonic associations remains unchanged since their principles have always been considered irreconcilable with the doctrine of the Church and therefore membership in them remains forbidden. Catholics who enrol in Masonic associations are in a state of grave sin and may not receive Holy Communion. Local Ecclesiastical authorities do not have the faculty to pronounce a judgment on the nature of Masonic associations which may include a diminution of the above-mentioned judgment".

Quote
“Think of the press as a great keyboard on which the government can play.”
Joseph Goebbels (Nazi)

by Celtic Warrior Tue Nov 28, 2006 13:11

Like it or lump it, the O'Connell street spike is a triangle when viewed from distance anywhere around Dublin. Why did we not get an explanation of how it relates to Ireland particularly as it stands outside the most historic building in Ireland –the GPO? Would it be standing there now if our leaders were not shot to death when they ‘won???’ Our freedom?

The triangle is one of the most used occultic symbols. A triangle with its point downward represents the deity and is called the Deity's Triangle, or the Water Triangle. With one point up, it is called the Earthly Triangle, Pyramid Triangle, or the Fire Triangle. These two definitions of the triangle are standard occult belief. From whence did they come? They came from a Masonic book, Symbolism of the Eastern Star, by Shirley Plessner, Cleveland, Ohio, Gilbert Publishing Co., 1956, p. 18. Robert Macoy said the same thing in Adoptive Rite Ritual , [Virginia: Macoy Publishing and Masonic Supply co., 1897, p. 237].

http://www.cuttingedge.org/free12.html

Look closely at the two characters in the Dublin Grand Lodge above then ask yourself.

What Religion has been attacked in Ireland since the advent of Christianity?

Who attacked it?

Why did they attack it?

How did they attack it?

When did the attack stop?

I think you might be right there!

Our very own 'Spiked' triangle (Dublin)

Dublin Grand Lodge Members