New Events

International

no events posted in last week

Blog Feeds

Public Inquiry
Interested in maladministration. Estd. 2005

offsite link RTEs Sarah McInerney ? Fianna Fail supporter? Anthony

offsite link Joe Duffy is dishonest and untrustworthy Anthony

offsite link Robert Watt complaint: Time for decision by SIPO Anthony

offsite link RTE in breach of its own editorial principles Anthony

offsite link Waiting for SIPO Anthony

Public Inquiry >>

Human Rights in Ireland
A Blog About Human Rights

offsite link UN human rights chief calls for priority action ahead of climate summit Sat Oct 30, 2021 17:18 | Human Rights

offsite link 5 Year Anniversary Of Kem Ley?s Death Sun Jul 11, 2021 12:34 | Human Rights

offsite link Poor Living Conditions for Migrants in Southern Italy Mon Jan 18, 2021 10:14 | Human Rights

offsite link Right to Water Mon Aug 03, 2020 19:13 | Human Rights

offsite link Human Rights Fri Mar 20, 2020 16:33 | Human Rights

Human Rights in Ireland >>

Lockdown Skeptics

The Daily Sceptic

offsite link ?North Sea Oil Workers Cannot be Sacrificed on the Altar of Net Zero?: Unions Go to War on Labour?s ... Sat May 18, 2024 15:00 | Will Jones
"North Sea oil workers cannot be sacrificed on the altar of Net Zero," the Unite union has told Labour as it launches a campaign against the party's "irresponsible" green agenda.
The post “North Sea Oil Workers Cannot be Sacrificed on the Altar of Net Zero”: Unions Go to War on Labour’s “Irresponsible” Green Policy appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.

offsite link Pull Down Covid-Era Signs That Are a Reminder of the ?Futility and Madness? of Lockdown, Scientists ... Sat May 18, 2024 13:00 | Will Jones
Scientists and MPs have demanded that all remaining Covid warning signs are removed because they serve only to remind the public of the "futility and madness" of restrictions.
The post Pull Down Covid-Era Signs That Are a Reminder of the “Futility and Madness” of Lockdown, Scientists Tell Government appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.

offsite link Twelve Reasons Why I Don?t Believe There?s a Climate Emergency Sat May 18, 2024 11:00 | Russell David
Russell David says he's not a scientist, but he has 12 reasons why he doesn?t trust the 'climate emergency' narrative, including that it seems to be a modern doomsday cult and all the scientists who dissent.
The post Twelve Reasons Why I Don’t Believe There’s a Climate Emergency appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.

offsite link The WHO Pandemic Treaty is Just Bad Public Health Sat May 18, 2024 09:00 | Dr David Bell
The WHO Pandemic Treaty isn't just a tool of globalist overreach, says Dr David Bell: with its myopic focus on rare, low-mortality outbreaks, it's also really bad public health.
The post The WHO Pandemic Treaty is Just Bad Public Health appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.

offsite link UN Author Says ?Cull? of Humanity is Only ?Realistic Way? to Avert Climate Catastrophe Sat May 18, 2024 07:00 | Chris Morrison
A "cull" of humanity with a high fatality pandemic is the only "realistic way" to avoid climate collapse, according to former UN contributing author Bill McGuire. Grisly green neo-Malthusianism is back.
The post UN Author Says “Cull” of Humanity is Only “Realistic Way” to Avert Climate Catastrophe appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.

Lockdown Skeptics >>

Voltaire Network
Voltaire, international edition

offsite link Voltaire, International Newsletter N°87 Sat May 18, 2024 05:29 | en

offsite link Europa Viva 2024 kowtows to the Straussians Sat May 18, 2024 03:01 | en

offsite link The world economic order is falling apart, by Alfredo Jalife-Rahme Fri May 17, 2024 08:13 | en

offsite link General Assembly supports Palestine's full membership in the United Nations Tue May 14, 2024 10:49 | en

offsite link Elections to the European Parliament: a costly masquerade, by Thierry Meyssan Tue May 14, 2024 07:04 | en

Voltaire Network >>

US "rendition" for torture illegal under UK law. Is it legal here?

category international | anti-war / imperialism | news report author Thursday January 19, 2006 15:14author by watcher Report this post to the editors

A few pertinent questions for the Irish government

Rendition of suspects by the US is illegal under UK law, according to a leaked document given to the New Statesman. The full document is at the last link below.

Some questions arise for the Irish government, civil service, Gardai and Irish army, who shamefully make us complicit in serious breaches of human rights law.

A) Why has the Government refused access to information on this subject under the Freedom of Information Act?

B) What has been the legal advice on US stopovers in Shannon given to the Irish government?

C) Minister for Foreign Affairs Ahern lied in the Dail on January 26th 2005 that the state was a party to any secret international agreement. Labour's Micheal D. Higgins later revealed two secret defence agreements:

1. The “Agreement concerning security measures for the protection of classified military information”. Signed at Dublin on the 31st January 2003, and entered into force on that date.

2. The “Acquisition and cross-servicing agreement, with annexes”, signed at Stuttgart-Vaihingen (US European Command HQ) and Dublin on the 26th and 27th February, 2004, entering into force on the later date.

What are nature of these agreements and why were they not laid before the democratic arm of the state, as is required by the Irish constitution?


More:

Secret payments for US landings, as reported by The Phoenix:
http://www.indymedia.ie/newswire.php?story_id=73809

Secret Irish Defence Agreements Linked to CIA Torture Revealed:
http://www.indymedia.ie/newswire.php?story_id=73761

Text of an ignored criminal complaint made about redition flights made at Shannon airport to Gardai on 2nd October 2004:

http://www.indymedia.ie/newswire.php?story_id=67865

Related Link: http://www.newstatesman.co.uk/rendition/rendition.htm
author by R. Isiblepublication date Thu Jan 19, 2006 18:57author address author phone Report this post to the editors

Including one conducted by the Occupation Authorities (who presumably didn't spin the poll so that they'd get the answer that the occupation was unpopular!) which showed that 82% of Iraqis disapproved of the troops and a CNN/Gallup poll which found that 57% of Iraqis wanted the troops out IMMEDIATELY. Do some reading around for yourself and stop just asking questions which you can find the answer to yourself.

Related Link: http://www.independent-media.tv/item.cfm?fmedia_id=7167&fcategory_desc=Iraq
author by robpublication date Thu Jan 19, 2006 15:58author address author phone Report this post to the editors

"according to recent authoritative opinion polls, wanted an end to the occupation."

What polls? and how was the question framed? for example did the respondents want and end to the occupation straight away or only after other variables are taken in to account?

author by None so blind as those that refuse to seepublication date Thu Jan 19, 2006 15:52author address author phone Report this post to the editors

Richard Boyd Barrett last night asked Dr Noam Chomsky if he would agree that, as a result, the Government was complicit with state terrorism, war crimes and breaches of international human rights. He also asked Dr Chomsky if he would endorse worldwide demonstrations on March 18th-19th for withdrawal of US-led forces from Iraq.

"The second one is easier to answer - yes." He said this would mean supporting "the overwhelming majority of the population of Iraq" which, according to recent authoritative opinion polls, wanted an end to the occupation.

On Shannon issue, he said: "I can only respond conditionally. I don't know the facts. But if what you say is correct, and if in fact even a part of it is correct, yes, that's participation in what was declared at Nuremberg to be 'the supreme international crime which encompasses within itself all of the evil that follows'. Participation in that is, yes, a crime. And from then on, it's your business."

author by painter not talkerpublication date Thu Jan 19, 2006 15:30author address author phone Report this post to the editors

Under international human rights law, the onus is on the government and Gardai to look for proof. They have not done this despite a number of criminal complaints. Diplomatic assurances are not enough on this one.

Shop or Just relax with friends
Shop or Just relax with friends

author by BRDpublication date Thu Jan 19, 2006 15:29author address author phone Report this post to the editors

Is the benchmark for a conviction in a court, not the criteria for starting an investigation.

It IS beyond reasonable doubt that: -

the same aircraft that have been involved in snatches and torture allegations around the world , have refuelled in Shannon.

that the aircraft are not carrying military nor diplomatic insignia

that the govt and the cops do not want to look inside.

author by justice 4 allpublication date Thu Jan 19, 2006 15:25author address author phone Report this post to the editors

Well where is the proof? Seeing a plane isnt proof... show me the prisoners... oh wait they arent there....

Beyond reasonable doubt people, familiarize yourselves with it

author by painter not talkerpublication date Thu Jan 19, 2006 15:23author address author phone Report this post to the editors

.

Nothing to see here just passing through
Nothing to see here just passing through

Number of comments per page
  
 
© 2001-2024 Independent Media Centre Ireland. Unless otherwise stated by the author, all content is free for non-commercial reuse, reprint, and rebroadcast, on the net and elsewhere. Opinions are those of the contributors and are not necessarily endorsed by Independent Media Centre Ireland. Disclaimer | Privacy