New Events

Dublin

no events posted in last week

Blog Feeds

Anti-Empire

Anti-Empire

offsite link North Korea Increases Aid to Russia, Mos... Tue Nov 19, 2024 12:29 | Marko Marjanovi?

offsite link Trump Assembles a War Cabinet Sat Nov 16, 2024 10:29 | Marko Marjanovi?

offsite link Slavgrinder Ramps Up Into Overdrive Tue Nov 12, 2024 10:29 | Marko Marjanovi?

offsite link ?Existential? Culling to Continue on Com... Mon Nov 11, 2024 10:28 | Marko Marjanovi?

offsite link US to Deploy Military Contractors to Ukr... Sun Nov 10, 2024 02:37 | Field Empty

Anti-Empire >>

The Saker

Indymedia ireland

Indymedia Ireland is a volunteer-run non-commercial open publishing website for local and international news, opinion & analysis, press releases and events. Its main objective is to enable the public to participate in reporting and analysis of the news and other important events and aspects of our daily lives and thereby give a voice to people.

offsite link Fraud and mismanagement at University College Cork Thu Aug 28, 2025 18:30 | Calli Morganite
UCC has paid huge sums to a criminal professor
This story is not for republication. I bear responsibility for the things I write. I have read the guidelines and understand that I must not write anything untrue, and I won't.
This is a public interest story about a complete failure of governance and management at UCC.

offsite link Deliberate Design Flaw In ChatGPT-5 Sun Aug 17, 2025 08:04 | Mind Agent
Socratic Dialog Between ChatGPT-5 and Mind Agent Reveals Fatal and Deliberate 'Design by Construction' Flaw
This design flaw in ChatGPT-5's default epistemic mode subverts what the much touted ChatGPT-5 can do... so long as the flaw is not tickled, any usage should be fine---The epistemological question is: how would anyone in the public, includes you reading this (since no one is all knowing), in an unfamiliar domain know whether or not the flaw has been tickled when seeking information or understanding of a domain without prior knowledge of that domain???!

This analysis is a pretty unique and significant contribution to the space of empirical evaluation of LLMs that exist in AI public world... at least thus far, as far as I am aware! For what it's worth--as if anyone in the ChatGPT universe cares as they pile up on using the "PhD level scholar in your pocket".

According to GPT-5, and according to my tests, this flaw exists in all LLMs... What is revealing is the deduction GPT-5 made: Why ?design choice? starts looking like ?deliberate flaw?.

People are paying $200 a month to not just ChatGPT, but all major LLMs have similar Pro pricing! I bet they, like the normal user of free ChatGPT, stay in LLM's default mode where the flaw manifests itself. As it did in this evaluation.

offsite link AI Reach: Gemini Reasoning Question of God Sat Aug 02, 2025 20:00 | Mind Agent
Evaluating Semantic Reasoning Capability of AI Chatbot on Ontologically Deep Abstract (bias neutral) Thought
I have been evaluating AI Chatbot agents for their epistemic limits over the past two months, and have tested all major AI Agents, ChatGPT, Grok, Claude, Perplexity, and DeepSeek, for their epistemic limits and their negative impact as information gate-keepers.... Today I decided to test for how AI could be the boon for humanity in other positive areas, such as in completely abstract realms, such as metaphysical thought. Meaning, I wanted to test the LLMs for Positives beyond what most researchers benchmark these for, or have expressed in the approx. 2500 Turing tests in Humanity?s Last Exam.. And I chose as my first candidate, Google DeepMind's Gemini as I had not evaluated it before on anything.

offsite link Israeli Human Rights Group B'Tselem finally Admits It is Genocide releasing Our Genocide report Fri Aug 01, 2025 23:54 | 1 of indy
We have all known it for over 2 years that it is a genocide in Gaza
Israeli human rights group B'Tselem has finally admitted what everyone else outside Israel has known for two years is that the Israeli state is carrying out a genocide in Gaza

Western governments like the USA are complicit in it as they have been supplying the huge bombs and missiles used by Israel and dropped on innocent civilians in Gaza. One phone call from the USA regime could have ended it at any point. However many other countries are complicity with their tacit approval and neighboring Arab countries have been pretty spinless too in their support

With the release of this report titled: Our Genocide -there is a good chance this will make it okay for more people within Israel itself to speak out and do something about it despite the fact that many there are actually in support of the Gaza

offsite link China?s CITY WIDE CASH SEIZURES Begin ? ATMs Frozen, Digital Yuan FORCED Overnight Wed Jul 30, 2025 21:40 | 1 of indy
This story is unverified but it is very instructive of what will happen when cash is removed
THIS STORY IS UNVERIFIED BUT PLEASE WATCH THE VIDEO OR READ THE TRANSCRIPT AS IT GIVES AN VERY GOOD IDEA OF WHAT A CASHLESS SOCIETY WILL LOOK LIKE. And it ain't pretty

A single video report has come out of China claiming China's biggest cities are now cashless, not by choice, but by force. The report goes on to claim ATMs have gone dark, vaults are being emptied. And overnight (July 20 into 21), the digital yuan is the only currency allowed.

The Saker >>

Public Inquiry
Interested in maladministration. Estd. 2005

offsite link RTEs Sarah McInerney ? Fianna Fail?supporter? Anthony

offsite link Joe Duffy is dishonest and untrustworthy Anthony

offsite link Robert Watt complaint: Time for decision by SIPO Anthony

offsite link RTE in breach of its own editorial principles Anthony

offsite link Waiting for SIPO Anthony

Public Inquiry >>

Human Rights in Ireland
Indymedia Ireland is a volunteer-run non-commercial open publishing website for local and international news, opinion & analysis, press releases and events. Its main objective is to enable the public to participate in reporting and analysis of the news and other important events and aspects of our daily lives and thereby give a voice to people.

offsite link Top Scientists Confirm Covid Shots Cause Heart Attacks in Children Sun Oct 05, 2025 20:31 | imc

offsite link Fraud and mismanagement at University College Cork Thu Aug 28, 2025 18:30 | Calli Morganite

offsite link Deliberate Design Flaw In ChatGPT-5 Sun Aug 17, 2025 08:04 | Mind Agent

offsite link AI Reach: Gemini Reasoning Question of God Sat Aug 02, 2025 20:00 | Mind Agent

offsite link Israeli Human Rights Group B'Tselem finally Admits It is Genocide releasing Our Genocide report Fri Aug 01, 2025 23:54 | 1 of indy

Human Rights in Ireland >>

Bin campaigners slam High Court Ruling, plan Appeal

category dublin | bin tax / household tax / water tax | press release author Wednesday January 21, 2004 14:19author by pat c Report this post to the editors

Bin campaigners slam High Court Ruling, plan Appeal

Dublin Campaign Against the Bin Tax has strongly criticised today?s High
Court decision in a case brought by three Finglas residents regarding the
fairness and legality of the imposition of bin charges. The case centred
around the ?polluter pays? principle and challenged the legality of the
imposition of a set bin charge which did not take account of the volume
of waste produced.

The High Court ruled that, although the Waste Management Plan required the
polluter pays principle to be implemented, the City Council does not have
to provide specific incentives to encourage householders to recycle or reduce
waste. Costs were also awarded against the three residents taking the case.


Joe Mooney, Secretary of the Campaign said:
"This High Court decision makes a mockery of the polluter pays principle,
it makes the nonsensical claim that although a provision is included in
the Waste Management Plan the Council has no legal obligation to actually
implement what is stated in it?s own Plan. We have constantly argued that
the imposition of a set fee by City Council actually discourages recycling.
Now the High Court has ruled that this unfair set fee is lawful and gives
the green light to City Council to further harass law abiding householders
who oppose unjust double taxation."

Cieran Perry, an activist with the Cabra Campaign, said:
"All our advice was that we had a very strong legal case, but it comes as
no surprise that the High Court decision should back up the City Council
and the Government position in support of bin charges.

In a previous case the High Court actually ruled in favour of Fingal bin
protestors, stating that the Council was legally obligated to collect all
bins regardless of whether charges had been paid. In 2003 the Dail rushed
through the "Protection of the Environment Act 2003", which permitted councils
to refuse to collect bins of non-payers. After going to all this trouble
to legalise their illegal double tax, it was very unlikely that the High
Court today would embarrass the government by delivering a second blow to
plans for ever increasing stealth taxes.

The Dublin Campaign Against the Bin Tax will be taking legal advice concerning
an appeal to the Supreme Court against High Courts decision."

Dublin Campaign Against the Bin Tax


21st January 2003

author by Dusty Binpublication date Wed Jan 21, 2004 16:19author address author phone Report this post to the editors

Will the Anti-Waste Charge campaign be dipping into its " war chest " to bail out the poor souls who were marched to the District Court in September 2002 and who insisted on stating a case to the High Court. On the subject of the High Court, the campaigners were delighted when the Court rightly ruled that all waste in Fingal, whether tagged or not, should be collected. One must presume that in stating the case to the High Court that they would have been equally delighted if the Court had found in their favour. But once the decision went against them, the High Court is the bad guy. Spokespersons from the campaign have no difficulty in slying impugning the integrity of the High Court when the Court decides on matters of fact and law (read the judgement). It is this selective, a la carte, approach to democracy that is pitiful. By the way, any chance of a receipt for my contribution at " mass meetings " to the war chest? How much has been collected? Who mananges the account? What is it spent on? How much is left?

author by pat cpublication date Wed Jan 21, 2004 16:47author address author phone Report this post to the editors

who pays you? FF or one of the councils? or are you a sick saddo who does this kind of trolling to get your kicks?

author by john mc dermott - Remove Fianna Fail Partypublication date Wed Jan 21, 2004 20:53author address ashtown,dublinauthor phone Report this post to the editors

This business of using rubbish collection as a "smokescreen" for more stealth taxation cannot be challenged in any court.If Bertie brought in a flat fee for farting for every flatulent figure in the land ,be he prince or pauper,there is not much you can do about it -is there?anyway he will just change the law,or the tax,and levy it elswhere..when the Mafia(Fianna Fail)make the laws...you will not win their game in any courtroom. because they write out all the rules themselves!

author by Confusedpublication date Thu Jan 22, 2004 10:36author address author phone Report this post to the editors

Why John if the Courts are such a waste of time and run by FF et al are you lot so eager to run to them time after time? Bad teams usually blame the referee.

author by Tom Luby - Republican SinnFéinpublication date Thu Jan 22, 2004 11:32author address author phone Report this post to the editors

RSF News - Bin Tag system criticised as insensitive



The introduction of a new bin tagging system in the south Dublin area has
been criticised as insensitive by the Tallaght branch of Republican SinnFéin today.

Residents received letters with their tags in the post this morning. Those
who are required to pay this double taxation received a yellow tag whilst
those in receipt of social welfare payments or on low income and who are
exempt from paying have received a large blue tag. This is in effect making
the private business of residents public by forcing those who are exempt
from paying to identify themselves to the council and in turn their neighbours
and friends.

This is totally insensitive to those who do not wish to make their financial
situation publicly known. We are now calling on the South Dublin County
Council to stop this practice as an interim measure until the bin tax is
finally scrapped. We would also call on residents to continue their non
payment protest until it reaches its successful conclusion.

Wolfe Tone Cumann
Tallaght

author by Class analysis manpublication date Thu Jan 22, 2004 15:47author address author phone Report this post to the editors

We will fight them in the estates
We will fight them in the council chambers
We will fight them in the courts.

Seriously though we have every right to be satisfied on the rare occasion a judge comes down on the side of the campaign's arguements in the courts.

We are similarly right to be dissatisfied with decisions that go against the campaign and disregard them if we can!

That's the class struggle. It's a subjective kind a thing. Dusty Bin may think it's an inconsistant approach but it ain't. It's consistant from the point of view of defending the interests of working class people!

author by john mc dermott - Remove Fianna Fail Partypublication date Thu Jan 22, 2004 22:20author email jmcd33 at eircom dot netauthor address Ashtown,dublinauthor phone Report this post to the editors

As is common knowledge,the Nazis began their discrimination campaign against german jews,by legislating for obligatory identification of jews,They were by law obliged to wear the Star of David emblem on their clothing.If the councils have this system on peoples rubbish bins,to identify their socio/economic standing in the community surely it is a gross invasion of privacy and will not stand a courtroom challenge ,even in Bertie,s courtroom.?This type of public discrimination must surely be against some kind of european norms/laws.Perhaps the campaign committee could investigatewhat our European Laws think of it?

author by confusedpublication date Fri Sep 01, 2006 21:37author address author phone Report this post to the editors

why did the other parties abstain from voting when this unjust tax was being put up for vote in the concil chambers by abstaining they let the people who are already paying for thier childrens free education, paying private companies for health cover because thier children will be left wating forever and a day to for treatment for which they have already paid thier taxes towards. one more question when the council bring out water charges for every householder which will happen when they have finished fitting water meters will the same parties abstain again

Number of comments per page
  
 
© 2001-2025 Independent Media Centre Ireland. Unless otherwise stated by the author, all content is free for non-commercial reuse, reprint, and rebroadcast, on the net and elsewhere. Opinions are those of the contributors and are not necessarily endorsed by Independent Media Centre Ireland. Disclaimer | Privacy