 North Korea Increases Aid to Russia, Mos... Tue Nov 19, 2024 12:29 | Marko Marjanovi?
Trump Assembles a War Cabinet Sat Nov 16, 2024 10:29 | Marko Marjanovi?
Slavgrinder Ramps Up Into Overdrive Tue Nov 12, 2024 10:29 | Marko Marjanovi?
?Existential? Culling to Continue on Com... Mon Nov 11, 2024 10:28 | Marko Marjanovi?
US to Deploy Military Contractors to Ukr... Sun Nov 10, 2024 02:37 | Field Empty Anti-Empire >>
Indymedia Ireland is a volunteer-run non-commercial open publishing website for local and international news, opinion & analysis, press releases and events. Its main objective is to enable the public to participate in reporting and analysis of the news and other important events and aspects of our daily lives and thereby give a voice to people.
Fraud and mismanagement at University College Cork Thu Aug 28, 2025 18:30 | Calli Morganite
UCC has paid huge sums to a criminal professor
This story is not for republication. I bear responsibility for the things I write. I have read the guidelines and understand that I must not write anything untrue, and I won't.
This is a public interest story about a complete failure of governance and management at UCC.
Deliberate Design Flaw In ChatGPT-5 Sun Aug 17, 2025 08:04 | Mind Agent
Socratic Dialog Between ChatGPT-5 and Mind Agent Reveals Fatal and Deliberate 'Design by Construction' Flaw
This design flaw in ChatGPT-5's default epistemic mode subverts what the much touted ChatGPT-5 can do... so long as the flaw is not tickled, any usage should be fine---The epistemological question is: how would anyone in the public, includes you reading this (since no one is all knowing), in an unfamiliar domain know whether or not the flaw has been tickled when seeking information or understanding of a domain without prior knowledge of that domain???!
This analysis is a pretty unique and significant contribution to the space of empirical evaluation of LLMs that exist in AI public world... at least thus far, as far as I am aware! For what it's worth--as if anyone in the ChatGPT universe cares as they pile up on using the "PhD level scholar in your pocket".
According to GPT-5, and according to my tests, this flaw exists in all LLMs... What is revealing is the deduction GPT-5 made: Why ?design choice? starts looking like ?deliberate flaw?.
People are paying $200 a month to not just ChatGPT, but all major LLMs have similar Pro pricing! I bet they, like the normal user of free ChatGPT, stay in LLM's default mode where the flaw manifests itself. As it did in this evaluation.
AI Reach: Gemini Reasoning Question of God Sat Aug 02, 2025 20:00 | Mind Agent
Evaluating Semantic Reasoning Capability of AI Chatbot on Ontologically Deep Abstract (bias neutral) Thought
I have been evaluating AI Chatbot agents for their epistemic limits over the past two months, and have tested all major AI Agents, ChatGPT, Grok, Claude, Perplexity, and DeepSeek, for their epistemic limits and their negative impact as information gate-keepers.... Today I decided to test for how AI could be the boon for humanity in other positive areas, such as in completely abstract realms, such as metaphysical thought. Meaning, I wanted to test the LLMs for Positives beyond what most researchers benchmark these for, or have expressed in the approx. 2500 Turing tests in Humanity?s Last Exam.. And I chose as my first candidate, Google DeepMind's Gemini as I had not evaluated it before on anything.
Israeli Human Rights Group B'Tselem finally Admits It is Genocide releasing Our Genocide report Fri Aug 01, 2025 23:54 | 1 of indy
We have all known it for over 2 years that it is a genocide in Gaza
Israeli human rights group B'Tselem has finally admitted what everyone else outside Israel has known for two years is that the Israeli state is carrying out a genocide in Gaza
Western governments like the USA are complicit in it as they have been supplying the huge bombs and missiles used by Israel and dropped on innocent civilians in Gaza. One phone call from the USA regime could have ended it at any point. However many other countries are complicity with their tacit approval and neighboring Arab countries have been pretty spinless too in their support
With the release of this report titled: Our Genocide -there is a good chance this will make it okay for more people within Israel itself to speak out and do something about it despite the fact that many there are actually in support of the Gaza
China?s CITY WIDE CASH SEIZURES Begin ? ATMs Frozen, Digital Yuan FORCED Overnight Wed Jul 30, 2025 21:40 | 1 of indy
This story is unverified but it is very instructive of what will happen when cash is removed
THIS STORY IS UNVERIFIED BUT PLEASE WATCH THE VIDEO OR READ THE TRANSCRIPT AS IT GIVES AN VERY GOOD IDEA OF WHAT A CASHLESS SOCIETY WILL LOOK LIKE. And it ain't pretty
A single video report has come out of China claiming China's biggest cities are now cashless, not by choice, but by force. The report goes on to claim ATMs have gone dark, vaults are being emptied. And overnight (July 20 into 21), the digital yuan is the only currency allowed. The Saker >>
Interested in maladministration. Estd. 2005
RTEs Sarah McInerney ? Fianna Fail?supporter? Anthony
Joe Duffy is dishonest and untrustworthy Anthony
Robert Watt complaint: Time for decision by SIPO Anthony
RTE in breach of its own editorial principles Anthony
Waiting for SIPO Anthony Public Inquiry >>
Parse failure for http://humanrights.ie/feed/. Last Retry Tuesday September 23, 2025 14:15
|
Cullen's propaganda, first the Bin Tax then Incineration
See the examiner story linked and pasted below for how incineration plants are "are earmarked for the south-east, Connacht, the north-east, Dublin, the midlands, and in the Limerick-Clare-Kerry region.", so not only in Cork and Meath then. Recycle me arse! not only do we have this punitive and unfair bin charge on the sector producing 15% of the waste, but the entirety of the waste will end up in smoke.
Indaver Ireland have already said that they intend to import waste from the north or abroad for the Cork plant, the Ringaskiddy port access is perfect for this. Will we see the same for the rest of the plants across the country?.
Certainly if waste is to be reduced private operators will need to find waste to make a profit, which goes completely against the principle of reduce, reuse, recycle. Cullen will probably save Dublin for last again, on incineration like the bin tax, so as to use the ridiculous "but sure we've already been (bin) payin it already" Dublin Vs the rest of the Country argument.
http://www.examiner.ie/pport/web/ireland/Full_Story/did-sgqiS1yakqYBEsg7OWirIStPSk.asp
and copied and pasted below
23/10/03
Cullen plans to fast-track building of incinerators
By Harry McGee
ENVIRONMENT Minister Martin Cullen plans to fast-track the construction of municipal waste incinerators around the country by the end of the Government’s term in 2007.
Mr Cullen aims to introduce the incinerators under the proposed National Infrastructure Board (NIB). Seven incinerators are planned under regional waste management strategies but those that have reached the planning stages have become bogged down in the planning process because of fierce local objections.
Department sources confirmed to the Irish Examiner yesterday that the minister’s view of Ireland’s growing waste management problem was “realistic” and that urgent action was need to replace municipal land-fills, most of which will have reached capacity by 2006.
In terms of where Ireland stood on waste-management in European terms, the source said: “We are in the relegation zone. We need to do something about it quickly.”
While remaining tight-lipped on the planned structure and functions of the NIB yesterday, the minister reiterated his view that emissions from thermal-treatment plans comprised less than 2% of dioxins in the atmosphere, a level that was less harmful than dioxins emitted by bonfires on Hallowe’en night.
Mr Cullen favours a limited number of high-tech thermal treatment facilities around the country.
So far, one municipal plant in Co Meath, run by private company Indaver, has received permission while another in Ringaskiddy is currently in the planning process.
Under the regional plans, further plants are earmarked for the south-east, Connacht, the north-east, Dublin, the midlands, and in the Limerick-Clare-Kerry region.
The minister was speaking at the launch of the Office of Environment Enforcement (OEE) yesterday and also promised that he would target the “quick-buck” merchants who flouted environmental laws.
The OEE, with 70 staff, will be a unit of the Environmental Protection Agency that will enforce waste and pollution control licences, supervise the environmental performances of local authorities and have power to prosecute for licence breaches and illegal dumping.
The 2003 Environment Act substantially increases the maximum fines of 15m for environmental pollution. Significantly, it also provides for a reversal of the burden of proof, leaving the defendant to prove that an activity did not cause environmental pollution.
Also, for the first time, landowners can be deemed to be complicit in illegal dumping on their land unless they can prove otherwise.
|
national |
bin tax / household tax / water tax |
news report
Thursday October 23, 2003 16:02
by Pax
printable version
Digg this
del.icio.us
Furl
Reddit
Technorati
Facebook
Gab
Twitter
View Comments Titles Only
save preference
Comments (7 of 7)
Jump To Comment: 7 6 5 4 3 2 1To Very Anonymous
Opposing incineration is of fundamental importance to the Greens (this is not the case with waste charges). We will do everything we possibly can to prevent it.
To Phuq Hedd
1. We must try to persuade the working class that our policies are just. By your definition most Greens are working class people.
2. Yes in the case of flat rate charges.
3. Campaign for a referendum on neutrality.
4. I'm sure that most Greens would be happy to sign such a contract. Who would be the judge of it though?
To another very amonymous person.
This is a point that many of us have been making for a very long time. This has led to enormous frustratation at the fact that many bin tax campaigners are unwilling to look at the waste issue as a whole.
Who wants to pay out hard cash if it can be avoided?
The Greens are not in Government and have nothing to gain politically from supporting any form of waste charges.
However, a point that many people seem to be missing is that if waste isn't properly managed that people can die.
I smell another corruption scandal here in this whole sorry saga. This bin tax is not about reducing waste nor is it anything to do with recycling.
There has been no levy on excessive packaging. Why, because the government need to ensure a steady stream of waste exists so as to make the new waste industry profitable and to ensure there is enough waste to supply the incinerators.
The recycling infrastructure is a sick sad joke. It is setup to fail. You can't have recycling and incineration at the same time, because they both bid for the same waste.
We know the waste business is already mired in corruption ala, the 80 or so illegal toxic waste dumps in Wicklow. Councillors and other officials have already been implicated in this.
The waste industry will be worth millions, so will the incinerators. It is beyond any shadow of doubt given the recent history of this country that there is NOT some kind of malpractice going on here.
....any Greens out there at all - have yis nuttin' to say?
QUESTION1: How do you propose to effect significant environmental change if you cannot persuade the working class [*] that the mechanisms that you propose are just?
* definition of working class: anyone that receives a wage in return for their labour (both physical and mental).
QUESTION2: Do you accept that the current implementation of the Bin Tax unjustly penalizes a section of the working-class because the tax is a fixed size which is a greater proportion of their income than of richer people?
QUESTION3: What does the Green Party propose to do in order to stop the ongoing violation of Ireland's neutrality?
QUESTION4: Given the long series of compromises on fundamental matters of principle that Green politicians have made when they've entered power (e.g. nuclear weapons in Germany) will Green politicians in Ireland sign a contract under which they can be recalled and expelled if they do not live up to election promises?
Time to make it a bit more interesting around here? I think so.
If a coherent and well thought out list of questions appears on this thread for The Greens on the subject of their attitude to the bin charges campaign and their plans to oppose incineration - I'll submit them to whoever is the environment spokesman for the Greens together with a link to this thread so they can see what the concerns of the 'audience' here are.
Perhaps we can begin conducting lots of interviews in this way - by e-mail and reply and publish the things unedited.
Readers/contributors will get their questions awnsered - activist 'faces' and left green anarko socialist republican politicians will get a platform to put their views into the public domain without the usual media editorial filters.
They can then get involved in dialogue if they want-
And of course it'll be interesting to see who enters into the spirit of open publishing and who does not.
What d'yiz think?
...to do about it? Niall of the Greens stated previously that they would try to be part of a government that categorically ruled out incineration. Since such a government couldn't be formed before 2007 if the Dail runs it full course - where does that leaves the greens given that these incinerators will be up an running by 2007? Direct Action? Court challanges? What strategy do they have to DEFEAT the imposition of incineration as opposed to taking the high moral ground of opposing incineration? Would like to see what they intend to do.
the bin tax protestors should look at making links with local anti-incinerator groups around the country. It is the same fight, and such links will do a lot to undermine the govt's attempts to cut across support for the campaign by pitting "dublin against the countryside".
As for the 2% claim, where does that figure come from, and would anyone care to refute with other data?