Concerrning coronavirus testing, vaccines and other important information 17:47 Jan 13 0 comments
Nazism, COVID-19 and the destruction of modern medicine: A Conversation with Vera Sharav 22:03 Nov 25 0 comments
Good news: Covid deaths are collapsing right across the globe 23:50 Oct 21 0 commentsmore >>
A bird's eye view of the vineyard
Hacking the human mind Wed Jan 20, 2021 11:31 | amarynth
America?s First Revolution Is Happening Now Wed Jan 20, 2021 08:55 | amarynth
Trump?s Opponents Succeeded With Their Government Coup (Ruslan Ostashko) Wed Jan 20, 2021 06:33 | Leo V.
Welcome to the ?New Woke USA?: Twerk on Washington! Tue Jan 19, 2021 22:31 | The Saker
Moveable Feast Cafe 2021/01/19 ? Open Thread Tue Jan 19, 2021 21:30 | Herb Swanson
Interested in maladministration. Estd. 2005
A Woulfe in judges clothing Anthony
A Blog About Human Rights
Poor Living Conditions for Migrants in Southern Italy Mon Jan 18, 2021 10:14 | Human Rights
Right to Water Mon Aug 03, 2020 19:13 | Human Rights
Human Rights Fri Mar 20, 2020 16:33 | Human Rights
Turkish President Calls On Greece To Comply With Human Rights on Syrian Refugee Issues Wed Mar 04, 2020 17:58 | Human Rights
US Holds China To Account For Human Rights Violations Sun Oct 13, 2019 19:12 | Human Rights
The Party and the Ballot Box Sun Jul 14, 2019 22:24 | Gavin Mendel-Gleason
On The Decline and Fall of The American Empire and Socialism Sat Jan 26, 2019 01:52 | S. Duncan
What is Dogmatism and Why Does It Matter? Wed Mar 21, 2018 08:10 | Sylvia Smith
The Case of Comrade Dallas Mon Mar 19, 2018 19:44 | Sylvia Smith
Review: Do Religions Evolve? Mon Aug 14, 2017 19:54 | Dara McHugh
Slovakia With a “Voluntary” Mass Testing Scheme, But If You Don’t “Volunteer” You Can’t Work, Enter Shops, or Go Outside
international | rights, freedoms and repression | news report Saturday December 05, 2020 19:53 by Pol Pot
Totally voluntary except for the threatened house arrest without trial part
The idea is that a negative test result exempts people from the curfew imposed this week and allows them to enter shops, provided they show the result.
“This will be a significant step for all of Slovakia on how we can win the fight against COVID-19,” Matovič said, describing the approach as an alternative to a hard lockdown.
“It means we don’t have to kill the economy,” he said. “This is a smarter solution.”
It was the first such mass testing project carried out by a country of Slovakia’s size. Other nations will be watching to see if this strategy can be effective in slowing the spread of the virus and limiting its economic damage.
Slovakia has seen the number of daily infections and COVID-19-related deaths soar in the past months, after being largely spared in the first wave. [I.e the virus is going to do what the virus is going to do, but on its own schedule, in a flu season of its picking.]
Infection rates began to rise rapidly in August and September, with thousands of new infections detected daily, reaching a high of 3,363 on October 29. As of Sunday, when Slovak labs detected 1,883 positives, the country had recorded 61,826 COVID-19 infections and 219 deaths attributed to the virus.
More than one-quarter of the total number of infections and deaths were recorded over the week of October 25 to 31.
Some 40,000 medics, soldiers, firefighters, police, local administrative employees and volunteers helped carry out the testing, which was performed at about 5,000 sites around the country. The tests were free and voluntary, but those who refused to be tested will have to self-isolate for 10 days in their homes.
Matovič went on Facebook late Sunday to thank those who took part in the project, writing: “You did it and without you this little big miracle could not have succeeded.”
In the run-up, the project had some prominent detractors, including President Zuzana Čaputovį, who asked to have the testing delayed because of a lack of medical staff. However, on Sunday she took to Facebook to call the project a success.
Others questioned the decision to use the antigen swab test, which has had its accuracy questioned by studies in The Lancet and elsewhere. Some infectious-disease experts had warned that the project was a risky public health decision and could undermine public trust in measures to control the pandemic.