New health group calls for Nphet to be disbanded 10:00 Nov 16 1 comments
Medical Journals Refuse To Publish Landmark Danish Mask Study 21:36 Oct 23 1 comments
Draconian Restrictions around Covid-19 condemned by HSE Doctor. 19:43 Sep 12 0 commentsmore >>
A bird's eye view of the vineyard
Pennsylvania State Legislature Holds Public Hearing on 2020 election Thu Nov 26, 2020 01:09 | The Saker
Trump?s last hurrah?! Wed Nov 25, 2020 22:45 | The Saker
Why Did RT Hire Liberals That Are Bringing Harm to Russia? (Ruslan Ostashko) Wed Nov 25, 2020 17:55 | Leo V.
China Newsbrief and Sitrep Wed Nov 25, 2020 11:54 | amarynth
Moveable Feast Cafe 2020/11/25 ? Open Thread Wed Nov 25, 2020 05:30 | Herb Swanson
Interested in maladministration. Estd. 2005
A Woulfe in judges clothing Anthony
Irish Examiner bias Anthony
The Party and the Ballot Box Sun Jul 14, 2019 22:24 | Gavin Mendel-Gleason
On The Decline and Fall of The American Empire and Socialism Sat Jan 26, 2019 01:52 | S. Duncan
What is Dogmatism and Why Does It Matter? Wed Mar 21, 2018 08:10 | Sylvia Smith
The Case of Comrade Dallas Mon Mar 19, 2018 19:44 | Sylvia Smith
Review: Do Religions Evolve? Mon Aug 14, 2017 19:54 | Dara McHugh
Portuguese Court Rules PCR Tests As Unreliable & Unlawful To Quarantine People
international | health / disability issues | news report Friday November 20, 2020 22:11 by 1 of indy
This case concerned the fact that four people had been quarantined by the Regional Health Authority. Of these, one had tested positive for COVID using a PCR test; the other three were deemed to have undergone a high risk of exposure.
Consequently, the Regional Health Authority decided that all four were infectious and a health hazard, which required that they go into isolation.
The https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=&sl=pt&tl=en&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.dgsi.pt%2Fjtrl.nsf%2F33182fc732316039802565fa00497eec%2F79d6ba338dcbe5e28025861f003e7b30 of the case to rule against the Regional Health Authority’s appeal reads as follows:
Given how much scientific doubt exists — as voiced by experts, i.e., those who matter — about the reliability of the PCR tests, given the lack of information concerning the tests’ analytical parameters, and in the absence of a physician’s diagnosis supporting the existence of infection or risk, there is no way this court would ever be able to determine whether C was indeed a carrier of the SARS-CoV-2 virus, or whether A, B and D had been at a high risk of exposure to it.
It is also important to remember PCR was invented as a way to create copies of genetic material. Its was never intended to be a diagnostic tool.
The standard coronavirus tests are throwing up a huge number of positive cases daily. These tests are done based on faulty WHO protocols which are designed to include false positives cases as well.
This fact about false positives of PCR Tests was first noted in public by Dr. Beda M. Stadler, a Swiss biologist, emeritus professor, and former director of the Institute of Immunology at the University of Bern.
So if we do a PCR corona test on an immune person, it is not a virus that is detected, but a small shattered part of the viral genome. The test comes back positive for as long as there are tiny shattered parts of the virus left. Correct: Even if the infectious viruses are long dead, a corona test can come back positive, because the PCR method multiplies even a tiny fraction of the viral genetic material enough [to be detected].
Earlier, the WHO’s testing protocol was even questioned by Finland’s national health authority.
Read the full article at https://greatgameindia.com/portuguese-court-pcr-tests-unreliable/