North Korea Increases Aid to Russia, Mos... Tue Nov 19, 2024 12:29 | Marko Marjanovi?
Trump Assembles a War Cabinet Sat Nov 16, 2024 10:29 | Marko Marjanovi?
Slavgrinder Ramps Up Into Overdrive Tue Nov 12, 2024 10:29 | Marko Marjanovi?
?Existential? Culling to Continue on Com... Mon Nov 11, 2024 10:28 | Marko Marjanovi?
US to Deploy Military Contractors to Ukr... Sun Nov 10, 2024 02:37 | Field Empty
Anti-Empire >>
Indymedia Ireland is a volunteer-run non-commercial open publishing website for local and international news, opinion & analysis, press releases and events. Its main objective is to enable the public to participate in reporting and analysis of the news and other important events and aspects of our daily lives and thereby give a voice to people.
Fraud and mismanagement at University College Cork Thu Aug 28, 2025 18:30 | Calli Morganite
UCC has paid huge sums to a criminal professor
This story is not for republication. I bear responsibility for the things I write. I have read the guidelines and understand that I must not write anything untrue, and I won't.
This is a public interest story about a complete failure of governance and management at UCC.
Deliberate Design Flaw In ChatGPT-5 Sun Aug 17, 2025 08:04 | Mind Agent
Socratic Dialog Between ChatGPT-5 and Mind Agent Reveals Fatal and Deliberate 'Design by Construction' Flaw
This design flaw in ChatGPT-5's default epistemic mode subverts what the much touted ChatGPT-5 can do... so long as the flaw is not tickled, any usage should be fine---The epistemological question is: how would anyone in the public, includes you reading this (since no one is all knowing), in an unfamiliar domain know whether or not the flaw has been tickled when seeking information or understanding of a domain without prior knowledge of that domain???!
This analysis is a pretty unique and significant contribution to the space of empirical evaluation of LLMs that exist in AI public world... at least thus far, as far as I am aware! For what it's worth--as if anyone in the ChatGPT universe cares as they pile up on using the "PhD level scholar in your pocket".
According to GPT-5, and according to my tests, this flaw exists in all LLMs... What is revealing is the deduction GPT-5 made: Why ?design choice? starts looking like ?deliberate flaw?.
People are paying $200 a month to not just ChatGPT, but all major LLMs have similar Pro pricing! I bet they, like the normal user of free ChatGPT, stay in LLM's default mode where the flaw manifests itself. As it did in this evaluation.
AI Reach: Gemini Reasoning Question of God Sat Aug 02, 2025 20:00 | Mind Agent
Evaluating Semantic Reasoning Capability of AI Chatbot on Ontologically Deep Abstract (bias neutral) Thought
I have been evaluating AI Chatbot agents for their epistemic limits over the past two months, and have tested all major AI Agents, ChatGPT, Grok, Claude, Perplexity, and DeepSeek, for their epistemic limits and their negative impact as information gate-keepers.... Today I decided to test for how AI could be the boon for humanity in other positive areas, such as in completely abstract realms, such as metaphysical thought. Meaning, I wanted to test the LLMs for Positives beyond what most researchers benchmark these for, or have expressed in the approx. 2500 Turing tests in Humanity?s Last Exam.. And I chose as my first candidate, Google DeepMind's Gemini as I had not evaluated it before on anything.
Israeli Human Rights Group B'Tselem finally Admits It is Genocide releasing Our Genocide report Fri Aug 01, 2025 23:54 | 1 of indy
We have all known it for over 2 years that it is a genocide in Gaza
Israeli human rights group B'Tselem has finally admitted what everyone else outside Israel has known for two years is that the Israeli state is carrying out a genocide in Gaza
Western governments like the USA are complicit in it as they have been supplying the huge bombs and missiles used by Israel and dropped on innocent civilians in Gaza. One phone call from the USA regime could have ended it at any point. However many other countries are complicity with their tacit approval and neighboring Arab countries have been pretty spinless too in their support
With the release of this report titled: Our Genocide -there is a good chance this will make it okay for more people within Israel itself to speak out and do something about it despite the fact that many there are actually in support of the Gaza
China?s CITY WIDE CASH SEIZURES Begin ? ATMs Frozen, Digital Yuan FORCED Overnight Wed Jul 30, 2025 21:40 | 1 of indy
This story is unverified but it is very instructive of what will happen when cash is removed
THIS STORY IS UNVERIFIED BUT PLEASE WATCH THE VIDEO OR READ THE TRANSCRIPT AS IT GIVES AN VERY GOOD IDEA OF WHAT A CASHLESS SOCIETY WILL LOOK LIKE. And it ain't pretty
A single video report has come out of China claiming China's biggest cities are now cashless, not by choice, but by force. The report goes on to claim ATMs have gone dark, vaults are being emptied. And overnight (July 20 into 21), the digital yuan is the only currency allowed.
The Saker >>
Richard Dawkins: ?Trans Women Are Women? Slogan is Scientifically False Thu Sep 25, 2025 11:17 | Will Jones
The slogan 'trans women are women' is scientifically false and harms the rights of women,?Richard Dawkins?has said in a new book warning that scientific truth must prevail over "personal feelings".
The post Richard Dawkins: ‘Trans Women Are Women’ Slogan is Scientifically False appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
A New Definition of Freedom of Speech: An Unsackable Late Night Host Thu Sep 25, 2025 09:00 | James Alexander
From liberal America, the people who brought you Covid and climate censorship and the assassination of Charlie Kirk, we have a new definition of free speech: the unsackable late night host, says Prof James Alexander.
The post A New Definition of Freedom of Speech: An Unsackable Late Night Host appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
How Quakers Are Funding Open Borders Thu Sep 25, 2025 07:00 | Charlotte Gill
Quaker foundations pour millions into organisations promoting open borders, interfering in our democracy and undermining voters' clear wish for security. Charlotte Gill investigates.
The post How Quakers Are Funding Open Borders appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
News Round-Up Thu Sep 25, 2025 00:46 | Richard Eldred
A summary of the most interesting stories in the past 24 hours that challenge the prevailing orthodoxy about the ?climate emergency?, public health ?crises? and the supposed moral defects of Western civilisation.
The post News Round-Up appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
?Serious Safety Concerns? as Trans Criminals Remain in Women?s Prison Despite Supreme Court Ruling Wed Sep 24, 2025 19:00 | Will Jones
Male trans criminals are still being held in a women's prison despite the Supreme Court ruling that sexes must be segregated, with the independent monitor reporting serious safety and welfare concerns.
The post “Serious Safety Concerns” as Trans Criminals Remain in Women’s Prison Despite Supreme Court Ruling appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
Lockdown Skeptics >>
Voltaire, international edition
Will intergovernmental institutions withstand the end of the "American Empire"?,... Sat Apr 05, 2025 07:15 | en
Voltaire, International Newsletter N?127 Sat Apr 05, 2025 06:38 | en
Disintegration of Western democracy begins in France Sat Apr 05, 2025 06:00 | en
Voltaire, International Newsletter N?126 Fri Mar 28, 2025 11:39 | en
The International Conference on Combating Anti-Semitism by Amichai Chikli and Na... Fri Mar 28, 2025 11:31 | en
Voltaire Network >>
View Comments Titles Only
save preference
Comments (10 of 10)
Jump To Comment: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10http://www.democracynow.org/2016/1/19/photographing_dro...peace
Your letter is self-explanatory and nicely composed. To me that should be as effective as any peaceful protest. Thanks for sharing the letter.
Not the specific act (HOW she violated the court order) but that she DID violate the court order.
The problem is, when you are, for example, out on bail, in this case pending appeal on an earlier case, the court CAN impose conditions for while you are out on bail, and these can forbid you to do things that you would ordinarily be allowed to do.
So the reality here is that she was sent to jail for violating an "abuse prevention order" requiring her to keep a certain distance from named persons and places.
I don't know enough details about the case to know if "did not know" a valid defense against violating the order. Having gotten too close accidentally (defense = did not know the person was there) is sometimes a defense and sometimes not, depending on how reasonable that the named person be there. So ........ (some examples)
a) Ordered to stay away from a girl who was below age 21 ------ went into a bar and she was present.
In this case the "accident" defense would almost certainly be accepted because she could be expected NOT to be in a bar because underage for drinking.
b) Ordered to stay away from a person --- went to that person's place of employment, argued that encounter accidental because did not know the person had come in that day or was absent work. Not a snowball's chance in Hell. You have to stay away from anywhere that person could reasonably be expected to be. If a neutral place and that person shows up, you have to leave, cannot argue "but I was there first".
I have seen examples of much more severe conditions imposed by courts as a condition of an activist out during appeal. Like take part in NO actions (however lawful the action might be).
But please do understand something. The essence of civil disobedience is that what you are doing is NOT lawful. If your protest action is staying strictly within the law, that would be civil obedience.
BTW, the essence of her defense was an attempt to alter the meaning of a court imposed ABO. Yes, these are very frequently imposed when there is a threat of violence. Domestic abuse cases, assault and battery cases, and in pretty much any criminal case, to stay distance away form any potential witness. The defense argument here that this common purpose meant she could ignore when a non-violent purpose. I think I already explained the "accident" part of her defense. When ABO's are involved, there is a high burden on the one restricted not to violate. So not likely to fly "was careless, not paying attention, accidentally stepped over the line". But "I was safely back far enough, but somebody behind me gave me a mighty shove" probably would be (if believed that the person shoving wasn't "helping")
What a load of rubbish you can write Mike. Even when what you throw in some half truths.
Mary Anne was found guilty of violating a "protection order", issued in 2012, NOT on foot of domestic violence or of any violence or threat of violence whatever, but on foot of a non-violent protest against killing drones, at Hancock Air Base near Syracuse New York. This base "pilots" unmanned drones that kill people in Afghanistan and trains the technicians who operate the drones.
The person who was being "protected" against her non-violent protest was none other than the Commander of the Drone Base, Colonel Earl Evans!
She obeyed the order but the following year photographed other non-violent protestors engaging in similar civil disobedience at the same base. It was for this she was sent to jail.
So you can try to transform her brave non-violence into legal jargon as the courts do. You cannot deny that she has been jailed, outrageously, for a non-violent action.
You are perhaps imagining that I am against civil disobedience? (or that I never take part in CD actions myself?)
You can indeed be sent to jail for non-violent civil disobedience. It is the essence of civil DISobedience that it is unlawful. It is the essence of civil disobedience that it is non-violent. If violent would be UNcivil disobedience.
But she was not (in this case) being sent to jail for civil disobedience at all but for violating a court order that was a condition of remaining out of jail pending appeal. It doesn't matter particularly that the act by which she committed the contempt of court was one of civil disobedience. IF you want to be out of jail pending appeal you might be required to agree not to do all sorts of things, some of which otherwise perfectly legal. You are NOT required to accept those condition, you can instead agree to remain in jail pending the appeal.
It is also common for us activists doing CD to accept those terms but violate them by continuing to do the forbidden activity (if we instead stayed in jail couldn't do the activity).
But b*tching and moaning about it? Getting jailed is part and parcel of being a CD activist. Though SOMETIMES you get away with it (for example, look up "Lovejoy's War" --- Sam Lovejoy did NOT end up going to jail! But I assure you, when he cut the guy wires and sent that 500' weather monitoring tower cashing to the ground he expected to, accepted being jailed.
Where I am (same area as Sam) we are now fighting a fracked gas pipeline. Still in the paper blockade stage of the fight, but if they get past that, then we will be doing other things, some of us CD actions that could get us jailed. Those who will do that if the need comes will be accepting the possibility of being jailed. Others of us might do violence to property hoping not to get caught, or like Sam, doing it and turning ourselves in, in either case accepting that we might end up in jail.
But I hope none of us do any of those things and then b*tch and moan (if and when we are arrested) "but I wasn't being violent to persons".
Mike It's not like the non-violent activists whom I know to criticise fellow activists who don't follow their own exact pattern of behaviour or to accuse them of moaning and bitching for putting the State on strict proof of the legality of its own actions against them.
Good for you if you have joined the non-violent activist brigade.
When you go to jail as you think you might I will be more interested in your comments.
I realize that this is hard for most Europeans (except perhaps the Swiss) to understand, but the US is a federal republic with some pretty strict divisions of powers and responsibilities between the federal government (government of the US) and the governments of the individual states.
That letter SHOULD have been sent to Andrew Cuomo (the governor of New York). He is the "executive" with the power to intervene, able to issue a "get out of jail" card. Not, for example, Obama, because she isn't being jailed by the feds but by a state court.
The only time you might ask the federal government to interne is when you think a (federal) Constitutional right involved. You would then address your complaint to one of the Supreme Court justices (or all of them; but since their politics differs, common to pick one you think would give sympathetic attention to the matter). It would be the 5th and 6th Amendments you would try to apply to this case. Don't think you'd have much luck. About the INITIAL matter, yes, and in fact part of what the appeal was about (excessive sentence). But if to be out of jail pending appeal having been convicted for X, "meanwhile, can't do X" is so a standard a stipulated condition that I can't easily imagine* a situation where it would not be.,
(*) OK, there is one. SOMETIMES there is an appeal because after conviction something comes to light making it rather clear the conviction was wrong. Now the person can't really be freed without the formal proceedings (appeals court orders new trial which then reverses the decision of the first). But minimal conditions might be imposed on that person to be out of jail awaiting completion of that process.
PS: I actually think the charge "contempt of court" is one of the most aptly named. Isn't contempt often exactly what we feel
PSS: I again recommend "Lovejoy's War". As long as you understand that so favorable an outcome for the activist is VERY unusual. Took the combination of a sympathetic judge allowing a necessity defense AND local feeling strong enough to bring "jury sovereignty" into play.
.. about the redirection of the letter to Governor Cuomo I tried same but there's no way to send him a message if you are not in the US. Maybe you could send him a copy?
Not that anyone would expect a result any more than one would from the US Ambassador here (there was none). But they are reminded of what is happening in their name and the action of Mary Anne and others is kept in the news.
We had our own success story here in Ireland. At the start of the Iraq war, the Pitstop Ploughshares [Deirdre Clancy, Nuin Dunlop, Karen Fallon, Damien Moran and Ciaron O'Reilly] after a marathon run of court appearances were found not guilty of damaging a US warplane in Shannon without due cause although the damage was deemed to be in millions of euro. Similarly, Mary Kelly was acquitted on a similar charge. Mary Anne attended most of the court appearances. So you see she deserves reciprocal support as well as the more fundamental support of human rights activists.
Good luck with your non-violent activism.
Amnesty International has a policy of asking its supporters to send goodwill messages to prisoners of conscience, so Justin's letter to the US ambassador about a hard-done-by activist follows a good tradition. Justin refers to Ciaron O'Reilly of pitstop ploughshares and the Catholic Worker. I hope Ciaron, a friend of Ireland, is in good form these days, presumably in Australia.
On 7 March Mary Anne was released on bail pending appeal.
On 26 Feruary she had written of her mother's serious illness and the fact that she had been granted a visit to her at home.
She wrote about that visit: "I walked, shackled, wrists to waist and ankles, to be at mom’s side, leaning over her to kiss her big smiling face. I told her over and over that I loved her, my tears wetting her soft cheeks. I asked if she was in any pain. 'No, I’m not in pain. I’m o.k.' She kept smiling and fell asleep"
Even in the midst of the dark fog of injustice you will always find someone who tries to light a candle and perform a deed of mercy.