New Events

International

no events posted in last week

User Preferences

  • Language - en | ga
  • text size >>
  • make this your indymedia front page make this your indymedia front page

Blog Feeds

forward

Public Inquiry
Just another WordPress site

offsite link Martin Mansergh: Chronically deluded

offsite link Sean Haughey’s double-speak: His corrupt father would be proud Anthony

offsite link Fianna Fail: Still operating in a fog of delusion Anthony

offsite link Irish citizens – going radical Anthony

offsite link Love owns marriage – everything else is peripheral Anthony

Public Inquiry >>

The Saker
A bird's eye view of the vineyard

offsite link THIS BLOG HAS MOVED TO A NEW LOCATION VINEYARDSAKER:

offsite link Good news out of Russia - even the "non-system" opposition refuses to blame the Kremlin VINEYARDSAKER:

offsite link Nemtsov murder: Putin warned about exactly this type of "false flag" two years ago VINEYARDSAKER:

offsite link DPR PM Zakharchenko presser 27/02/15 Economical and political future of DPR VINEYARDSAKER:

offsite link Breaking news: FALSE FLAG IN MOSCOW! VINEYARDSAKER:

The Saker >>

Human Rights in Ireland
www.humanrights.ie

offsite link Business Said Yes! To Marriage Equality ? But Will the Circle be Widened? Fri May 29, 2015 14:21 | Charles O'Mahony

offsite link Human Rights and Social Movements: the Right2Water case Fri May 22, 2015 12:13 | Ntina Tzouvala

offsite link The Embodied Subject: Northern/Irish Feminist Judgments Project Thu May 21, 2015 13:47 | Aoife O'Donoghue

offsite link O?Conaill on the ?Logic? of ?No? #marref Thu May 21, 2015 10:17 | GuestPost

offsite link ACJRD Criminal Justice Essay Competition 2015 Thu May 21, 2015 09:00 | Yvonne Daly

Human Rights in Ireland >>

Cedar Lounge
For lefties too stubborn to quit

offsite link Someone in government says something about the not being allowed to mention something controversy?bu... 19:01 Fri May 29, 2015 | WorldbyStorm

offsite link Creationism? 15:29 Fri May 29, 2015 | WorldbyStorm

offsite link A deafening silence from Government TDs on the something someone said that someone else doesn?t want... 13:36 Fri May 29, 2015 | WorldbyStorm

offsite link Meanwhile, back in the North? 11:31 Fri May 29, 2015 | WorldbyStorm

offsite link Tipperary and the next election 07:03 Fri May 29, 2015 | irishelectionliterature

Cedar Lounge >>

Chomsky's response to UN's 'Global Crime Against Humanity' and my reply.

category international | rights, freedoms and repression | opinion/analysis author Tuesday January 14, 2014 07:52author by Anthony Ravlich - Human Rights Council (New Zealand) Report this post to the editors

A Great World can be achieved by Great States ensuring global ethical human rights.

Noam Chomsky's response to UN's 'Global Crime Against Humanity' which is described in my recent article, 'A Great World can be achieved by Great States ensuring global ethical human rights'. It also contains my reply.

Chomsky’s response to UN’s ‘Global Crime Against Humanity’ and my reply.

Anthony Ravlich
Chairperson
Human Rights Council (New Zealand)
10D/15 City Rd.,
Auckland City.
Ph: (0064) (09) 940 9658
www.hrc2001.org.nz

Noam Chomsky’s response to UN’s ‘Global Crime Against Humanity’ described in my article, ‘A Great World can be achieved by Great States ensuring global ethical human rights’, see links, http://www.indybay.org/newsitems/2014/01/08/18748916.php or http://www.indymedia.org.nz/articles/1848 .

Noam Chomsky stated:

“You’re right about the terrible failure to uphold the UD, but one can’t put the blame on the UN. It cannot act on the matter. That is the responsibility of its members, who may accept the UD in words, but not in deeds. And sometimes not even in words. Thus the US rejects 1/3 of the UD – on social-economic rights – and dismisses another third – cultural/community rights” (email, today, 14 Jan 2014).

My reply to Noam Chomsky (via email, today, 14 Jan 2014):

Anthony Ravlich. “I have been trying to get the UN to tell people about the ethical approach to human rights, development and globalization (to replace neoliberal absolutism) since it was first outlined in my book in 2008.
Is the UN bureaucracy so helpless that they couldn’t even include ethical human rights, development and globalization in the public notices of major newspapers (I did it twice in NZ)?
And should they be so helpless in the face of member States who often have a vested interest in maintaining the status quo devoid of dissent by human rights defenders?
After all the ethical approach retains the universality of the UDHR and consequently is a far more authentic reflection of the declaration than when, as at present, the UDHR is made compatible with IMF polices which seriously negates many (and eventually all, in my view) of the individual rights the declaration is meant to uphold.
In addition, about 3m ago I asked Helen Clark, Head UNDP, directly in a packed auditorium at Auckland University why the UN says nothing about the ethical approach and she politically side-stepped my question – shouldn’t the UN bureaucracy have a duty to inform the public of important human rights truths rather than stand in the path of human rights development?”

Related Link: http://www.hrc2001.org.nz
© 2001-2015 Independent Media Centre Ireland. Unless otherwise stated by the author, all content is free for non-commercial reuse, reprint, and rebroadcast, on the net and elsewhere. Opinions are those of the contributors and are not necessarily endorsed by Independent Media Centre Ireland. Disclaimer | Privacy