New Events


no events posted in last week

User Preferences

  • Language - en | ga
  • text size >>
  • make this your indymedia front page make this your indymedia front page

Blog Feeds

Public Inquiry
Interested in maladministration. Estd. 2005

offsite link Hell at the Gates: A propaganda exercise

offsite link Breaking: New minister for investigative judges to be appointed Anthony

offsite link Michael O’Regan: A ‘surface’ journalist Anthony

offsite link Brendan Howlin: A political leprechaun Anthony

offsite link Irish media should be fighting gagging law Anthony

Public Inquiry >>

The Saker
A bird's eye view of the vineyard

offsite link CrossTalk: The Great Debate Fri Oct 21, 2016 21:59 | The Saker

offsite link Battle for Mosul: Challenges of Reluctant Allies Fri Oct 21, 2016 21:48 | The Saker

offsite link Questions about ?Babushka security? and tons of answers, all of them wrong Fri Oct 21, 2016 17:13 | The Saker
I just watched a video for a neighbor of Motorola who explains that Motorola had no real protection, that it was easy to enter his building, that it was easy

offsite link Syrian War Report ? October 21, 2016: Major Militant Stronghold near Damascus Surrenders to Govt For... Fri Oct 21, 2016 16:15 | The Saker

offsite link Syria & Iraq War Report ? October 20, 2016: Russia-made TOS-1A Heavy Flamethrower Systems in Battle ... Fri Oct 21, 2016 15:52 | The Saker

The Saker >>

Human Rights in Ireland

offsite link Benefit Sanctions and Coercion Within the Irish Welfare System Thu Sep 22, 2016 13:38 | Cliodhna Murphy

offsite link The rights of the unborn: a troubling decision from the High Court? Wed Aug 10, 2016 12:42 | Mirad Enright

offsite link Progress Report on the Northern/Irish Feminist Judgments Project. Mon Jul 11, 2016 13:40 | admin

offsite link The UN and the Eighth Amendment Thu Jun 23, 2016 09:46 | admin

offsite link Call for Papers: State Accountability for Vulnerability Mon Jun 20, 2016 12:29 | admin

Human Rights in Ireland >>

Cedar Lounge
For lefties too stubborn to quit

offsite link ?Clogged up? ports 15:15 Fri Oct 21, 2016 | WorldbyStorm

offsite link Moderates and liberals 12:15 Fri Oct 21, 2016 | WorldbyStorm

offsite link UK left in pieces? Well? 12:15 Fri Oct 21, 2016 | WorldbyStorm

offsite link Rally for Justice! Tomorrow 12:05 Fri Oct 21, 2016 | irishelectionliterature

offsite link Fairness in Dil speaking time? 11:15 Fri Oct 21, 2016 | WorldbyStorm

Cedar Lounge >>

Chomsky's response to UN's 'Global Crime Against Humanity' and my reply.

category international | rights, freedoms and repression | opinion/analysis author Tuesday January 14, 2014 07:52author by Anthony Ravlich - Human Rights Council (New Zealand) Report this post to the editors

A Great World can be achieved by Great States ensuring global ethical human rights.

Noam Chomsky's response to UN's 'Global Crime Against Humanity' which is described in my recent article, 'A Great World can be achieved by Great States ensuring global ethical human rights'. It also contains my reply.

Chomskys response to UNs Global Crime Against Humanity and my reply.

Anthony Ravlich
Human Rights Council (New Zealand)
10D/15 City Rd.,
Auckland City.
Ph: (0064) (09) 940 9658

Noam Chomskys response to UNs Global Crime Against Humanity described in my article, A Great World can be achieved by Great States ensuring global ethical human rights, see links, or .

Noam Chomsky stated:

Youre right about the terrible failure to uphold the UD, but one cant put the blame on the UN. It cannot act on the matter. That is the responsibility of its members, who may accept the UD in words, but not in deeds. And sometimes not even in words. Thus the US rejects 1/3 of the UD on social-economic rights and dismisses another third cultural/community rights (email, today, 14 Jan 2014).

My reply to Noam Chomsky (via email, today, 14 Jan 2014):

Anthony Ravlich. I have been trying to get the UN to tell people about the ethical approach to human rights, development and globalization (to replace neoliberal absolutism) since it was first outlined in my book in 2008.
Is the UN bureaucracy so helpless that they couldnt even include ethical human rights, development and globalization in the public notices of major newspapers (I did it twice in NZ)?
And should they be so helpless in the face of member States who often have a vested interest in maintaining the status quo devoid of dissent by human rights defenders?
After all the ethical approach retains the universality of the UDHR and consequently is a far more authentic reflection of the declaration than when, as at present, the UDHR is made compatible with IMF polices which seriously negates many (and eventually all, in my view) of the individual rights the declaration is meant to uphold.
In addition, about 3m ago I asked Helen Clark, Head UNDP, directly in a packed auditorium at Auckland University why the UN says nothing about the ethical approach and she politically side-stepped my question shouldnt the UN bureaucracy have a duty to inform the public of important human rights truths rather than stand in the path of human rights development?

Related Link:
© 2001-2016 Independent Media Centre Ireland. Unless otherwise stated by the author, all content is free for non-commercial reuse, reprint, and rebroadcast, on the net and elsewhere. Opinions are those of the contributors and are not necessarily endorsed by Independent Media Centre Ireland. Disclaimer | Privacy