User Preferences

  • Language - en | ga
  • text size >>
  • make this your indymedia front page make this your indymedia front page

Blog Feeds

Public Inquiry
Interested in maladministration. Estd. 2005

offsite link Irish Examiner compares water protesters with Provisional IRA

offsite link RTE: A mouthpiece for a corrupt regime? Anthony

offsite link Newstalk responds to complaint Anthony

offsite link Newstalk: Contempt for listeners and broadcasting regulations Anthony

offsite link Media exploiting the murder of Jo Cox Anthony

Public Inquiry >>

The Saker
A bird's eye view of the vineyard

offsite link After BREXIT: Russia Ukraine Finland Poland SITREP, by Scott Humor Mon Jun 27, 2016 04:55 | Scott
Michael McFaul, the Washington Post and all others who declared Brexit to be a Putin’s victory, still don’t understand that Putin has won long before June 23rd referendum. The fact

offsite link Cracks in the EU Sun Jun 26, 2016 23:18 | The Saker
by Kakaouskia Greetings to the Saker community and readers. So, the UK people, contrary to the ?script? that wanted a narrow Remain win have elected to leave the European Union.

offsite link CrossTalk BREXIT: GOAL! Sun Jun 26, 2016 03:56 | The Saker

offsite link Russia Defense Report: Kuril Islands Dispute Sat Jun 25, 2016 17:56 | The Saker
https://southfront.org/russia-defense...

offsite link US Options in the Ukraine: trigger a religious war? Sat Jun 25, 2016 13:23 | The Saker
Note from the Saker: I wrote this article before taking a break to write my thesis and I am posting it now even though my summer fundraiser will only end

The Saker >>

Human Rights in Ireland
www.humanrights.ie

offsite link The UN and the Eighth Amendment Thu Jun 23, 2016 09:46 | admin

offsite link Call for Papers: State Accountability for Vulnerability Mon Jun 20, 2016 12:29 | admin

offsite link UK at the CESCR: A Focus on Benefit Sanctions Thu Jun 16, 2016 08:17 | admin

offsite link Irish Journal for European Law: CALL FOR PAPERS 2016 Mon Jun 13, 2016 10:48 | Aoife O'Donoghue

offsite link Amanda Jane Mellet v. Ireland ? The Key Points Thu Jun 09, 2016 18:54 | Mirad Enright

Human Rights in Ireland >>

Cedar Lounge
For lefties too stubborn to quit

offsite link Left Archive: Trade Councils Model Rules and Notes for Guidance ? ICTU c. 1970 03:10 Mon Jun 27, 2016 | WorldbyStorm

offsite link Brexit? There is no plan! 23:07 Sun Jun 26, 2016 | WorldbyStorm

offsite link ?Quite possibly all or part of Northern Ireland will join Ireland? 22:00 Sun Jun 26, 2016 | WorldbyStorm

offsite link A bit of humour in these turbulent times! 15:58 Sun Jun 26, 2016 | guestposter

offsite link Showband stories? 12:03 Sun Jun 26, 2016 | WorldbyStorm

Cedar Lounge >>

Chomsky's response to UN's 'Global Crime Against Humanity' and my reply.

category international | rights, freedoms and repression | opinion/analysis author Tuesday January 14, 2014 07:52author by Anthony Ravlich - Human Rights Council (New Zealand) Report this post to the editors

A Great World can be achieved by Great States ensuring global ethical human rights.

Noam Chomsky's response to UN's 'Global Crime Against Humanity' which is described in my recent article, 'A Great World can be achieved by Great States ensuring global ethical human rights'. It also contains my reply.

Chomskys response to UNs Global Crime Against Humanity and my reply.

Anthony Ravlich
Chairperson
Human Rights Council (New Zealand)
10D/15 City Rd.,
Auckland City.
Ph: (0064) (09) 940 9658
www.hrc2001.org.nz

Noam Chomskys response to UNs Global Crime Against Humanity described in my article, A Great World can be achieved by Great States ensuring global ethical human rights, see links, http://www.indybay.org/newsitems/2014/01/08/18748916.php or http://www.indymedia.org.nz/articles/1848 .

Noam Chomsky stated:

Youre right about the terrible failure to uphold the UD, but one cant put the blame on the UN. It cannot act on the matter. That is the responsibility of its members, who may accept the UD in words, but not in deeds. And sometimes not even in words. Thus the US rejects 1/3 of the UD on social-economic rights and dismisses another third cultural/community rights (email, today, 14 Jan 2014).

My reply to Noam Chomsky (via email, today, 14 Jan 2014):

Anthony Ravlich. I have been trying to get the UN to tell people about the ethical approach to human rights, development and globalization (to replace neoliberal absolutism) since it was first outlined in my book in 2008.
Is the UN bureaucracy so helpless that they couldnt even include ethical human rights, development and globalization in the public notices of major newspapers (I did it twice in NZ)?
And should they be so helpless in the face of member States who often have a vested interest in maintaining the status quo devoid of dissent by human rights defenders?
After all the ethical approach retains the universality of the UDHR and consequently is a far more authentic reflection of the declaration than when, as at present, the UDHR is made compatible with IMF polices which seriously negates many (and eventually all, in my view) of the individual rights the declaration is meant to uphold.
In addition, about 3m ago I asked Helen Clark, Head UNDP, directly in a packed auditorium at Auckland University why the UN says nothing about the ethical approach and she politically side-stepped my question shouldnt the UN bureaucracy have a duty to inform the public of important human rights truths rather than stand in the path of human rights development?

Related Link: http://www.hrc2001.org.nz
© 2001-2016 Independent Media Centre Ireland. Unless otherwise stated by the author, all content is free for non-commercial reuse, reprint, and rebroadcast, on the net and elsewhere. Opinions are those of the contributors and are not necessarily endorsed by Independent Media Centre Ireland. Disclaimer | Privacy