User Preferences

  • Language - en | ga
  • text size >>
  • make this your indymedia front page make this your indymedia front page

Blog Feeds

forward

Cedar Lounge
For lefties too stubborn to quit

offsite link Sick kids and sick workers? 06:32 Thu Oct 23, 2014 | WorldbyStorm

offsite link That apology over the UKIP song? 22:20 Wed Oct 22, 2014 | WorldbyStorm

offsite link A spot of bother over the Technical Group and some apparently unwelcome new arrivals 17:33 Wed Oct 22, 2014 | WorldbyStorm

offsite link A government called hope? 11:31 Wed Oct 22, 2014 | WorldbyStorm

offsite link What you want to say ? 22nd October 03:53 Wed Oct 22, 2014 | WorldbyStorm

Cedar Lounge >>

Irish Left Review
Joined up thinking for the Irish Left

offsite link The Changing Pattern of Foreign Investment in China Wed Oct 22, 2014 13:36 | John Ross

offsite link Welcome to the New Tax Avoidance Scheme, Same as the Old Tax Avoidance Scheme Mon Oct 20, 2014 16:26 | Michael Taft

offsite link Revealed: EU science chief promised to be ?flexible? towards Israel?s war crimes Thu Oct 16, 2014 15:21 | David Cronin

offsite link Austerity is Over? Now Back to the Real World Wed Oct 15, 2014 17:21 | Michael Taft

offsite link A New Kind of Trade Unionism Emerging Wed Oct 15, 2014 16:24 | Irish Left Review

Irish Left Review >>

Human Rights in Ireland
www.humanrights.ie

offsite link The Extraordinary Synod in Rome. Will it bring extraordinary times? Wed Oct 22, 2014 07:09 | GuestPost

offsite link A new Constitutional Settlement for Northern Ireland: Queries from International Law Mon Oct 20, 2014 10:27 | Aoife O'Donoghue

offsite link Why Budget 2015 must be that last of its kind Fri Oct 17, 2014 08:36 | Liam Thornton

offsite link Socio-Economic Rights & Budget Analysis: Some Notes on Available Resources, ?Progressivity? and Non... Thu Oct 16, 2014 11:55 | Liam Thornton

offsite link Legal pathways to reproductive justice and abortion rights #repealthe8th Mon Oct 13, 2014 15:00 | GuestPost

Human Rights in Ireland >>

NAMA Wine Lake

offsite link Farewell from NWL Sun May 19, 2013 14:00 | namawinelake

offsite link Happy 70th Birthday, Michael Sun May 19, 2013 14:00 | namawinelake

offsite link Of the Week? Sat May 18, 2013 00:02 | namawinelake

offsite link Noonan denies IBRC legal fees loan approval to Paddy McKillen was in breach of E... Fri May 17, 2013 14:23 | namawinelake

offsite link Gayle Killilea Dunne asks to be added as notice party in Sean Dunne?s bankruptcy Fri May 17, 2013 12:30 | namawinelake

NAMA Wine Lake >>

Inside the paranoid Maoist cults of 1970s Britain

category international | rights and freedoms | news report author Sunday December 01, 2013 13:07author by Evan Smith Report this post to the editors

The couple accused in the case of alleged “domestic slavery” in London were reportedly the leaders of a tiny Maoist sect, the Workers’ Institute of Marxism-Leninism-Mao Zedong Thought, which had gone “underground” in the late 1970s. To understand how the Workers’ Institute ended up so far off the radar, we need to understand where they came from – the strange world of radical Maoist politics in 1970s London.

1marxismengelsleninismstalinmaoism.jpg

Maoism in Britain at that time was, to put it mildly, a very fragmented movement. Under the guise of “Marxist-Leninism” or “Anti-Revisionism”, Maoist groups had originally broken away from the Communist Party of Great Britain (CPGB) in the 1960s, believing it had become too moderate. As the Cultural Revolution gained pace in China, many of those disillusioned with the Soviet-inspired CPGB looked to Mao’s regime as a model for socialist revolution. But unlike the more prominent “Marxist-Leninist” groups at work in the USA, France and Germany, Britain’s Maoist splinter groups remained very small, especially compared with the various Trotskyist groups who made inroads into the student movement in the late 1960s.

By the early-to-mid-1970s, these “Marxist-Leninist” groups had fully separated from their Communist parent movements. They busied themselves selling their often impenetrable literature, holding discussion groups, and confronting police (who they believed were the repressive arm of the “fascist state”) at demonstrations. Most of the groups were inward-looking, and politically isolated from the rest of the British left. Unsurprisingly, they were unable to recruit many members.

One particularly confrontational group was the Communist Party of England (Marxist-Leninist), which was criticised by others on the far left for “political bankruptcy” and “political thuggery”. In 1974, one of this group’s leading members, Aravindan Balakrishnan, was expelled for forming a faction that “attempted to put themselves above the discipline of the Party”.
Comrade Bala strikes out

Between 1974 and 1976, the small number of followers that revolved around Balakrishnan (more commonly known as Comrade Bala) attempted to form “base areas” within working class districts (primarily inner South London) and worked in ordinary jobs. They avoided trade unions, whom they saw as corrupt agents of the “imperialist fascist bourgeoisie”.

Balakrishnan and his followers coalesced into the Workers’ Institute of Marxism-Leninism-Mao Tsetung (later Zedong) Thought. Whereas the CPE(M-L) had favoured confrontation with the police, the Workers’ Institute isolated themselves, distributing nonsensical reading material and occasionally disrupting other leftist gatherings – making them an even more marginal group.

In 1976, following Mao’s death, the Workers' Institute erected the Mao Tsetung Memorial centre at 140 Acre Lane, Brixton. The Centre ran films and lectures, but also functioned as a collective. As the Workers' Institute described themselves in a “report” produced for their conference in 1977, the centre had “thirteen core members living in the centre, half in paid work, six doing full-time revolutionary work, [including] a strong emphasis on women taking a leading role”.

The majority of the centre’s workforce was made up of former international students, which may explain the origins of the two elder women who claim they were held captive.

Other Maoist groups went through internal schisms as the regime in China shifted from Cultural Revolution towards reconciliation with the West and economic reform; some shifted their support to the regimes in Albania, North Korea or Cambodia. But the Workers’ Institute stuck to the Cultural Revolution line, proclaiming in screaming capital letters their adherence to “THE PROLETARIAN REVOLUTIONARY LINE OF CHAIRMAN MAO”.

The institute also maintained it wasn’t just a Maoist group, but a section of the Chinese Communist Party and that the CCP had “established covertly” the “INTERNATIONAL DICTATORSHIP OF THE PROLETARIAT”. Their castles in the sky amused rather than influenced the British left, and were satirised repeatedly in The Times.

The group’s documents show they were increasingly paranoid about the operations of the British government and police. As the group consisted of a number of former international students, there were several instances of members being arrested on deportation orders, and in March 1978, the police raided the Mao Memorial Centre.

The group claimed this involved “over 200 police”, including officers from the paramilitary Special Patrol Group, “under the pretext of searching for drugs”. The Workers’ Institute claimed the “fascist courts” had closed down the centre and jailed several members, while threatening others. In response, the group was to undertake “a new long march” and await the “great victory” of “our world Party”, which they predicted would happen in 1980.

Their paranoid beliefs meant the group’s “long march” effectively consisted of going “underground” and “off the grid”. It seems likely that the members of the group who remained were convinced to end all contact with others and maintain an intense level of secrecy. It has been reported that Balakrishnan, his wife, and the three women who claim they were held captive moved between several different properties, suggesting that they might have been moving between “safe houses” to escape detection.
Splinters from a fringe

There are two things worth noting about the Workers’ Institute and their decision to go underground in 1978. The first is that other revolutionary groups, such as the Weather Underground in the USA, the Red Army Faction in Germany, and the Red Brigades in Italy, reacted in a much more violent manner when confronted by the police. By contrast, the Workers’ Institute’s decision to wait in secret until the “great victory” was unveiled seems closer to the mindset of a religious cult.

The second is that, while the Workers’ Institute is an extreme example of this kind of paranoid and cultish behaviour, other groups on the British far left have acted in a similar fashion. The Workers’ Revolutionary Party, which had been the largest Trotskyist group in the 1950s and 1960s, was torn apart in the 1980s by allegations of sexual abuse against its leader Gerry Healy; its remaining factions went on to support the likes of Colonel Gaddafi and Saddam Hussein. The Revolutionary Communist Party, later to beget Living Marxism and then Sp!ked Online, were also accused of behaving in a bizarre and cultish manner in the 1980s and 1990s.

The Workers’ Institute of Marxism-Leninism-Mao Tsetung Thought emerged from a radical political landscape that had flourished in the late 1960s and early 1970s. But the group soon rejected the tactics used by other leftist groups and adopted an isolationist outlook, becoming cult-like and secretive. Their paranoia-inspired actions are a clear example of the dangers of clandestine, marginal groups. Despite superficial similarities to other leftist factions, the group was an anomaly on the British radical left. As long-term socialist activist Keith Flett wrote this week, “British Maoists [were] mostly good comrades and mostly harmless”.

_____________________________________________________

Woman who mysteriously died when living at London 'slave house' Maoist commune went to University with Cherie Blair

By Mia De Graaf

- Sian Davies, mother of one of the London 'slaves' that escaped last week, graduated from LSE with former Prime Minister Tony Blair's wife in 1975

- She had been studying for a masters degree at the leading university

-Mrs Blair's contemporary has described Ms Davies as 'quiet and shy'

- She joined Maoist group and gave £10,000 of her inherited money to them

- In 1997 she died after falling out window of a Maoist commune near Brixton

The woman linked to the slavery case who mysteriously died while living in a Maoist commune was at university with Cherie Blair, it has emerged.

Sian Davies graduated with a masters degree at the London School of Economics in 1975 alongside the wife of former Prime Minister Tony Blair who had studied law.

One of the world’s top universities, the Russell Group establishment’s alumni includes some of the world's top politicians including 12 Nobel Prize winners, two presidents of Colombia, the former prime minister of Nepal, and former American president John F. Kennedy.

While Mrs Blair, then Ms Booth, was called to the bar a year later, Ms Davies immersed herself in south east London’s Maoist community.

One of Cherie Blair's former contemporaries told the Daily Mirror: 'Sian was quiet and shy. There were a lot of strange groups operating around the university and it looks like she got involved with one of them.'

Ms Davies, who was privately educated in Wales before studying law at Aberystwyth University, died in 1997, seven months after she fell from the window of a Maoist home in Herne Hill, south London.

When she died, she had just £5 in her bank account and her only possession was a stash of Marxist literature, according to reports.

In 1970 she had received thousands of pounds when her father Alun died - but apparently spent most of it on funding the far-Left movement based in South London.

It has also been claimed that Ms Davies' family, from whom she was enstranged, were so worried about her being exploited that they froze her bank account.

She was living with cult leader Aravindan Balakrishnan and his other followers.

Three other women, including Ms Davies' daughter Rosie, who has lived with the sect her whole life, escaped the property last week.

They were yesterday interviewed by police for the first time as officers investigate whether Balakrishnan, known as 'Comrade Bala', and his wife Chanda should face charges.

Ms Davies, who was 44 when she died, was brought up in a middle-class family in North Wales and attended the prestigious Cheltenham Ladies' College.

She was drawn in to the Workers' Institute of Marxism-Leninism-Mao Zedong Thought after she moved to London for university in 1977.

The group relied on her inheritance to fund itself for many years, leaving her almost penniless, according to the Guardian.

The Maoists were apparently based for a time in a house in Battersea owned by Ms Davies, before she gave them £10,000 to lease their headquarters in Brixton.

Her family were unaware that she had had a daughter while living with Balakrishnan, and were not told that she had been left paraplegic after falling from a second-storey window.

3maoismantiimperialismantirevisionismmaozedong.jpg

2nixonmaozedongfordkissingercommunistpartychinacpp.jpg

12345mao_zedong_with_women_in_1950.jpg

12345newdemocracypeoplesliberationarmycpp.jpg

author by independent leftpublication date Tue Dec 03, 2013 10:44Report this post to the editors

It's really scary how intelligent university students became radical political activists and eventually morphed into a psychological fanaticism similar to strains of breakaway religious sectarian fanaticism. It mentally enslaved the true believers in Mao Tse Tung (now Mao Zedong) and did no good whatsoever to the lower income dependents and working class the ideology and 'struggles' were supposed to be in aid of.

author by fredpublication date Tue Dec 03, 2013 20:38Report this post to the editors

It's really scary how intelligent university students became radical political activists and eventually morphed into a psychological fanaticism similar to strains of breakaway religious sectarian fanaticism.


Now now, can we leave FG / FF / PD's out of this? ;-)

author by bemusedpublication date Tue Dec 03, 2013 22:42Report this post to the editors

Prime time covered this last week 25/11/2013 and some psychiatrist being interviewed said these types of cult relationships are more common than we think especially at the level of personnel relationships in people's marriages and the like where one person has power over the other.

The link is: http://www.rte.ie/player/nl/show/10226819/

author by independent leftpublication date Tue Dec 03, 2013 23:24Report this post to the editors

More pertinent to the case is the threat posed to the credibility of left causes by the adventurist fanatics who have practised scary psycho-ideology in the name of the working class. Partner domination in marriage may be a social problem, but it has no bearing on the psychodynamics in breakaway religious or political cult groups.

 
© 2001-2014 Independent Media Centre Ireland. Unless otherwise stated by the author, all content is free for non-commercial reuse, reprint, and rebroadcast, on the net and elsewhere. Opinions are those of the contributors and are not necessarily endorsed by Independent Media Centre Ireland. Disclaimer | Privacy