User Preferences

  • Language - en | ga
  • text size >>
  • make this your indymedia front page make this your indymedia front page

Blog Feeds

Public Inquiry
Interested in maladministration. Estd. 2005

offsite link Hell at the Gates: A propaganda exercise

offsite link Breaking: New minister for investigative judges to be appointed Anthony

offsite link Michael O’Regan: A ‘surface’ journalist Anthony

offsite link Brendan Howlin: A political leprechaun Anthony

offsite link Irish media should be fighting gagging law Anthony

Public Inquiry >>

The Saker
A bird's eye view of the vineyard

offsite link Are there any video enhancement specialists in our community? Mon Oct 24, 2016 02:29 | The Saker
Dear friends, A friend of mine has had one of his geese attacked by what appears to be a Florida Panther. We have grainy footage of the attack taken by

offsite link ?Vatnik? ? to the Ukrainians. Why would we liberate YOU? Sun Oct 23, 2016 18:32 | The Saker
Note: ?vatnik? is a derogatory term used in today?s Ukraine to describe people in Donbass and other South-Eastern regions as well as anybody supportive of the ?Russian World?. The word

offsite link Breaking: What Trump Said Seconds Ago Burned Hillary Alive With No MSNBC To Put Out The Flames Sun Oct 23, 2016 18:21 | The Saker

offsite link World SITREP October 23rd, 2016, by Baaz Sun Oct 23, 2016 17:55 | Scott
Russia This Ain’t Grandpa’s Soviet Jeep: New UAZ Patriot Competes With Luxury SUVs The Russian anti-terrorist operation in Syria is about to get more ‘patriotic’. On Friday, the Defense Ministry

offsite link The recent article about ?Cat Motja on Motorola and Ukraine in simple human language? Sat Oct 22, 2016 20:33 | The Saker
Dear friends, My bad. I screwed up. The recent article by Scott “Cat Motja on Motorola and Ukraine in simple human language” should not have been published, at least not

The Saker >>

Human Rights in Ireland

offsite link Benefit Sanctions and Coercion Within the Irish Welfare System Thu Sep 22, 2016 13:38 | Cliodhna Murphy

offsite link The rights of the unborn: a troubling decision from the High Court? Wed Aug 10, 2016 12:42 | Mirad Enright

offsite link Progress Report on the Northern/Irish Feminist Judgments Project. Mon Jul 11, 2016 13:40 | admin

offsite link The UN and the Eighth Amendment Thu Jun 23, 2016 09:46 | admin

offsite link Call for Papers: State Accountability for Vulnerability Mon Jun 20, 2016 12:29 | admin

Human Rights in Ireland >>

Cedar Lounge
For lefties too stubborn to quit

offsite link Left Archive: Interview and advert for Eamon Gilmore TD, Labour Party, December 2000 11:10 Mon Oct 24, 2016 | guestposter

offsite link What a difference this will make ? no doubt? 08:13 Mon Oct 24, 2016 | WorldbyStorm

offsite link Left Archive: Occupation News 1, 12 June 1979, Wood Quay Protest. 03:42 Mon Oct 24, 2016 | guestposter

offsite link An ?increasingly right wing agenda?? 18:31 Sun Oct 23, 2016 | WorldbyStorm

offsite link John Carpenter? 15:59 Sun Oct 23, 2016 | WorldbyStorm

Cedar Lounge >>

Report on Magdalene Laundries published

category national | rights, freedoms and repression | news report author Thursday February 07, 2013 23:49author by T Report this post to the editors

The government inter-departmental committee setup to establish the facts into State involvement of the Magdalen Laundries was published on Tues 5th Feb in an attempt to deal with the issue for once and for all. What the findings show is that there was significant involvement and the laundries seem to have been used by a variety of state institutions for dealing for young women in terms of the justice system and social services that the state was unable or unwilling to deal with and the interface with reformatories and industrial schools.

In the aftermath the government has only offered a partial apology to the victims and they feel this is not good enough


The government report into the Magdalene laundries was finally published last Tues 5th Feb and has found the State was directly involved in the running of them whereby over 25% of referrals were made or aided by the State.

The report shows how the laundries were run by by four separate religious orders of nuns as a form of semi-slave labour institutes where the inmates were largely young girls and women who were placed there for various reasons from being orphans, foster kids, homeless women, unmarried mothers, to those involved in petty crime

The report covers 10 of the laundries for the period from 1922 to 1996 although the worst excesses were obviously in the periods when the church had greater influence on the affairs and public life of the state.

The committee appeared to set as its objects the level of state involvement covering how girls and women entered the laundries, how long they stayed there, how they left and the level of state funding, assistance and contracts given to the Laundries.

Some of the findings of the committee, largely determined through statistical analysis were that:

There were The actual number of known admissions was 14,607
Routes of Entry were:
Average age at entry: 23 yrs
median age 20
youngest entrant 9
Oldest entrant 89

Median duration of stay 27.6 weeks (approximately 7 months)
And the duration of stay broken down as follows:
Less than 3 months 35.6%
Less than 6 months 47.4%
Less than 1 year 61.0%
Less than 18 months 68.0%
Less than 2 years 73.2%
Less than 3 years 79.0%
Less than 5 years 85.6%
Less than 18 months 68.0%

Parental backgrounds
Both parents alive: 12.5%
Mother dead, father alive: 8.5%
Father dead, mother alive: 11.6%
Both parents dead: 13.5%

Deaths occurring in the Laundries from 1922: 879

Routes of Entry were:

Referrals of girls or women from the criminal justice system, (approximately 8.1% of known routes of entry)
Referrals from Industrial and Reformatory Schools (approximately 7.8% of known routes of entry);
Referrals from the health and social services sector (approximately 6.8% of known routes of entry),
Referrals from Mother and Baby Homes (approximately 3.9% of known routes of entry).

Overall though there seemed to be a complex and ad-hoc arrangement whereby women were sent from the Courts, Reformatory Schools, Industrial schools and so on. It seemed to act as some kind of alternative prison for women.

There were few ledgers recording who did business with the laundries but the limited data shows that contracts were with the Defense forces, Govt Departments, State funded hospitals, hotels, schools, hotels, schools, various private institutions and individuals

On finances one of the interesting findings relates to the Sean McDermott Street covering sales from 1960 to 1966 showed during this period state contracts were worth around 18%. The report expresses the sales in 2011 Euro terms so it is not clear how they calculations were made but the year sales averaged around 850,000.
It is difficult to determine whether this is a high figure or not because to run an institute like that today would easily cost that but it does raise the question as to where all the profits if any were flowing and what were the exact objectives of the laundries from the religious orders perspectives.

The full report can be found at:

And an executive summary can be found at:

author by anonpublication date Fri Feb 08, 2013 13:02Report this post to the editors

It was a gross injustice what happened,and there were clearly contracts to the state,army etc..

I do think that the profitable ''charities'' in question, should be playing a part in paying up..

Whether the government will make an admittance through an apology is another matter.

© 2001-2016 Independent Media Centre Ireland. Unless otherwise stated by the author, all content is free for non-commercial reuse, reprint, and rebroadcast, on the net and elsewhere. Opinions are those of the contributors and are not necessarily endorsed by Independent Media Centre Ireland. Disclaimer | Privacy