User Preferences

  • Language - en | ga
  • text size >>
  • make this your indymedia front page make this your indymedia front page

Blog Feeds

Public Inquiry
Interested in maladministration. Estd. 2005

offsite link RTEs Mary Wilson: A woman with some brain…

offsite link Irish journalism: Suffering from a serious malaise Anthony

offsite link Brian Cowen: A political idiot Anthony

offsite link Hell at the Gates: A propaganda exercise Anthony

offsite link Breaking: New minister for investigative judges to be appointed Anthony

Public Inquiry >>

The Saker
A bird's eye view of the vineyard

offsite link NAVAL BRIEF NB04 December 02nd, 2016 by LeDahu Fri Dec 02, 2016 15:58 | Scott
NAVAL BRIEF 04 December 02nd, 2016 by LeDahu Naval Briefing 01 November 9th, 2016 Naval Briefing 02 November 14th, 2016 NAVAL BRIEF 03 November 22nd, 2016   In his annual

offsite link Hands Off Syria Coalition event in NYC Fri Dec 02, 2016 12:34 | The Saker

offsite link Syrian War Report ? December 2, 2016: Govt Forces Liberated Western Ghouta Fri Dec 02, 2016 12:28 | The Saker
https://southfront.org/syrian-war-rep...

offsite link Syrian War Report ? December 1, 2016: Operation in Idlib to Be Launched after Liberation of Aleppo Fri Dec 02, 2016 12:27 | The Saker
https://southfront.org/syrian-war-rep...

offsite link CrossTalk: Trump?s Syria Fri Dec 02, 2016 12:25 | The Saker

The Saker >>

Human Rights in Ireland
www.humanrights.ie

offsite link Notes on Judge Harding-Clark?s Report on the Symphysiotomy Payment Scheme. Thu Nov 24, 2016 17:50 | Mirad Enright

offsite link The Practical Implications of Miller v SSEEU for Brexit: Nine Reflections Thu Nov 03, 2016 16:30 | Fiona de Londras

offsite link Having Our Voices Heard ? the Official Languages Act foreshadowing the Recognition of Irish Sign Lan... Wed Nov 02, 2016 09:35 | admin

offsite link Benefit Sanctions and Coercion Within the Irish Welfare System Thu Sep 22, 2016 13:38 | Cliodhna Murphy

offsite link The rights of the unborn: a troubling decision from the High Court? Wed Aug 10, 2016 12:42 | Mirad Enright

Human Rights in Ireland >>

Cedar Lounge
For lefties too stubborn to quit

offsite link The public sector wage claims 12:45 Fri Dec 02, 2016 | WorldbyStorm

offsite link Interesting, but pointless? 11:45 Fri Dec 02, 2016 | WorldbyStorm

offsite link Begrudgery? 11:23 Fri Dec 02, 2016 | WorldbyStorm

offsite link That Richmond By-Election 09:06 Fri Dec 02, 2016 | irishelectionliterature

offsite link This Week At Irish Election Literature 05:44 Fri Dec 02, 2016 | irishelectionliterature

Cedar Lounge >>

E.U. says "F.U." to latest Zio-Nazi attempt at "Law-Fare"

category international | rights, freedoms and repression | news report author Monday December 24, 2012 14:52author by Zionism=Nazism Report this post to the editors

EU throws out NGO Monitor case, tells Gerald Steinberg to pick up the tab

Wikipedia defines "Law-Fare" as:

    Lawfare is a recently coined word not yet appearing in the Oxford English Dictionary, a portmanteau of the words 'law' and 'warfare', said to describe a form of asymmetric warfare.

    Lawfare is asserted by some to be the illegitimate use of domestic or international law with the intention of damaging an opponent, winning a public relations victory, financially crippling an opponent, or tying up the opponent's time so that they cannot pursue other ventures


It has recently become a staple in the Zio-Nazi attempts to stifle all criticism and any and all attempts to help Palestinians obtain their legal rights.

lawfare.jpg

Zio-Nazi astro-turfing front-group NGO Monitor and its director went all the way to Luxembourg to sue the EU for supposed "lack of transparency" concerning the funds its gives NGOs in Israel and Palestine.

Last month, the EU Court of Justice threw the case out saying the action was manifestly lacking any foundation in law

Basically the E.U. is saying "F.U." to the Zio-Nazi that brought the case in the first place

    ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++


EU throws out NGO Monitor case, tells Gerald Steinberg to pick up the tab - http://972mag.com/eu-throws-out-ngo-monitor-case-tells-...2491/

    About three years ago, those lovely people over at [Zio-Nazi astro-turfing front-group] NGO Monitor filed a suit in Luxembourg against the European Union to force the EU to release details of its funding of NGOs.

    [Zio-Nazi astro-turfing front-group] NGO Monitor pulled out all the stops hiring a top law firm, calling a press conference to announce the move, accusing the EU of a lack of transparency, with director Gerald Steinberg saying that the EU has funnelled about $46 million to about 90 NGOs in Israel and the Palestinian territories over three years.

    This past January, [Zio-Nazi astro-turfing front-group] NGO Monitor attacked the German Heinrich Bll Foundation for a grant of 6,000 euros it gave +972 Magazine in 2011.

    Well, [+972 Magazine is] happy to inform you that the court has thrown out the case, and Steinberg has been left with the bill. According to a ruling dated November 27, 2012 on the official website of the EU Court of Justice, Steinbergs case against the EU has been thrown out, with Steinberg ordered to foot all legal costs. The judges ruled, The action is dismissed as, in part, manifestly inadmissible and, in part, manifestly lacking any foundation in law and that

      [Zio-Nazi] Gerald Steinberg shall bear his own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission.


Well done the E.U - it's about time they started standing up to these ridiculous Zio-Nazi attempts to cripple any attempts to put the brakes on Zio-Nazi machinations against Palestinians and Israelis that attempt to counter the madness that is Zio-Nazism

author by Zionism=Nazismpublication date Mon Dec 24, 2012 14:57Report this post to the editors

Inside the Lawfare Project: Netanyahus attack on human rights NGOs comes to the US - http://mondoweiss.net/2010/03/inside-the-lawfare-projec....html

    As the anti-Goldstone, human rights-bashing Lawfare Projects opening event on March 11 wrapped up, I asked its chairman, Columbia University Law School Dean David Schizer, for an interview. Schizer, who had just attacked the Goldstone Report from the podium, pointedly refused to speak to me and looked for the exit. As Schizer was leaving, he was politely confronted by Columbia Law School Professor Katherine Franke, who heads the schools Program in Gender and Sexuality Law.

    "Why didnt you invite any speakers with an alternative perspective?" Franke asked Schizer.

    His reply was curt. "We invited one or two but they couldnt make it," Schizer claimed before hurrying away.

    Schizer was understandably nervous about his exposure. After all, he had just presided over a day-long conference during which Israeli human rights workers were labeled as traitors while Judge Richard Goldstone and human rights groups were compared to "anti-Semitic street gangs." After several speakers had harshly condemned legal efforts against the construction of Israeli settlements in East Jerusalem and the West Bank, Schizer appeared beside them to lend his credibility to their views.

author by Zionism=Nazismpublication date Mon Dec 24, 2012 15:08Report this post to the editors

I wonder if NGO Monitor, who have their own transparency issues, will tell us how they manage to fund the payment of the legal fees.

Foreign influence, transparency problems of NGO Monitor - http://972mag.com/questions-regarding-foreign-influence...5854/

    Haaretzs Uri Blau had a short expose available only in the Hebrew edition regarding the rightwing non-profit NGO Monitor. As some readers might remember, NGO Monitor recently attacked the German Heinrich Bll Foundation for a grant of 6,000 Euros it gave +972 Magazine in 2011.

    According to its website,
      NGO Monitors objective is to end the practice used by certain self-declared humanitarian NGOs of exploiting the label universal human rights values to promote politically and ideologically motivated agendas.


    It does so through attacking public position taken by NGOs, questioning their motives and partners, and going after their sources of funding.

    Human rights organizations in Israel are very transparent, partly because of the increasing attention their activities get (this is one, and probably the only positive influence of the work of some conservative groups and journalists). Right-wing groups, on the other hand, seem to operate under different standards. Im Tirzu, for example, submitted its list of donors only after receiving threats from the states NGO department. Elad, the organization leading the colonization efforts of Palestinian neighborhoods in East Jerusalem, has received special status from the government that allows it not to disclose any of its major donors.

    NGO Monitor, it turns out, is not much better: In 2010, three of its donations came from undisclosed (though legal) sources:
    • The first one, for the sum of NIS 570,000 ($154,000), was passed through the Jewish Federation of North America and the Jewish Agency;

    • the second one, for NIS 100,000, was transferred through the Israeli non-profit Matan started in 1998 by local tycoon Shari Arison, owner of Israels largest Bank

    • and the third donation came through a British fund registered in the Isle of Man, known for its favorable tax rates.


    When the origin of these funds were questioned by Haaretz, the organization that promotes transparency and accountability suddenly becomes very vague. Asked about the NIS half million donation from the Jewish Agency, Gerald Steinberg, president of NGO Monitor, said:

      Its the kind of thing I dont remember by heart exactly. Sometimes I dont deal with money Someone who sees in our activities something worthy of donations gives us money. Unlike the organizations we write about, we dont get money from any government


    The Jewish Agency, which transferred the donation to NGO Monitor, is a quasi-governmental organization, operating in Israel under special status. An effort to understand the source of the donation from the chairman of NGO Monitor non-profit, attorney Yoel Golovansky, had similar results:

      I am not that knowledgeable [of the source of the money]. We go through the financial report when its submitted, but I dont remember if I knew I dont remember. Usually its someone that donated through the [Jewish] Agency.

      Who is it?

      I dont know. I dont know if I knew, but I surely dont know today.


    One could only imagine the press release NGO Monitor would have written if it got those kind of answers from a human rights group.


"Hypocrisy" is apparently not a word of which Zio-Nazis such as Steinberg are aware.

Even our own beloved Bertie Ahern might have hesitated and blushed a little, if only for a moment or two, before giving out such obviously evasive answers

 
© 2001-2016 Independent Media Centre Ireland. Unless otherwise stated by the author, all content is free for non-commercial reuse, reprint, and rebroadcast, on the net and elsewhere. Opinions are those of the contributors and are not necessarily endorsed by Independent Media Centre Ireland. Disclaimer | Privacy