New Events


no events posted in last week

User Preferences

  • Language - en | ga
  • text size >>
  • make this your indymedia front page make this your indymedia front page

Blog Feeds

Public Inquiry
Interested in maladministration. Estd. 2005

offsite link Brian Cowen: A political idiot

offsite link Hell at the Gates: A propaganda exercise Anthony

offsite link Breaking: New minister for investigative judges to be appointed Anthony

offsite link Michael O’Regan: A ‘surface’ journalist Anthony

offsite link Brendan Howlin: A political leprechaun Anthony

Public Inquiry >>

The Saker
A bird's eye view of the vineyard

offsite link Will Trump save America like Putin saved Russia? (Saker article made into video!) Fri Oct 28, 2016 05:20 | The Saker
Dear friends, This is really neat!  I just got an email from TyrannyUnmasked who informed me that he had come across a video of Snordster reading my article clumsily entitled

offsite link Moveable Feast Cafe 2016/10/28 ? Open Thread Fri Oct 28, 2016 04:30 | Herb Swanson
2016/10/28 03:30:01Welcome to the ‘Moveable Feast Cafe’. The ‘Moveable Feast’ is an open thread where readers can post wide ranging observations, articles, rants, off topic and have animate discussions of

offsite link Trump and the Power of Money Fri Oct 28, 2016 01:10 | The Saker
by Peter Koenig Imagine, Donald Trump would accede to the US Presidency, an unlikely event with the presstitute media relentlessly slamming, slashing and demonizing him, not unlike they do with

offsite link President Putin Meeting of the Valdai International Discussion Club Thu Oct 27, 2016 20:43 | Scott
Vladimir Putin took part in the final session of the Valdai International Discussion Club?s 13th annual meeting, which this year took the theme The Future in Progress: Shaping the World of Tomorrow. Over the three-day event, 130 experts and political analysts

offsite link Feudalism ? Medieval and Modern Thu Oct 27, 2016 19:04 | The Saker

The Saker >>

Human Rights in Ireland

offsite link Benefit Sanctions and Coercion Within the Irish Welfare System Thu Sep 22, 2016 13:38 | Cliodhna Murphy

offsite link The rights of the unborn: a troubling decision from the High Court? Wed Aug 10, 2016 12:42 | Máiréad Enright

offsite link Progress Report on the Northern/Irish Feminist Judgments Project. Mon Jul 11, 2016 13:40 | admin

offsite link The UN and the Eighth Amendment Thu Jun 23, 2016 09:46 | admin

offsite link Call for Papers: State Accountability for Vulnerability Mon Jun 20, 2016 12:29 | admin

Human Rights in Ireland >>

Cedar Lounge
For lefties too stubborn to quit

offsite link Archives 13:40 Fri Oct 28, 2016 | irishelectionliterature

offsite link Brexit and the North and whose problem is it really? 13:04 Fri Oct 28, 2016 | WorldbyStorm

offsite link This Week At Irish Election Literature 06:34 Fri Oct 28, 2016 | irishelectionliterature

offsite link Time Flies ?? 21:19 Thu Oct 27, 2016 | irishelectionliterature

offsite link His inability to speak in anything but hyperbole? 20:52 Thu Oct 27, 2016 | WorldbyStorm

Cedar Lounge >>

Why I As A Muslim Woman Don't Wear A Headscarf

category international | gender and sexuality | other press author Thursday April 14, 2011 18:15author by Lamya Kaddor Report this post to the editors

Lamya Kaddor confronts the myths regarding the wearing of the Hijab. She shows that this is not an observance required by Islam. Rather it is an invention of misogynistic mullahs. Full text at link.

However, if God had required a special head covering, would He not have said so explicitly? The khimâr thus merely constitutes a 'fashion accessory' according to the spirit of that age. Viewed rationally, functions consciously or unconsciously associated with head coverings across the course of history – such as protection against sand or evil influences – are all superannuated today and have lost their validity. People's powers of imagination have changed.

Lamya Kaddor
Lamya Kaddor

Today's orthodox comprehension of the obligation to wear a head covering is primarily based on the interpretations of scholars who lived several generations after the Prophet Mohammed. One can follow their judgements but they are not sacrosanct. As human beings all scholars are fallible. Conservative and fundamentalist circles constantly emphasise that our behaviour should follow the Koran and the Prophet. Their spokesmen maintain that this directly accords with what was laid down during the Prophet's lifetime and the initial period of Islam.

However in reality this view is mainly based on the ideas of scholars who lived some 600 (!) years later – such people as Ibn Qudâma (d. 1223), Ibn Taymîya (d. 1328), or the latter's pupil Ibn Qayyim al-Jawzîya (d. 1350). Bearing in mind the patriarchal social structures of that time, it is unsurprising that interpretations of sources concerning relations between the sexes were usually unfavourable for women – even though that contradicts a striving (to be found throughout the Koran) towards improving women's situation.

Related Link:
author by V for vendettapublication date Thu Apr 14, 2011 23:17Report this post to the editors

The koran only said that a woman should "dress modestly". Thats not unreasonable and leaves lots of flexibility of dress for a woman.

Misogynist men decided that that meant the ridiculous hijab or niquab. These men just wanted to oppress women.

Its got so bad that women are now oppressing themselves. Pure stockholm syndrome.

Brave stand. I commend you on your courage standing up to these violent bullies who don't even read their own holy book properly and try to twist it to their own misogynistic ends.

author by Yoginder Sikanpublication date Sun Apr 17, 2011 13:31Report this post to the editors

The French ban on the Muslim face veil that came into effect earlier this week has added new dimensions to on-going debates about secularism, democracy, religion, identity, the freedom of choice and gender justice. There is no simple answer to many of the troubling questions that the ban has provoked. Unequivocally approving or condemning the ban, to take any particular side in the fiercely polarised debate about the ban, is not an easy option...

A regular columnist for, Yoginder Sikand works with the Centre for the Study of Social Exclusion at the National Law School, Bangalore.

Full text at link.

Related Link:
© 2001-2016 Independent Media Centre Ireland. Unless otherwise stated by the author, all content is free for non-commercial reuse, reprint, and rebroadcast, on the net and elsewhere. Opinions are those of the contributors and are not necessarily endorsed by Independent Media Centre Ireland. Disclaimer | Privacy