User Preferences

  • Language - en | ga
  • text size >>
  • make this your indymedia front page make this your indymedia front page

Blog Feeds

Public Inquiry
Interested in maladministration. Estd. 2005

offsite link Daniel McConnell: Happy to wear establishment blinkers

offsite link State failing in its duty to enforce law Anthony

offsite link Elaine Byrne/Fergus Finlay: Afraid to condemn their own? Anthony

offsite link Jobstown trial exposes mainstream bias Anthony

offsite link RTE: Blatant censorship and manipulation of news Anthony

Public Inquiry >>

The Saker
A bird's eye view of the vineyard

offsite link Death of the 2nd Amendment on the Internet Sun Aug 20, 2017 02:47 | The Saker
Note by the Saker: if you don’t care about the Second Amendment, consider this: if they can go after the Second, there is nothing stopping them going after the First

offsite link Moveable Feast Cafe 2017/08/19 ? Open Thread Sat Aug 19, 2017 22:00 | Herb Swanson
2017/08/19 21:00:02Welcome to the ‘Moveable Feast Cafe’. The ‘Moveable Feast’ is an open thread where readers can post wide ranging observations, articles, rants, off topic and have animate discussions of

offsite link Anti-goyim headline by the Huffington Post Sat Aug 19, 2017 21:04 | The Saker
See here for the details about Sam Levine?s article, photo and headline: http://www.unz.com/isteve/goy-bye-mai... http://www.pacificpundit.com/2017/08/... I won’t even bother commenting myself.  QED is all I will say. The Saker and a

offsite link Russia?s Foreign Ministry answer to anti-Russia statements by CIA Director Mike Pompeo Sat Aug 19, 2017 17:30 | Scott
Briefing by Foreign Ministry Spokesperson Maria Zakharova, Moscow, August 17, 2017 ????, ? ??????? ? ??? ???????????? ?? ??????????… pic.twitter.com/SAOMkMmExT — ?????????? ???????? (@Current_policy) August 18, 2017 “It is strange

offsite link The coup Sat Aug 19, 2017 16:19 | The Saker

The Saker >>

Human Rights in Ireland
www.humanrights.ie

offsite link Ireland?s violation of International Abortion rights: A perpetual Déjŕ vu. Sat Jul 29, 2017 18:49 | admin

offsite link Call for Papers: Irish Yearbook of International Law Thu Jul 20, 2017 10:54 | Fiona de Londras

offsite link Understanding the Increases in Direct Provision Allowance for Asylum Seekers Mon Jul 17, 2017 11:31 | Liam Thornton

offsite link Ireland?s Failing Abortion Law: Statutory Interpretation, Human Rights and the Detention of Pregnant... Tue Jun 13, 2017 17:08 | admin

offsite link RIA Conference on Human Rights and the Social Sciences, June 22nd. Thu Jun 01, 2017 16:59 | admin

Human Rights in Ireland >>

Cedar Lounge
For lefties too stubborn to quit

offsite link Speaking of music T-Shirts? 11:41 Sun Aug 20, 2017 | WorldbyStorm

offsite link Getting time and place right in film and television 10:36 Sun Aug 20, 2017 | WorldbyStorm

offsite link Good T-shirt ? wrong person wearing it. 11:24 Sat Aug 19, 2017 | WorldbyStorm

offsite link Redneck Revolt 10:23 Sat Aug 19, 2017 | WorldbyStorm

offsite link This Weekend I?ll Mostly be Listening to? The Dils/Rank and File/BlackBird/Cowboy Nation 06:46 Sat Aug 19, 2017 | WorldbyStorm

Cedar Lounge >>

Why I As A Muslim Woman Don't Wear A Headscarf

category international | gender and sexuality | other press author Thursday April 14, 2011 18:15author by Lamya Kaddor Report this post to the editors

Lamya Kaddor confronts the myths regarding the wearing of the Hijab. She shows that this is not an observance required by Islam. Rather it is an invention of misogynistic mullahs. Full text at link.

However, if God had required a special head covering, would He not have said so explicitly? The khimâr thus merely constitutes a 'fashion accessory' according to the spirit of that age. Viewed rationally, functions consciously or unconsciously associated with head coverings across the course of history – such as protection against sand or evil influences – are all superannuated today and have lost their validity. People's powers of imagination have changed.

Lamya Kaddor
Lamya Kaddor

Today's orthodox comprehension of the obligation to wear a head covering is primarily based on the interpretations of scholars who lived several generations after the Prophet Mohammed. One can follow their judgements but they are not sacrosanct. As human beings all scholars are fallible. Conservative and fundamentalist circles constantly emphasise that our behaviour should follow the Koran and the Prophet. Their spokesmen maintain that this directly accords with what was laid down during the Prophet's lifetime and the initial period of Islam.

However in reality this view is mainly based on the ideas of scholars who lived some 600 (!) years later – such people as Ibn Qudâma (d. 1223), Ibn Taymîya (d. 1328), or the latter's pupil Ibn Qayyim al-Jawzîya (d. 1350). Bearing in mind the patriarchal social structures of that time, it is unsurprising that interpretations of sources concerning relations between the sexes were usually unfavourable for women – even though that contradicts a striving (to be found throughout the Koran) towards improving women's situation.

Related Link: http://www.countercurrents.org/kaddor140411.htm
author by V for vendettapublication date Thu Apr 14, 2011 23:17Report this post to the editors

The koran only said that a woman should "dress modestly". Thats not unreasonable and leaves lots of flexibility of dress for a woman.

Misogynist men decided that that meant the ridiculous hijab or niquab. These men just wanted to oppress women.

Its got so bad that women are now oppressing themselves. Pure stockholm syndrome.

Brave stand. I commend you on your courage standing up to these violent bullies who don't even read their own holy book properly and try to twist it to their own misogynistic ends.

author by Yoginder Sikanpublication date Sun Apr 17, 2011 13:31Report this post to the editors

The French ban on the Muslim face veil that came into effect earlier this week has added new dimensions to on-going debates about secularism, democracy, religion, identity, the freedom of choice and gender justice. There is no simple answer to many of the troubling questions that the ban has provoked. Unequivocally approving or condemning the ban, to take any particular side in the fiercely polarised debate about the ban, is not an easy option...

A regular columnist for NewAgeIslam.com, Yoginder Sikand works with the Centre for the Study of Social Exclusion at the National Law School, Bangalore.

Full text at link.

Related Link: http://newageislam.com/NewAgeIslamIslamicSociety_1.aspx...=4459
 
© 2001-2017 Independent Media Centre Ireland. Unless otherwise stated by the author, all content is free for non-commercial reuse, reprint, and rebroadcast, on the net and elsewhere. Opinions are those of the contributors and are not necessarily endorsed by Independent Media Centre Ireland. Disclaimer | Privacy