User Preferences

  • Language - en | ga
  • text size >>
  • make this your indymedia front page make this your indymedia front page

Blog Feeds

Public Inquiry
Interested in maladministration. Estd. 2005

offsite link Vincent Browne: Blind to what’s coming down the road

offsite link Terry Prone: Water protesters are dumb Anthony

offsite link Conor Pope: Genuinely clueless Anthony

offsite link Conor Pope: Supporting Irish Water Anthony

offsite link Colette Browne chases Rabbitte back down his burrow Anthony

Public Inquiry >>

The Saker
A bird's eye view of the vineyard

offsite link Counter-propaganda, Russian style Fri May 06, 2016 04:55 | The Saker
This column was written for the Unz review: http://www.unz.com/tsaker/counter-pro... Listening to the western corporate media one would get the impression that the Kremlin controls all the Russian media with an

offsite link ?Praying for Palmyra': Russian orchestra performs concert honoring victims of Syria war Fri May 06, 2016 04:50 | The Saker
Note: this concert took place in the same location where Daesh used to film mass execution.  When listening to this amazing music, please remember that this is what was taking

offsite link STAND for Ukraine Act H.R. 5094 and its authors, by Scott Fri May 06, 2016 01:17 | Scott
The week before the Orthodox Christian Easter, the US senate went frantic with activities, adopting one obscene legislature after another. On April 28, US House Armed Services Committee adopted $610

offsite link International Military Review ? Yemen, May 5, 2016 Thu May 05, 2016 23:48 | The Saker
https://southfront.org/international-...

offsite link Catherine Austin Fitts interviews the Saker for the Solari Report: A Unipolar vs. Multipolar World Thu May 05, 2016 23:45 | The Saker
Dear friends, Last month I have had, once again, the real pleasure to have a one hour long conversation with Catherine Austin Fitts, the president of Solari, Inc., the publisher

The Saker >>

Human Rights in Ireland
www.humanrights.ie

offsite link Minority Government, Human Rights, and the Opportunity for Constitutional Dialogue Fri May 06, 2016 11:36 | Ntina Tzouvala

offsite link Intensifying the glare of the United Nations? spotlight Wed May 04, 2016 06:46 | GuestPost

offsite link PhD studentships at DCU Fri Apr 29, 2016 17:15 | Eoin Daly

offsite link The Role of Sport in the Recognition of Transgender and Intersex Rights Mon Apr 11, 2016 10:54 | Eoin Daly

offsite link Call for Papers: ?International and Comparative Law in the 21st Century: Lessons learned?? Wed Mar 23, 2016 17:58 | GuestPost

Human Rights in Ireland >>

Cedar Lounge
For lefties too stubborn to quit

offsite link Assembly /UK Elections open thread 11:18 Fri May 06, 2016 | irishelectionliterature

offsite link The Croke Park Hours Threat 06:51 Fri May 06, 2016 | irishelectionliterature

offsite link This Week At Irish Election Literature 06:37 Fri May 06, 2016 | irishelectionliterature

offsite link ?Walter Carpenter: a revolutionary life? East Wall History Group Sunday 8th May 22:01 Thu May 05, 2016 | guestposter

offsite link Red Banner ? An Appreciation 17:08 Thu May 05, 2016 | guestposter

Cedar Lounge >>

Why I As A Muslim Woman Don't Wear A Headscarf

category international | gender and sexuality | other press author Thursday April 14, 2011 18:15author by Lamya Kaddor Report this post to the editors

Lamya Kaddor confronts the myths regarding the wearing of the Hijab. She shows that this is not an observance required by Islam. Rather it is an invention of misogynistic mullahs. Full text at link.

However, if God had required a special head covering, would He not have said so explicitly? The khimâr thus merely constitutes a 'fashion accessory' according to the spirit of that age. Viewed rationally, functions consciously or unconsciously associated with head coverings across the course of history – such as protection against sand or evil influences – are all superannuated today and have lost their validity. People's powers of imagination have changed.

Lamya Kaddor
Lamya Kaddor

Today's orthodox comprehension of the obligation to wear a head covering is primarily based on the interpretations of scholars who lived several generations after the Prophet Mohammed. One can follow their judgements but they are not sacrosanct. As human beings all scholars are fallible. Conservative and fundamentalist circles constantly emphasise that our behaviour should follow the Koran and the Prophet. Their spokesmen maintain that this directly accords with what was laid down during the Prophet's lifetime and the initial period of Islam.

However in reality this view is mainly based on the ideas of scholars who lived some 600 (!) years later – such people as Ibn Qudâma (d. 1223), Ibn Taymîya (d. 1328), or the latter's pupil Ibn Qayyim al-Jawzîya (d. 1350). Bearing in mind the patriarchal social structures of that time, it is unsurprising that interpretations of sources concerning relations between the sexes were usually unfavourable for women – even though that contradicts a striving (to be found throughout the Koran) towards improving women's situation.

Related Link: http://www.countercurrents.org/kaddor140411.htm
author by V for vendettapublication date Thu Apr 14, 2011 23:17Report this post to the editors

The koran only said that a woman should "dress modestly". Thats not unreasonable and leaves lots of flexibility of dress for a woman.

Misogynist men decided that that meant the ridiculous hijab or niquab. These men just wanted to oppress women.

Its got so bad that women are now oppressing themselves. Pure stockholm syndrome.

Brave stand. I commend you on your courage standing up to these violent bullies who don't even read their own holy book properly and try to twist it to their own misogynistic ends.

author by Yoginder Sikanpublication date Sun Apr 17, 2011 13:31Report this post to the editors

The French ban on the Muslim face veil that came into effect earlier this week has added new dimensions to on-going debates about secularism, democracy, religion, identity, the freedom of choice and gender justice. There is no simple answer to many of the troubling questions that the ban has provoked. Unequivocally approving or condemning the ban, to take any particular side in the fiercely polarised debate about the ban, is not an easy option...

A regular columnist for NewAgeIslam.com, Yoginder Sikand works with the Centre for the Study of Social Exclusion at the National Law School, Bangalore.

Full text at link.

Related Link: http://newageislam.com/NewAgeIslamIslamicSociety_1.aspx...=4459
 
© 2001-2016 Independent Media Centre Ireland. Unless otherwise stated by the author, all content is free for non-commercial reuse, reprint, and rebroadcast, on the net and elsewhere. Opinions are those of the contributors and are not necessarily endorsed by Independent Media Centre Ireland. Disclaimer | Privacy