France Rises Up Against the New Fascism - Vaccine Passports 23:57 Jul 21 3 comments George Floyd: one death too many in the “land of the free” 23:58 Jun 23 0 comments The leveraged buyout, exploitation and punishment beating of Greece as warning to others. 11:45 May 11 0 comments Red Banner issue 60 out now 13:18 Jun 22 0 comments Red Banner issue 59 out now 17:46 Mar 28 0 comments more >>Blog Feeds
Anti-EmpireRheinmetall Plans to Make 700,000 Artill... Thu Apr 25, 2024 04:03 | Anti-Empire America’s Shell Production Is Leaping,... Wed Apr 24, 2024 05:29 | Anti-Empire Ukraine Keeps Snapping Up Chinese Drones Tue Apr 23, 2024 03:14 | Anti-Empire Moscow Is Prosecuting the War on a Pathe... Mon Apr 22, 2024 12:26 | Anti-Empire US Military Aid to Kiev Passes After Tru... Sun Apr 21, 2024 05:57 | Anti-Empire
Human Rights in IrelandA Blog About Human RightsUN human rights chief calls for priority action ahead of climate summit Sat Oct 30, 2021 17:18 | Human Rights 5 Year Anniversary Of Kem Ley?s Death Sun Jul 11, 2021 12:34 | Human Rights Poor Living Conditions for Migrants in Southern Italy Mon Jan 18, 2021 10:14 | Human Rights Right to Water Mon Aug 03, 2020 19:13 | Human Rights Human Rights Fri Mar 20, 2020 16:33 | Human Rights
Lockdown Skeptics
Reports of the Demise of the Scottish Enlightenment May Have Been Premature Fri Apr 26, 2024 13:00 | C.J. Strachan
The Push for Global Censorship in Australia Fri Apr 26, 2024 11:17 | Rebekah Barnett
The Green Agenda Will Lead to Civil War Fri Apr 26, 2024 09:00 | Ben Pile
Climate Scientists Hail Boost to Global Plant Growth From Higher CO2 Fri Apr 26, 2024 07:00 | Chris Morrison
News Round-Up Fri Apr 26, 2024 00:42 | Richard Eldred
Voltaire NetworkVoltaire, international editionIsrael's complex relations with Iran, by Thierry Meyssan Wed Apr 24, 2024 05:25 | en Iran's hypersonic missiles generate deterrence through terror, says Scott Ritter... Mon Apr 22, 2024 10:37 | en When the West confuses Law and Politics Sat Apr 20, 2024 09:09 | en The cost of war, by Manlio Dinucci Wed Apr 17, 2024 04:12 | en Angela Merkel and François Hollande's crime against peace, by Thierry Meyssan Tue Apr 16, 2024 06:58 | en |
Direct Action London on March 26
international |
anti-capitalism |
feature
Friday February 04, 2011 07:06 by Chris Knight
Regional TUCs are expecting 300,000 to converge on central London on March 26. It should be an interesting day. While stewards are being recruited in liaison with police to stop any repeat of what happened to Millbank, there’ll be thousands of us with other ideas. If an NUS demonstration of 30,000 can accidentally demolish the Tory Party HQ, what might 300,000 achieve?
Related Links:
In one occupied art college I visited, a gigantic Trojan horse - inevitably a carthorse! - was being constructed by students as an ‘alternative TUC’; this will head an early morning feeder procession from Camberwell to join the march.
|
View Comments Titles Only
save preference
Comments (10 of 10)
Jump To Comment: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10"While stewards are being recruited in liaison with police to stop any repeat of what happened to Millbank": This so called "direct action" demonstration is shaping up to be another ICTU/USI/Gary Redmond safety valve mockery.?
I was talking to a comrade in London recently - probably known to many who post on here - who is of the opinion that the TUC stewards will not make a serious effort to interfere with those interested in such "Peoples Assemblies". They're not quite that stupid.
The question that really needs to be asked is 'Why is the same not happening in a neighbouring country to Britain where the IMF controls the economy' ?
I can only hope that a Fine Gael led Government in Ireland results in the same level of opposition from the mass of working people that the Tories have caused in Britain.
Indymedia readers may be interested to know of some exciting direct-action plans for the TUC demonstration on March 26. The ideas below were arrived at during a representative gathering last weekend, but are subject to endorsement or amendment at a much larger meeting to be held at the University of London Union on March 12-13.
1. Hyde Park and the Pentacle plan: ‘Hyde Park Stay for One Day’ was agreed as the best ‘soft’ option, which will unify the most people, so it had plenty of support, even though some people thought it was not a sufficiently political target. Plenty of activists may wish to skip the march and go straight to Hyde Park to set things up, and make things comfortable. There was also strong support for the idea of re-occupying Parliament Square. In addition, we heard that the Student Activist Network may aim to camp overnight in Trafalgar Square.
The overall conclusion was that we should publish the Pentacle of five points - including Parliament Square and Trafalgar Square to be occupied at early stages of the march, plus (later on) Buckingham Palace, Piccadilly and Hyde Park/Hilton Hotel. We know that we can pull off Hyde Park. This will be the launch pad and should help us achieve the other more political occupations. The Pentacle allows for many different possibilities: people can choose their own styles of music and protest. The Pentacle is designed to keep people partying till Earth Hour at 8.30pm, when we should really ‘cast a spell’ by blacking out London.
2. Synchronised signal at 2.11pm: To improve our chances to go into occupation of both Parliament Square and Trafalgar Square, we agreed that striking simultaneously with a synchronised signal would stretch the police more, making it harder to kettle different groups at the same time. We calculate that the maximum number of people should be along the length of Whitehall around 2pm, with plenty more marchers still to pass parliament. Therefore we decided on 02.11 (easy to remember because of 2011) as the moment to strike!
At that point, all hell breaks loose - signals, flares, foghorns, air raid sirens, beetroot juice, red wine flowing in Trafalgar Square fountains, and general mayhem, out of which people can do whatever diversions they feel appropriate to prove ourselves ungovernable!
Indymedia readers may have noted that the Con-Dem government plans to sack one in 10 members of the armed forces, many just back from Afghanistan. Perhaps we should be asking: What is Her Majesty doing about that? Why spend millions on a royal wedding at such an inappropriate time? Everyone else seems to have human rights: aren’t soldiers human too? Between March 26 and May Day we’ll be preparing leaflets to welcome our comrades in uniform and extend them full trade union rights.
With support pouring in from all sides, I think we can expect regime change sooner than might have been imagined this time last year.
For more information, see: http://www.battleofbritainmarch26.org.
Chris Knight
In yesterdays Guardian it emerged that the TUC will have 2,800 stewards on the Demo. These stewards are cooperating with the Metropolitan Police and these traitors even have an office in the Met HQ. They have been trained by the Met to deal with protesters who sit down! It is obvious that these TUC Stewards are in effect Special Constables.
While ICTU stewards haven't had the nerve to mix it with the Left on demos, on the 29 November demo several independent journalists were assaulted by ICTU stewards. We may have problems with ICTU stewards in the future.
It should be possible to organise an event in solidarity with those who are carrying out direct action on this demo.
Why can't Network X organise their own event if they so strongly disagree with the TUC march? I know the TUC are not democratic but, as its says here, 300,000 are expected to respond to its call on March 26. Many of these will want stronger action from the TUC but how many of these agree with the "other ideas" for the day? How is it decided that "300,000" want to "achieve" these alternative plans?
Was the demo on 29 November ICTUs demo? Should the left have kept away from it? Were we wrong to organise seperately and hold a meeting at the end of it?
The Demo on the 26 March is a demo against the cutbacks. It is not owned by the gutless TUC who are sabotaging any real fightback. The TUC has effectively made its stewards into special constables. The Met training TUC stewards to deal with protesters who sit down? What is the trade union movement coming to?
If the TUC special constables attack genuine protesters on the demo then they shouldn't be surprised if people defend themselves..
"Was the demo on 29 November ICTUs demo?"
The ICTU called and organised it. The Irish left (most of it) want the ICTU to call more of them, and on working days too.
"Should the left have kept away from it?"
Certainly not.
"Were we wrong to organise seperately and hold a meeting at the end of it?"
There is a danger that such seperate meetings are seen as sideshows, piggybacking or even divisive. It worked on 29 November I think. It depends on whether you judge an audience of c. 300/400 already-converted at the O'Connell Monument as productive. In any case the left meeting on 29 November was held after the main march and did not seek to channel the march itself in directions not planned by the organisers or anticipated by the marchers.
The TUC should steward the march and not be engaged in crowd control.
Were you at the O'Connell Statue meeting? There were about 2,000 people at it. I have discussed this with members of the WSM & SP & independents who are not prone to exaggeration and they would agree with this figure.
I'm not supporting mindless rioting at any demo and I believe that protesters should not take offensive action. But if protesters are attacked by either police or "Trade Union" stewards then they have the right to defend themselves.
It is truly mind-boggling that the TUC would allow stewards to be trained by the Met to deal with people who hold sit down protests. The TUC are determined to stamp down on any effective protest.
Given the way ICTU stewards attacked independent journalists on 29 November I wonder if ICTU stewards are being trained by the Garda to put down protests. All part of Social Partnership.
"There is a danger that such seperate meetings are seen as sideshows, piggybacking or even divisive."
So you are effectively saying that the Left do not have the right to organise separately on a workers demo. The Left also built for this demo. Of course we are divisive! We want to seperate the workers from the ICTU misleaders.
The PBPA originally wanted us to split away from the march and go to the IFSC. It didn't happen on this occasion. But in a situation where ICTU are deliberately demobilising protests it ight be an option next time.
Anti-cuts campaigners plan to turn Trafalgar Square into Tahrir Square
Student activists draw inspiration from Egypt protests and call for 24-hour occupation of London landmark
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/mar/22/anti-cuts-c...ahrir
Campaigners against public service cuts are calling for a 24-hour occupation of Trafalgar Square – drawing inspiration from revolts in the Middle East – to coincide with Saturday's trade union protest in London.
Student activists who organised last year's demonstrations say there will be a rolling programme of sit-ins and protests on the day and have called on people to occupy the central London square turning "Trafalgar into Tahrir" – a reference to the gathering point in Cairo that was at the heart of the revolution in Egypt earlier this year.
"We want Trafalgar Square to become a focal point for the ongoing occupations, marches and sit-ins that will carry on throughout the weekend," said Michael Chessum from the National Campaign Against Fees and Cuts. "There are a lot of smaller scale demonstrations and actions planned and, just as we have seen in recent protests in the Middle East and north Africa, we want to create an ongoing organising hub."...