New Events

National

no events posted in last week

Blog Feeds

Public Inquiry
Interested in maladministration. Estd. 2005

offsite link RTEs Sarah McInerney ? Fianna Fail supporter? Anthony

offsite link Joe Duffy is dishonest and untrustworthy Anthony

offsite link Robert Watt complaint: Time for decision by SIPO Anthony

offsite link RTE in breach of its own editorial principles Anthony

offsite link Waiting for SIPO Anthony

Public Inquiry >>

Human Rights in Ireland
A Blog About Human Rights

offsite link UN human rights chief calls for priority action ahead of climate summit Sat Oct 30, 2021 17:18 | Human Rights

offsite link 5 Year Anniversary Of Kem Ley?s Death Sun Jul 11, 2021 12:34 | Human Rights

offsite link Poor Living Conditions for Migrants in Southern Italy Mon Jan 18, 2021 10:14 | Human Rights

offsite link Right to Water Mon Aug 03, 2020 19:13 | Human Rights

offsite link Human Rights Fri Mar 20, 2020 16:33 | Human Rights

Human Rights in Ireland >>

Lockdown Skeptics

The Daily Sceptic

offsite link Slavery Did Not Make Britain Rich, Report Finds Wed May 01, 2024 19:00 | Will Jones
Slavery and colonialism did not make Britain rich, and may even have made the nation poorer, a new study from the Institute of Economic Affairs has found.
The post Slavery Did Not Make Britain Rich, Report Finds appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.

offsite link Government Caught Playing Hardball Over Vaccine Injury Payouts as Victims? Legal Bills Mount Wed May 01, 2024 17:00 | Will Jones
The Government has been caught shamefully playing hardball with the victims of Covid vaccine injuries, refusing to settle payouts despite devastating harms, as legal bills mount.
The post Government Caught Playing Hardball Over Vaccine Injury Payouts as Victims’ Legal Bills Mount appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.

offsite link How to Say ?NO!? to Clearly Crazy Policy Ideas Wed May 01, 2024 15:18 | Joanna Gray
This is how we should respond to clearly crazy policy ideas, says Joanna Gray. Like a streetwise woman in a nightclub who spots a chancer coming and stops him in his tracks, we all just need to say "NO!"
The post How to Say “NO!” to Clearly Crazy Policy Ideas appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.

offsite link EV Battery Timebomb Wed May 01, 2024 13:09 | Sallust
Many EVs will lose up to 12% of their charge capacity by six years and some may lose even more, research has found, leading one expert to warn customers to be wary of buying a used electric car beyond eight years.
The post EV Battery Timebomb appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.

offsite link The Historical Significance of Humza Yousaf Wed May 01, 2024 11:00 | James Alexander
The real significance of Humza Yousaf is that he was the first leader of a British country to be a practising Muslim, says politics professor Dr James Alexander.
The post The Historical Significance of Humza Yousaf appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.

Lockdown Skeptics >>

Voltaire Network
Voltaire, international edition

offsite link Paris 2024 and Berlin 1936 in the service of an impossible imperial dream, by Th... Tue Apr 30, 2024 07:07 | en

offsite link Georgia and the financing of political organizations from abroad Sat Apr 27, 2024 05:37 | en

offsite link Voltaire, International Newsletter N°84 Sat Apr 27, 2024 05:35 | en

offsite link Israel's complex relations with Iran, by Thierry Meyssan Wed Apr 24, 2024 05:25 | en

offsite link Iran's hypersonic missiles generate deterrence through terror, says Scott Ritter... Mon Apr 22, 2024 10:37 | en

Voltaire Network >>

Breaking news SIPTU leadership call for yes vote

category national | worker & community struggles and protests | news report author Tuesday April 13, 2010 18:44author by James - wsm personal capacity Report this post to the editors

SIPTU public sector executive call for vote in favour of the "Croke Park" deal

The first substantial blow to the prospects of a rejection of the Croke Park agreement came today as SIPTU's public sector executive came out in favour of the deal. Earlier the INMO had urged rejection. The agreement will now be the subject of meetings and debate throughout the state before all the members of the public sector unions vote.

Should the unions vote for acceptance it will represent a resounding victory for the government and a humiliating climb down by the unions. The extremely poorly run campaign by ICTU to reverse the pension levy, followed by the abortive attempt to mollify the governments budget resulting in severe wage cuts, has exposed the Trade Union movement to attack as never before. After 20 years of coasting along on partnership marking time until their pensions the first big struggle with the governement has seen the leaders of the unions battered and bruised whilst their membership have seen their wages shrink steadily.

It now comes down to the workers in the public sector to decide on an agreement that even should they accept it, will not guarantee that further wage cuts are out. It certainly will not see their earlier wages cuts reversed. It appears that the SIPTU leadership was hugely dishonest in mounting a campaign against cuts they never expected to see reversed.

author by Used2bSnowWhitepublication date Tue Apr 13, 2010 23:45author address author phone Report this post to the editors

After today's announcement I am completely outraged with the colluding behaviour of the union leadership especially my union SIPTU. They betrayed their members as they slithered out of negotiations saying 'it's the best we can do' with no cast iron guarantees. They have plenty of time to try and secure new SIPTU premises but no time to secure guarantees to reverse wage cuts to low income earners and stop future pay cuts. I can see a lot of people from my organisation leaving siptu because of their union's treacherous dealings with the government. They are still desperate to walk the corridors of the Dail securing the high-powered bureaucratic bonuses based on membership fees. What happened to their 10 point plan which included protecting the vulnerable and not giving into the bankers? Nothing has been organised or followed up.They say there's no alternative, sure there is, vote these union leaders out!

author by johnny on the tearpublication date Tue Apr 13, 2010 23:52author address author phone Report this post to the editors

can anyone tell me how much these slithering siptu officials get paid???
saw jack o conner on the news talking mumbo jumbo which basically sounded like
they were selling out their membership because they are a bunch of highly paid weasels.

author by Used2bSnowWhitepublication date Wed Apr 14, 2010 00:28author address author phone Report this post to the editors

Johnny, regarding leader's pay, I believe it's in the region of €120,000.00 for Jack O'Connor, siptu, for Peter McLoone, representing Impact 170,000.00 and David Begg, ICTU, €130,000.00. Not sure about the others. Like many union members I do not believe they need such exorbitant salaries to do their job. Let's face it, they couldn't cope with the recent Croke Park debacle so why are they getting paid so much?

author by Michael Gallagherpublication date Wed Apr 14, 2010 06:15author email libertypics at yahoo dot ieauthor address author phone Report this post to the editors

.....

As I was saying.....  © Michael Gallagher 2009
As I was saying..... © Michael Gallagher 2009

author by puisinpublication date Thu Apr 15, 2010 21:01author address author phone Report this post to the editors

which side are they on?
author by puisinpublication date Déar 15 Aib 2010 20:56:49 CDT

james is understating the magnitude of the sellout. This agreement is a straight forward unconditional and surrender of every condition or gain workers have attained over generations. There is no climbdown by the unions. The basic element of this deal were put on the table by the unions themselves last November/ December in the previous talks. The end of the 8 hour day the 5 day monday to friday week and a free hand for the govt.to implement its wrecking of the plan for the puplic services were the unions proposals, the only major new elements are the rescinding of the right to strike or protest any of the restructering of the public sector plus the explicit blanket approval of government economic policies and these flow naturally from the nature of the unions proposals.

The no further pay cuts 'guarantee' is dependendant on the govt.s policies succeeding, that is bailing out anglo and the rest of their cronies through NAMA. Presumably a blue moon and flying pigs could just as credibly have been includedl.

Clearly we are in a bad situation which pre- existed the latest deal, even if there is a no vote we have a huge problem. The same union leaders who campaigned for the deal are virtually unchallenged by organised workers with many uncritically supporting the work to rule campaign which was waged to produce just such a result.

The unions have proved to be the main prop of the govt and its bailout which are both opposed by massive majorities of the population. A government which should have fallen as a result of its total corruption recklessness and rotteness is instead being feted in Europe and its success in waging naked class war against the working class and poor and indeed the middle class is touted in Europe's capitals as a model strategy for making workers pay the price of rescuing capitalism. The key element of this strategy is the underwriting of it by the basic defence organisations of workers.

As long as the union bosses collusion remain unchallenged the more the attacks will continue and such collusion will become more openly adopted by the trade union bureaucracies across Europe.

author by Seán Ógpublication date Fri Apr 16, 2010 09:40author address author phone Report this post to the editors

It is now very clear that whatever workers decide the decision is going to be made over their heads by the unelected ICTU leadership and others such as Jack O'Connor who masquerade as champions of workers rights but are in fact sellout merchants. Even if the "deal" were to be rejected they will go straight back into talks and sign another one with a few minor tweaks. If anything it resembles Lloyd George's 1921 threat of "immediate and terrible war" to the negotiators led by Griffith and Collins - and we know where that led!

Workers must realise that their only option is to fight. The threats will be carried out anyway regardless of whether they crawl in and accept this insulting deal or reject it. Either way the government will extract its pounds of flesh and hand them over to the bankers and speculators who have destroyed this country. Time for the yellow leadership of the trade union movement in this country to step aside or be swept aside.

author by truth - ranks of the unemployedpublication date Sun Apr 18, 2010 17:01author address author phone Report this post to the editors


Down there in the south what can you expect from yes men only a yes vote. Up here in belfast we don't have siptu where once we had thousands. The forerunner of siptu in my grandfathers day yes'd themselves out of a job and the union out of the north. The only reminder of JIM Larkin is a statute of him. Thats whats going to happen down there

author by Outraged - SIPTUpublication date Tue Apr 20, 2010 12:48author address author phone Report this post to the editors

I'm sick and tired of O'connors statements that nothing better can be achieved. Have they tried. Why does he not want to upset the employers and the goverment. Where is the partnership that we endured for years while the employers made a fortune. Partnership ever only suited the employers. it was completely one sided. The goverment and employers and O'Connor and the union were against the workers. We got nothing when the employers made billions and the union and ictu were very well paid w8th perks and backhanders

author by Not Dumb - not siptu - yeah!publication date Wed Apr 21, 2010 14:42author address author phone Report this post to the editors

Obviously the deal will be made over the workers heads. What they want does not count. No-one in the trade union movement ever agreed for Beggs to sit with employers or corrupt bankers in the central bank. Although he claims not to have been paid for for his monthly meetings at central bank, does this excuse his refusal to question the bankers. Or did he not have to because he agreed with them

Number of comments per page
  
 
© 2001-2024 Independent Media Centre Ireland. Unless otherwise stated by the author, all content is free for non-commercial reuse, reprint, and rebroadcast, on the net and elsewhere. Opinions are those of the contributors and are not necessarily endorsed by Independent Media Centre Ireland. Disclaimer | Privacy