For Lefties too Stubborn to Quit
RIA Lunchtime Lecture Series 14:43 Sun Feb 12, 2012 | WorldbyStorm
Sunday Independent Stupid Statement of the Week 11:42 Sun Feb 12, 2012 | Garibaldy
KKE At the Acropolis on Day 2 of the General Strike 21:13 Sat Feb 11, 2012 | Garibaldy
Bit?s and pieces: Weekend edition, Steve Kilbey and Sophie Koh cover the Go-Betweens, Borgen ? is i... 08:42 Sat Feb 11, 2012 | WorldbyStorm
This Weekend I?ll Mostly Be Listening to? Flowered Up 07:54 Sat Feb 11, 2012 | WorldbyStorm Cedar Lounge >>
It's a group blog. What more do you need to know?
UNLOCK NAMA TALK - 28 JAN 2012 09:34 Sat Feb 11, 2012
GILMORE DECLARES GOVERNMENT OF NATIONAL UNITY - HE JUST FORGETS TO TELL THE NATION 12:22 Fri Feb 10, 2012
A MASTERCLASS IN IRISH COMPRADOR/MIDDLEMAN CAPITALISM, COURTESY OF TONY O?REILLY JNR 09:41 Fri Feb 10, 2012
I ALWAYS KNEW SHATTER WAS A BAD ?UN?.. 05:24 Fri Feb 10, 2012
PEOPLE?S NEWS, LATEST ISSUE OUT NOW 00:37 Tue Feb 07, 2012 Dublin Opinion >>
Joined up thinking for the Irish Left
A MASTERCLASS IN IRISH COMPRADOR/MIDDLEMAN CAPITALISM, COURTESY OF TONY O?REILLY... Fri Feb 10, 2012 10:11 | Conor McCabe
The Finance Bill: To Those that Have . . . Thu Feb 09, 2012 16:00 | Michael Taft
Catastrophic Event Thu Feb 09, 2012 13:19 | Aiden Lloyd
Europe?s largest economic failure is not in Greece - but in the UK, Italy and Sp... Wed Feb 08, 2012 14:08 | John Ross
The IFSC Doesn?t Even Buy Ireland a Pint Mon Feb 06, 2012 17:47 | Conor McCabe Irish Left Review >>
A shot at bias in the media
The web's political rainbow Wed Dec 07, 2011 09:47
The Forgotten Constituency: The Majority and The Irish Economic Crisis Fri Mar 11, 2011 11:49
A curse on the zombie establishment Tue Sep 21, 2010 15:11
'Officials say', 'officials say', 'according to an official' Tue Jul 27, 2010 17:05
'The false reality of news journalism' Fri Jul 02, 2010 13:15 MediaBite >>
|
Noam Chomsky on Language Reassessed
international |
education |
other press
Sunday February 07, 2010 19:08 by John Cornford

Chris Knight examines Noam Chomsky’s ‘scientific’ fairy tales about language and its origins
Prof Chris Knight of the Radical Anthropology Group really sticks the boot into Chomsky. He weighs Chomskys credentials in the balance and finds then wanting. Full text at link.
Chomsky was about to deliver a lecture in Delhi. Setting aside the usual niceties, his host - a certain professor Agnihotri of Delhi University - introduced the visiting speaker with a challenge. He was bewildered that a person “so deeply touched by human suffering” could ignore the roots of both happiness and suffering in his scientific work. Noam Chomsky, continued the professor, insisted on viewing language as a “purely biological cognitive system” unconnected with “sociological power-games”. But isn’t language a key tool used by the powerful to deceive, exploit and oppress? How can Chomsky turn a blind eye to such things in his linguistic research?[8] Many in that Delhi audience still seemed puzzled. Why was Chomsky so ambivalent? Was he, perhaps, holding something back? His two temptations seemed to pull him in opposite directions. He would invoke Rousseau, Marx and other great revolutionary thinkers as sources of political inspiration. Yet would any of these figures have shared his difficulties in connecting politics with science? Rousseau’s 1762 treatise, The social contract, was both scholarly and incendiary. Marx intended his Capital to change the world. Is science itself not revolutionary? Why should the pursuit of truth - scientific truth about language, for example - require different methods or pull in a different direction from the pursuit of social equality and justice?
|
View Comments Titles Only
save preference
Comments (6 of 6)
Jump To Comment: 1 2 3 4 5 6The powers that be use Fallacies, cheap rhetoric and emotive language to persuade. These aspects of particular USES of language are well known. Noam chomsky studied the theory of language itself at a more fundamental level. They are not quite the same thing.
This is just an excuse to have a cheap go at a distinguished but elderly man who in his time has contributed a great amount to science and to furthering our awareness of the misuse of political power. He was and still is a man of principle.
He deserves much better than this. Kudos Noam!
I have not formed an opinion on this article but I admire Chomsky for his political activities. Just as I admire Chris Knight who is also a great class struggle activist. Chris lost his job due to his activities during the G20 Summit in London last year.
More info about Chris at: http://www.chrisknight.co.uk/
Chris in Tophat
Let's also not forget Chomsky's great essay/talk on 'Language and Freedom' available in Chomsky on Anarchism or at the link below.
A PDF of the talk (with an introduction to it) is available here:
http://www.chomsky.info/books/state02.pdf
A audio of a related talk is available here:
http://www.almanews.unibo.it/04_05/chomeibl/video/chmsk...1.ram
Great article. Chomsky is an enigma all right. Is his LAD theory not a case of 'biology making the argument for anarchism' i.e., without the imposition of society/the state/institutions etc., the human being would flourish - language is not learned, it is innate and we are all born with the full 'code' for perfect, and 'natural', language production - it is 'society' that imposes upon/restricts overall 'free' human development, and explains 'Orwell's Problem'. An asocial explanation too far methinks.
I am surprised that the article makes no reference to Engels' "The Part played by Labour in the Transition from Ape to Man" by way of explaining the role of social relations in the development/evolution of humankind and (by necessary extension), language.
In other writings by Chris Knight he certainly references Engels on Ape to Man. You can find more articles here: http://www.radicalanthropologygroup.org/new/RAG_Home.html
Many of Chris Knights articles and books are available online at:
http://www.chrisknight.co.uk/publications/
Is how humble he is and how he doesn't always try to engage in these pissing contests to show how great he is. He's always willing to entertain criticism. Thats special for an academic of his standing. Sorry to see that it's not such a common trait. Not even on indy comments sections.