Upcoming Events

National | EU

no events match your query!

Blog Feeds

Cedar Lounge
For lefties too stubborn to quit

offsite link Attention seeker 18:35 Tue Nov 12, 2019 | WorldbyStorm

offsite link Changing the narrative on the climate crisis 11:54 Tue Nov 12, 2019 | WorldbyStorm

offsite link Left resources and links ? November 2019 11:08 Tue Nov 12, 2019 | guestposter

offsite link Ban private jets? 09:53 Tue Nov 12, 2019 | WorldbyStorm

offsite link A New Tactic ?? 09:27 Tue Nov 12, 2019 | irishelectionliterature

Cedar Lounge >>

Dublin Opinion
Life should be full of strangeness, like a rich painting

offsite link Some Thoughts on the Brexit Joint Report 11:50 Sat Dec 09, 2017

offsite link IRISH COMMONWEALTH: TRADE UNIONS AND CIVIL SOCIETY IN THE 21ST CENTURY 14:06 Sat Nov 18, 2017

offsite link Notes for a Book on Money and the Irish State - The Marshall Aid Program 15:10 Sat Apr 02, 2016

offsite link The Financial Crisis:What Have We Learnt? 19:58 Sat Aug 29, 2015

offsite link Money in 35,000 Words or Less 21:34 Sat Aug 22, 2015

Dublin Opinion >>

NAMA Wine Lake

offsite link Test ? 12 November 2018 Mon Nov 12, 2018 14:28 | namawinelake

offsite link Farewell from NWL Sun May 19, 2013 14:00 | namawinelake

offsite link Happy 70th Birthday, Michael Sun May 19, 2013 14:00 | namawinelake

offsite link Of the Week? Sat May 18, 2013 00:02 | namawinelake

offsite link Noonan denies IBRC legal fees loan approval to Paddy McKillen was in breach of E... Fri May 17, 2013 14:23 | namawinelake

NAMA Wine Lake >>

Taoiseach Cowen's spoofery on Lisbon Two could make Irish media & people laughing stock of Europe

category national | eu | press release author Friday December 12, 2008 01:22author by O. O'C. - National Platform for EU Research & Informationauthor email info at nationalplatform dot orgauthor address 24 Crawford Avenue Dublin 9author phone 00-353-1-8305792 Report this post to the editors

Political Declarations or promises regarding future Treaties that are not yet even drafted will not alter a comma of the Lisbon Treaty...

...Taoiseach Brian Cowen's hypocrisy in pretending to "respect" the people's referendum vote on Lisbon is now evident, for not a jot or tittle of Lisbon will be altered when he forces the people to vote on it a second time next year...

Thursday 11 December 2008

... If people vote Yes in Lisbon Two to exactly the same Treaty which they voted No to last June they will be changing the Irish Constitution so as to recognise the supremacy of the law of the new Union which Lisbon would establish over anything contrary, whether in the Irish Constitution or in political Declarations and promises that might be tacked on to Lisbon.

No political Declarations or promises about commitments and even Protocols in future EU Treaties can change Lisbon or the supremacy of the EU Court of Justice in interpreting that Treaty's provisions. These will have come into force well before any further EU Treaty or Treaties will even be negotiated.

If the Irish media and public opinion allow themselves to be taken in by the kind of presentational trickery Taoiseach Cowen and his Government are now planning, they could be making themselves the laughing stock of Europe.

A promise by the 27 EU Governments that each Member State can keep a Commissioner permanently under Lisbon is valueless in the light of that Treaty's provision that from 2014 Member States will lose their right to decide who their national commissioner will be.

For under Lisbon (Article 17.7, amended Treaty on European Union) a Government's present right to decide would be replaced by a right to make "suggestions" only, for the incoming Commission President to decide (See notes below elaborating on this point).

Under the present Nice Treaty arrangements Member States would retain permanently their right to decide who their national Commissioner is - a right which they would lose under Lisbon.

The Nice Treaty requires that the number of Commissioners should be fewer than the number of Member States from 2009, but by an unspecified number to be agreed unanimously.

This requirement of the present Nice-based Treaties can be abided by, and Ireland and the other States can keep a national Commissioner permanently, by the simple expedient of reducing the number of Commissioners from 27 to 26 and permitting whoever holds the job of "High Representative for EU Foreign and Security Policy" - currently Spain's Javier Solana - to attend Commission meetings instead of being formally titled a Commissioner from that State.

This can and should be done under the Nice Treaty. This would mean that the Commission arrangements would continue virtually unchanged from the present. Ireland would retain a Commissioner permanently except in the unlikely event of an Irish person being given the even more important job of High Representative.

Taoiseach Cowen and his Government have deliberately sought to isolate and put pressure on their own people by failing to say after the Lisbon referendum last June that Ireland would not ratify Lisbon in view of the people's No vote.

If the Taoiseach had done that, continued ratification by the other EU States would have been pointless, for Lisbon requires ratification by all 27 States before it can come into force for anyone.

Such a stand would have led to the Lisbon Treaty being opened and a chance created for a more democratic rather than less democratic EU through a better Treaty.

The prudent stand now for the Government and for the EU is to wait for the UK general election and the likely advent to office in Britain of a Conservative Government which will be committed to holding a referendum on Lisbon in the UK and recommending a No vote to it, as long as we Irish do not alter our No vote before then.

That would put paid to the attempted isolation of Ireland, which its own Government has connived at.

It would also give our fellow countrymen and women in Northern Ireland a chance to vote on this Treaty-cum-Constitution which would make them real citizens for the first time of an EU that would have the constitutional form of a supranational Federal State run on most undemocratic lines under Franco-German hegemony.

(Signed)

Anthony Coughlan
Secretary

_______

A NOTE ON HOW LISBON WOULD TAKE AWAY IRELAND'S RIGHT TO DECIDE WHO ITS NATIONAL COMMISSIONER WOULD BE:

Under the current Nice Treaty arrangements (Treaty Establishing the European Community, Article 214.2) Member States have the right to "propose" a Commissioner every five years. This is effectively a right to decide, because while the others can ask the Member State in question to give them some other proposal if they do not like the person proposed, if that Member State declines to change its mind, its proposal will prevail, for otherwise it can refuse to accept the proposals of the others.

Article 214.2 TEC reads: "The Council, acting hy a qualified majority and by common accord with the nominee for the President shall adopt the list of other persons whom it intends to appoint as Members of the Commission, drawn up in accordance with the proposals made by each Member State."

Under Lisbon (amended Treaty on European Union, Article 17.7) Commissioners would be appointed on the basis of "suggestions" from the Member States. The word "proposals" is thus replaced in Lisbon by "suggestions".

Effectively under Lisbon, if it should come into force, it will be the incoming President of the Commission, interacting with the Member States, who will decide what "suggestions" are acceptable to him or not.

The President of the Commission will be effectively decided first by a special qualified majority vote of the Prime Ministers and Presidents - 20 out of 27 - taking account of who has the majority in the EU Parliament. They will propose their nominee to the European Parliament, who will then "elect" him or her. If the European Parliament does not elect the person nominated as President, the Prime Ministers and Presidents must propose another candidate within a month.

Then when it comes to the individual Commissioners, Lisbon states (Article 17.7 amended TEU) :

"The Council, by common accord with the president-elect, shall adopt the list of the other persons whom it proposes for appointment as members of the Commission. They shall be selected, on the basis of suggestions made by Member States, in accordance with the criteria set out in paragraph 3 ..."

Paragraph 3 refers to the criteria of "their general competence and European commitment".

The Commission President, the High Representative for Foreign and Security Policy and the other members of the Commission shall then "be subject as a body to a vote of consent by the European Parliament". If this consent is given "the Commission as a whole shall be appointed by the European Council, acting by a qualified majority"

In power-political terms the Big States in the EU can look with equanimity on the proposal that they should lose their national Commissioner for 10 years out of every 15 in the rotating system proposed by Lisbon, because they know that they will have the decisive say in appointing the new Commission President, who in turn will have the key role in deciding who ALL the Commissioners will be, based on mere "suggestions" rather than proposals from the Member States.

It is unlikely that that the incoming Commission President will adopt "suggestions" that are uncongenial or unacceptable to the Big States who will have been crucial in his or her own appointment.

Lisbon would thus endow the incoming Commission President with powers very similar to those of a Prime Minister at national level - the right to decide what "suggestions" from Member States are acceptable to him, so giving him the right to decide his "Commissioners/Ministers", the right to allocate whatever jobs he likes to the Commissioners and the right to obtain their resignation and replacement at any time.

________

A NOTE ON THE BIG STATE POWER-GRAB FOR CONTROL OF A POST-LISBON EUROPEAN UNION

This is shown by three specific proposals of the Lisbon Treaty:

a) Appointing the new permanent EU President as a plum job by agreement of the Prime Ministers and Presidents among themselves, without any democratic input from the EU's peoples. The new President would replace the present rotating six-month EU presidencies and would chair the summit meetings of Prime Ministers and Presidents for a period of 2.5 years, renewable once.

b) Basing EU law-making post-Lisbon on population size instead of the present system of weighted votes. This would double Germany's relative voting weight in making EU laws from the present 8% to 17%, increase France's, Britain's and Italy's from their present 8% each to 12% each, and halve Ireland's from 2% to 0.8%.

Lisbon would therefore allow 15 EU States to outvote 12 in making European laws, so long as as the 15 constitute 65% of the total EU population of 500 million or so. France and Germany between them already have one-third of the EU's population.

c) (i) Removing the right of Member States to decide their own Commissioner and effectively giving that function to the incoming Commission President, who will be a creature of the Big States.

(ii) Reducing the number of Commissioners by one-third from 2014 - a proposal that can be abandoned by unanimous agreement under Lisbon.

Related Link: http://www.nationalplatform.org/wordpress
author by October Revolution?publication date Fri Dec 12, 2008 15:02author address author phone Report this post to the editors

The plan to make us vote again raises all sorts of issues- what happens when we say no again? Will there be a third try?

What will the Labour Party do since they declared the treaty "dead" in June and now have to dig it up and present its corpse to the people with a few "declarations" to disguise the smell?

This makes Lisbon the only isse for the European elections in Ireland next year, and will probably make Europe figure even in the local elections. I can't see many Fine Gael and Labour politicians relishing the prospect of announcing that they agree with Fianna Fail and the Green Party on this fundamental issue, while they should be kicking them for the appalling mess they have made of virtually everything from the cuts in education to the poison pork recall.

Caption: Embedded video Youtube Video


author by We should all reinforce the No votepublication date Fri Dec 12, 2008 21:27author address author phone Report this post to the editors

It is absolutely an insult to ask us to vote again.

Everyone should go out and vote No again no matter what changes are made to the re-hashed Treaty.

Why have the vote in the first place if the Government will not accept the votes of the people. It is a farce to keep holding it again until they get the answer they want.

Ireland the country of the wee folk and leprechauns like Cowan have made us the laughing stock of the world.

We are meant to have a democracy but when we exercise our democratic right to freely decide what we want we are contradicted by the Government and told to go back to the polls again and do it right next time!

Me thinks Swine Fever has taken over the brains of half of the members in Leinster House and they are not talking straight. Maybe there are even a few Mad Cows there too!

When Cowan falls on his face after the second round of votes he will be one of the many adding to the numbers in DOLE queue for sure.

author by Sharon. - Individual .publication date Fri Dec 12, 2008 23:49author address author phone Report this post to the editors

Hi !

We 'NO' voters have nothing to worry about : if the Treaty is passed in October 2009 I , for one , have no doubt whatsoever that 'the powers that be' will be equally 'as fair' and give us all a third go at it .
Indeed.

More comment at the 'Related Link' below .

Thanks!

Sharon.

VOTE 'NO!' . AGAIN.
VOTE 'NO!' . AGAIN.

Related Link: http://11sixtynine.blogsome.com/2008/12/12/lisbon-treaty-re-run-vote-no-again/
author by Johnpublication date Sat Dec 13, 2008 08:33author address author phone Report this post to the editors

In the interests of democracy, and the avoidance of tyranny, the Republic of Ireland should have insisted that it would only hold a second referendum if the citizens of all the other sovereign states involved were also allowed to have a referendum.

Doing so would represent real and significant social progress in Europe.

Instead, our "public servants" (so called) play into the hands of the bullies and their never-ending orgies of corruption, crime, and social unrest.

Fuck them!!

author by Michael Hoganpublication date Sat Dec 13, 2008 14:46author address author phone Report this post to the editors

The best answer to a No 2 referendum on Lisbon, would be to repeat our answer of Lisbon 1 with an increase of No votes and shoot them all up the ass !

author by lulupublication date Sat Dec 13, 2008 20:18author address author phone Report this post to the editors

Can we have the election again? Some of us voted wrongly, & have since found Fianna Fáil are a gang of baboons.
We should play to them 'No Is No!' by They Might Be Giants: good song for the New No Campaign.

author by Wonderingpublication date Thu May 28, 2009 22:31author address author phone Report this post to the editors

Supposing there is another vote here on the Lisbon Treaty, and that instead of 53% voting NO (which it was last time I think) that the next time 63% (say) vote NO -- which could well happen I believe.

Surely that would put the bastards in their place? -- or would it?

These bastards are such bastards it seems, that there is possibly no stopping them?

Number of comments per page
  
 
© 2001-2019 Independent Media Centre Ireland. Unless otherwise stated by the author, all content is free for non-commercial reuse, reprint, and rebroadcast, on the net and elsewhere. Opinions are those of the contributors and are not necessarily endorsed by Independent Media Centre Ireland. Disclaimer | Privacy