The Party and the Ballot Box Sun Jul 14, 2019 22:24 | Gavin Mendel-Gleason
On The Decline and Fall of The American Empire and Socialism Sat Jan 26, 2019 01:52 | S. Duncan
What is Dogmatism and Why Does It Matter? Wed Mar 21, 2018 08:10 | Sylvia Smith
The Case of Comrade Dallas Mon Mar 19, 2018 19:44 | Sylvia Smith
Review: Do Religions Evolve? Mon Aug 14, 2017 19:54 | Dara McHugh
Spirit of Contradiction >>
Interested in maladministration. Estd. 2005
Elaine Byrne: Lacking moral courage to name names
Real democracies and referendums Anthony
Public Services Card: Some still forced to comply Anthony
Catholic Church: Dark influence still active Anthony
Tom Parlon launches new career in comedy Anthony
Public Inquiry >>
A bird's eye view of the vineyard
Ground Control to Planet Lockdown: This Is Only a Test Sat Apr 04, 2020 03:30 | amarynth
By Pepe Escobar and crossposted with Strategic Culture Foundation As much as Covid-19 is a circuit breaker, a time bomb and an actual weapon of mass destruction (WMD), a fierce
Corona rewrites capitalist bust-chronology & proves: It?s the nation-state, stupid Fri Apr 03, 2020 18:56 | amarynth
By Ramin Mazaheri for The Saker Blog It?s an unusual prediction, but the coronavirus may kill the ?neoliberal Trotskyist? projects of the Eurozone and the European Union because the pan-European
Living in the Covid-19 environment Fri Apr 03, 2020 18:42 | amarynth
By G H Eliason for The Saker Blog You?ve heard the US Surgeon General saying, ?We should be acting as if we have the virus” to flatten the curve? How
China rolls out the Health Silk Road Thu Apr 02, 2020 18:50 | amarynth
by Pepe Escobar – Posted with permission In the Belt and Road framework, China is supplying much of the world including virus-hit Europe with medicine and healthcare items When President
(A Soviet?) Superman: Red Son ? the new socialist film to watch on lockdown Thu Apr 02, 2020 17:38 | amarynth
By Ramin Mazaheri for The Saker Blog It?s the film which captures what 2020?s zeitgeist should become, given that the rabidly anti-socialist West has chosen to economically self-implode Everything Bubble
The Saker >>
A Blog About Human Rights
Human Rights Fri Mar 20, 2020 16:33 | Human Rights
Turkish President Calls On Greece To Comply With Human Rights on Syrian Refugee Issues Wed Mar 04, 2020 17:58 | Human Rights
US Holds China To Account For Human Rights Violations Sun Oct 13, 2019 19:12 | Human Rights
UN Human Rights Council Should Address Human Rights Crisis in Cambodia Sat Aug 31, 2019 13:41 | Human Rights
Fijian women still face Human Rights violations Mon Aug 26, 2019 18:49 | Human Rights
Human Rights in Ireland >>
Comhlámh Document on Lisbon Treaty
Wednesday May 21, 2008 20:02 by Gar - N/A
I'm not a member of Comhlamh, but just thought I'd point out a document the NGO has produced on the Lisbon Treaty. The PDF is available on their website.
A summary of the Lisbon Treaty for Comhlámh supporters
On the 12th of June 2008 you can be part of shaping the future of the EU by using your vote in
the referendum on this treaty.
What is it?
The Lisbon Treaty is also known as the EU Reform Treaty. It aims to make the EU a more
efficient global player, to provide it with the institutional set-up to deal with its rapidly
growing membership (now 27 countries) and mandate, and to enable it to speak with one
Why should I vote?
As EU citizens we have a part to play in creating the EU. It should reflect the people who make
it up. Ireland is the only country in the EU where citizens have the chance to vote on the Lisbon
treaty. In other countries it has been passed through national parliaments. In Ireland we can
play a part in deciding what the European voice will be.
This treaty will restructure the workings of the EU in an aim to simplify decision-making and
strengthen democratic accountability. Currently, two thirds of our laws are made at EU level.
The treaty will give the EU new law-making power in at least 32 new areas and broadens
current law-making power in 40 other areas. The EU Commission, which is not elected or
transparent, proposes these laws and our elected MEPs vote on them.
The treaty will reduce the number of MEPs to 751 (from 785) and increase the use of Qualified
Majority Voting (QMV) to new areas that currently need a unanimous vote in parliament. This
would reduce Ireland’s percentage of votes in the council from the current 2% to 0.8%,
resulting in less involvement of smaller countries in decision making and influencing laws.
The number of EU commissioners will be reduced from 27 to 18. This means that small
countries such as Ireland will be not represented in the EU by a commissioner for 5 out of every
National parliaments will be able to challenge proposed legislation within eight weeks on the
grounds that action would make more sense at national or at regional level. Citizens can object
to the commission’s proposals if over a million citizens from at least 15 member states petition
the commission. In both cases the commission has to consider the objection to their proposal;
however it does not have to act upon the objection.
Thus the treaty increases the power of the European Commission without a corresponding
increase in accountability to either the European Parliament or the national parliaments. This
will weaken, not strengthen democratic accountability.
While many questions have not been addressed regarding how the new institutional set up will
function, and there is no consolidated text of the treaty available, the current focus of the EU
is on getting the treaty implemented by the end of 2008. However this puts Irish citizens in a
situation where we are voting on a treaty without adequate knowledge of what will happen
The EU’s overarching development aim of eradicating poverty is enshrined in the treaty. The
treaty will create a new post of the High Representative of Foreign Affairs which will combine
two current roles and coordinate all of the EU’s external policies, offering the potential for
greater coherence. However, its mandate stresses the centrality of Security issues, not
Development. There is the danger that the aim is to improve coherence in the area of Security,
and that development concerns could get sidelined and marginalised.
According to critics this presents the risk that EU development funds may be diverted to
finance EU foreign policy objectives. The reduction of overall commissioners means
furthermore that there is no guarantee of a permanent Commissioner for Development.
The treaty sets out the principles of ‘impartiality, neutrality, and non-discrimination’ in
relation to humanitarian assistance. Critics point out that the principle of ‘independence’ is
left out. This principle – that humanitarian assistance is free of political objectives – would
prevent EU humanitarian assistance being dependent on countries cooperating with the EU’s
The treaty calls for the establishment of a Voluntary Humanitarian Aid corps despite NGOs
having long campaigned against this on the basis that effective humanitarian assistance
requires professional intervention to ensure quality and accountability. According to critics
there is an inherent risk that both development and humanitarian responses will be subjugated
to political objectives.
The treaty repeats the EU commitment to the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) and to
reaching the target of giving 0.7% of GNP in overseas aid. However the treaty does not include
any concrete plans on how to implement these aspirations. Currently the average spending
within the EU on aid is 0.3% and most countries are not on track to achieve 0.7% by 2010. The
treaty aims to ensure that EU states coordinate their aid and make it more effective. Ireland
will still be able to agree on bilateral aid agreements with developing countries.
The Lisbon Treaty clearly enshrines the current pro-liberalisation approach of the European
Union as it puts into legislation that “all restrictions on the movement of capital between
Member States and between Member States and third countries shall be prohibited” (Art 56),
regardless of the end results for development, consumer rights, or environmental standards.
Furthermore the treaty adds to the range of trade decisions that are already made at EU level,
speeds up some trade decisions at EU level (through more QMV), and expands the powers of the
unelected Trade Commissioner.
Under the terms of the treaty, the trade commission will see its remit increased to cover the
issues of investment and intellectual property (areas many developing countries do not want to
liberalise) as well as further aspects of trade in services, in addition to its existing competence
on goods trade. Comhlamh has been campaigning against this approach for the last 10 years.
The treaty commits member states to spending more on defence and to allowing the EU to use
their military and civilian facilities for military purposes. Member states can form a military
alliance within the EU and use EU resources for these military actions. Other member states
who are not participating are not involved in this alliance – in action, discussion, or voting -
however their resources may be used, and there is a risk that these alliances will be widely
viewed as an EU force.
How do I vote?
The referendum will be held on Thursday the 12th of June 2008.