Upcoming Events

Cork | Anti-Capitalism

no events match your query!

New Events

Cork

no events posted in last week

Blog Feeds

Public Inquiry
Interested in maladministration. Estd. 2005

offsite link RTEs Sarah McInerney ? Fianna Fail supporter? Anthony

offsite link Joe Duffy is dishonest and untrustworthy Anthony

offsite link Robert Watt complaint: Time for decision by SIPO Anthony

offsite link RTE in breach of its own editorial principles Anthony

offsite link Waiting for SIPO Anthony

Public Inquiry >>

Human Rights in Ireland
A Blog About Human Rights

offsite link UN human rights chief calls for priority action ahead of climate summit Sat Oct 30, 2021 17:18 | Human Rights

offsite link 5 Year Anniversary Of Kem Ley?s Death Sun Jul 11, 2021 12:34 | Human Rights

offsite link Poor Living Conditions for Migrants in Southern Italy Mon Jan 18, 2021 10:14 | Human Rights

offsite link Right to Water Mon Aug 03, 2020 19:13 | Human Rights

offsite link Human Rights Fri Mar 20, 2020 16:33 | Human Rights

Human Rights in Ireland >>

Lockdown Skeptics

The Daily Sceptic

offsite link Topsy-Turvy Land Sun May 05, 2024 09:00 | Guy de la Bédoyère
It seems that Enid Blyton was way ahead of the curve when it came to understanding the tearing of society apart by compelling everyone to join in the madness to be the same and using Stasi-like police as enforcers.
The post Topsy-Turvy Land appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.

offsite link Green Blob Tells Government to Spend £30 Billion on Machine to Remove CO2 From the Air Sun May 05, 2024 07:00 | Ben Pile
The 'Green Blob' has told the Government to spend £30bn trying to remove CO2 from the air using experimental technology that will likely fail and would do no good even if it worked.
The post Green Blob Tells Government to Spend £30 Billion on Machine to Remove CO2 From the Air appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.

offsite link News Round-Up Sun May 05, 2024 01:14 | Will Jones
A summary of the most interesting stories in the past 24 hours that challenge the prevailing orthodoxy about the ?climate emergency?, public health ?crises? and the supposed moral defects of Western civilisation.
The post News Round-Up appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.

offsite link U.S. Government Mandates Preferred Pronouns in All Workplaces Sat May 04, 2024 15:00 | Will Jones
The U.S. Government has mandated the use of preferred pronouns in every workplace in America in a clampdown on 'discrimination' against transgender people under the 1964 Civil Rights Act. Even customers must comply.
The post U.S. Government Mandates Preferred Pronouns in All Workplaces appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.

offsite link Have Left-Wing Protesters Moved On From Climate Change? Sat May 04, 2024 13:00 | Will Jones
Climate protests are so last year, it appears, as the same crowd now preoccupies itself with Gaza demonstrations. Is the truth that Left-wing protests are just fads chasing the latest issue du jour?
The post Have Left-Wing Protesters Moved On From Climate Change? appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.

Lockdown Skeptics >>

Voltaire Network
Voltaire, international edition

offsite link Voltaire, International Newsletter N°85 Fri May 03, 2024 14:25 | en

offsite link The Kastner case resurfaces Fri May 03, 2024 14:06 | en

offsite link Non-Semite (sic) Khazar Netanyahu calls US anti-genocidal academics "anti-Semite... Fri May 03, 2024 07:13 | en

offsite link Paris 2024 and Berlin 1936 in the service of an impossible imperial dream, by Th... Tue Apr 30, 2024 07:07 | en

offsite link Georgia and the financing of political organizations from abroad Sat Apr 27, 2024 05:37 | en

Voltaire Network >>

Solidarity On The Cork Docks

category cork | anti-capitalism | feature author Saturday May 17, 2008 12:37author by Kevin Doyle - Workers Solidarity Movement - Cork Report this post to the editors

featured image
Scene of the crime

In mid April, Cork dock workers took action in support of the crew of The Defender, a cargo ship owned by Forestry Shipping from Riga, Latvia but registered in Cambodia.

The Defender had nine crew on board and was carrying cargo for delivery in the Cork area.Kevin Doyle spoke to Peter Andrers, Stephen McCarty and Timmy Ricken, members of SIPTU’s No 5 branch about the action.

Q: You were at work when you heard about the situation of the crew. Can you tell me what happened?

A: Well you see, the boys in Connolly Hall* heard about the Defender via Ken Fleming of the International Transport Federation. We were working when we got a call at nine o clock to tell us that the crew on this Defender hadn’t been paid. When we got to where the ship was berthed, Ken Fleming was there with our acting branch secretary. There were six of our colleagues discharging the ship - well five and a foreman, that is. The ship was loaded with timber. So, we were made aware of the consequences of the situation and there was a bit of too-ing and fro-ing. We were asked for our support. And we decided to support the crew on humanitarian grounds – that the people weren't being paid. Our lads stopped unloading the ship at about 11 or 11.30 or thereabout.

*SIPTU’s main office in Cork

Q: What was the exact situation of the crew?

A: They hadn’t been paid for a long while. Over four months. Which for seagoing people is very very hard to swallow. You can imagine even when they berthed in a port these men probably had no money to disembark. It was very difficult. The crew’s claim for unpaid wages amounted to over €50,000. They were all signed up for the agreed ITF minimum rates, but these rates weren’t honoured by the owners. Some new lousy contracts were forced on them.
Q: Is this an unusual situation to come across on the docks or what?
A: When we were asked to support them we did so and it was then we found out about what was happening on the Defender. The ITF knew about it and had been tracking the ship for awhile. She was regular calling to Cork, that ship, but we didn’t know about it ’til we heard via Ken Fleming.

Q: What was the response to your solidarity action?

A: Well nothing happened then! What I mean is that the timber load was on the Defender and that was where it was staying. We had a meeting with Ken Fleming about 2 o clock. To be honest we were a little annoyed we heard so late in the day about the ship and we said that. But anyway we went from there to the new airport hotel and we met the Harbour Master and others there. They were all at a meeting up at this hotel as there were big discussions going on about the proposed extension of the Cork docks down into Ringaskiddy deep port. We also met one of representatives of Doyles. Doyles are the stevedore company that we work for. They were dealing with the Defender.

Q: What happened then?

A: No one was happy at this stage. Not the Harbour Board, not Doyles, not the ship’s agent. To be fair, if it was known about what was happening with the Defender, it wouldn’t even have been left into Cork Harbour in the first place. But that was a good move by Ken Fleming and the ITF. So our priority was to get the sailors their money. It was total injustice. We weren’t going to unload the ship until they did.

Q: Where was the ship from?

A: It was a Latvian ship but the sailors were a couple of nationalities. We weren’t too worried where they were from.

Q: What was the upshot of the meeting at the airport?

A: We got a guarantee from the Harbour authorities that the ship would not be allowed leave the port. In fact the ship was arrested – in the sense that it was impounded. Along the way, a big load of cigarettes was found on board her too – so that complicated things further for the owners. So anyway the ship was now to be kept in port. Once we had secured this agreement that the crew would be paid, we gave our men the word to discharge the cargo as there were quite a few businesses waiting on that cargo of timber. Those businesses were anxious to get the cargo moving.

Q: Did the crew get their money at this point?

A: Well the Harbour Master got onto the owners and said about the money owed to the crew. The Harbour Master could technically sell the cargo to settle the matter if he wished. Our employer, PF Doyle, went with the flow then. They wanted to get the cargo moving too. And anyway at this point word was out. The Harbour Board workers are also militant - the harbour pilots and so on, I mean. If they say some action is justified, then not much can move in the harbour. We have a great relationship with them. And if we are backing a dispute, they will back us up. And we would also back them. We are all in No 5 branch of SIPTU, as are the Harbour Board workers and pilots.

Q: Did all the crew of the Defender get sorted?

A: In three or four days yes. We started the action on a Thursday and by Tuesday of the following week we were notified that they had all been paid. Everything went well once we secured the agreement. The ship sailed off again.

Q: You got the result?

A: Once we stopped the unloading it brought it all to a head. If that hadn’t been done I think the crew would still be without their pay.

Q: In the recent times, there have been a few well publicised cases of dock workers acting in solidarity with other workers and with larger political struggles. The South African workers refused to unload weapons for Mugabe’s regime in Zimbabwe and then there was action of US dock workers against George Bush’s war in Iraq. Are there similarities with these widely publicised cases?

A: Solidarity is always there. It’s always been there, but when we don’t know about a situation or dispute we don’t do anything. But once we were notified, as I said, then it’s different. Our priority once we knew about it was to get the crew paid. And we did.

Related Link: http://www.wsm.ie/news_viewer/3887
author by Tony Ayton - Retired ITF inspectorpublication date Mon Jun 16, 2008 20:26author email tony.ayton at upcmail dot ieauthor address Privateauthor phone 00353 87 6794426Report this post to the editors


In relation to the point about ensuring that the seafarers actually get to keep the money that has been recovered for them, it is not uncommon for rogue shipowners to try to claw the money back, once the vessel is out of port.

For that reason the ITF always try to get the seafarer(s) to hand over the money to the ITF inspctor, who gives them an offical receipt and then lodges the money in a special interest bearing seafares wages bank account . The seafarer(s) can then, when they feel it is safe to do so- contact the ITF - which is a worldwide organisation - and draw their money plus any interest earned.

Sadly, many seafarers do not use this facility and we have stories - always hard to prove ,of seafarers being beaten-up and the money taken.

There are occasions when we got the seafarer repatriated and they insisted on taking fairly large sums of money in cash which we recoverd for them. Next we heard that elements of the security services in their home country, searched them, found and then took a lot of the cash, as the price for letting them through without "trouble" It would be best if I did not name the countries, but they were not in Western Europe.

Tony Ayton

Related Link: http://www.itfglobal.org
author by Justin Morahanpublication date Wed Jun 04, 2008 13:08author address author phone Report this post to the editors

It's really heartwarming to read of an action like this and the success of the non-violent action of simply laying down tools. It's another world on board ship and rogue owners might think they can treat human beings like pawns and get way with it "because no-one will be bothered about it".

That's all the more reason why it's so important to have people like the ITFand SIPTU (No 5 Branch) to show that other people do care and will not let these injustices happen.

Well done to the Harbour Board workers and pilots, to Kevin Doyle for the interview and story, to Peter Andrers, Stephen McCarty , Timmy Ricken for the interview, to Ken Fleming and Tony Ayton and anyone else involved. I was particularly delighted with the response of the interviewee who said: "We weren’t too worried where they [the sailors] were from". Not being worried where they were from shows real worker solidarity.

There's just one little point still niggling at my brain. The interviewee said "We were notified that they had all been paid". I was wondering, in view of the initial non-payment , who gave this notification and was it trustworthy. That is, could it be that the ship owners got their work done and put to sea with a promise that might later be broken or re-bargained with the sailors who would then be in a more compromised position. It would be good, in my opinion, if ITF would follow up this initial success by contacting the sailors at some other port and finding out exactly what happened after their action. Or maybe this has already been done?

Keep up thr good work

author by Tony Ayton - Retired Inspector of the International Transport Workers Fedpublication date Tue Jun 03, 2008 19:44author email tony.ayton at upcmail dot ieauthor address 45 Avondale Lawn, Avondale, Waterford Cityauthor phone 087 6794426Report this post to the editors

My name is Tony Ayton. I was the first full-time inspector appointed for Ireland by the International Transport Workers Federation. (ITF) I have now retired. Ken Fleming is now the Inspector .Before my appointment, the welfare of unpaid or generally abused seafarers was left to individual officials of SIPTU to deal with, if they could, on top of their other duties. I was one of those officials.

During my time and now in Ken Flemings time, the most effective weapon to use against rogue shipowners is worker solidarity. If dockers, won't load/unload the vessel and/or the pilots would take her in/out, or the tugs won't assist then we have the shipowner by the short and curlys

Give Ken Fleming all the help and support you can. I know I am biased because he is a friend of mine - but he is a great and dedicated trade Unionist, deeply committed to the welfare of seafarers

 
© 2001-2024 Independent Media Centre Ireland. Unless otherwise stated by the author, all content is free for non-commercial reuse, reprint, and rebroadcast, on the net and elsewhere. Opinions are those of the contributors and are not necessarily endorsed by Independent Media Centre Ireland. Disclaimer | Privacy