Interested in maladministration. Estd. 2005
RTEs Sarah McInerney ? Fianna Fail?supporter? Anthony
Joe Duffy is dishonest and untrustworthy Anthony
Robert Watt complaint: Time for decision by SIPO Anthony
RTE in breach of its own editorial principles Anthony
Waiting for SIPO Anthony Public Inquiry >>
Promoting Human Rights in IrelandHuman Rights in Ireland >>
The Sugar Tax Sums Up Our Descent into Technocratic Dystopia Thu May 08, 2025 19:00 | Dr David McGrogan The sugar tax sums up Britain's descent into a technocratic dystopia, says Dr David McGrogan. While our Government does almost nothing well, it remains a world-leader in passive-aggressive, surreptitious nudging.
The post The Sugar Tax Sums Up Our Descent into Technocratic Dystopia appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
UK ?Shafted? by US Trade Deal Thu May 08, 2025 17:44 | Will Jones The US-UK trade deal announced today is a clear win for Trump, says Sam Ashworth-Hayes, leaving the UK worse off than in March and opening up UK markets in exchange only for reducing recently imposed tariffs.
The post UK “Shafted” by US Trade Deal appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
Australia?s Liberal Party Only Has Itself to Blame for its Crushing Defeat by Labour Thu May 08, 2025 15:30 | Dr James Allan As in Canada, so in Australia, the crushing defeat of the conservative Liberal Party by Labour has been widely blamed on Trump. But in truth, Peter Dutton and his team only have themselves to blame, says Prof James Allan.
The post Australia’s Liberal Party Only Has Itself to Blame for its Crushing Defeat by Labour appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
Sun-Dimming Quango has ?800 Million of Taxpayer Money to Blow ? and a CEO on ?450k Thu May 08, 2025 13:28 | Sallust The quango behind the mad and dangerous plan to dim the Sun has a budget of ?800 million of taxpayer money to blow on speculative projects ? and a CEO on ?450k. What an extraordinary misuse of public money.
The post Sun-Dimming Quango has ?800 Million of Taxpayer Money to Blow ? and a CEO on ?450k appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
Voters Reject Net Zero, Opinion Poll Shows Thu May 08, 2025 11:13 | Will Jones Voters reject Net Zero when asked whether it is more important than cutting the cost of living, an opinion poll has shown, with nearly 60% picking cutting costs and just 13% cutting carbon emissions when asked to choose.
The post Voters Reject Net Zero, Opinion Poll Shows appeared first on The Daily Sceptic. Lockdown Skeptics >>
Voltaire, international edition
Will intergovernmental institutions withstand the end of the "American Empire"?,... Sat Apr 05, 2025 07:15 | en
Voltaire, International Newsletter N?127 Sat Apr 05, 2025 06:38 | en
Disintegration of Western democracy begins in France Sat Apr 05, 2025 06:00 | en
Voltaire, International Newsletter N?126 Fri Mar 28, 2025 11:39 | en
The International Conference on Combating Anti-Semitism by Amichai Chikli and Na... Fri Mar 28, 2025 11:31 | en Voltaire Network >>
|
Search author name words: A
Red Banner magazine ceases publication.
national |
anti-capitalism |
press release
Thursday June 07, 2007 16:05 by Red Banner editorial board - Red Banner magazine

Editorial board of Red Banner magazine ceases publication.
3rd June 2007
The editorial board of Red Banner has decided to cease publication of the magazine and to incorporate it into a proposed new publication in the future.
Since the editorial board meeting of 29th March, a board member, solely on his own initiative with the subsequent support of a second board member, has sought to exclude another board member from the editorial board. Since 8th May he has sought to exclude yet another member. He then refused to conduct editorial business or to agree to the convening of editorial meetings, bringing work on issue No. 28 of Red Banner to a halt.
In order to address the situation and to discuss and make decisions on the future of the magazine, we called a meeting of the five members of the editorial board for Monday 28th May.
Neither of the other two board members attended or acknowledged notice of the meeting.
At that meeting the editorial board resolved:
“…that the only option is to wrap up the magazine. [‘X’s] determination to impose his will on the editorial board, the exclusion and attempted exclusion of two board members and the practical paralysis that [‘X’] has now imposed on the production of the magazine, make it impossible to carry on.
This inflexibility also makes it impossible to envisage down the line any editorial and political changes needed to develop the magazine. So it is timely for a new, or two new, publications to succeed Red Banner. It is the intention of the editorial board to begin discussions among Red Banner readers and supporters and others on the left with a view to a new publication, incorporating Red Banner and its original spirit.
Red Banner has maintained publication, respect and a small readership for ten years, as the only independent socialist publication in print that allowed for the free and open exchange of socialist ideas in considered, extensive and detailed form. It could not have done so for one year without the dedication of the two editorial board members who have now brought Red Banner to a standstill. Despite our unfortunately irreconcilable differences we salute their past indispensability to Red Banner and their continued work for the oppressed and for socialism.
With a special irony in the case of Red Banner, the left has disgraced itself again by splitting. Red Banner, which emerged as an alternative to sectarianism, to champion a new politics, has fallen victim to intolerance and overbearance on its own editorial board and produced another dispute between factions.
We request the other editorial board members to now make all the assets of Red Banner available to the new publication or publications. We undertake to honour subscriptions to Red Banner, or to refund the money, and we hope that the readers, subscribers and writers of Red Banner will carry their support over to its proposed successor.”
The editorial board sent its resolution to the two missing board members and set about reporting the full and detailed resolution to the subscribers, contributors and supporters of Red Banner. We are now doing so with the updated position, including the paragraph below. Before our resolution was circulated one of us received in the post on 31st May a copy of Issue 28 of Red Banner, produced (we guess) by the other two board members. Now they have advertised Issue 28 on Indymedia and a Red Banner website has been constructed and launched. We are compelled to make a public statement.
The narrative is now complete: the exclusion of first one, then two, non-compliant editorial members, has now extended to all three. The editorial work for Issue No.28 has not been halted at all, just carried out by a minority on the editorial board with the exclusion of the members unacceptable to them, while boycotting a validly convened editorial meeting and whatever decisions it might make. The board decided to cease publication. Issue No.28 is a pirate issue. Its publishers should now comply with the clear intentions of the editorial board, produce their own publication and desist from their usurpation of Red Banner.
Des Derwin
John Meehan
Brendan Young.
Red Banner Editorial Board members.
|
View Full Comment Text
save preference
Comments (37 of 37)