Upcoming Events

National | Arts and Media

no events match your query!

User Preferences

  • Language - en | ga
  • text size >>
  • make this your indymedia front page make this your indymedia front page

Blog Feeds

forward

Cedar Lounge
For lefties too stubborn to quit

offsite link What you want to say ? 17th September 2014 03:51 Wed Sep 17, 2014 | WorldbyStorm

offsite link Last few polls in Scotland? 21:20 Tue Sep 16, 2014 | WorldbyStorm

offsite link Area man says Fine Gael ?have gone very right wing?? He should know. 21:06 Tue Sep 16, 2014 | WorldbyStorm

offsite link America?s Largest Pension Fund Pulls Out of Hedge Funds 16:07 Tue Sep 16, 2014 | Garibaldy

offsite link Speaking of polls, what of party polling in the UK? 14:49 Tue Sep 16, 2014 | WorldbyStorm

Cedar Lounge >>

Dublin Opinion
Life should be full of strangeness, like a rich painting

offsite link Global Finance, Money and Power: Lecture One - The Nature of Money and Credit 10:21 Thu Sep 11, 2014

offsite link MANDATE TRADE UNION TRAINING - IRELAND AND FINANCE (SEP 2014) 08:58 Tue Sep 09, 2014

offsite link I SEE THE CLICHÉ CHICKENS ARE BACK AGAIN TED 10:02 Sat Aug 30, 2014

offsite link IRELAND?S TAX HAVEN INDUSTRY 22:01 Tue Aug 05, 2014

offsite link IPA Summer School - Social Justice, Poverty and Ireland - 28 July 2014 11:56 Mon Jul 28, 2014

Dublin Opinion >>

Irish Left Review
Joined up thinking for the Irish Left

offsite link Appreciating Facts Tue Sep 16, 2014 13:48 | Michael Taft

offsite link The September Socialist Voice Out Now Tue Sep 16, 2014 13:36 | Irish Left Review

offsite link The Rising Tide ? LookLeft 19 in Shops Now Fri Sep 12, 2014 17:17 | Irish Left Review

offsite link Phil Hogan, the Embodiment of the Crony Capitalist Links Between Business and Po... Wed Sep 10, 2014 21:16 | Andy Storey

offsite link The Loneliness of a Low-Tax, Low-Wage Economy Thu Sep 04, 2014 17:39 | Michael Taft

Irish Left Review >>

Human Rights in Ireland
www.humanrights.ie

offsite link PILnet?s 8th Annual European Pro Bono Forum Tue Sep 16, 2014 15:14 | GuestPost

offsite link 12th Annual Human Rights Conference: Criminal Justice and Human Rights in Ireland Tue Sep 16, 2014 15:08 | GuestPost

offsite link On Repealing the 8th Amendment. #repealthe8th Thu Sep 11, 2014 08:43 | admin

offsite link ?Let us Play?: Support Children in Direct Provision Wed Sep 10, 2014 10:05 | Liam Thornton

offsite link The Northern/Irish Feminist Judgments Project begins next month! Tue Sep 09, 2014 13:11 | admin

Human Rights in Ireland >>

Kevin Myers shows poor judgement in returning to his folly

category national | arts and media | opinion/analysis author Friday April 20, 2007 00:17author by MJ Costello - Erin Foods (deceased) Report this post to the editors

Irish Independent SOB re-focusses attention on Irish Times MOB article

In a recent Irish Independent article Kevin Myers blamed RTE for "hate mail, death threats, and abusive graffiti on my car, concluding with my home having to be given round-the-clock Garda protection"

Kevin says this resulted from Joe Duffy’s Liveline whipping up the “mob” "after (as I admitted within a day and repeat now) was [sic] a very poor article of mine".

Major Myarse, as Kev is known affectionately, does not reveal why he was persona non-grata with the “mob”.

Was it opposition to poor syntax, bad grammar, or irritation at Kev not letting facts get in the way of his opinions (or of his apology, which took two days to appear, not one)? Not the latter, we can be sure. Otherwise the mob would be scribbling its criticism on Kev's car every day of the week and Kev, like Salman Rushdie, would require permanent ”round-the-clock Garda protection”.

"Is the boss a bastard?"
"Is the boss a bastard?"

No, it was because in the infamously "poor" column on February 8 2005 in the Irish Times, Kev referred to unmarried mothers as “mothers of bastards”, or “MoBs”. Not once, but a lot of times. The misogynist and reactionary Myers attacked the so-called "heresy underlying welfarism".

The nation (minus K Myers, who is not a member) rose up as one in revolt.

RTE's 'Liveline' merely reflected the indignation of the populace.

Kev forgets the negative opinions expressed on radio by his Irish Times colleagues.

Madam regrets

On radio Irish Times columnist John Waters, criticised Irish Times editors and “weasel words” in a subsequent “regretful”, but self-congratulatory, editorial. Waters is the (unmarried) father of a child with Sinead O'Connor, who was the only named ‘MoB’ in Kev’s column.

Fintan O'Toole told RTE he was disgusted and said Irish tabloids would have rejected it. The ICTU’s David Begg, a member of the Irish Times Trust, also objected. Political reporter Mark Hennessy said on radio: "There is nobody in the Irish Times arguing that it is anything other than a mistake and a bad one."

IT reporter Kitty Holland, daughter of the late and unmarried Irish Times columnist Mary Holland, spoke of her terror as a child that she would be regarded as a "bastard" by school mates. A radio caller noted that the Irish Times “regretful” editorial devoted 47 lines to praising itself and just one to expressing regret. Times columnist Vincent Browne referred to the opening two sentences as containing "astounding self-regard".

Myers says sorry, sort-of

Kev’s 'apology' to the mob for his references to the ‘MoB’ was wrenched out of him on February 10, 2005. Sorry for the words he used, not for the thoughts they expressed.

Some time after the indignity of having to apologise to the great unwashed, and having forced Madam Editor into uttering her ‘regret’ for publishing the piece, Kev decamped from the Irish Times and went to work for 'bean baron' Tony ('Sir Anthony') O'Reilly in the Irish Independent.

Mother(s) Reilly

Kev may imagine that Tone of the Indo is more tolerant of his brand of bigotry.

And how right (for once) Kev is, since the 'bean-knighted' boss of the Indo is a son of an ‘MoB’. His parents were not married. O’Reilly was born to Aileen O'Conner and James O'Reilly (already married to Judith Clarke O’Reilly with four children) on May 7th 1936 in the National Maternity Hospital. As in so much else O’Reilly, who literally sold out the Irish food industry to Heinz in the 1960s, while employed by the publicly owned Erin Foods, was ahead of the pack. Afterwards O’Reilly got his big job with the US multinational and started making his millions at Irish workers’ expense. The workers were made redundant from the companies O’Reilly bought during the late 1960s, early 1970s. Thousands lost their jobs and O’Reilly also managed, almost single-handedly, to wipe out the flagship companies of the old Protestant business class, for example Dockrells and Goulding Fertilizers. The golden boy slashed his way through and destroyed the assets of Irish capitalism and the workers it employed.

You have to hand it to him, what a bastard!

Legitimate comment

Myers hero worships O’Reilly’s achievements in his one Irish success story, Independent Newspapers. He ignores the failings.

Currently, O’Reilly intends to outsource production and turn Independent Newspapers into “the Ryanair of the newspaper sector”, as in super-profitable, rather than cheap to buy (according to Martin Fitzpatrick in April’s Village magazine – www.villagemagazine.ie). Good move in an election year. What anxious publicity-seeking politician is going to criticise the axe-wielding boss of the biggest newspaper group in such circumstances.

But Has Kev has ever ventured a thought about his boss's dear departed mother, or has Tone himself ever ventured a thought on Kev's thoughts on the matter. If so, we are none the wiser.

And so it should be, as the whole thing is in very poor taste. If ever they pass in the corridor, on the stairs or are stuck in the lift together, or if ever Kev is lucky enough to receive an invitation to Castlemartin (where Aileen O’Connor’s corpse is entombed) Kev could greet the boss, his benefactor, with "Hello Tony old bean, you clever bastard". Then again, maybe not. Otherwise Kev might end up as redundant as the old Gouldings Fertiliser workers. After all, there are limits to freedom of speech.

-----------Kev’s attack on RTE radio-----------

Irish Independent April 11 2007

Kev charges Joe Duffy with metaphorical murder


Radio One… has mercilessly driven down the quality of debate in Ireland. One of its apparent goals is to generate regular bouts of metaphorically murderous anger, which one day might well prove to be more literal than figurative. It is one thing for independent radio stations to whip up base popular emotions - quite another for a State broadcaster to be doing so.

Admittedly, I have particular feelings about this after the frenzy of hatred which convulsed the national airwaves for the best part of a week two years ago, after (as I admitted within a day and repeat now) was a very poor article of mine. But hold on: unlike those IRA leaders who are given such a cushy time on RTE, I didn't kill anyone. Nonetheless, RTE One's systematic vilification of me, day in and day out, resulted in hate mail, death threats, and abusive graffiti on my car, concluding with my home having to be given round-the-clock Garda protection.

….

Montrose does not compensate for these vile indulgences by providing public service radio broadcasting as provided by BBC Radio Three and BBC Four. The latter, in particular, is one of the great triumphs of British civilisation: the reverse is true for RTE Radio One. BBC Radio Four dissects and analyses: RTE One generates the mob and then follows it from the front.


-----------That "poor" article in full-----------

The Irish Times February 8 2005

An Irishman's Diary by Kevin Myers

How did Edward Walsh feel as he found himself sitting outside the warm tepee of political correctness, and in the howling blizzard of reality, after his remarks about unmarried mothers? Kevin Myers writes.

Not very comfortable, probably. Never mind, Ed, I'm used to the vitriolic epistolary hiss in the column inches that besiege me in my little corner here. We can sit together here in the snow and perish together - or maybe think the unthinkable.

Such as that our system of benefits to unmarried mothers is creating a long-term time-bomb. Even as things stand, we are bribing the unmotivated, the confused, the backward, the lazy into making the worst career decision of their young lives, and becoming professional unmarried mothers, living off the State until the grave takes over. Our welfare system is creating benefits-addicted, fatherless families who will be raised in a culture of personal and economic apathy - and from such warped timber, true masts are seldom hewn.

The response of Anne Bowen, policy officer of the One Parent organisation was - naturally - that Ed's remarks were "offensive" and "hurtful". God knows why she didn't say "unhelpful", "unsavoury" or "distasteful", which form part of the usual verbal repertoire of the politically correct. This assesses any political observation not on its factual merits but on the lachrymosity of the audience.

So she naturally declared that it would be extremely "hurtful" to suggest that women would choose single parenthood for financial pain, or that "they would be put themselves before their children". No doubt it is hurtful. But is it true? And how many girls - and we're largely talking about teenagers here - consciously embark upon a career of mothering bastards because it seems a good way of getting money and accommodation from the State? Ah. You didn't like the term bastard? No, I didn't think you would. In the welfare-land of Euphemesia, what is the correct term for the offspring of unmarried mothers? One-parent offspring? But when we use that deceitful term, one-parent, we actually mean fatherless, in the social meaning of the word, though not of course in the genetic sense. The lads who (in Sinead O'Connor's immortal word) are the donors are probably off elsewhere, donating away wherever and whenever they can, and usually without having to pay a penny of child support for the results of their generous donations.

Ed had suggested that mothers of bastards could earn up to EUR 20,000 a year from benefits. Through her gushing tears, Anne inconsolably declared that a lone parent (i.e., a MoB) gets only EUR 148.80 a week, plus EUR 19.30 per child. And indeed, this would be impossible to live on if it were all that the State forked out; but it is not. In addition, the State pays for the MoBs' rented accommodation - worth over EUR 13,000 or more a year. So the MoB's real income could come to nearly EUR 23,000. If you're working, you have to have pre-tax earnings in the region of EUR 38,000 to match that income.

All of which is a long-winded way of describing insanity - because we all agree it is mad to bribe impressionable young women into a life of MoBbery, which is crushingly limiting, with little sense of achievement or personal ambition, and no career to speak of, other - that is - from cash-crop whelping.

And how do MoBs cope when their male bastards (in a literal sense) become metaphorical bastards in adolescence? How does a woman assert her will over a sour, aggressive, uncommunicative teenage boy? Well, she usually doesn't - as a study of the parental backgrounds of gang members in London and New York - where they are ahead of us in such matters - will tell you. Mob members usually have stressed-out MoBs for mothers, and absent FoBs for dads.

The central heresy underlying welfarism is that benefits don't influence general conduct and that all the State is doing is simply helping individuals. Social groups - the argument goes - do not emerge in direct response to welfare payments. That's what liberals in the US said, so they formulated policies that were kind and good, and certainly not ones that were designed to corrupt and deprave. But corrupt and deprave they did. Welfare lines and teenage moms by the hundred thousand emerged as a direct result of the apparently but illusorily attractive State incentive not to work.

Well, even that compulsive sharer of pain, Bill Clinton, knew something tough had to be done: at the instigation of a Republican-dominated Congress, he began a concerted drive against MoBbery, cutting welfare and introducing strong tax incentives for working MoBs. The results were amazing. After 30 years of unbroken increase, the rise in MoBbery was swiftly halted. Welfare handouts plummeted; and 10 years on, two out of three MoBs are now in work.

We just know that's not going to happen in Ireland while debate remains mired in the schoolgirl swamp of what is "hurtful" and "offensive": why, thith howwid talk makes one want to cwy. Even our super-sized MEP, Big Mac, tearfully denounced Ed for his heartless remarks. Well, naturally. After all, Sinn Fein/IRA have strong proprietorial feelings about single-parent families, having made hundreds and hundreds of them out of what had originally been two-parent families: why, God love them, they've even dabbled in making a good few no-parent families.

We have 80,000 MoBs, and the numbers are rising; time to ring the alarm bells. But of course, in Dail Eireann, we'll get some weepy, sanctimonious bilge over what is "offensive", while the rest reach for the ear-plugs.


Tony O'Reilly: "I don't believe in illegitimate comment."
Tony O'Reilly: "I don't believe in illegitimate comment."

The mother of AJF 'Tony' O'Reilly - you won't read it in his paper
The mother of AJF 'Tony' O'Reilly - you won't read it in his paper

author by Michaelpublication date Fri Apr 20, 2007 08:48Report this post to the editors

That is certainly one. Is there more on how O'Reilly got his money?

author by Miriam Cotton - MediaBitepublication date Fri Apr 20, 2007 11:25Report this post to the editors

From Media Lens:

"For the advertiser, the newspaper remains the most effective mechanism to convey to the potential consumer the virtue, value, colour and style of any new product, service or offering that he has." (O'Reilly, Independent News & Media Plc Annual Report 2004, p.3)

This focus on profit and consumerism, rather than on news reporting and critical analysis, should come as no surprise. Consider the credentials of those involved. O'Reilly is a former chairman, president and CEO of H J Heinz, the leading food company. He is also a former member of the board of the New York Stock Exchange. His personal fortune, estimated at £1.3 billion, makes him the richest man in Ireland. He makes £15 million a year in salary and dividends. He is married to Chryss Goulandris, a Greek shipping heiress who has a personal fortune estimated at £442 million. (Colm Murphy, 'The Rich List 2005: Ireland's richest 250', Sunday Times, April 3, 2005)

Together with brother-in-law Peter Goulandris, O'Reilly controls Waterford Wedgwood, the crystal and luxury goods manufacturer. O'Reilly has a controlling 72% share in Arcon, the zinc mining operation, and he has interests in oil and gas exploration. He also owns Fitzwilton, a large industrial group with core activities in food retail and light manufacturing. In 2004, he made a £29 million tax-free profit when a consortium he led refloated Eircom, the former Irish state phone monopoly.

O'Reilly has six children, "each of whom, Murdoch-style, has been put in charge of a part of the O'Reilly empire" (William Cash, 'The luck of the Irish', Evening Standard, February 27, 2004). His son Gavin runs the Irish operations of INM in Dublin and is tipped to take over at the top when his father retires. O'Reilly's newspapers are dominant in the Irish market where they "hold a position of unchallengeable strength". ('O'Reilly's global empire is still built on print', Sunday Business Post, April 29, 2001)"


Full article

http://www.medialens.org/alerts/05/051011_a_special_kin...e.php

author by Peterpublication date Fri Apr 20, 2007 12:31Report this post to the editors

That is the money he has now. Once you have got it, it is easy to keep and to grow. But where did he get it in the first place? How did he accumulate the capital in Ireland? Follow the money trail.

author by Martin Fitzpatrick - Village Magazinepublication date Sun Apr 22, 2007 10:03Report this post to the editors

Tony O’Reilly’s cash cow
by Martin Fitzpatrick (formerly Business Editor in the Sunday Independent)

O’Reilly alone took €110m in payments from Independent Newspapers since 2000, while jobs are being cut and outsourced to make way for even more largesse.

Village magazine April 2007 - http://www.village.ie

Independent News and Media (INM) has become the most remarkable cash cow the Irish market has ever seen, the beneficiary being Tony O’Reilly.

In the six years since the turn of the millennium alone, O’Reilly has taken €110m in cash terms from INM. That figure counts only his dividend income, salary, bonus and perks. In 2006 alone, his dividend take topped €25m. But the Indo milking machine produces a lot more each year for the former rugby ace and one-time head of Bord Bainne.

The €110 m figure does not, for instance, include the valuable share options he exercises (more millions), nor does it include the breathtaking capital gains he has notched up as the company’s shares have appreciated. Since the market lows of 2001, O’Reilly’s personal holding has scorched ahead and is now worth some €360m more than in the dark days of stock market gloom. His stake is currently valued at around €620m.

The late JF Galbraith once observed that a chief executive’s salary was a warm personal gesture by the individual to himself. Tony O’Reilly has never been one to accept less than the going rate for his job as chief executive. The annual report due out next month will show that he will have pocketed well over €1.5m in salary and bonus.

Other CEOs and executive chairmen (Grafton Group’s Michael Chadwick is an example), have declined to accept a salary when they are stuffing their pockets with dividend income. Tony O’Reilly has never been embarrassed by this.

Later on this year he may have an opportunity to be even more open-handed because Independent News and Media is currently poised to conclude an APN deal in Australia that puts it in a position to receive proceeds topping €350m. There is talk that at least some of this is going to be paid out by way of special dividend to shareholders. If Tony O’Reilly wants it to come in the shape of a dividend, there is little doubt it will happen that way. And if it does, then the tax-exiled CEO will be able to put 28 per cent of whatever that dividend is into his already ample pocket (more millions).

There is an irresistible temptation, especially among the Independent News and Media’s trade unions, to contrast the largesse being paid at shareholder level with what’s happening to the company’s employees. Essentially Indo staff have been subjected to the latest O’Reilly mantra that INM must become the “Ryanair of the newspaper sector”. It’s mentioned on a number of occasions in the preliminary results announcement that INM’s stated objective is to be the industry’s low cost operator.

The essential requirement for the achievement of this status is to keep labour costs as low as possible. Thus the Independent organisation in Ireland has been resolutely focused on redundancies and outsourcing. Over two years ago when Independent Newspapers Ireland couldn’t get its clerical employees or the balance of its printing staffs (some 200-odd of them) to disappear quietly in the cause of outsourcing, the company tore up its agreements with the unions and offered a ‘Hobson’s Choice’ of statutory redundancies or the specially tailored Indo package. For some staff this included a re-employment option at lower wages, in locations like Clonakilty, South Armagh or Herefordshire.

Not surprisingly, the long-serving Indo employees took the ‘lump’ and moved, bitter and resentful into what was admittedly a buoyant jobs market.
The timing of this outsourcing exercise coincided with the local government elections, thus politicians of any hue were not going to go to war with the Indo in the middle of an election. With the exception of an airing on the Joe Duffy Liveline show, the dispute got minimal media exposure – virtual silence compared with the Irish Ferries protests which were about the same critical industrial relations issue.

This year (another election year) the Indo is taking on the only big organised group of workers left in the industry, the journalists. Ironically the dispute is unlikely to be any noisier this time.

In an extraordinary move, the company is proposing large-scale outsourcing of the editorial production functions. Exactly what impact this will have on editorial quality at the Indo titles is one of the apprehensions of the remaining Indo journalists and their union, the NUJ.

However the intentions of the O’Reilly management are clear and the “Ryanisation” concept as it applies to the Indo titles in Ireland is becoming irresistible.

This may be bad for journalism but it is seen to be good for profitability (the share price has endorsed the move) and big profits crank out big dividends.


(The article mentioned in the main piece above)

Tony O'Reilly: Show me the money and show the journalists the door
Tony O'Reilly: Show me the money and show the journalists the door

Related Link: http://www.village.ie/Ireland/Society_%26_Justice/Tony_..._cow/
author by Ciara O'Connorpublication date Tue Nov 18, 2008 11:05Report this post to the editors

Hi all,

for those of you who have been left reeling from Kevin Myers in the past, all of you who may have an interest in mental health and suicide, and in fact, women's issues (as feminism is dragged into his blithering rant), would be horrified by today's piece.

Ive set up a facebook group with a view to organising a protest against Myers.

http://www.facebook.com/home.php#/group.php?gid=57870081336

author by Hubrispublication date Tue Nov 18, 2008 17:38Report this post to the editors

is RIDICULE. His ideas are so reactionary and over-the-top they will only flourish with the addition of Protest.

Laugh at the fool each and every opportunity. But do it with mixture of humour and scorn or ridicule. Treat him like the human-waste he appears to be.

Dissect his ideas and show them to be the product of a half-formed human with serious empathy and self-hatred issues, a massive ego, an unwillingness to stand by his words in public, and a hard-on for the British army.

Myers 'work' is fertile ground for the pop-psychologist in all of us.

Like Ian O'Doherty, for instance, he never seems to miss a chance to attack the weaker members of society. That's a evidence of a fairly serious pathological condition right there

Number of comments per page
  
 
© 2001-2014 Independent Media Centre Ireland. Unless otherwise stated by the author, all content is free for non-commercial reuse, reprint, and rebroadcast, on the net and elsewhere. Opinions are those of the contributors and are not necessarily endorsed by Independent Media Centre Ireland. Disclaimer | Privacy