Upcoming Events

Dublin | Gender and Sexuality

no events match your query!

New Events

Dublin

no events posted in last week

Blog Feeds

Anti-Empire

Anti-Empire

offsite link North Korea Increases Aid to Russia, Mos... Tue Nov 19, 2024 12:29 | Marko Marjanovi?

offsite link Trump Assembles a War Cabinet Sat Nov 16, 2024 10:29 | Marko Marjanovi?

offsite link Slavgrinder Ramps Up Into Overdrive Tue Nov 12, 2024 10:29 | Marko Marjanovi?

offsite link ?Existential? Culling to Continue on Com... Mon Nov 11, 2024 10:28 | Marko Marjanovi?

offsite link US to Deploy Military Contractors to Ukr... Sun Nov 10, 2024 02:37 | Field Empty

Anti-Empire >>

The Saker

Indymedia ireland

Indymedia Ireland is a volunteer-run non-commercial open publishing website for local and international news, opinion & analysis, press releases and events. Its main objective is to enable the public to participate in reporting and analysis of the news and other important events and aspects of our daily lives and thereby give a voice to people.

offsite link Fraud and mismanagement at University College Cork Thu Aug 28, 2025 18:30 | Calli Morganite
UCC has paid huge sums to a criminal professor
This story is not for republication. I bear responsibility for the things I write. I have read the guidelines and understand that I must not write anything untrue, and I won't.
This is a public interest story about a complete failure of governance and management at UCC.

offsite link Deliberate Design Flaw In ChatGPT-5 Sun Aug 17, 2025 08:04 | Mind Agent
Socratic Dialog Between ChatGPT-5 and Mind Agent Reveals Fatal and Deliberate 'Design by Construction' Flaw
This design flaw in ChatGPT-5's default epistemic mode subverts what the much touted ChatGPT-5 can do... so long as the flaw is not tickled, any usage should be fine---The epistemological question is: how would anyone in the public, includes you reading this (since no one is all knowing), in an unfamiliar domain know whether or not the flaw has been tickled when seeking information or understanding of a domain without prior knowledge of that domain???!

This analysis is a pretty unique and significant contribution to the space of empirical evaluation of LLMs that exist in AI public world... at least thus far, as far as I am aware! For what it's worth--as if anyone in the ChatGPT universe cares as they pile up on using the "PhD level scholar in your pocket".

According to GPT-5, and according to my tests, this flaw exists in all LLMs... What is revealing is the deduction GPT-5 made: Why ?design choice? starts looking like ?deliberate flaw?.

People are paying $200 a month to not just ChatGPT, but all major LLMs have similar Pro pricing! I bet they, like the normal user of free ChatGPT, stay in LLM's default mode where the flaw manifests itself. As it did in this evaluation.

offsite link AI Reach: Gemini Reasoning Question of God Sat Aug 02, 2025 20:00 | Mind Agent
Evaluating Semantic Reasoning Capability of AI Chatbot on Ontologically Deep Abstract (bias neutral) Thought
I have been evaluating AI Chatbot agents for their epistemic limits over the past two months, and have tested all major AI Agents, ChatGPT, Grok, Claude, Perplexity, and DeepSeek, for their epistemic limits and their negative impact as information gate-keepers.... Today I decided to test for how AI could be the boon for humanity in other positive areas, such as in completely abstract realms, such as metaphysical thought. Meaning, I wanted to test the LLMs for Positives beyond what most researchers benchmark these for, or have expressed in the approx. 2500 Turing tests in Humanity?s Last Exam.. And I chose as my first candidate, Google DeepMind's Gemini as I had not evaluated it before on anything.

offsite link Israeli Human Rights Group B'Tselem finally Admits It is Genocide releasing Our Genocide report Fri Aug 01, 2025 23:54 | 1 of indy
We have all known it for over 2 years that it is a genocide in Gaza
Israeli human rights group B'Tselem has finally admitted what everyone else outside Israel has known for two years is that the Israeli state is carrying out a genocide in Gaza

Western governments like the USA are complicit in it as they have been supplying the huge bombs and missiles used by Israel and dropped on innocent civilians in Gaza. One phone call from the USA regime could have ended it at any point. However many other countries are complicity with their tacit approval and neighboring Arab countries have been pretty spinless too in their support

With the release of this report titled: Our Genocide -there is a good chance this will make it okay for more people within Israel itself to speak out and do something about it despite the fact that many there are actually in support of the Gaza

offsite link China?s CITY WIDE CASH SEIZURES Begin ? ATMs Frozen, Digital Yuan FORCED Overnight Wed Jul 30, 2025 21:40 | 1 of indy
This story is unverified but it is very instructive of what will happen when cash is removed
THIS STORY IS UNVERIFIED BUT PLEASE WATCH THE VIDEO OR READ THE TRANSCRIPT AS IT GIVES AN VERY GOOD IDEA OF WHAT A CASHLESS SOCIETY WILL LOOK LIKE. And it ain't pretty

A single video report has come out of China claiming China's biggest cities are now cashless, not by choice, but by force. The report goes on to claim ATMs have gone dark, vaults are being emptied. And overnight (July 20 into 21), the digital yuan is the only currency allowed.

The Saker >>

Lockdown Skeptics

The Daily Sceptic

offsite link The Technocrats Are Falling as Their Ideology Fails Fri Oct 10, 2025 09:00 | Tilak Doshi
The technocrats are falling across the West as their ideology founders on reality. The cracking of the Net Zero consensus, like the end of Lysenkoism in the Soviet Union, is a moment of hope, says Dr Tilak Doshi.
The post The Technocrats Are Falling as Their Ideology Fails appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.

offsite link The Sceptic | Episode 54: Alexander Adams on Dissident Art, the Tyranny of the Arts Council and His ... Fri Oct 10, 2025 07:00 | Richard Eldred
In Episode 54 of the Sceptic: Alexander Adams on dissident art, the tyranny of the Arts Council England and his new exhibition: Power and Intimacy.
The post The Sceptic | Episode 54: Alexander Adams on Dissident Art, the Tyranny of the Arts Council and His New Exhibition appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.

offsite link News Round-Up Fri Oct 10, 2025 00:47 | Richard Eldred
A summary of the most interesting stories in the past 24 hours that challenge the prevailing orthodoxy about the ?climate emergency?, public health ?crises? and the supposed moral defects of Western civilisation.
The post News Round-Up appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.

offsite link Teenagers Must Be Warned About the Dystopia Being Built Around Them Thu Oct 09, 2025 19:00 | Mike Fairclough
Mike Fairclough was a nationally feted headteacher before he was cancelled during Covid for speaking out against the tyranny. Now he has written a novel to warn teens about the dystopian world being built around them.
The post Teenagers Must Be Warned About the Dystopia Being Built Around Them appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.

offsite link Italy to Ban Burka Thu Oct 09, 2025 17:00 | Will Jones
Italy is to ban the burka as part of new legislation against "Islamic separatism" that includes strengthening penalties for forced marriages and stricter financial regulation of Muslim organisations.
The post Italy to Ban Burka appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.

Lockdown Skeptics >>

Voltaire Network
Voltaire, international edition

offsite link Will intergovernmental institutions withstand the end of the "American Empire"?,... Sat Apr 05, 2025 07:15 | en

offsite link Voltaire, International Newsletter N?127 Sat Apr 05, 2025 06:38 | en

offsite link Disintegration of Western democracy begins in France Sat Apr 05, 2025 06:00 | en

offsite link Voltaire, International Newsletter N?126 Fri Mar 28, 2025 11:39 | en

offsite link The International Conference on Combating Anti-Semitism by Amichai Chikli and Na... Fri Mar 28, 2025 11:31 | en

Voltaire Network >>

Picket on rogue pregnancy agency in Dublin

category dublin | gender and sexuality | news report author Monday March 26, 2007 20:26author by Joe - WSM - personal capacity Report this post to the editors

Audio and photos

Photos and audio from the picket of the rogue pregnancy advice agency in Dublin. Audio (first comment) includes some an anti-choice activist trying to defend the agency on the grounds that the ends justify the means.
Picket from across the road
Picket from across the road

Note that the agency had covered up its usual sign for the morning, a further confirmation of its real agenda.

img_0052.jpg

img_0055.jpg

anti-choice activist who is heard on the audio
anti-choice activist who is heard on the audio

img_0073.jpg

author by Joe - WSM - personal capacitypublication date Mon Mar 26, 2007 20:30author address author phone Report this post to the editors

Its 3.1 mb and around 11 minutes.

Due to a technical problem with the recording equipment the are some short segments randomly missing, apologies for this



Interviews made at Saturdays picket
audio Interviews made at Saturdays picket 3.11 Mb

author by Interestingpublication date Mon Mar 26, 2007 20:34author address author phone Report this post to the editors


Where is the WRC?

They have come to terms with the false advertising- but not the false medical information
have they registered with yellow pages?????

author by pensionerpublication date Mon Mar 26, 2007 21:39author address author phone Report this post to the editors

This agency clearly and in very large letters that even the very dimmest person could understand states that it is against abortion. Just look at the very large sign over the shopfront.

Does anyone with any sense believe that anyone who is seeking 'non-directive' pregnancy-councelling would ever consider seeking out such an agency?

One thing is as clear as the letters on the big big sign - this agency is nailing its colours to the mast. It certainly isn't trying to disguise its purpose or mislead anyone.

So what's the fuss?

If you want abortion info just go to the FPL. The address is in the phone book. Attacking other extremists isn't helping anyone.

So what is this ridiculous demo about? Well, I'll tell you. Its about doing what the loony-left does best - trying to supress opinions that differs with its own, and doing so by noisy intimidatory barracking. No wonder no one votes for them and every issue they campaign on fails.

Get a life. Leave the 'right-to-life' nutters to theirs. No one votes for them either.

author by Joepublication date Mon Mar 26, 2007 21:43author address author phone Report this post to the editors

Yeah that sign had been nailed up that morning and removed in the afternoon. I guess your involved - if so pretty stupid move as all you did was confirm your self-awareness of your own dishonesty.

author by Pseudonympublication date Mon Mar 26, 2007 23:23author address author phone Report this post to the editors

"Anti Choice Activist", that should be removed. He is trying to espouse a view. In fairness by the rational of those who frequent Indymedia those who were pickiting should be called "pro death activists"

author by Joepublication date Mon Mar 26, 2007 23:29author address author phone Report this post to the editors

Seeing as the guy was justifying tricking women into life changing decisions I thought my description of him as an 'anti-choice' activist was rather mild. But its also accurate, the argument is between those who think the decision should be the choice of the women and those who do not.

author by Qpublication date Tue Mar 27, 2007 08:37author address author phone Report this post to the editors

Joe, the place is advertised as a pregnancy angency. One would assume it is to affirm and nourish the pregnancy. If it was advertised as a termination clinic and then low and behold when you got through the door and discovered nuking the foetus was not an option, then you might have a case. When you refer to "women" and choice you are not refering to the unborn women who are increasingly the victim of sex selected abortions. When you refer to someone advocating a choice not to your liking they are "anti-choice".

author by respect free speechpublication date Tue Mar 27, 2007 09:15author address author phone Report this post to the editors

The photos betray those that are trying to excuse their intimidation of those that operate this premises by claiming that they give false information. The place is clearly run by those that are anti-abortion and anybody entering the place will have no doubt that information provided will be anti-abortion and indeed every effort will be made to get the pregnant woman to choose an option other than abortion.This is legitimate activity in a democracy.
Again the use of the word "rogue" has connotaions with attempts to justify the invasion of Iraq which resulted in the deaths of 500000 innocent people. So not exactly a great choice of an "abuse label" Or are pro-choice people saying that anyone who disagrees with their position is "rogue"? Perhaps the legal brain behind the pro-choice campaign will step forward and explain/excuse the use of this term and the open bullying on those that are operating this premises.
You may not agree with what they preach, but they have a right to preach it and it would be extremely dangerous if those who can shout the loudest could simply bully those they disagree with into silence.

author by Respect truthpublication date Tue Mar 27, 2007 09:26author address author phone Report this post to the editors

No, you're still refusing to listen. The sign was put up in the morning of the protest and taken down again the same afternoon. It's not there today and won't be there for any of the visits paid by women conned by the deliberately misleading ads in the Yellow Pages. If they had that sign up all the time and were honest about the nature of their "advice", there wouldn't be a problem. Instead, they deliberately set out to mislead women, as admitted by one of their supporters on the audio above.

author by Respect free speechpublication date Tue Mar 27, 2007 11:44author address author phone Report this post to the editors

No problem with your position that this premises should make clear that they are anti-abortion and will offer advise and assitance on the other options only. That said, should not all these premises state clearly whether they are pro or anti?
I have to say that I don't think that the harrassment of this premises is entirely about whether it is clear on it's position. It is obvious that it is being picketed because it is anti-abortion and that is bullying.

author by Trollpublication date Tue Mar 27, 2007 12:02author address author phone Report this post to the editors



Funny how the bullies and abusers can twist things is it not?

1. This agency should be reffered to the IAPC (asap).
2. The golden Pages should be made aware of the issue.
3. well done- but be careful, cornered animals rattle and roar.

IAPC- Irish association of Professional Counsellors.

author by Respect honest speechpublication date Tue Mar 27, 2007 13:59author address author phone Report this post to the editors

"It is obvious that it is being picketed because it is anti-abortion"

No it's not. If it were, Life and Cura would be picketed. They aren't, because they are honest about their anti-abortion stance. This agency is being picketed because it advertises itself as if it were pro-choice (look at its Golden Pages listings if you need proof) when it isn't.

Are there no right-to-lifers who find it unacceptable for one of their agencies to use such false, misleading tactics?

author by Fiery Spublication date Tue Mar 27, 2007 18:26author address author phone Report this post to the editors

"Yeah that sign had been nailed up that morning and removed in the afternoon. I guess your involved - if so pretty stupid move as all you did was confirm your self-awareness of your own dishonesty."

Why, everytime someone on indymedia expresses a different point of view, do these people come out and automatically accuse them of being "Shell spies" or "trolls" or whatever? I'm going to say this once, and maybe after reading the post several times, "Joe" will understand it.
The sign is in the picture.
There is no evidence in the picture that the sign is temporary.
Therefore he thought that it was there as a permanent fixture.
That is why he thought that they were being honest.

author by Joepublication date Tue Mar 27, 2007 18:48author address author phone Report this post to the editors

Err Fiery S nice theory buts its rather contradicted by the fact that the written and audio reports both say that the sign was temporary. Plus you have what is almost certainly the same person making pretty much the same point over and over as if they are unable to read either the reports or the replies already given. The technique is a pretty standard PR one that works in the mainstream media with lazy journalists where there is no peer review. No reason to allow it to work here.

Just cause your paranoid doesn't mean they are not out to get you. In this case online trolls are hardly a figment of my imagination and in fact indymedia has nailed several in the past who were using just such tactics as our friends above. My hit rate at spotting them is pretty good in so far as 100% that were investigated have been found to be what I thought.

author by Janepublication date Tue Mar 27, 2007 19:13author address author phone Report this post to the editors

"It is obvious that it is being picketed because it is anti-abortion and that is bullying."

I wish people would find out a bit more about the situation before making grandiose statements like that.

Stated as clearly as possible..

I am not opposed to agencies who clearly state that they only give information on TWO options (adoption and completion of pregnancy) in crisis pregnancy situations - i.e. Cura and Life.
I am opposed to agencies who pretend to be three option agencies (like 50 Dorset St) when in reality only deal with two options - and not only refuse to give out abortion information (as defined by the 1995 Abortion Information Act - no bullshit about 'a video showing abortion IS abortion information' thanks - not according to the law, it isn't) but tell outright lies about the procedure and related issues.

At the protest on Saturday, we handed out leaflets detailing other agencies that women could go to in a crisis pregnancy as opposed to 50 Dorset St. We listed them as two and three option agencies, and in the two option category we included Cura - who are most definitely not interested in giving women information on abortion. So how exactly do you reconcile this action with your statement that we are only picketing 50 Dorset St because it is "anti-abortion"? Nothing could be further from the truth.

Also, to back up the other people who have pointed this out - the sign visible in the pictures is very much temporary and was removed the same day as the protest. Usually, the only thing visible on the shop front are the letters WRC, standing for Womens' Resource Centre. If you don't believe us, then perhaps you should empower your bad self and drive by the place so you can see it with your own eyes.

Thanks to the WSM for the podcast, too.

author by H.publication date Tue Mar 27, 2007 19:14author address author phone Report this post to the editors

This sign is temporary. This is not paranoia, I walk past the agency everyday. As someone above said, we are not picketing pro-life agencies- this agency pretends to be pro-choice, but is not. It is as simple as that. The agency advertises towards women who are interested in having all of their options available to them. The people there then use emotional blackmail AND GIVE MEDICALLY INCORRECT INFORMATION in order to bully the women into not having an abortion. That is the reason it is a rogue agency. This situation is dangerous, and it is wrong. We picket the agency because it should not be lying to women. I repeat that we are not picketing pro-life agencies, just rogue agencies, who are lying to women about medical information.

author by respect free speechpublication date Tue Mar 27, 2007 19:20author address author phone Report this post to the editors

Joe says, " My hit rate at spotting them is pretty good in so far as 100% that were investigated have been found to be what I thought." Your wonderful Joe. It must be extraordinary to be so sure that you are right. I guess there is no point entering discussion with you. And that is precisely what you want. No debate, no discussion, your right and that's that. Anyone threatening to dent your certainty must be shouted down and abused. I am now more convinced that what is happening here is one group bully another group that they don't agree with.

author by Janepublication date Tue Mar 27, 2007 19:23author address author phone Report this post to the editors

Are you going to address my point? It was directed at your comments, I think.

author by Respect free spesschpublication date Tue Mar 27, 2007 19:49author address author phone Report this post to the editors

Yes Jane I agree that this clinic must make it clear what it's position is. No problem with that. I remain concerned that there are those engaged in this action that are not simply attacking dishonesty but are attacking the views that those that run the place hold.
And will you please stop using the word "Rogue" Every time I see it a image of George Bush pops into mind and that is not good for my disposition.

author by Elisa O'Dpublication date Tue Mar 27, 2007 20:00author address author phone Report this post to the editors

"This agency clearly and in very large letters that even the very dimmest person could understand states that it is against abortion. Just look at the very large sign over the shopfront.
Does anyone with any sense believe that anyone who is seeking 'non-directive' pregnancy-councelling would ever consider seeking out such an agency?
One thing is as clear as the letters on the big big sign - this agency is nailing its colours to the mast. It certainly isn't trying to disguise its purpose or mislead anyone.
So what's the fuss? "

Like others who have posted before I walk past this agency each day on my way to work in the mater and I have never seen that white sign before. Also this agency operates throughout Ireland not just from Dorset street. I attended their 'branch' (someones house) in Limerick and there was no such sign above the door. I thought I was going to receive good solid,comforting advice from a symathetic counciller as their head office/golden pages said I would. Instead I was subjected to an hour of horrific post abortion images and fed lies about links with breast cancer and suicide.
I dont think anyone would have a problem with these people giving this information out or remaining open as long as they no longer advertise as a non directive family planning clinic.They have to advertise themselves honestly and let their clients know that they do not give advice on all pregnancy options.

author by Janepublication date Tue Mar 27, 2007 20:02author address author phone Report this post to the editors

But Cura and Life hold the same views. We aren't protesting outside of their offices. Nobody is. So what makes you think that we are protesting outside the agency merely because of their views on abortion, or even that some people involved are?

Surely if that was the case, they'd have set up camp outside Cura and Life long ago?

author by Respect truthpublication date Wed Mar 28, 2007 11:45author address author phone Report this post to the editors

Your points have been dealt with comprehensively, again and again by several posters. You no longer have any basis for your opinion. You can continue to hold that opinion if you like, just as some people may believe the world is flat, but don't pretend that you can back it up with the merest shred of evidence, and don't start shrieking about "intolerance" when people exercise their right to reply to your arguments and expose the gaping holes. You are the only one trying to stifle free speech here, by attempting to slander the people involved in this campaign and hurling mud in the hope that some of it will stick.

Number of comments per page
  
 
© 2001-2025 Independent Media Centre Ireland. Unless otherwise stated by the author, all content is free for non-commercial reuse, reprint, and rebroadcast, on the net and elsewhere. Opinions are those of the contributors and are not necessarily endorsed by Independent Media Centre Ireland. Disclaimer | Privacy