Interested in maladministration. Estd. 2005
RTEs Sarah McInerney ? Fianna Fail supporter? Anthony
Joe Duffy is dishonest and untrustworthy Anthony
Robert Watt complaint: Time for decision by SIPO Anthony
RTE in breach of its own editorial principles Anthony
Waiting for SIPO Anthony Public Inquiry >>
A Blog About Human Rights
UN human rights chief calls for priority action ahead of climate summit Sat Oct 30, 2021 17:18 | Human Rights
5 Year Anniversary Of Kem Ley?s Death Sun Jul 11, 2021 12:34 | Human Rights
Poor Living Conditions for Migrants in Southern Italy Mon Jan 18, 2021 10:14 | Human Rights
Right to Water Mon Aug 03, 2020 19:13 | Human Rights
Human Rights Fri Mar 20, 2020 16:33 | Human Rights Human Rights in Ireland >>
Church Tribunal Clears Clergyman Who Called Trans Archdeacon ?a Bloke? Fri Mar 29, 2024 15:00 | Will Jones A clergyman who called the Church of England's first trans woman archdeacon a "bloke" should not be punished, a disciplinary tribunal has ruled.
The post Church Tribunal Clears Clergyman Who Called Trans Archdeacon “a Bloke” appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
Climate Change is ?Slowing the Earth?s Rotation? Fri Mar 29, 2024 13:00 | Sallust If you weren?t already gibbering in your boots at the prospect of devastating climate change, it's time to think again. Apparently, the movement of water from the 'melting icecaps' is slowing the rotation of the Earth.
The post Climate Change is “Slowing the Earth’s Rotation” appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
Hancock Fails to Have Bridgen Libel Case Thrown Out Paving Way for Full Trial Fri Mar 29, 2024 11:00 | Sally Beck Matt Hancock, the ex-Health Secretary, has failed in his bid to have Andrew Bridgen's libel case thrown out after Hancock branded him antisemitic, paving the way for a full trial.
The post Hancock Fails to Have Bridgen Libel Case Thrown Out Paving Way for Full Trial appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
DEI Wokery is Swallowing Small Businesses Too Fri Mar 29, 2024 09:00 | C.J. Strachan It's not only large corporations with hyperactive HR departments that are succumbing to efficiency-sapping wokery, says C.J. Strachan. Small and medium-sized enterprises are being swallowed up by DEI as well.
The post DEI Wokery is Swallowing Small Businesses Too appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
Are We Being Gaslit Over the Cause of the Princess of Wales?s Cancer? Fri Mar 29, 2024 07:00 | Melissa Kite First Charles and then Kate ? it's hard to ignore the soaring cancer rate when two members of the Royal Family are diagnosed within weeks. But are we being gaslit about what's behind the surge, asks Melissa Kite.
The post Are We Being Gaslit Over the Cause of the Princess of Wales’s Cancer? appeared first on The Daily Sceptic. Lockdown Skeptics >>
Voltaire, international edition
Moscow attack reminds us of the links between Islamists and Kiev's fundamentalis... Tue Mar 26, 2024 06:57 | en
Failure to assist a people in danger of genocide, by Hassan Hamadé Tue Mar 26, 2024 06:32 | en
Yugoslavia March 24, 1999 The Founding War of the New Nato, by Manlio Dinucci Sun Mar 24, 2024 05:15 | en
France opposes Russian Korean-style peace project in Ukraine Sat Mar 23, 2024 11:11 | en
Voltaire, International Newsletter N°79 Fri Mar 22, 2024 11:40 | en Voltaire Network >>
|
Open letter to Siptu re threats made by Siptu to Sinaltrainal
Siptu hreatens to run campaign against Colombian union
Below is the text of an open letter to Siptu re the threats made by Anne Speed and Jack McGinley to run a campaign against the Colombian union Sinaltrainal. Open Letter to Siptu General President Re International Campaign Against Sinaltrainal.
Dear Mr O'Connor,
We are writing to you in relation to the recent visit by two Siptu delegates to Colombia. The two delegates Ann Speed and Jack McGinley met with Sinaltrainal representatives which included its president Javier Correa. This was not the first meeting between Siptu and Sinaltrainal. On two occasions Siptu has met with Sinaltrainal in Ireland, the most recent of these being the recent visit by Edgar Paez at Lasc's invitation. Sinaltrainal also met Siptu at a recent Euorpean works meeting of Coke workers in Rome, however, it is the meeting in Colombia which is of most concern to us here.
We are pleased that Siptu said they would take up the issues again with the company. However, we are unsure of what this might mean in the context of other promises that were made at the same meeting. According to the report that we have received from Sinaltrainal (copy attached) Ann Speed and Jack McGinley stated that if the boycott and disinvestment call wasn't lifted, Siptu, along with the IUF, the international body of food and drinks workers to which Siptu is affiliated, will launch an international campaign against Sinaltrainal. This is very worrying and we are seeking clarification on this matter. We are doing so publicly, as the effects of any international campaign against Sinaltrainal will be publicly noticed even if the campaign is run internally within the trade union movement.
Therefore we would ask you to clarify whether it is the official position of Siptu to launch or participate in such a campaign against Sinaltrainal, a union whose only crime is to defend its members lives. It is a very sad day, if Siptu's conclusion after having met with Sinaltrainal on four occasions is no public clarity on the substance of the allegations made by Sinaltrainal but rather that Siptu needs to run a campaign against a union whose membership and leadership have shown extreme courage and tenacity in the face of death and imprisonment.
Yours sincerely
Gearóid Ó Loingsigh
(PRO LASC)
Report on the meeting with SIPTU members Jack McGinley & Anne Speed
The meeting took place on Thursday November 4, 2004 and was attended by Javier Correa, Ermelina Mosquera, and Gonzalo Quijano on behalf of Sinaltrainal. The SIPTU representatives made their and their organisations's presentation. They mentioned that they had met in Dublin with the Colombian vice-president Fransisco Santos and expressed their demands that the repression and the violation of human rights in Colombia stop. After that SIPTU demanded of Sinaltrainal that the boycott end and threatened that otherwise they along with the IUF would begin a campaign against our union not only in Europe but throughout the world. Our response to this was that is was not our iniciative but a result of the conclusions of the three public hearings held in 2002 at which there were over 500 international organizations. We also explained that by giving up the campaign without a resolution to the proposed reparations from the multinational, Coca Cola, would allow the impunity to go unchecked in our land; that what is at issue are the lives of 9 of our fellow colleagues who were killed by dark forces and from which the company benefitted. It would also be tantamount to forgetting the kidnapping of workers and their children, the forced displacement suffered by 64 of our brothers and their families; the unjust imprisonment of our colleagues falsely accused by Coca Cola.
It was further clarified that in order to stop the boycott Coca Cola would have to deal with the petitions we presented to them around these cases on the 22nd of January 2003 in which we seek truth, justice and full reparations for the victims, the families and the social organisation that we represent. In the meeting we gave them copies of some of the evidence of what Coca Cola does to prevent the right of free association and also to overturn the statutes of our union to prevent its growth amongst other things.
At the end of the meeting they agreed to make further representations to Coca Cola and that they would again talk with government officials to see what they could do for our cause.
Luis Javier Correa Suárez
National President
Back Home
|
View Comments Titles Only
save preference
Comments (11 of 11)
Jump To Comment: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11You do an excellent job on keeping us informed of the true nature of the rotten leadership.
They show the true nature of modern day solidarity within the Trade Union Movement i.e. partnership with neoliberal governments, multinationals, the bosses and death squads.
Any response yet to your letter?
Whats the news on Francisco?
Jack and Ann are doing their jobs, protecting the rights of irish workers. They are to be congratulated. Tell the Colombian communists where to stick their boycott/
The comment above this one about SIPTU doing their job is appalingly ignorant of the histroy of the working class and trade union movement.
International Labour is supposed to transcend the artificial construct that is the nation-state and show support and unconditional solidarity to those oppressed around the globe.
SIPTU are a disgrace and should be disbanded.
We share a common humanity and have to fight and oppose human rights abuses, oppression explotation and violence wherever we find it. To facilitate and encourage it in the name of making a quick buck is morallyu repugnant.
Maybe SIPTU were bought off by Coca-Cola here?
He's right! Why should the jobs of the Einsatz have been in jeopardy just becuase they were shoving people into ovens.
In reality, the very notion that Coca Cola would turn around and tell consumers that if they chose not to drink Coke, they were hurting Irish workers, says a lot about their inability to come up with any valid riposte to the charges against them.
Well if Jack and Ann were sensible trade Unionists they would line up with people with common interest as their own say for example hmmm .... maybe other workers
Jack and Ann have common interests, they just don't see them as being with other workers that is all.
In relation to whether we have received a response to the letter; no we have not. We await a reply from Siptu.
The silence is deafening. Either it is not official policy or it is. It shouldn't be too hard to come up with a reply.
There was an article in this week's An Phoblacht/Republican News about "SIPTU rep's solidarity visit to Colombia" (it can be read here: http://www.anphoblacht.com/news/detail/7775 )
It featured an interview with Ann Speed. Maybe someone from LASC or anyone else involved in the boycott campaign can write in a letter about the issues being addressed (or not being addressed, as the case may be).
The interview with Anne Speed in An Phoblacht (above) indicates the total nonsense represented by O'Loinsigh's 'open letter’.
O'Loinsigh's sectarianism is indicated by the fact that his first instinct was attack, just after SIPTU had brought Sinaltainal into discussion with European Coca Cola workers and had raised the issue with other Coca Cola workers and with Coca Cola management.
Here was a golden opportunity for O'Loinsigh to work with SIPTU, since they had made efforts to work with Sinaltrainal, despite opposition to the boycott. Here was an opportunity to put the past behind and to try and resolve this difficulty. Publicise it sure, if the response is not satisfactory.
But no, O'Loinsigh's first and only instinct is to attack publicly and to reinforce and deepen the suspicion and paranoia. He does not even pick up the telephone to communicate his concern, to ask if perhaps this is a misunderstanding, because it just doesn't make sense. The facts contradict it.
O’Loinsigh has brought his personal political opinions and history into solidarity work. He is prepared to sacrifice and to sabotage the possibility of joint work (even on the basis of disagreements) for the sake of scoring a cheap political hit whose content has no basis. The proof: the European Works Council Coca Cola meeting that SIPTU ensured Sinaltrainal was invited to, after meeting them in Colombia. That is unforgivable.
As for a reply from SIPTU, did they bother to send one? I’m sure that Gearoid would have brought it to our attention and would have put it on the table as quickly as he possibly could. (Yeah, right.)
i am a member of siptu ,it is with great sadness thatm i have to say ,that our secretary has decided to put me on a black list ,reason being that i desagreed with his way of handling my problem,that i had with my bosses,he has actualy made things worse, so i went to my bosses and explained my side now things are a little betterat , so union sec has told other members to black list me which most of them has refused his request, tell me why should anyone pay to be bullied, i hope u will deal with him and any others like him that are out there.if not i will.