Interested in maladministration. Estd. 2005
RTEs Sarah McInerney ? Fianna Fail?supporter? Anthony
Joe Duffy is dishonest and untrustworthy Anthony
Robert Watt complaint: Time for decision by SIPO Anthony
RTE in breach of its own editorial principles Anthony
Waiting for SIPO Anthony
Public Inquiry >>
Parse failure for http://humanrights.ie/feed/.
Last Retry Wednesday September 24, 2025 01:41
Britain?s Judiciary is Biased to its Core Tue Sep 23, 2025 20:08 | Dr David McGrogan
The Court of Appeal overturned the closure of Epping's migrant hotel because Britain's judiciary is biased to its core, says Dr David McGrogan. The Right must get to grips with this problem ? and fast.
The post Britain’s Judiciary is Biased to its Core appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
Muslim Who Attacked Koran Burner Hamit Coskun With Knife Spared Jail as Judge Says He ?Lost His Temp... Tue Sep 23, 2025 17:08 | Will Jones
The Muslim man who attacked Koran-burning protester Hamit Coskun with a knife has been spared jail after the judge said he "lost his temper". Hamit, meanwhile, remains in hiding, as concerns about two-tier justice grow.
The post Muslim Who Attacked Koran Burner Hamit Coskun With Knife Spared Jail as Judge Says He “Lost His Temper” appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
The Exaltation of the Cross Tue Sep 23, 2025 15:00 | Chris Larkin
Church leaders are too quick to condemn Tommy Robinson and the Unite the Kingdom march, says Chris Larkin. We don't know what Jesus would have made of our politics, but we can?t just assume he?d have been a Lib Dem voter.
The post The Exaltation of the Cross appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
Council Insists Women Be Called ?People With Ovaries? Tue Sep 23, 2025 13:27 | Will Jones
Bristol City Council has been accused of offending women with "virtue-signalling madness" after insisting that women be called "people with ovaries" and claiming that defining sex as biological "misgenders trans people".
The post Council Insists Women Be Called “People With Ovaries” appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
Jimmy Kimmel?s Comeback Derailed as Major ABC Affiliate Refuses to Air Show After Charlie Kirk Comme... Tue Sep 23, 2025 11:04 | Will Jones
Jimmy Kimmel's comeback after his Charlie Kirk comments has been dealt a massive blow with ABC affiliates refusing to air it in nearly 40 major markets after Disney announced the liberal talk host will return Tuesday.
The post Jimmy Kimmel’s Comeback Derailed as Major ABC Affiliate Refuses to Air Show After Charlie Kirk Comments appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
Lockdown Skeptics >>
Voltaire, international edition
Will intergovernmental institutions withstand the end of the "American Empire"?,... Sat Apr 05, 2025 07:15 | en
Voltaire, International Newsletter N?127 Sat Apr 05, 2025 06:38 | en
Disintegration of Western democracy begins in France Sat Apr 05, 2025 06:00 | en
Voltaire, International Newsletter N?126 Fri Mar 28, 2025 11:39 | en
The International Conference on Combating Anti-Semitism by Amichai Chikli and Na... Fri Mar 28, 2025 11:31 | en
Voltaire Network >>
View Comments Titles Only
save preference
Comments (6 of 6)
Jump To Comment: 1 2 3 4 5 6Another swp bandwagon fronted by davey
to Davy / anybody else in the SWP
You could ignore the above comment - it doesn't amount to much and it will hardly carry much weight with readers.
Or you could moan about indymedia being full of sectarian sniping (despite the fact that this is a single anonymous user on the internet who many have no connection whatsoever with indymedia or anything else for that matter).
Or you could use this criticism as a chance to explain what this anti-racist initiative is, why it is not a front for the SWP, what measures have been put in place to ensure democracy and so on.
I know which type of response makes the best impression on me.
I was going to stick to Chekov's first point but will briefly answer the points of his third statement.
Quite simply - at a meeting not called 'by the SWP' a proposal was put for a second meeting where two people from two other groups one a leading human rights group and another a leading development - solidarity organisation both with 'no SWP members' then proposed me 'an SWP member' {as I had introduced myself at the meeting} to convene the next meeeting, with which I am working with a person as above from the MCRS whom had hosted the first meeting.
What measures have been put in place?, well the meeting has not met yet but as stated above all progressive organisations are invited and as I stated above it will be informal {no top table - but round table as like the first meeting} and democratic {all can have an imput, with the outcome decided democratically by the meeting.
Again, but now in a different context why is it so strange to some in the South that we in Belfast get involved in various campaigns we have not initiated simply because we actually believe in helping the campaigns {we have members in Belfast actively working in campaigns for years which we had not initiated, which holds many different organisations working together still today, within the same campaign} Or indeed why is it so strange to people that various organisations would and do offer us support and like above, have and do propose us at various meetings in Belfast?
My response was not directed to 'anonymous' but to Chekov whom I can agree with some of the points he has made on the site over time.
Davey will you confire that your party will
(1) load the meeting to push your agenda.
(2) Will be selling the party paper?
(3) Will be trying to recruit.
(4) Will you confirm that when your party realise that the will not sell any papers or gain any recruits they will walk away on to the next bandwagon.
What comes first the party or socialism?
Answered many such questions time and again for those that are regulars on this site, and for those that matter and whom we work with, well they already know those answers. Signing off away to a campaign meeting.
Maybe you'd like to patronise foreigners some more, next you might stretch to greeting them in public, obviously only if noones looking.