Red Cross concern over torture of Civilain Detainees in Iraq

national | miscellaneous | news report

Monday May 26, 2003 08:32

by James McKenna

jimmymac61 at hotmail dot com

Detainees gagged, hooded and tied up in baking sun

Vistiors to a concentration camp near Baghdad Airport where civilian and common law detainees are held along with some genuine POW's have described seeing prisoners gagged and tied up in scorcing sunlight.

The Red Cross call the prisoners they have interviewed "Civilian detainees" and "common law detainees" but have not denied there are some genuine POW's in the camp. They will not issue any controversial statement that might jeopardise their ongoing visits to the camp which began the day before yesterday nor will they comment publicly on the condition of the prisoners. However, visitors to the camp have described seeing "......men with their hands tied behind their backs, hooded and kneeling in the hot sun."

Concern has also been expressed that other aspects of the Geneva Convention are being broken, in that the prisoners are not receiving proper food, water or medical care. The official UK/US
number held is 3000 but this may be inaccurate and the International Committee of the Red Cross have asked for a more accurate number . They are also still seeking permission to see all prisoners.

save preference

Comments (2 of 2)

Worse To Come?

by pat c

Mon May 26, 2003 12:57

We should brace ourselves for even worse news re Uranium poisoning if Afghanistan is anything to go on.

***********************************
Last Updated: Thursday, 22 May, 2003, 15:51 GMT 16:51 UK

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/3050317.stm

Afghans' uranium levels spark alert

By Alex Kirby
BBC News Online environment correspondent

A small sample of Afghan civilians have shown "astonishing" levels of uranium in their urine, an independent scientist says.

Critics suspect new weapons were used in Afghanistan
He said they had the same symptoms as some veterans of the 1991 Gulf war.

But he found no trace of the depleted uranium (DU) some scientists believe is implicated in Gulf War syndrome.

Other researchers suggest new types of radioactive weapons may have been used in Afghanistan.

The scientist is Dr Asaf Durakovic, of the Uranium Medical Research Center (UMRC), based in Canada.

Dr Durakovic, a former US army adviser who is now a professor of medicine, said in 2000 he had found "significant" DU levels in two-thirds of the 17 Gulf veterans he had tested.

In May 2002, he sent a team to Afghanistan to interview and examine civilians there.

The UMRC says: "Independent monitoring of the weapon types and delivery systems indicate that radioactive, toxic uranium alloys and hard-target uranium warheads were being used by the coalition forces." There is no official support for its claims, or backing from other scientists.

Shock results

It says Nangarhar province was a strategic target zone during the Afghan conflict for the deployment of a new generation of deep-penetrating "cave-busting" and seismic shock warheads.

The UMRC says its team identified several hundred people suffering from illnesses and conditions similar to those of Gulf veterans, probably because they had inhaled uranium dust.

Bomb damage was widespread
To test its hypothesis that some form of uranium weapon had been used, the UMRC sent urine specimens from 17 Afghans for analysis at an independent UK laboratory.

It says: "Without exception, every person donating urine specimens tested positive for uranium internal contamination.

"The results were astounding: the donors presented concentrations of toxic and radioactive uranium isotopes between 100 and 400 times greater than in the Gulf veterans tested in 1999.

"If UMRC's Nangarhar findings are corroborated in other communities across Afghanistan, the country faces a severe public health disaster... Every subsequent generation is at risk."

It says troops who fought in Afghanistan and the staff of aid agencies based in Afghanistan are also at risk.

Scientific acceptance

Dr Durakovic's team used as a control group three Afghans who showed no signs of contamination. They averaged 9.4 nanograms of uranium per litre of urine.

The average for his 17 "randomly selected" patients was 315.5 nanograms, he said. Some were from Jalalabad, and others from Kabul, Tora Bora, and Mazar-e-Sharif. A 12-year-old boy living near Kabul had 2,031 nanograms.

Troops and aid workers could be at risk
The maximum permissible level for members of the public in the US was 12 nanograms per litre, Dr Durakovic said.

A second UMRC visit to Afghanistan in September 2002 found "a potentially much broader area and larger population of contamination". It collected 25 more urine samples, which bore out the findings from the earlier group.

Dr Durakovic said he was "stunned" by the results he had found, which are to be published shortly in several scientific journals.

Identical outcome

He told BBC News Online: "In Afghanistan there were no oil fires, no pesticides, nobody had been vaccinated - all explanations suggested for the Gulf veterans' condition.

"But people had exactly the same symptoms. I'm certainly not saying Afghanistan was a vast experiment with new uranium weapons. But use your common sense."

The UK Defence Ministry says it used no DU weapons in Afghanistan, nor any others containing uranium in any form.

A spokesman for the US Department of Defense told BBC News Online the US had not used DU weapons there.

He could not comment on Dr Durakovic's findings of elevated uranium levels in Afghan civilians.

Where is Raed ?

by Raymond McInerney

Mon May 26, 2003 19:12

What's happening at 'street level' in Iraq.

Upcoming Events

New Events

Other Press

User Preferences

Feeds

Blog Feeds

Anti-Empire

The Saker

Lockdown Skeptics

Voltaire Network

Red Cross concern over torture of Civilain Detainees in Iraq

Comments (2 of 2)