Upcoming Events

National | Miscellaneous

no events match your query!

Blog Feeds

Public Inquiry
Interested in maladministration. Estd. 2005

offsite link RTEs Sarah McInerney ? Fianna Fail?supporter? Anthony

offsite link Joe Duffy is dishonest and untrustworthy Anthony

offsite link Robert Watt complaint: Time for decision by SIPO Anthony

offsite link RTE in breach of its own editorial principles Anthony

offsite link Waiting for SIPO Anthony

Public Inquiry >>

Human Rights in Ireland
Indymedia Ireland is a volunteer-run non-commercial open publishing website for local and international news, opinion & analysis, press releases and events. Its main objective is to enable the public to participate in reporting and analysis of the news and other important events and aspects of our daily lives and thereby give a voice to people.

offsite link Trump hosts former head of Syrian Al-Qaeda Al-Jolani to the White House Tue Nov 11, 2025 22:01 | imc

offsite link Rip The Chicken Tree - 1800s - 2025 Tue Nov 04, 2025 03:40 | Mark

offsite link Study of 1.7 Million Children: Heart Damage Only Found in Covid-Vaxxed Kids Sat Nov 01, 2025 00:44 | imc

offsite link The Golden Haro Fri Oct 31, 2025 12:39 | Paul Ryan

offsite link Top Scientists Confirm Covid Shots Cause Heart Attacks in Children Sun Oct 05, 2025 21:31 | imc

Human Rights in Ireland >>

Lockdown Skeptics

The Daily Sceptic

offsite link News Round-Up Sun Nov 23, 2025 01:46 | Will Jones
A summary of the most interesting stories in the past 24 hours that challenge the prevailing orthodoxy about the ?climate emergency?, public health ?crises? and the supposed moral defects of Western civilisation.
The post News Round-Up appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.

offsite link British TV Comedy Has Lost its Class Sat Nov 22, 2025 17:00 | Finlay McLaren
The BBC's Director of Comedy wants to "save the sitcom". But the sitcom is only endangered because most of them stopped being funny. As To the Manor Born reminds us, British comedy has lost its class, says Finlay McLaren.
The post British TV Comedy Has Lost its Class appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.

offsite link Is the Era of Cheap Internet Surveys Over? Sat Nov 22, 2025 15:00 | Noah Carl
Is the era of cheap internet surveys over? A new paper demonstrates that AIs can now be "trivially programmed" to answer online surveys in ways that are essentially indistinguishable from humans.
The post Is the Era of Cheap Internet Surveys Over? appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.

offsite link Thank Lockdowns for the Worst Budget in History Sat Nov 22, 2025 13:00 | Will Jones
We're a week away from the most painful Budget in history thanks largely to the eye-watering cost of lockdown. Yet Baroness Hallett says next time the Government must be ready to go harder and faster. This is insanity.
The post Thank Lockdowns for the Worst Budget in History appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.

offsite link Taxpayers Are Charged for the BBC Whether They Like it or Not Sat Nov 22, 2025 11:00 | Charlotte Gill
It's bad enough that all UK TV users are forced to fund the BBC via a TV licence. But it's worse than that, says Charlotte Gill: millions of pounds of taxpayers' money are handed to the corporation via backdoor channels.
The post Taxpayers Are Charged for the BBC Whether They Like it or Not appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.

Lockdown Skeptics >>

Voltaire Network
Voltaire, international edition

offsite link Will intergovernmental institutions withstand the end of the "American Empire"?,... Sat Apr 05, 2025 07:15 | en

offsite link Voltaire, International Newsletter N?127 Sat Apr 05, 2025 06:38 | en

offsite link Disintegration of Western democracy begins in France Sat Apr 05, 2025 06:00 | en

offsite link Voltaire, International Newsletter N?126 Fri Mar 28, 2025 11:39 | en

offsite link The International Conference on Combating Anti-Semitism by Amichai Chikli and Na... Fri Mar 28, 2025 11:31 | en

Voltaire Network >>

Britain's dirty secret

category national | miscellaneous | news report author Thursday March 06, 2003 21:47author by The Guardian/UK Report this post to the editors

Who built the chemical plant?

A chemical plant which the US says is a key component in Iraq's chemical warfare arsenal was secretly built by Britain in 1985...the deal would ruin Britain's image in the world if news got out:

Britain's dirty secret

David Leigh and John Hooper
Thursday March 6, 2003
The Guardian

A chemical plant which the US says is a key component in Iraq's chemical warfare arsenal was secretly built by Britain in 1985 behind the backs of the Americans, the Guardian can disclose.
Documents show British ministers knew at the time that the £14m plant, called Falluja 2, was likely to be used for mustard and nerve gas production.

Senior officials recorded in writing that Saddam Hussein was actively gassing his opponents and that there was a "strong possibility" that the chlorine plant was intended by the Iraqis to make mustard gas. At the time, Saddam was known to be gassing Iranian troops in their thousands in the Iran-Iraq war.

But ministers in the then Thatcher government none the less secretly gave financial backing to the British company involved, Uhde Ltd, through insurance guarantees.

Paul Channon, then trade minister, concealed the existence of the chlorine plant contract from the US administration, which was pressing for controls on such exports.

He also instructed the export credit guarantee department (ECGD) to keep details of the deal secret from the public.

The papers show that Mr Channon rejected a strong plea from a Foreign Office minister, Richard Luce, that the deal would ruin Britain's image in the world if news got out: "I consider it essential everything possible be done to oppose the proposed sale and to deny the company concerned ECGD cover".

The Ministry of Defence also weighed in, warning that it could be used to make chemical weapons.

But Mr Channon, in line with Mrs Thatcher's policy of propping up the dictator, said: "A ban would do our other trade prospects in Iraq no good".

The British taxpayer was even forced to write a compensation cheque for £300,000 to the German-owned company after final checks on the plant, completed in May 1990, were interrupted by the outbreak of the Gulf war.

The Falluja 2 chlorine plant, 50 miles outside Baghdad, near the Habbaniya airbase, has been pinpointed by the US as an example of a factory rebuilt by Saddam to regain his chemical warfare capability.

Last month it featured in Colin Powell's dossier of reasons why the world should go to war against Iraq, which was presented to the UN security council.

Spy satellite pictures of Falluja 2 identifying it as a chemical weapons site were earlier published by the CIA, and a report by Britain's joint intelligence committee, published with Tony Blair's imprimatur last September, also focused on Falluja 2 as a rebuilt plant "formerly associated with the chemical warfare programme".

UN weapons inspectors toured the Falluja 2 plant last December and Hans Blix, the chief inspector, reported to the security council that the chemical equipment there might have to be destroyed.

But until now, the secret of Britain's knowing role in Falluja's construction has remained hidden.

Last night, Uhde Ltd's parent company in Dortmund, Germany, issued a statement confirming that their then UK subsidiary had built Falluja 2 for Iraq's chemical weapons procurement agency, the State Enterprise for Pesticide Production.

A company spokesman said: "This was a normal plant for the production of chlorine and caustic soda. It could not produce other products".

The British government's intelligence at the time, as shown in the documents, was that Iraq, which was having increasing difficulty in obtaining precursor chemicals on the legitimate market, intended to use the chlorine as a feedstock to manufacture such chemicals as epichlorohydrin and phosphorous trichloride. These in turn were used to make mustard gas and nerve agents.

Paul Channon, since ennobled as Lord Kelvedon, was last night holidaying on the Caribbean island of Mustique. He issued a statement through his secretary, who said: "He can't object to the story. So he's got no comment."

Related Link: http://www.guardian.co.uk/Iraq/Story/0,2763,908426,00.html
author by Seaninpublication date Fri Mar 07, 2003 05:39author address author phone Report this post to the editors

I really hate the Tory party and I'dlove to believe all this is true, but I just don't believe the Guardian anymore. It's lost all editorial values.

author by Get a grippublication date Fri Mar 07, 2003 10:12author address author phone Report this post to the editors

ruin Britain's image in the world ?
what image, you mean the image of an empire-obsessed tyrant who along with the US supports military regimes in their extermination of peace, freedom, democracy and the poor? That Britain?

author by Raypublication date Fri Mar 07, 2003 11:04author address author phone Report this post to the editors

The Guardian weren't just reporting hearsay. They have actual documents that report what ahppened, and quotes from involved parties confirming the story.
Iraq was a western ally throughout the 80's. Why is this so hard to believe?

author by Andrewpublication date Fri Mar 07, 2003 11:32author address author phone Report this post to the editors

Ray maybe its because Seanin's deep love for the ar is such that he has great problems beliving anything that might even slightly question that love. Seanin is convinced that while previous wars have let him down by turning out to be only interested in power, wealth and maintaining the status quo this one will be different. Deep in his heart he belives this is the war that his mother always said was waiting for him, even just thinking of this war gives him a special warm feeling all over.

author by Seaninpublication date Fri Mar 07, 2003 11:35author address author phone Report this post to the editors

I thought that we were discussing the Guardian article?
Leave my mother out of this mate. OK?

author by Andrewpublication date Fri Mar 07, 2003 12:04author address author phone Report this post to the editors

But it is about the fact that in a few days the mothers of Iraq will start to be killed. Should they not also be 'left out of it' mate? And their off spring, male and female. Why don't you join us in demanding that the war mongers 'leave them out of it'?

author by Seaninpublication date Fri Mar 07, 2003 12:58author address author phone Report this post to the editors

I wish I could join those who are protesting against the forthcoming war, but in conscience, I can't.

From what I know of the situation, a quick change of government is needed in Iraq to prevent any more people dying of sanctions. We're told that over a million have died there already.

I hear everywhere that Iraqi exiles are clamouring for the US to overthrow Saddam. There's every chance that the people within Iraq, who have no voice want this to happen too. I cannot presume to speak on their behalf.

If Saddam trashes his weapons, what happens? Are we allowed to send him all the banned materials again as if this never happened? Or do the sanctions stay in place? No matter what happens, as long as Saddam stays in power, innocent people die (Iran/Iraq War - Kuwait - Marsh Arabs - Kurds).

The US is acting to protect it's own interests, as all states do. It just so happens that the US is a democracy not unlike that of Ireland, and their intention is to install such a govt in Iraq.

17 UN resolutions and 1,000,000 dead people after 12 years of sanctions is enough justification in my book for war.

Wish I could join you but I can't.

author by sick of this guypublication date Fri Mar 07, 2003 13:13author address author phone Report this post to the editors

Good god man, listen to yourself!!!
as i work my way through this newswire i keep coming across your vitriolic spittle pasted to every article, did your mammy not hug you enough as a kid or something?

(didnt mean to bring your mother up again)

author by Seaninpublication date Fri Mar 07, 2003 13:46author address author phone Report this post to the editors

Is this the level of debate here? Couldn't you kind of address the arguments?


BTW, thats' all right, it's probavly a figure of speech.

author by Stanpublication date Fri Mar 07, 2003 15:20author address author phone Report this post to the editors

$
by Seanin Fri, Mar 7 2003, 12:46pm

Is this the level of debate here? Couldn't you kind of address the arguments?

And here's one example of how to do it....

$
by Seanin Fri, Mar 7 2003, 11:11am

I've alwas been puzzled by them. If they're the Real IRA, were the other lot imaginary?

Seany is either a psyops cop (SEHB) or else a very bored sad individual.

Seany, if you just want to slag people off, do it elsewhere.


author by Seaninpublication date Sat Mar 08, 2003 04:52author address author phone Report this post to the editors

Em, am I not entitled to use this forum just because I have a differnt opinion to most others?

Isn't that why it's called Indymedia, free of any "slant"?

As for slagging off people, I never made any personal attacks on people, unlike somebody I could mention.


Number of comments per page
  
 
© 2001-2025 Independent Media Centre Ireland. Unless otherwise stated by the author, all content is free for non-commercial reuse, reprint, and rebroadcast, on the net and elsewhere. Opinions are those of the contributors and are not necessarily endorsed by Independent Media Centre Ireland. Disclaimer | Privacy