1,000 years of climate data confirms Australia's warming 20:17 May 20 41 comments
Internet Freedom Fighters Build a Shadow Web 17:44 Feb 25 5 comments
Mobile Phone Cancer Link Looking Less And Less Likely 20:22 Jul 03 0 comments
Apache helicopters for Libya 14:03 May 27 9 commentsmore >>
A bird's eye view of the vineyard
Pennsylvania State Legislature Holds Public Hearing on 2020 election Thu Nov 26, 2020 01:09 | The Saker
Trump?s last hurrah?! Wed Nov 25, 2020 22:45 | The Saker
Why Did RT Hire Liberals That Are Bringing Harm to Russia? (Ruslan Ostashko) Wed Nov 25, 2020 17:55 | Leo V.
China Newsbrief and Sitrep Wed Nov 25, 2020 11:54 | amarynth
Moveable Feast Cafe 2020/11/25 ? Open Thread Wed Nov 25, 2020 05:30 | Herb Swanson
Interested in maladministration. Estd. 2005
A Woulfe in judges clothing Anthony
Irish Examiner bias Anthony
The Party and the Ballot Box Sun Jul 14, 2019 22:24 | Gavin Mendel-Gleason
On The Decline and Fall of The American Empire and Socialism Sat Jan 26, 2019 01:52 | S. Duncan
What is Dogmatism and Why Does It Matter? Wed Mar 21, 2018 08:10 | Sylvia Smith
The Case of Comrade Dallas Mon Mar 19, 2018 19:44 | Sylvia Smith
Review: Do Religions Evolve? Mon Aug 14, 2017 19:54 | Dara McHugh
international | sci-tech | opinion/analysis Tuesday November 03, 2020 21:43 by Sean Crudden - IMPERO
Is Progress Possible?
I do not know much about it. But I think science policy nationally and internationally is a delicate balance. It's difficult to form a picture of who is doing research, what are their objectives, what are the rewards. My impression is that science is mostly controlled by commercial interests. What is invented mostly is what can sell. You have copyright and secrecy backed up by law to preserve the pitch for profit. It is easy to see the sense in this because it provides an incentive for scientists and their employers to spend time and money on research.
Maybe we are at the end of scientific discovery. Has everything already been invented? Is there nothing new down the tracks?