Teenage girls suffering health effects of HPV vaccine ending up in psychiatric wards

by Mike Novack Thu Aug 20, 2015 23:34

Don't bother to tell us about this or that bad reaction to a vaccine. By itself, that isn't relevant.

You need to present data for the argument that the net risk (frequency of negative reactions, extent of damage from negative reactions) is greater than the net risk of the disease in an unvaccinated pouplation (likelihood of catching the disease, serious consequences for the disease).

Vaccines are NOT risk free. But if the risk from the vaccine is very much less than the risk from no vaccine (risk of the disease) then its a good vaccine. So if you want to argue "bad vaccine" you have to show not very much less.

by Martin Fri Aug 21, 2015 20:47

Regret.ie investigates very rare blood disorder reported after gardasil vaccination (3 cases reported In one week).

by Fenrir Mon Aug 24, 2015 13:27

How about investigating if the adverse effects are caused by an additive or contaminant?,

"Norma Erickson of SaneVax, the leading news website documenting the dangers of Gardasil, recently announced that independent laboratories in France have confirmed that Gardasil contains toxic DNA fragments connected to over 79 serious diseases."

http://healthimpactnews.com/2014/gardasil-toxic-contami...ance/