User Preferences

  • Language - en | ga
  • text size >>
  • make this your indymedia front page make this your indymedia front page

Blog Feeds

The Saker
A bird's eye view of the vineyard

offsite link How Russia Implements the Minsk 2 Agreement, by Scott Humor Mon Feb 20, 2017 05:03 | Scott
A few years ago, I was having coffee with my then-business partner. He happened to be in the middle of a process called “enrolling your child in a private school.”

offsite link Moveable Feast Cafe 2017/02/19 ? Open Thread Sun Feb 19, 2017 23:00 | Herb Swanson
2017/02/19 23:00:03Welcome to the ‘Moveable Feast Cafe’. The ‘Moveable Feast’ is an open thread where readers can post wide ranging observations, articles, rants, off topic and have animate discussions of

offsite link National Anthems ? a comparison Sun Feb 19, 2017 20:51 | The Saker
by Christine Marais Although involved in many wars, there is no indication that Greece, Persia, Rome or the Ottoman Empire ever had or needed national anthems.  When we look at

offsite link Trump dreams vs Trump reality ? hopes still permitted! Sun Feb 19, 2017 05:09 | The Saker
This article was written for the Unz Review: For a lot of Trump supporters the past week has been a painful one. Whether we chose to react with abject

offsite link Iran and Hezbollah respond to Donald Trump Sat Feb 18, 2017 21:59 | The Saker
by Sayed Hasan Since his election campaign, Donald Trump has not hidden his fierce hostility to the international deal on Iran’s nuclear program, calling it the worst of the agreements

The Saker >>

Human Rights in Ireland

offsite link Hague Justice Journal: Call for Papers Mon Feb 20, 2017 11:13 | GuestPost

offsite link Reflections on the Citizen?s Assembly (3): The Presentation of Dr. Joan McCarthy Tue Feb 14, 2017 14:01 | GuestPost

offsite link Reflections on the Citizens Assembly (2): The Presentation of Bobbie Farsides Tue Feb 07, 2017 05:44 | GuestPost

offsite link Languishing in Direct Provision: Rights in ?Reasonable? and ?Unreasonable? Times Mon Feb 06, 2017 18:10 | Liam Thornton

offsite link The Story of King Tex: A Modern Allegory Fri Feb 03, 2017 06:20 | GuestPost

Human Rights in Ireland >>

Cedar Lounge
For lefties too stubborn to quit

offsite link is it me or are ?leadership? contests in parties like FG generally very very dull. 20:01 Mon Feb 20, 2017 | WorldbyStorm

offsite link Policing stories 14:47 Mon Feb 20, 2017 | WorldbyStorm

offsite link Poll projections? 12:45 Mon Feb 20, 2017 | WorldbyStorm

offsite link Left Archive: RSYM Position on Recent Developments (IRSP) ? c.2009 02:21 Mon Feb 20, 2017 | leftarchivist

offsite link The Fine Gael leadership race? Who much cares? 13:00 Sun Feb 19, 2017 | WorldbyStorm

Cedar Lounge >>

Dublin Opinion
Life should be full of strangeness, like a rich painting

offsite link Notes for a Book on Money and the Irish State - The Marshall Aid Program 15:10 Sat Apr 02, 2016

offsite link The Financial Crisis:What Have We Learnt? 19:58 Sat Aug 29, 2015

offsite link Money in 35,000 Words or Less 21:34 Sat Aug 22, 2015


offsite link ALWAYS THE ARTISTS: WEEK THREE OF THE BANK INQUIRY 23:11 Thu Jan 22, 2015

Dublin Opinion >>

Supreme Court ruling on Registered Employment Agreements poses need for organising drive by union movement as first step in protection of conditions

category national | worker & community struggles and protests | press release author Thursday May 09, 2013 15:10author by Turing Report this post to the editors

9 May 2013

Press statement: Joe Higgins TD

Supreme Court ruling on Registered Employment Agreements poses need for organising drive by union movement as first step in protection of conditions

Commenting on today's Supreme Court ruling that Registered Employment Agreements are unconstitutional Joe Higgins TD said:

"The striking down by the Supreme Court of the REAs will be seen by employers and sub contractors as a signal for a savage attack on the wages and conditions of workers. The trade union movement should immediately declare that any such attacks will be met by all out action and must now go on the offensive to ensure that wages and conditions provided for by the REAs remain intact.

"Today's ruling is further proof that the judiciary in the final analysis contains an inherent bias against the interests of working people. Employers have allies in the top echelons of the state who are prepared to strike down the legal underpining of conditions in the private sector that exceed the statutory minimum wage.

"I and my party will study the judgement closely but a number of points need to be immediately injected into the debate. Firstly this ruling does not automatically empower employers to tear up existing contracts of workers where REAs have been observed. Any amendment to existing contracts requires the consent of workers. Doubtlessly pressure will come from employers across the board on workers to agree to such changes or face redundancy.

"Secondly we might anticipate attempts by employers to wind up pension schemes and even attempts to claw back employer pension contributions from schemes that were underpined by REAs.

"Thirdly, it has to be acknowledged that the REAs were being widely flouted in any case by employers. The six monthly reports that the National Employment Rights Authority have produced since that agency came into being in the aftermath of the GAMA scandal demonstrated high levels of non compliance of REAs uncovered in the workplaces inspected by them.

"Issues of non compliance on REAs, employer pension contributions and bogus self employment have even been brought to my offices attention in recent times on building sites of state funded projects. Ministers including Minister Quinn has been made aware of this fact on school projects his department has funded and he has done nothing to address the situation.

"All of this leads us to the conclusion that while it is correct for the trade union movement and the left to struggle for every possible legal enhancement and underpining for workers rights and conditions in the end it is what is achieved by trade union organisation in the workplace that counts from the point of view of obtaining the best conditions possible and safeguarding them. Any illusions on the part of elements of the trade union movement leadership that employment law can do the job of the unions needs to be utterly dispensed with.

"I welcome particularly the response of UNITE the trade union to the ruling where they fully acknowledge that we are in new territory now where it is essentially a straight fight between unions and employers with no basis for state backed arbitration. The task now posed for the trade union movement is a concerted drive to better and more fully organise those sectors which were covered by the REAs and to prepare a campaign to win and maintain the conditions that the employers have tried to dismantle.

"The court room is their chosen battlefield, the battlefield of the trade union movement is the workplace, building site and the street.

"Finally this is another acid test for the Labour Party, as if they needed further exposure in their betrayal of the people who voted for them. Will they insist on the introduction of fresh legislation to restore the REAs or even initiate a referendum to alter the constitution if that is required required? We should of course demand this but by no means hold our breath because what is necessary now is a revival of the methods of Larkin and Connolly to defend workers rights."


For information and confirmation

Michael O'Brien 087 2400331

author by Comyn - Trade Unions publication date Fri May 10, 2013 15:07Report this post to the editors

More of the same rhetoric. The left is faltering; it is too snug in its own waffle without strategy to cope with the massive unemployment created by this recession. Take this component of 'Blame' which suggests that the left are incompetent in becoming aware of the needs of those who are on the margins while so many in the public sector - the HSE, Education, Transport, etc fail to value that they have:- jobs, they have holidays, they have sick leave, they have over and above the minimum redundancy rights, and also they have pensions for the remainder of the ever extending lives when they retire. Take this tired line for instance .... Look to semi-state too surely Mr Higgins.

"Today's ruling is further proof that the judiciary in the final analysis contains an inherent bias against the interests of working people. Employers have allies in the top echelons of the state who are prepared to strike down the legal underpining of conditions in the private sector that exceed the statutory minimum wage.

Yes, Joe Higgins cite the Judiciary and the Employers - their inherent cronyism but why the silence about the funds that SIPTU hold (£30 million+), the SIPTU/HSE £4 million fund for junkets, the IMO massive scandal where a 52 year old (McNeice) had to be bargained down from the £24 million package he had somehow negotiated for himself to £9.7. Trade unions and their leaders need to be investigated. There are too many scandals going under the radar and if people in the public service are to be represented fairly and encouraged to strike, they first need to know what is going on within the Unions.

FAS changes its name and the findings of Shane Ross go to the abyss.

author by Quinsy - workers unitepublication date Sat May 11, 2013 18:39Report this post to the editors

Has higgins finally lost it this case was taken by workers in the construction Industry that were going to be sent to prison by employer bodies and there freinds working in tandem with unlawful agreements the Union Lords does Higgins even know what this case is about Clown

© 2001-2017 Independent Media Centre Ireland. Unless otherwise stated by the author, all content is free for non-commercial reuse, reprint, and rebroadcast, on the net and elsewhere. Opinions are those of the contributors and are not necessarily endorsed by Independent Media Centre Ireland. Disclaimer | Privacy