Upcoming Events

National | Environment

no events match your query!

User Preferences

  • Language - en | ga
  • text size >>
  • make this your indymedia front page make this your indymedia front page

Blog Feeds

forward

The Saker
A bird's eye view of the vineyard

offsite link Immigrant Crisis: Facts, Myth or Plot? Tue Feb 09, 2016 22:50 | The Saker
by Brainstorm The designed, created and carefully articulated immigrant flow to Europe, generating one of the biggest crises in after the Cold War as the byproduct of US waged wars

offsite link One Size Does Not Fit All! Tue Feb 09, 2016 21:49 | Herb Swanson
This comment was chosen by Mod HS from the post ?Turkey?s Gates To Europe?.  The moderator believes this comment is interesting because it asks where did it all go wrong

offsite link Tom Mysiewicz reviews ?The Essential Saker? for the ShamirReaders mailing list Tue Feb 09, 2016 18:34 | The Saker
Book Review Book Title: The Essential Saker Copyright 2015 ISBN-13: 978-1-60888-058-4 Author: The Saker Publisher: Nimble Books LLC, Ann Arbor, MI, USA 48103 Web Page: http://www.NimbleBooks.com E-mail: wfz@nimblebooks.com Reviewer: Tom

offsite link International Military Review ? Syria, Feb. 9, 2016 Tue Feb 09, 2016 18:29 | The Saker
If you are having trouble viewing this video, go to the Youtube version at https://www.youtube.com/user/crimeanf...

offsite link CrossTalk: Bullhorns Spin The Spin Tue Feb 09, 2016 14:38 | The Saker

The Saker >>

Human Rights in Ireland
www.humanrights.ie

offsite link THE SPECIAL CRIMINAL COURT, THE IRISH GENERAL ELECTION AND THE PROPOSED FRENCH CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDM... Mon Feb 08, 2016 13:03 | Ntina Tzouvala

offsite link Out on the Inside Thu Feb 04, 2016 06:00 | Sinead Ring

offsite link A&L Goodbody and Irish Refugee Council Asylum Law Award 2016 Wed Jan 27, 2016 08:46 | Liam Thornton

offsite link The Espaces Generation Climat and the domestication of public engagement Fri Jan 15, 2016 11:43 | Ntina Tzouvala

offsite link Reflections on climate action in the aftermath of Paris Tue Jan 12, 2016 13:17 | Ntina Tzouvala

Human Rights in Ireland >>

Cedar Lounge
For lefties too stubborn to quit

offsite link Dublin at the Election 15:54 Wed Feb 10, 2016 | irishelectionliterature

offsite link Uselessness? 14:18 Wed Feb 10, 2016 | guestposter

offsite link Another Poll 11:07 Wed Feb 10, 2016 | irishelectionliterature

offsite link One major component of the present crisis in the US? 10:11 Wed Feb 10, 2016 | WorldbyStorm

offsite link An unhealthy fixation on budget surplus or deficit 10:03 Wed Feb 10, 2016 | WorldbyStorm

Cedar Lounge >>

Dublin Opinion
Life should be full of strangeness, like a rich painting

offsite link The Financial Crisis:What Have We Learnt? 19:58 Sat Aug 29, 2015

offsite link Money in 35,000 Words or Less 21:34 Sat Aug 22, 2015

offsite link THE WRATH OF KANE: BANKING CRISES AND POLITICAL POWER 09:32 Fri Jan 30, 2015

offsite link ALWAYS THE ARTISTS: WEEK THREE OF THE BANK INQUIRY 23:11 Thu Jan 22, 2015

offsite link FIANNA FÁIL AND THE BANK INQUIRY : SOME INITIAL OBSERVATIONS 21:04 Mon Jan 12, 2015

Dublin Opinion >>

Press Release: Criminalisation of non-violent Belgian anti-GM activists.

category national | environment | press release author Tuesday March 05, 2013 19:13author by Roundiehouse Report this post to the editors

Dendermonde, 12th February 2013. Today the court of Dendermonde convicted 11 activists of 'gang formation'. In doing so, the judge has criminalised their participation in the non violent direct action and debate on May 29th, 2011, which brought attention to the need for a sustainable agriculture system.

Dendermonde, 12th February 2013. Today the court of Dendermonde convicted 11 activists of gang formation. In doing so, the judge has criminalised their participation in the non violent direct action and debate on May 29th, 2011, which brought attention to the need for a sustainable agriculture system.

This is an extremely dangerous precedent which will have an impact on all kinds of civil action. With this verdict, the Belgian court has fundamentally undermined the right of citizens to freedom of speech. For example, one of the participants has been given a six month custodial sentence for talking to the press.

After it became known that the anti-GM activists were to be charged with forming a criminal gang, a large number of people from the environmental and agricultural sectors, academics and politicians rallied behind the defendants and put themselves forward to join them in the dock as voluntary defendants. A number of organisations ranging from trade unions to farmers’ organisations, and including Oxfam and Greenpeace, expressed their solidarity with the charged activists. Today’s ruling will further strengthen this solidarity.

“This is absurd,” said Tjerk Dalhuisen, a Dutch defendant. “If the Belgian justice system thinks that this is the way to keep us quiet, then they’re wrong. We shall continue in our struggle for sustainable agriculture without genetic manipulation and without pesticides. We do not want to be guinea pigs in industries’ experiments and we will continue to make our voices heard.”
Marie Smekens, a young farmer and one of the eleven defendants, added: “The sentences are completely disproportionate. It is clear that this trial was designed to muzzle all forms of future protest.”

The defendants are appealing against the ridiculous verdict and demanding a retrial which respects their legal right to a appropriate defence in court.
On January 15th, the defendants and their lawyers left the court room and the trial after the judge had refused to hear their witnesses or consider their evidence. These testimonies formed an important part of the defences’ case as they emphasised the political nature of the action. The judge also refused to acknowledge the voluntary defendants.

The action on May 29th in Wetteren was carried out in order to draw attention to the major problems with and consequences resulting from the introduction of GMOs into agriculture and food chains.

For more information:
field.liberation@gmail.com
https://fieldliberation.wordpress.com/
tel: 0032 484 35 70 53

Background: The great potato swap

The Action
The defendants in the GMO potato trial took part in an action of civil disobedience in order to make an important social and ecological problem visible.

On 29 May 2011, around 400 protesters swapped a number of genetically manipulated potatoes being grown in a promotional field trial for organic varieties which are cultivated because they are naturally resistant to potato blight.

They wanted to challenge the governments’ agricultural policy which allows unwanted GM in food and agriculture, while health and environmental impacts have yet to be sufficiently tested. By taking this action they were also taking a stand against the increasing privatisation of food production, including the patenting of crops.

Groups have been calling for a democratic debate about the introduction of genetically modified crops for years. Environmental and agricultural organisations including Friends of the Earth, Landwijzer, Greenpeace and the organic Bioforum have been campaigning constantly for sustainable agriculture and emphasising that GMO’s cannot be a part of this. They objected to the potato field trial which they described as unwanted and useless. Above all, they highlighted the environmental risks involved in such an experiment. Three experts from the Biotechnology Safety Council gave negative advice regarding the potato trial. They emphasised the environmental risks linked to the trial and pointed out that it was scientifically ungrounded. In August 2012 a judge in Ghent ruled that the GM field trial itself was actually illegal because there was no justification for the fact that the ministers in charge did not allow for objections or for minority positions on the Biotechnology Safety Council to be considered.

The action took place after all these other attempts from people to express their views had been systematically swept aside. The structural problems in agriculture, and the consequences of the use of genetically modified organisms have still not been openly discussed in Flanders, and public debate about the issue is systematically avoided.

The Trial
The public prosecutor and the research consortium (Flemish Institute for Biotechnology, University of Ghent, HoGent and the Flemish Agency for Agriculture and Fishery) chose to have this debate in court via direct summons and civil proceedings.

The group of activists had prepared a thorough defence. This was based on calling up expert witnesses, video testimonies from scientists, and video footage from the action in order to prove that 1) the action was covered by the principle of freedom of expression, and 2) that action was necessary in order to protect the precautionary principle. The action in Wetteren was carried out to protect the environment, public health and small-scale farming.

Without any further discussion, the judges refused to hear these testimonies or to view the video footage. The testimonies, however, were crucial to emphasise the political nature of the action. The judges therefore denied the defendants their legal right to an appropriate defence, as well as the opportunity to question the use of genetically modified organisms in agriculture. They also refused to allow the 91 voluntary defendants to be included into the proceedings. The presence of so many voluntary defendants demonstrates that a large number of people do not accept that action for sustainable agriculture has been criminalised.

The message to the politicians, the media, academia and the judiciary is clear: we, and many people with us, will continue to struggle for a fair, sustainable, GMO-free agriculture, and this movement continues to grow.

Related Link: https://fieldliberation.wordpress.com/2013/02/12/press-...stem/
author by Mike Novackpublication date Sun Mar 10, 2013 17:58Report this post to the editors

"civil disobedience"

If an action is law abiding it is NOT civil disobedience but civil obedience.

Just because an action is peaceful does not mean it is not criminal. In order for the action to be an example of civil disobedience it MUST be breaking some law or other.

Plenty of (ordinary) criminal activities are peaceful. Consider these:
counterfeiting
uttering (a forged check for example)
shoplifting
embezzlement
putting horse meat in sausages labeled beef

PLEASE, I am NOT meaning to imply that civil disobedience actions are the same sort of law breaking. Just how silly the notion "if peaceful should be legal".

author by fredpublication date Tue Apr 16, 2013 02:54Report this post to the editors

stop nit picking victims and activists all the time Mike.

How about nit picking the rich corporations trying to control our food chain for profit, and quite happy to poison us in the process?

They are the actual "criminals" here, not conscientious activists.

some of the many examples:

http://rt.com/usa/toxic-study-gmo-corn-900/

http://rt.com/usa/monsanto-congress-silently-slips-830/

http://rt.com/usa/monsanto-seeds-trial-bowman-123/

 
© 2001-2016 Independent Media Centre Ireland. Unless otherwise stated by the author, all content is free for non-commercial reuse, reprint, and rebroadcast, on the net and elsewhere. Opinions are those of the contributors and are not necessarily endorsed by Independent Media Centre Ireland. Disclaimer | Privacy