A bird's eye view of the vineyard
Reporting from Korea during the 2013 ?crisis?: 5 key facts the West ignores Fri Oct 20, 2017 05:05 | The Saker
by Ramin Mazaheri In 2013 my bosses in Tehran sent me to Seoul, and I felt quite courageous: just like today, Seoul was about to be ground zero for thermonuclear
Re-visiting Russian counter-propaganda methods Fri Oct 20, 2017 05:03 | The Saker
This article was written for the Unz Review A special ‘thank you!’ to my Director of Research, Scott, for providing me with the background info for this article Everything
Vladimir Putin?s speech at the Meeting of the Valdai International Discussion Club Thu Oct 19, 2017 23:36 | The Saker
I am not sure how optimistic it will sound, but I am aware that you had very lively discussions over the last three days. I will try, as has now become customary, to share with you
SITREP Kurdistan: Pepe Escobar and Alexander Mercouris Thu Oct 19, 2017 21:41 | The Saker
In order to try to provide a profound analysis of what has happened in Iraqi Kurdistan and offer not one, but two, different, but complimentary views, on this topic: Pepe
Syria War Report ? October 19, 2017: U.S. Blames Assad For ?Hindering? Its Anti-ISIS Efforts Thu Oct 19, 2017 16:54 | Scott
https://southfront.org/syria-war-repo... If you?re able, and if you like our content and approach, please support the project. Our work wouldn?t be possible without your help: PayPal: email@example.com or via: http://southfront.org/donate/ or via: https://www.patreon.com/southfront The Syrian Arab Army
The Saker >>
Repeal or Replace? Tue Oct 03, 2017 06:31 | Fiona de Londras
An Abortion Law Immune from Constitutional Review? Thu Sep 28, 2017 20:14 | Fiona de Londras
Should the pro-choice movement support a new constitutional provision on abortion? Wed Sep 27, 2017 16:19 | Eoin Daly
Replace v Repeal and the Politics of Legal Certainty Thu Sep 21, 2017 10:57 | Máiréad Enright
Ireland?s violation of International Abortion rights: A perpetual Déjà vu. Sat Jul 29, 2017 18:49 | admin
Human Rights in Ireland >>
For lefties too stubborn to quit
This Weekend I?ll Mostly Be Listening to? The Martin Hayes Quartet 06:46 Sat Oct 21, 2017 | irishelectionliterature
He really loves the Bomb? the more the better. 13:03 Fri Oct 20, 2017 | WorldbyStorm
Surely a former Bank of England chief would know about the implications of Brexit on customs? Or per... 12:00 Fri Oct 20, 2017 | WorldbyStorm
Michael Murphy interview 11:00 Fri Oct 20, 2017 | WorldbyStorm
This Week At Irish Election Literature 06:17 Fri Oct 20, 2017 | irishelectionliterature
Cedar Lounge >>
Life should be full of strangeness, like a rich painting
Notes for a Book on Money and the Irish State - The Marshall Aid Program 15:10 Sat Apr 02, 2016
The Financial Crisis:What Have We Learnt? 19:58 Sat Aug 29, 2015
Money in 35,000 Words or Less 21:34 Sat Aug 22, 2015
THE WRATH OF KANE: BANKING CRISES AND POLITICAL POWER 09:32 Fri Jan 30, 2015
ALWAYS THE ARTISTS: WEEK THREE OF THE BANK INQUIRY 23:11 Thu Jan 22, 2015
Dublin Opinion >>
Petition: Human Rights in Irish Childbirth - A Woman's right to choice on how and where she births.
rights, freedoms and repression |
Tuesday February 26, 2013 13:41 by AIMS Ireland and HBA Ireland - Assoc for Improvements in Maternity Services Ireland and Homebirth Assoc of Ireland
This petition was created by AIMS Ireland and HBA Ireland, Feb 2013
Abstract: There is an overwhelming failure to recognize human rights in birth in Ireland. In December 2011 the Fine Gael and Labour Government passed legislation, called The Nurses and Midwives Act, 2011, which governs the way midwives are insured to attend homebirth in Ireland. Midwives who make an individual assessment, that the mother and baby are safer birthing at home than in a hospital setting, desite falling outside generalized guidelines, are punishable by law with a €60,000 fine and/or a 10 year prision sentence. Women who make an informed decision, against the uninformed terms, are threatened with having their midwife barred from attending them in childbirth and having their baby taken into State custody at birth.
In 2011 the Fine Gael and Labour Government passed legislation, called The Nurses and Midwives Act, which regulates the terms on which a woman may access homebirth services in Ireland. A Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) was created to outline the terms in which a midwife is insured to attend a woman at home. Midwives who book women outside of the rules and hse criteria, in the interest of safety for the woman and baby, are punishable by law with a €60,000 fine and/or a 10 year prison sentence. Women who make an informed decision, against the un-informed terms, are threatened with having their midwife barred from attending them in childbirth and having their baby taken into State custody at birth. Women have also been threatened with risk assessors, mental health assessments and doorstep visits from relevant stakeholders.
AIMSI has raised concerns on the criteria in the MOU at every level due to failures by the HSE, State, and stakeholders involved in the process to recognize the woman’s right to choice on how/where she births in this process. AIMSI published HSE proposals which recognized the Gardaí as 'relevant stakeholders' in homebirth and have documented examples of threats women have recieved when exercising their choice for a homebirth outside of 'the rules'.
A finalized version of the MOU is currently being negotiated through the National Steering Committee for Homebirth. Proposals to the finalized MOU include the mandatory attendance of two midwives per homebirth. The implementation of two midwives will end independent midwifery and homebirth in Ireland.
Proposals to Finalized MOU – mandatory attendance of two midwives
AIMSI and HBA are concerned by proposals in the finalized MOU in which it will become mandatory for two midwives to attend every homebirth; this has raised serious concerns and, if included, the implications on homebirth will be immense. Ireland simply does not have the infrastructure to implement this proposal. The impact of such a proposal would deeply restrict homebirth in many areas and would threaten the existence of independent midwifery. The proposal of two midwives also infringes on a woman’s right to privacy, the decision on how and where to birth, and the continuity of care relationship between woman and her midwife, as the primary caregiver.
Mandatory attendance of two midwives is not evidence based, nor is it routine practice in other EU States. Restrictions in homebirth places added strain on over-stretch hospital based services. Homebirth costs less and opens services in consultant-led care for women who want or need this option.
Human Rights in Childbirth – Ireland:
AIMSI and HBA rejects the Government’s belief that the decision on where and how to give birth is with the HSE, insurance companies, and the Government; not the woman.
Current legislation to negate a woman’s right to choose where to birth her baby is in breach of the European Convention on Human Rights which enshrines the fundamental right to bodily integrity. The legislation and current prohibitive criteria in the MOU also is in conflict with the European Union court of human rights: Ternovsky vs Hungary - December 2004 - which found in favour of the right to choose the circumstances in becoming a parent. On a local level, the Irish Constitution upholds the right to bodily integrity and autonomy. The HSE recognizes the right to informed choice in medical treatment and health.
Pregnant women should be afforded the same rights to bodily integrity and autonomy in her health care as other citizens. As informed, equal citizens, pregnant women have equal rights to making decisions on her choice of healthcare, privacy, and place of birth. Neither the Government, nor the HSE, nor the panel of "experts" who created the MOU have the authority to make decisions for individuals in relations to their personal health and care options.
International best practice, clearly defines a woman’s choice as final, regardless of recommendations. The Irish Maternity Services has failed to implement recognition of these rights, and instead, relies on blanket criteria outlining who may access midwife led care options. Best Practice clearly defines recommendations as a means to guide women and health care professionals towards a recommended care option, but guidance should never replace the right to informed choice. The removal of choice, as seen in an Irish context, is never best practice.
There is currently no protection for the rights of pregnant women in Ireland. Ireland has the European Social Charter, the European Convention on Human Rights and the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, but nothing specific to the Irish State that gives pregnant women rights, that protects pregnant women, nor defines women's right to autonomy in childbirth such as NICE.
We, the undersigned, recognize a woman's right to informed choices, bodily integrity, and autonomy in childbirth. We recognize that women have the right to decide how and where she births. We recognize the findings of the EU Court of Human Rights, which found in favour of the right to choose the circumstances on becoming a parent.
We demand revisions to the MOU, to define, recognize, and under-pin these rights, regardless of criteria recommendations. These revisions should reflect a woman’s right to give birth how/where she wishes, fully insured, by the care provider of her choice; be it hospital, MLU, or home.
We reject the implementation of mandatory two midwives per homebirth into the MOU.