Interested in maladministration. Estd. 2005
Formal complaint against RTE for bias
Water protester convicted on trumped up charge Anthony
The people now know what you are Mr. Ross Anthony
Independents must decide: The people or the corrupt political system Anthony
Independent Alliance TDs must decide: The people or the corrupt regime Anthony
Public Inquiry >>
A bird's eye view of the vineyard
Mother Superior vs. ranting schoolboy Tue Sep 27, 2016 18:13 | The Saker
by Pepe Escobar for Sputnik International The temptation is irresistible to conceptualize the Clinton Machine?s strategy going into the first US presidential debate; let Donald Trump metastasize into a pretzel.
The US, Russia and SYRIA SitRep by Cat Motya, September 27, 2016 Tue Sep 27, 2016 05:19 | Scott
So… A few boring pieces about the future, because a few important moments came to realization. Considering these important moments, we will post some forecasts foretelling the future, but only
Trump ? Clinton debate: réaction à chaud (Saker rant) Tue Sep 27, 2016 04:19 | The Saker
Since I might be asked about that, I might as well share my opinion about the debate tonight. Frankly? I was absolutely horrified. I had expected Trump to completely slaughter
Syrian War Report ? September 26, 2016: Russia Deploys More Warplanes in Syria Tue Sep 27, 2016 00:39 | The Saker
Moveable Feast Cafe 2016/09/26 ? Open Thread Mon Sep 26, 2016 21:00 | Herb Swanson
2016/09/26 20:00:01Welcome to the ‘Moveable Feast Cafe’. The ‘Moveable Feast’ is an open thread where readers can post wide ranging observations, articles, rants, off topic and have animate discussions of
The Saker >>
Benefit Sanctions and Coercion Within the Irish Welfare System Thu Sep 22, 2016 13:38 | Cliodhna Murphy
The rights of the unborn: a troubling decision from the High Court? Wed Aug 10, 2016 12:42 | Máiréad Enright
Progress Report on the Northern/Irish Feminist Judgments Project. Mon Jul 11, 2016 13:40 | admin
The UN and the Eighth Amendment Thu Jun 23, 2016 09:46 | admin
Call for Papers: State Accountability for Vulnerability Mon Jun 20, 2016 12:29 | admin
Human Rights in Ireland >>
For lefties too stubborn to quit
Another five or six months? 18:20 Tue Sep 27, 2016 | WorldbyStorm
CLR Book Club ? Week 5 12:55 Tue Sep 27, 2016 | WorldbyStorm
Dublin Central? 11:00 Tue Sep 27, 2016 | WorldbyStorm
With Corbyn 07:42 Tue Sep 27, 2016 | WorldbyStorm
A fake choice? 12:01 Mon Sep 26, 2016 | WorldbyStorm
Cedar Lounge >>
[choucha] refugee protest in tunisia
Break the isolation!
About 100 rejected asylum seekers from the refugee camp in Choucha are currently protesting in the Tunisian capital.
About 100 refugees from the refugee camp in Choucha, which lies on the border between Tunisia and Libya, reached Tunis on Monday 28th January in order to stage a protest that will continue for several days. They had no choice but to live in the desert for two years while the UNHCR negligently worked on their cases, and eventually rejected them as refugees. Since October 2012 they have been denied access to food and medical care. Now the protesters have taken the necessary steps to challenge their isolation and the consequent lack of prospects.
Idle individuals become activists
The camp in Choucha was established during the Libyan civil war during winter 2011. It offered refugees the opportunity to access an asylum procedure and to travel on to participating states in the framework of the resettlement programme. Over the past two years, daily life in the refugee camp hasn't had much to offer apart from unbearable periods of waiting while putting up with the heat and sandstorms. This particularly affected refugees who were not recognised as such by the UNHCR.
The camp has to be seen as a part of the externalisation politics of the European Union - it prevented hundreds of people from challenging the EU's border regime by trying to enter its territory, by embarking on a boat. At the same time, granting access to a limited number of refugees allowed the media to paint a different picture, diverting public attention away from a militarised campaign against migrants. Germany (pop. 82 million) demonstrated its extraordinary generosity by accepting 205 refugees, whereas Tunisia (pop. 10 Mio.) welcomed half a million people during the Libya-crisis. However, only people who hold a refugee certificate are granted access to the resettlement programme. Many of those who the UNHCR did not recognise as refugees have already traveled back to their countries of origin. 230 of them are still in Choucha. They accuse the UNHCR of severe mistakes and negligence in processing their demands for asylum. These errors range from biased and incompetent interpreters, misspelled names of places and families to the cooperation with the government bodies that refugees fled from in the first place.
The ensuing exclusion and lack of perspectives of this group of about 230 people led to various protests last year and to the most recent demand for an independent review of the rejected cases. In order to make their voices heard, 100 of them traveled to Tunis.
No one is illegal - not even in Tunisia
The journey to Tunis represents an act of resistance in itself. Because they have been rejected by the UNHCR, the group of 230 refugees are now considered "illegal migrants" by the governent and are not allowed to move freely. That is why they may be arrested, detained and deported at any time if the Tunisian state decides to. Until now the illegalised protesters have only been detained for short periods of time and sent back to Choucha after having been told that the UNHCR is reponsible for them. In this passing on of responsibilities the UNHCR's most recent course of action is remarkable. Since October 2012 rejected asylum seekers are being denied access to food and medical care. This scandalous and merciless strategy of a reputable humanitarian organisation evidently aims at forcing people to leave.
The refugees keep emphasising that because of persecution and/or war, they cannot return to their home countries - which the UNHCR would have been able to ascertain if it had adequately reviewed their cases. They decisively reject the UNHCR's cynical suggestion to just go back to Libya. Libya still does not offer security - black people in particular are constantly threatened by arbitrary arrests and racist violence. Many refugees in Choucha were told about such experiences by people who did return to Libya.
This is why two central demands of the current protest are for the UNHCR to resume the supply of food and medicine to the refugee camp, and to allow access to the resettlement programme for everybody who remained in Chocha. The latter demand is also directed at the European Union and all NATO states that caused the current situation by intervening in the civil war in Libya.
To reinforce these demands to the UNHCR and the EU, and to make them accesible to the Tunisian and the international public, the Chocha refugees will stage a protest for several days in Tunis. In order to achieve this, they need support! Please:
* Spread information about the protest via mailing lists, Facebook and by word of mouth!
* Sign the open letter adressed to Ursula Aboubacar, the head of the Tunisian UNHCR, containing the demands of the protesters! (http://chouchaprotest.noblogs.org/?attachment_id=56)
* Participate in the fax campaign and send a fax (englisch: http://chouchaprotest.noblogs.org/?attachment_id=51, francais: http://chouchaprotest.noblogs.org/?attachment_id=53, deutsch: http://chouchaprotest.noblogs.org/?attachment_id=52) to UNHCR offices in your country and to the Tunisian Representatives.
* Donate money for food, transport and means of telecommunication for the protesters. Transfers can be made to this bank account:
Sparkasse der Stadt Berlin
Account number: 61 00 24 264
Bank code: 100 500 00
* Organise solidarity actions - in front of UNHCR offices all over the world!
Further information you will find at:
Contact Germany: 00491734108642 (deutsch, englisch, francais)
Contact to the Protesters: 004915210453991 (deutsch, english, francais, 'arab)