A bird's eye view of the vineyard
Exclusive: Amelia Earhart shot down by Putin! Tue Jan 17, 2017 13:30 | The Saker
Spoof sent to me by an anonymous reader. The Saker
Syrian War Report ? January 16, 2017: ISIS Overruns Army Defenses In Deir Ezzor Tue Jan 17, 2017 04:26 | The Saker
Bullhorns: Real News (CrossTalk) Tue Jan 17, 2017 04:23 | The Saker
Moveable Feast Cafe 2017/01/16 ? Open Thread Mon Jan 16, 2017 04:00 | Herb Swanson
2017/01/16 04:00:01Welcome to the ‘Moveable Feast Cafe’. The ‘Moveable Feast’ is an open thread where readers can post wide ranging observations, articles, rants, off topic and have animate discussions of
Guess what?s neither meat nor fish, but Ms. Chalupa and John Schindler, by Scott Mon Jan 16, 2017 03:34 | Scott
“What is this?” “This is no fish, neither meat, but Uncle Taras’ zalupa.” An insulting Ukrainian saying. The first time I heard the word “chalupa” I was standing
The Saker >>
Guest Post: Extension of the 14 day rule: potential implications for Irish embryos Thu Jan 12, 2017 18:05 | Eilionoir Flynn
Notes on Judge Harding-Clark?s Report on the Symphysiotomy Payment Scheme. Thu Nov 24, 2016 17:50 | Máiréad Enright
The Practical Implications of Miller v SSEEU for Brexit: Nine Reflections Thu Nov 03, 2016 16:30 | Fiona de Londras
Having Our Voices Heard ? the Official Languages Act foreshadowing the Recognition of Irish Sign Lan... Wed Nov 02, 2016 09:35 | admin
Benefit Sanctions and Coercion Within the Irish Welfare System Thu Sep 22, 2016 13:38 | Cliodhna Murphy
Human Rights in Ireland >>
For lefties too stubborn to quit
CLR Book Club ? Week 3, Jan 17, 2017 11:35 Tue Jan 17, 2017 | WorldbyStorm
Pension woes? redux 10:21 Tue Jan 17, 2017 | WorldbyStorm
Expedient demise of the Executive? 07:55 Tue Jan 17, 2017 | WorldbyStorm
?the country had voted to get people like her to ?get out??? 20:55 Mon Jan 16, 2017 | WorldbyStorm
Opinion polling on Brexit? 11:58 Mon Jan 16, 2017 | WorldbyStorm
Cedar Lounge >>
Life should be full of strangeness, like a rich painting
Notes for a Book on Money and the Irish State - The Marshall Aid Program 15:10 Sat Apr 02, 2016
The Financial Crisis:What Have We Learnt? 19:58 Sat Aug 29, 2015
Money in 35,000 Words or Less 21:34 Sat Aug 22, 2015
THE WRATH OF KANE: BANKING CRISES AND POLITICAL POWER 09:32 Fri Jan 30, 2015
ALWAYS THE ARTISTS: WEEK THREE OF THE BANK INQUIRY 23:11 Thu Jan 22, 2015
Dublin Opinion >>
[choucha] refugee protest in tunisia
Break the isolation!
About 100 rejected asylum seekers from the refugee camp in Choucha are currently protesting in the Tunisian capital.
About 100 refugees from the refugee camp in Choucha, which lies on the border between Tunisia and Libya, reached Tunis on Monday 28th January in order to stage a protest that will continue for several days. They had no choice but to live in the desert for two years while the UNHCR negligently worked on their cases, and eventually rejected them as refugees. Since October 2012 they have been denied access to food and medical care. Now the protesters have taken the necessary steps to challenge their isolation and the consequent lack of prospects.
Idle individuals become activists
The camp in Choucha was established during the Libyan civil war during winter 2011. It offered refugees the opportunity to access an asylum procedure and to travel on to participating states in the framework of the resettlement programme. Over the past two years, daily life in the refugee camp hasn't had much to offer apart from unbearable periods of waiting while putting up with the heat and sandstorms. This particularly affected refugees who were not recognised as such by the UNHCR.
The camp has to be seen as a part of the externalisation politics of the European Union - it prevented hundreds of people from challenging the EU's border regime by trying to enter its territory, by embarking on a boat. At the same time, granting access to a limited number of refugees allowed the media to paint a different picture, diverting public attention away from a militarised campaign against migrants. Germany (pop. 82 million) demonstrated its extraordinary generosity by accepting 205 refugees, whereas Tunisia (pop. 10 Mio.) welcomed half a million people during the Libya-crisis. However, only people who hold a refugee certificate are granted access to the resettlement programme. Many of those who the UNHCR did not recognise as refugees have already traveled back to their countries of origin. 230 of them are still in Choucha. They accuse the UNHCR of severe mistakes and negligence in processing their demands for asylum. These errors range from biased and incompetent interpreters, misspelled names of places and families to the cooperation with the government bodies that refugees fled from in the first place.
The ensuing exclusion and lack of perspectives of this group of about 230 people led to various protests last year and to the most recent demand for an independent review of the rejected cases. In order to make their voices heard, 100 of them traveled to Tunis.
No one is illegal - not even in Tunisia
The journey to Tunis represents an act of resistance in itself. Because they have been rejected by the UNHCR, the group of 230 refugees are now considered "illegal migrants" by the governent and are not allowed to move freely. That is why they may be arrested, detained and deported at any time if the Tunisian state decides to. Until now the illegalised protesters have only been detained for short periods of time and sent back to Choucha after having been told that the UNHCR is reponsible for them. In this passing on of responsibilities the UNHCR's most recent course of action is remarkable. Since October 2012 rejected asylum seekers are being denied access to food and medical care. This scandalous and merciless strategy of a reputable humanitarian organisation evidently aims at forcing people to leave.
The refugees keep emphasising that because of persecution and/or war, they cannot return to their home countries - which the UNHCR would have been able to ascertain if it had adequately reviewed their cases. They decisively reject the UNHCR's cynical suggestion to just go back to Libya. Libya still does not offer security - black people in particular are constantly threatened by arbitrary arrests and racist violence. Many refugees in Choucha were told about such experiences by people who did return to Libya.
This is why two central demands of the current protest are for the UNHCR to resume the supply of food and medicine to the refugee camp, and to allow access to the resettlement programme for everybody who remained in Chocha. The latter demand is also directed at the European Union and all NATO states that caused the current situation by intervening in the civil war in Libya.
To reinforce these demands to the UNHCR and the EU, and to make them accesible to the Tunisian and the international public, the Chocha refugees will stage a protest for several days in Tunis. In order to achieve this, they need support! Please:
* Spread information about the protest via mailing lists, Facebook and by word of mouth!
* Sign the open letter adressed to Ursula Aboubacar, the head of the Tunisian UNHCR, containing the demands of the protesters! (http://chouchaprotest.noblogs.org/?attachment_id=56)
* Participate in the fax campaign and send a fax (englisch: http://chouchaprotest.noblogs.org/?attachment_id=51, francais: http://chouchaprotest.noblogs.org/?attachment_id=53, deutsch: http://chouchaprotest.noblogs.org/?attachment_id=52) to UNHCR offices in your country and to the Tunisian Representatives.
* Donate money for food, transport and means of telecommunication for the protesters. Transfers can be made to this bank account:
Sparkasse der Stadt Berlin
Account number: 61 00 24 264
Bank code: 100 500 00
* Organise solidarity actions - in front of UNHCR offices all over the world!
Further information you will find at:
Contact Germany: 00491734108642 (deutsch, englisch, francais)
Contact to the Protesters: 004915210453991 (deutsch, english, francais, 'arab)