Russian Diplomat Drops a Bombshell: US Expected ISIS to Seize Damascus by October 23:13 Feb 18 0 comments
“Humanitarian Lies”: Evidence Proves US Afghan Hospital Attack Was Deliberate 22:06 Oct 19 1 comments
Dublin protest against Suruc massacre and support to ISIS by Turkey outside Turkish embassy 22:49 Jul 27 0 comments
BAe and BBC War Propaganda 16:24 Jul 03 0 comments
US Admits Paying Terrorists For Services Rendered In Syria and elsewhere 23:04 Jul 02 0 commentsmore >>
Joined up thinking for the Irish Left
DDCI calls on New Government to Strictly Regulate Vulture Fund Acquisitions Wed May 04, 2016 15:22 | Irish Left Review
Warning: Ultra-Low Spend Economy Ahead Wed May 04, 2016 11:59 | Michael Taft
May Issue of Socialist Voice Out Now Wed May 04, 2016 10:56 | Communist Party of Ireland
Time to Get Real Fri Apr 29, 2016 13:45 | Michael Taft
Turning Failure Into Hope Fri Apr 29, 2016 13:40 | Michael Taft
Wailings about Left Unity Sat Feb 13, 2016 01:13 | James O'Brien
The Bern Manifesto: Why I am Voting for Bernie Sanders Wed Jan 27, 2016 23:59 | Jerome Nikolai Warren
Kautsky â€“ The crisis of capitalism and the shortening of working time Mon Nov 09, 2015 22:34 | James O'Brien
How to do better things with words Fri Oct 23, 2015 07:38 | modulus
Syriza and Israel: Syrizaâ€™s response Thu Aug 20, 2015 18:10 | yeksmesh
Interested in maladministration. Estd. 2005
Conor Pope: Genuinely clueless Anthony
A bird's eye view of the vineyard
Dying to Dive. Underwater Search for Serenity with World?s Top Freedivers Wed May 04, 2016 18:20 | The Saker
International Military Review ? Syria, May 4, 2016 Wed May 04, 2016 15:19 | The Saker
?CrossTalk? Realist vs. Hawk? Wed May 04, 2016 13:34 | The Saker
The unforgiving choice: enemies versus allies Wed May 04, 2016 05:10 | The Saker
CrossTalk: Bullhorns in the Bullpen Wed May 04, 2016 05:09 | The Saker
British High Court rules that Assange can seek Appeal to Supreme Court
Today, Veterans for Peace, Catholic Workers, Occupy London and other anti-war activists gathered outside the High Court in London in solidarity with WikiLeaks activist Julain Assange. Julian has spent the past 363 days in England under house arrest without charge. A secret U.S. Grand Jury continues to sit in Virginia pursuing indictments. Leading U.S. Republican Presidential candidate Newt Gringrich has stated "Julian Assange is engaged in terrorism. He should be treated as an enemy combatant." We believe the U.S., British, Swedish and Australian governments are planning to do just that! We are all weary of the war which has now entered its second decade. We need to question the lies of our war making governments, defend the human rights and offer solidarity to those resisters like Julian Assange and Bradley Manning who are being defamed and pursecuted for exposing the nature of these wars in which our governments remain complicit
"Democracy Now": Julian Assange’s Attorney Gareth Peirce Speaks about Imminent British Court Decision on Sweden’s Request to Extradite Assange
***UK Indymedia Dec 5th. High Court rules that Assange can seek Appeal to Supreme Court
Julian Assange was back at the Royal Courts of Justice in London
today seeking permission - from the High Court judges who dismissed his
appeal against extradition in November - to take his case to the
Supreme Court. They haven't actually allowed this, but they're allowing
him to ask the Supreme Court directly for leave to appeal, on one of the
two points raised.
THE ISSUES AND COURT RULING
The two points on which Assange's case was being made - that there are issues of 'general public importance' - are as follows:
1) Whether a European Arrest Warrant issued by a partisan prosecutor working for the executive (i.e. not an independent judge or investigating magistrate in the civil law system) is a valid Part 1 Warrant issued by a "judicial authority" within the meaning of sections 2(2) & 66 of the Extradition Act 2003?
* This point argues that the decision goes against parliamentary intent in the 2003 Extradition Act (see High Court Ruling).
2) Whether a person in respect of whom no decision to prosecute has been taken can be said to be ’accused’ within the meaning of sections 2(3)(a) of the Extradition Act 2003?
My understanding is that the second of these points was dismissed by the judges, but that they have allowed Assange to try to seek a ruling from the Supreme Court on the first point.
***More footage of support outside of court