no events posted in last week
Ukraine Buys Huge Amounts of Russian Fue... Fri Jan 20, 2023 08:34 | Antonia Kotseva
Turkey Has Sent Ukraine Cluster Munition... Thu Jan 12, 2023 00:26 | Jack Detsch
New Israeli Government Promises to Talk ... Tue Jan 10, 2023 21:13 | Al Majadeen
Russia Training Iranian Pilots Ahead of ... Tue Jan 10, 2023 15:19 | The Times of Israel
Lukashenko Abolishes Copyright Protectio... Tue Jan 10, 2023 15:05 | Nikki Main
A bird's eye view of the vineyard
The Saker blog is now frozen Tue Feb 28, 2023 23:55 | The Saker
Dear friends As I have previously announced, we are now “freezing” the blog. We are also making archives of the blog available for free download in various formats (see below).
What do you make of the Russia and China Partnership? Tue Feb 28, 2023 16:26 | The Saker
by Mr. Allen for the Saker blog Over the last few years, we hear leaders from both Russia and China pronouncing that they have formed a relationship where there are
Moveable Feast Cafe 2023/02/27 ? Open Thread Mon Feb 27, 2023 19:00 | cafe-uploader
2023/02/27 19:00:02Welcome to the ‘Moveable Feast Cafe’. The ‘Moveable Feast’ is an open thread where readers can post wide ranging observations, articles, rants, off topic and have animate discussions of
The stage is set for Hybrid World War III Mon Feb 27, 2023 15:50 | The Saker
Pepe Escobar for the Saker blog A powerful feeling rhythms your skin and drums up your soul as you?re immersed in a long walk under persistent snow flurries, pinpointed by
A few minor things Sun Feb 26, 2023 16:50 | The Saker
Dear friends Quick reminder: we are about to freeze the blog and announce how/where to download the archive from. I expect the details posted here on Tuesday. I want J.B.
The Saker >>
Woke to the Bones? Pittsburgh Prof Denies Differences Between Male and Female Skeletons Sat Apr 01, 2023 11:05 | Ian Macleod
"I have more degrees than you" should never win debates. This American professor found out the hard way. Wielding credentialism to deny sex differences in human skeletons has drawn laughter and criticism.
The post Woke to the Bones? Pittsburgh Prof Denies Differences Between Male and Female Skeletons appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
Narrative Crumbles as Doctors Thank Aseem Malhotra and Angus Dalgleish for Explaining How the mRNA V... Sat Apr 01, 2023 09:00 | Dr Angus Dalgleish
The narrative is crumbling as doctors thank Aseem Malhotra and Angus Dalgleish for explaining how the mRNA vaccines are injuring their patients.
The post Narrative Crumbles as Doctors Thank Aseem Malhotra and Angus Dalgleish for Explaining How the mRNA Vaccines Are Injuring Their Patients appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
More Climate Fiction From the BBC Sat Apr 01, 2023 07:00 | Chris Morrison
Last week's Start the Week on BBC Radio 4 provides a case study in how fiction is mixed with cherry-picked fact and presented as a learned contribution to our understanding of how the climate is breaking down.
The post More Climate Fiction From the BBC appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
News Round-Up Sat Apr 01, 2023 00:26 | Will Jones
A summary of the most interesting stories in the past 24 hours that challenge the prevailing orthodoxy about the virus and the vaccines, the ?climate emergency? and the supposed moral defects of Western civilisation.
The post News Round-Up appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
The Daily Sceptic is Hiring Sensitivity Readers Sat Apr 01, 2023 00:00 | Will Jones
Here at the Daily Sceptic we consider ourselves at the leading edge of progressive mainstream journalism and are keen to maintain our position in the field by bringing sensitivity readers into our growing team.
The post The Daily Sceptic is Hiring Sensitivity Readers appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
Lockdown Skeptics >>
Fetch failure for https://www.voltairenet.org/spip.php?page=backend&id_secteur=1110&lang=en.
Last Retry Saturday April 01, 2023 07:43
Human Rights questions being asked in Mayo courts
The courts have recently become a very hotly contested arena in the conflict over Shell's imposition of their unsafe project on Erris. Charges and prosecutions have been coming thick and fast over the last year and a half, but they seem to be more about persecuting campaigners than any concept of justice, and recent weeks have shown a clear bias in the policing of protest.
Former Garda sergeant Benny McCabe has stated that the Gardai have acted with ‘impunity’, and described the approach to the policing of the protests as ‘anathema to the spirit of community policing’. Mr McCabe even went as far as to state :
“I have worked as a human rights observer with the UN, the EU and the OSCE in Cambodia, the Balkans, South Africa and in many post-conflict situations, but I have never been treated the way I was in Glengad in late June last year”
March’s special sitting of Belmullet District Court, to deal with cases arising from protests against Shell’s Corrib gas project, saw 27 people before the court on a whole range of public order charges, particularly relating to supposed obstruction and failure to comply with the direction of Gardai. And it had a startling result. Only one person was convicted, one was given the probation act, and a remarkable 25 people had all of their charges either dismissed or withdrawn, vindicating their right to the presumption of innocence. This would give any citizen cause for pause, given that the Gardai’s word is generally accepted in cases there.
The pattern is evident. Bring charges against as many people as possible, irrespective of the likelihood of achieving convictions. This is the essence of the misuse of police powers in attempting to impose huge pressure on citizens so as to make them fearful of pursuing their right to protest.
One case in particular stands out from March’s sitting, in which nine people were before the court in relation to a day when road blocking protests took place in Glengad last June while the Solitaire pipe-laying ship was in Broadhaven Bay. All of the people arrested that day were charged with relatively minor offenses under the Public Order Act, and yet Judge Devins saw fit to remand seven of the nine to prison pending trial, before her decision was overturned by the High Court after the campaigners had spent three and four days in jail. However, this was not the issue brought before the court recently. After lengthy legal argument in the test case of Eoin Lawless , Judge Haughton ruled that his detention was unlawful on three counts:
* He was held from 2.20pm until approximately 4.30pm before being brought to a Garda station for charge. By 4.30pm the detention had become unlawful.
* He was held in Ballina Garda Station for some hours, and was not fully charged until 9.15pm, rather than being charged expeditiously.
* He was brought before a special sitting of Ballina court at 5.30pm the following day, which was ruled not to fulfill the requirement to face a judge ‘as soon as practicable’. A court was available in Galway at 10.30am on the relevant day, and this is where he should have been brought.
The court ruled that these matters constituted a ‘conscious and deliberate breach of the accused’s rights’. After this ruling, the cases against the other eight people were withdrawn.
As outlined on the Human Rights in Ireland (HRI) blog, these are far from insignificant matters. HRI state that the case “raises very serious questions about the disproportionate application of the law to the powerful and, legally speaking, the powerless in society, the police of our State have breached fundamental rights of the campaigners.” They further emphasise that detention for more than 24 hours is only supposed to apply to the most serious offenses – in this case, the Gardai were not even entitled to hold the accused for more than four hours. It is further stated that “in these cases detention should have been for the purpose of arrest which should have been for the purpose of bringing the accused before a judge. This is not what happened.”
The article ends in questioning the manner in which Shell appear to be able to breach laws and regulations – such as assaults by their security staff against protestors such as Willie Corduff; laying part of their pipe in Glengad without planning – while campaigners are criminalised for their actions.
Criminalisation of the campaign has happened in a number of different ways, on a progressively growing basis. People are being subject to detention, without their rights to arrest, charge and trial being properly upheld. There is a continuing application of criminal law to campaigners who, on the basis of 25 of 27 people having their presumption of innocence vindicated, do not deserve it. Many campaigners would contend that the Gardai and the DPP are making use of what has been described by the chief inspector of constabulary of the British police, talking about issues around policing of protest, as ‘a conveniently harsh legal environment’. This works hand in hand with the media’s change in recent years to sending crime correspondents to report on the campaign in Erris, and the attendant problems of dependency on Gardai for stories.
There is another striking parallel with the practice of Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation (SLAPPs), which are legal cases taken not in the expectation of victory, but rather to attempt to limit groups, such as oppositional campaigning groups from making their protest. The threat of this type of lawsuit also intends to intimidate individuals from taking action, even before such a case becomes a reality, and to exhaust them through many months of a legal process which is often alien and intimidating. It might be argued that this is a good comparison for the current approach of the Gardai to this campaign – prosecute a large number of cases, push for the harshest possible penalties, and above all, keep campaigners under threat and pressure. This policy follows on from previous approaches to the policing here, such as the ‘no arrest’ policy which was in force in 2006 (Gardai used violence to police the protests at this time), followed by 43 arrests during the summer of 2008, none of which were followed up with charges, to today’s situation of charging as many campaigners as possible.
This all feeds into the discourse of ‘illegality’ around the demonstrations here, serving the dual purpose of ‘justifying’ Garda actions and attempting to delegitimise and criminalise the actions of people opposed to the Corrib gas project. Further, it provides a smokescreen behind which the Gardai can hide their failure to investigate fully the numerous illegalities by Shell and their associates which have been reported to them.
This issue is also very much in the public eye in the UK, following controversy over the policing of last year’s G20 protests in London, including the death of Ian Tomlinson. George Monbiot argues that a confrontational attitude to policing these types of events is not a tactical issue, but rather is ‘deeply rooted in the politics and culture of the police’. When the chief inspector of the Copenhagen police (after the recent failed COP-15 summit) justifies holding four people without charge for three weeks for the ‘crime’ of unfurling a banner at a dinner for dignitaries as follows – “When you do that kind of thing, you are going to pay for it” – it becomes difficult to argue that the culture within the police has much concern for the rights of campaigners.
If this all seems very negative, then perhaps we should look at the example of five campaigners in the UK who were recently awarded upwards of 100,000 pounds sterling in relation to a case that saw them assaulted and unlawfully detained, restricting their ‘democratic right to peaceful protest’ after a demonstration at the Mexican embassy following the killing of a journalist in the state of Oaxaca. Their solicitor had this to say:
“This case shows that policing protest unlawfully carries a high cost. This includes the severe human cost to protestors, but also the cost to the public purse and more worryingly to public confidence in the police. The implications for those I am advising in relation to G20 are clear.”
I suggest that the implications are also clear for the nine people unlawfully detained in June of last year in Erris.
View Comments Titles Only
Comments (2 of 2)Jump To Comment: 1 2
Good exposition. Benny Mc Cabes's statement illustrates an excellent point - he was observing with state - sponsored institutions supported by the Department of Foreign Affairs and the EU. To be an observer on behalf of a State institution assures respect and security. What happenend to him in Glengad illustrates treatment when one does not have State security machinery to support observing activity. The State must respect the act of observing set up by civil society. Indeed the said department makes large grants to civil society actors in countries important politically to Ireland and the EU. Why support civil society actors elsewhere while manhandling those in one's own society.
I think it's really important to realise that guards are as human as anyone else, by which I mean they will use the cover of their uniform to advance the cause for which they are paid, hiding in the blue jungle, avoiding personal responsibility for their actions and bringing the whole of the Force into disrepute. Just as many a person becomes a doctor to heal people, others become one attracted by the money. Ditto with the gardai. The weaker among them will become like puppets on a string doing their masters bidding. Nor are judges Gods, or Goddesses.
Surely it's important to provide a publicly accessible record for the citizenry to see, online for instance (www.ratemyguard.com anyone?), of how their tax euros are being spent both in terms of policing and in the quality of the judiciary. And so I suggest a website be organised on which the deeds of such state puppets can clearly be seen, including a decent photograph, Garda number, station posting, arresting event, or one detailing bringing the law into disrepute through it's abuse etc, so that a picture and a pattern can be built up of the moral vicissitudes to which an individual guard or member of the judiciary is subject. And should they be posted to a station in another part of the country their record will follow them, with the added advantage of making the locals thus more aware of the low calibre of policing they're getting, not to mention judging, as the case may be.
Maintenance of such a site should be established offshore, that undue pressure not be brought to bear, nor the fear of Michael McDowell turning up on the webmasters doorstep, both hands full of shite to fling at the irritant in his eye, or convince of the undercover terroristas the Shell-to-Sea campaigners undoubtedly are.
The net effect might be to make the gardai aware that what they do at this juncture in the relationship of citizen and state will follow them around long after this matter has been dealt with, the politicians responsible imprisoned, and who knows, the citizenry actually sobered up enough to vote for a less mendacious/incompetent political management.
Were that to be the case and the wind turns, the guards might find themselves with a nasty web record they can't get rid of, and you know how the Irish love a scapegoat.
Remember not all guards are puppets, nor judges wives of Fianna Fail politicians. Viva la Potato Republic! Viva!