New Events

Mayo

no events posted in last week

Blog Feeds

Spirit of Contradiction

offsite link The Party and the Ballot Box Sun Jul 14, 2019 22:24 | Gavin Mendel-Gleason

offsite link On The Decline and Fall of The American Empire and Socialism Sat Jan 26, 2019 01:52 | S. Duncan

offsite link What is Dogmatism and Why Does It Matter? Wed Mar 21, 2018 08:10 | Sylvia Smith

offsite link The Case of Comrade Dallas Mon Mar 19, 2018 19:44 | Sylvia Smith

offsite link Review: Do Religions Evolve? Mon Aug 14, 2017 19:54 | Dara McHugh

Spirit of Contradiction >>

Public Inquiry
Interested in maladministration. Estd. 2005

offsite link Public Services Card: Some still forced to comply

offsite link Catholic Church: Dark influence still active Anthony

offsite link Tom Parlon launches new career in comedy Anthony

offsite link Presumption of innocence does not universally apply in Ireland Anthony

offsite link The poor standard of Irish political journalism Anthony

Public Inquiry >>

The Saker
A bird's eye view of the vineyard

offsite link A few short comments about the Fascist coup in Bolivia Tue Nov 12, 2019 19:17 | The Saker
These are the folks who just came to power: They are all members of some kind of Fascist “Christian” cult. This is what these folks did with those who dare

offsite link Democracy is restored to Bolivia (one image) Tue Nov 12, 2019 18:17 | The Saker
After all, what can be more “democratic” than the military demanding that their Commander in Chief step down?

offsite link Butina Reflection Tue Nov 12, 2019 18:08 | The Saker
by William Spencer for the Saker Blog Hi, I am writing this with a few men and women in mind I corresponded with a few months ago overseas, but I?d

offsite link QE paid for a foreign buying spree: developing countries hurt the most Tue Nov 12, 2019 18:01 | The Saker
by Ramin Mazaheri for The Saker Blog Of course, developing countries were not hurt by the subprime crisis because they were not involved ? the idiocy, usury, malfeasance and willful

offsite link Kadyrov about the Russian soldier who refused to denounce Christianity when captured by the jihadist... Tue Nov 12, 2019 01:59 | Scott
Translated by Leo. Source: https://cont.ws/@Handusenko... November 10, 2019 ? Everyone knows about the feat of Yevgeny Rodionov. In May 1996, a Russian soldier from the Penza region near the Chechen

The Saker >>

Human Rights questions being asked in Mayo courts

category mayo | rights, freedoms and repression | other press author Wednesday April 28, 2010 15:35author by lynn Report this post to the editors

The courts have recently become a very hotly contested arena in the conflict over Shell's imposition of their unsafe project on Erris. Charges and prosecutions have been coming thick and fast over the last year and a half, but they seem to be more about persecuting campaigners than any concept of justice, and recent weeks have shown a clear bias in the policing of protest.

http://livinginrossport.wordpress.com/2010/04/22/unlawf...tter/

Former Garda sergeant Benny McCabe has stated that the Gardai have acted with ‘impunity’, and described the approach to the policing of the protests as ‘anathema to the spirit of community policing’. Mr McCabe even went as far as to state :

“I have worked as a human rights observer with the UN, the EU and the OSCE in Cambodia, the Balkans, South Africa and in many post-conflict situations, but I have never been treated the way I was in Glengad in late June last year”

March’s special sitting of Belmullet District Court, to deal with cases arising from protests against Shell’s Corrib gas project, saw 27 people before the court on a whole range of public order charges, particularly relating to supposed obstruction and failure to comply with the direction of Gardai. And it had a startling result. Only one person was convicted, one was given the probation act, and a remarkable 25 people had all of their charges either dismissed or withdrawn, vindicating their right to the presumption of innocence. This would give any citizen cause for pause, given that the Gardai’s word is generally accepted in cases there.

The pattern is evident. Bring charges against as many people as possible, irrespective of the likelihood of achieving convictions. This is the essence of the misuse of police powers in attempting to impose huge pressure on citizens so as to make them fearful of pursuing their right to protest.

One case in particular stands out from March’s sitting, in which nine people were before the court in relation to a day when road blocking protests took place in Glengad last June while the Solitaire pipe-laying ship was in Broadhaven Bay. All of the people arrested that day were charged with relatively minor offenses under the Public Order Act, and yet Judge Devins saw fit to remand seven of the nine to prison pending trial, before her decision was overturned by the High Court after the campaigners had spent three and four days in jail. However, this was not the issue brought before the court recently. After lengthy legal argument in the test case of Eoin Lawless , Judge Haughton ruled that his detention was unlawful on three counts:

* He was held from 2.20pm until approximately 4.30pm before being brought to a Garda station for charge. By 4.30pm the detention had become unlawful.
* He was held in Ballina Garda Station for some hours, and was not fully charged until 9.15pm, rather than being charged expeditiously.
* He was brought before a special sitting of Ballina court at 5.30pm the following day, which was ruled not to fulfill the requirement to face a judge ‘as soon as practicable’. A court was available in Galway at 10.30am on the relevant day, and this is where he should have been brought.

The court ruled that these matters constituted a ‘conscious and deliberate breach of the accused’s rights’. After this ruling, the cases against the other eight people were withdrawn.

As outlined on the Human Rights in Ireland (HRI) blog, these are far from insignificant matters. HRI state that the case “raises very serious questions about the disproportionate application of the law to the powerful and, legally speaking, the powerless in society, the police of our State have breached fundamental rights of the campaigners.” They further emphasise that detention for more than 24 hours is only supposed to apply to the most serious offenses – in this case, the Gardai were not even entitled to hold the accused for more than four hours. It is further stated that “in these cases detention should have been for the purpose of arrest which should have been for the purpose of bringing the accused before a judge. This is not what happened.”

The article ends in questioning the manner in which Shell appear to be able to breach laws and regulations – such as assaults by their security staff against protestors such as Willie Corduff; laying part of their pipe in Glengad without planning – while campaigners are criminalised for their actions.

Criminalisation of the campaign has happened in a number of different ways, on a progressively growing basis. People are being subject to detention, without their rights to arrest, charge and trial being properly upheld. There is a continuing application of criminal law to campaigners who, on the basis of 25 of 27 people having their presumption of innocence vindicated, do not deserve it. Many campaigners would contend that the Gardai and the DPP are making use of what has been described by the chief inspector of constabulary of the British police, talking about issues around policing of protest, as ‘a conveniently harsh legal environment’. This works hand in hand with the media’s change in recent years to sending crime correspondents to report on the campaign in Erris, and the attendant problems of dependency on Gardai for stories.

There is another striking parallel with the practice of Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation (SLAPPs), which are legal cases taken not in the expectation of victory, but rather to attempt to limit groups, such as oppositional campaigning groups from making their protest. The threat of this type of lawsuit also intends to intimidate individuals from taking action, even before such a case becomes a reality, and to exhaust them through many months of a legal process which is often alien and intimidating. It might be argued that this is a good comparison for the current approach of the Gardai to this campaign – prosecute a large number of cases, push for the harshest possible penalties, and above all, keep campaigners under threat and pressure. This policy follows on from previous approaches to the policing here, such as the ‘no arrest’ policy which was in force in 2006 (Gardai used violence to police the protests at this time), followed by 43 arrests during the summer of 2008, none of which were followed up with charges, to today’s situation of charging as many campaigners as possible.

This all feeds into the discourse of ‘illegality’ around the demonstrations here, serving the dual purpose of ‘justifying’ Garda actions and attempting to delegitimise and criminalise the actions of people opposed to the Corrib gas project. Further, it provides a smokescreen behind which the Gardai can hide their failure to investigate fully the numerous illegalities by Shell and their associates which have been reported to them.

This issue is also very much in the public eye in the UK, following controversy over the policing of last year’s G20 protests in London, including the death of Ian Tomlinson. George Monbiot argues that a confrontational attitude to policing these types of events is not a tactical issue, but rather is ‘deeply rooted in the politics and culture of the police’. When the chief inspector of the Copenhagen police (after the recent failed COP-15 summit) justifies holding four people without charge for three weeks for the ‘crime’ of unfurling a banner at a dinner for dignitaries as follows – “When you do that kind of thing, you are going to pay for it” – it becomes difficult to argue that the culture within the police has much concern for the rights of campaigners.

If this all seems very negative, then perhaps we should look at the example of five campaigners in the UK who were recently awarded upwards of 100,000 pounds sterling in relation to a case that saw them assaulted and unlawfully detained, restricting their ‘democratic right to peaceful protest’ after a demonstration at the Mexican embassy following the killing of a journalist in the state of Oaxaca. Their solicitor had this to say:

“This case shows that policing protest unlawfully carries a high cost. This includes the severe human cost to protestors, but also the cost to the public purse and more worryingly to public confidence in the police. The implications for those I am advising in relation to G20 are clear.”

I suggest that the implications are also clear for the nine people unlawfully detained in June of last year in Erris.

Related Link: http://www.shelltosea.com
author by witnesspublication date Thu Apr 29, 2010 11:46author address author phone Report this post to the editors

Good exposition. Benny Mc Cabes's statement illustrates an excellent point - he was observing with state - sponsored institutions supported by the Department of Foreign Affairs and the EU. To be an observer on behalf of a State institution assures respect and security. What happenend to him in Glengad illustrates treatment when one does not have State security machinery to support observing activity. The State must respect the act of observing set up by civil society. Indeed the said department makes large grants to civil society actors in countries important politically to Ireland and the EU. Why support civil society actors elsewhere while manhandling those in one's own society.

author by A Potato Republican writes...publication date Fri Apr 30, 2010 11:54author address author phone Report this post to the editors

I think it's really important to realise that guards are as human as anyone else, by which I mean they will use the cover of their uniform to advance the cause for which they are paid, hiding in the blue jungle, avoiding personal responsibility for their actions and bringing the whole of the Force into disrepute. Just as many a person becomes a doctor to heal people, others become one attracted by the money. Ditto with the gardai. The weaker among them will become like puppets on a string doing their masters bidding. Nor are judges Gods, or Goddesses.
Surely it's important to provide a publicly accessible record for the citizenry to see, online for instance (www.ratemyguard.com anyone?), of how their tax euros are being spent both in terms of policing and in the quality of the judiciary. And so I suggest a website be organised on which the deeds of such state puppets can clearly be seen, including a decent photograph, Garda number, station posting, arresting event, or one detailing bringing the law into disrepute through it's abuse etc, so that a picture and a pattern can be built up of the moral vicissitudes to which an individual guard or member of the judiciary is subject. And should they be posted to a station in another part of the country their record will follow them, with the added advantage of making the locals thus more aware of the low calibre of policing they're getting, not to mention judging, as the case may be.
Maintenance of such a site should be established offshore, that undue pressure not be brought to bear, nor the fear of Michael McDowell turning up on the webmasters doorstep, both hands full of shite to fling at the irritant in his eye, or convince of the undercover terroristas the Shell-to-Sea campaigners undoubtedly are.
The net effect might be to make the gardai aware that what they do at this juncture in the relationship of citizen and state will follow them around long after this matter has been dealt with, the politicians responsible imprisoned, and who knows, the citizenry actually sobered up enough to vote for a less mendacious/incompetent political management.
Were that to be the case and the wind turns, the guards might find themselves with a nasty web record they can't get rid of, and you know how the Irish love a scapegoat.
Remember not all guards are puppets, nor judges wives of Fianna Fail politicians. Viva la Potato Republic! Viva!

 
© 2001-2019 Independent Media Centre Ireland. Unless otherwise stated by the author, all content is free for non-commercial reuse, reprint, and rebroadcast, on the net and elsewhere. Opinions are those of the contributors and are not necessarily endorsed by Independent Media Centre Ireland. Disclaimer | Privacy