Upcoming Events

National | History and Heritage

no events match your query!

New Events

National

no events posted in last week

Blog Feeds

Anti-Empire

Anti-Empire

offsite link Sanctioned by PayPal Thu Aug 04, 2022 21:31 | Anti-Empire

offsite link Spain Limits Heating to 19ºC, Cooling t... Tue Aug 02, 2022 11:39 | Associated Press

offsite link WHO Declares Monkeypox a “Global Healt... Sat Jul 23, 2022 21:01 | Apoorva Mandavilli

offsite link Zelensky Says Ukrainian KIA Down From Pe... Sat Jul 23, 2022 18:13 | Anti-Empire

offsite link German Health Ministry: 1 Severe Adverse... Sat Jul 23, 2022 11:25 | Matthew Roscoe

Anti-Empire >>

The Saker
A bird's eye view of the vineyard

offsite link The Second Coming of the Heartland Sun Aug 14, 2022 19:25 | The Saker
by Pepe Escobar, posted with the author?s permission and widely cross-posted It?s tempting to visualize the overwhelming collective West debacle as a rocket, faster than free fall, plunging into the

offsite link We will come after you! Message for the Ukronazi terrorists Sun Aug 14, 2022 04:51 | The Saker

offsite link What War, Mr. Kissinger? Sat Aug 13, 2022 22:27 | The Saker
Please visit Andrei?s website: https://smoothiex12.blogspo... and support him here: https://www.patreon.com/beP...

offsite link Guo Xi and the Great Emptiness ? in Times of the Collapse of the West Sat Aug 13, 2022 21:14 | The Saker
by Nora Hoppe and Tariq Marzbaan for the Saker blog Notes and reflections by Nora Hoppe and Tariq Marzbaan Foreword: This contribution does not intend to provide a profound analysis

offsite link A Tale of Two Cities Sat Aug 13, 2022 16:33 | The Saker
By Batiushka for The Saker (With Apologies to Charles Dickens) Moscow and Washington It was the best of times, it was the worst of times, it was the age of

The Saker >>

Public Inquiry
Interested in maladministration. Estd. 2005

offsite link Formal complaint against Robert Watt Anthony

offsite link RTE bias complaint Anthony

offsite link Fergus Finlay and the maternity hospital ‘gotcha’ trap Anthony

offsite link Irish Examiner and fake news Anthony

offsite link Labour Party: The unvarnished truth Anthony

Public Inquiry >>

Voltaire Network
Voltaire, international edition

offsite link Voltairenet.org is taking a hiatus Thu Jul 14, 2022 20:47 | en

offsite link Paradoxes of Russophobia Thu Jul 14, 2022 12:46 | en

offsite link EU-Russia agreement on supplying Kaliningrad Thu Jul 14, 2022 12:26 | en

offsite link Political destabilization plagues the West Thu Jul 14, 2022 05:40 | en

offsite link Ukraine destroys its Nova Kakhovka factory Wed Jul 13, 2022 07:53 | en

Voltaire Network >>

Search words: tara

The 6th World Archaeological Congress (WAC), tara and the M3

category national | history and heritage | feature author Sunday June 29, 2008 23:01author by Maggie Ronayne, Archaeology Dept, NUI Galway & GWS Ireland - Global Women's Strike, Irelandauthor email Ireland at globalwomenstrike dot netauthor phone 087 7838688 Report this post to the editors

The privatisation of Irish archaeology and corruption on the road schemes

featured image
Cultural Destruction

How the issue of a discussion at WAC 6 on tara and the M3 arose and an update on the situation.

The issue of a debate on tara and the M3 at the World Archaeological Congress, which takes place next week in Dublin, arose after tara campaigners requested that I investigate whether such a discussion could be facilitated at one of the sessions dealing with ethics. I wrote to WAC asking for a session on campaigns against cultural destruction as a counterbalance to the programme as it was, which included several pro-developer, pro-private sector archaeology themes as well as the shocking presence at the congress of the US military.


I requested that in the tradition of WAC, such a session be open to all involved in fighting cultural destruction and suggested a fee waiver for campaigners due to the prohibitive costs of attending.


WAC replied agreeing to include public discussion on the case of tara and the M3 during the debate in the ethics forum on Thursday 3rd July. tara was to be one of two cases examined in detail by participants in this forum.


WAC suggested I contact one of the co-organisers of the forum if I wished to be involved myself. I replied repeating my concern that any campaigners could participate if they so wished. I reiterated my request for a fee waiver and also asked, following a request from tara campaigners, about a crèche so that those who are normally excluded, like campaigners who are the mothers of young children, could participate. There was no response.


Later I wrote to the session organizer to whom WAC had referred me, and received an email which included the following:


‘…the format of the session is not a debate, nor is it even going to be specifically about the cases that the ethics forum participants studied in preparation. We've revised the format of the forum in response to dialogues with stakeholders, members of the WAC Executive and the WAC Committee on Ethics, as well as in relation to what information would be most beneficial to WAC. With that in mind, our forum will be a panel presentation/discussion of recommendations to give to WAC on considering ethical cases in general, so that future cases can be avoided/prevented/considered in constructive/non-painful ways.


Our forum participants did study two real cases studies in preparation for this, but the public panel will be process-oriented and future-focused… in shifting the public panel format off of the specific cases, we hope to maintain our focus on this process, minimize further pain for stakeholders, and also avoid our participants and the forum itself from being pigeonholed politically as "for" or "against" a particular issue…’


Following subsequent confusion on whether there would still be a discussion on tara at this forum, my department sought clarification from this session organizer and was told in a second email that:


‘…We will not be detailing the specifics of either case we studied. As I've attempted to explain in both emails (to you and Vincent [Salafia]), our process-driven and future-oriented recommendations are *informed by* the case studies our participants have been studying, but the public forum will not be focused or commenting *directly* on those… specific stakeholders were contacted by us earlier to submit to the participants position statements that would be taken into consideration along with the published material on the case studies we chose… there was (and still is) a process in place for which we were gathering direct statements from interested parties - that's just not the focus of our public forum (we have never wanted the forum to be a soapbox for any side of any of the issues)…’


She added that the ‘stakeholders’ selected by WAC for this pre-congress study and who submitted documentation included the NRA. We understand that UCD is now telling journalists there will be discussion of tara in some sessions though there’s no information on the format or level of participation. So we don’t know if there will be substantive discussion– it’s anyone’s guess.


Whatever the case may be, most of those who have spent years trying to oppose destruction at tara will not be able to participate. WAC chose which grouping in the movement it wanted to participate and by means of this action, the prohibitively expensive entry fee and emails such as those above, WAC appear to have effectively closed the discussion down. said to other campaigners, to archaeologists opposed to the motorway or whose field, like in my own case, is professional ethics and active opposition to cultural destruction: you can’t speak. The campaigner they have chosen to participate in the debate credited WAC for organising a tara/M3 discussion rather than those who insisted on such a discussion.


Meanwhile the article published in the academic journal Public Archaeology to coincide with the World Archaeological Congress in Dublin is circulating. It discusses the privatization of archaeology, corrupt development and the movement against it, looking at the case of tara and the M3 in particular. It can be found at the link below.


As it says at the end of the article, 'if privatized archaeology in the service of corrupt development is adopted as the model globally, it will be used in the Third World to cause the deaths of millions of people in wars and US-backed ‘democracy and development’ projects... Already there is an attempt to use WAC to approve a global, privatised archaeology modelled on recent development in Ireland.'

Related Link: http://www.nuigalway.ie/archaeology/maggie_ronayne.html

tara2.png

 #   Title   Author   Date 
   In shock     Tara Tara Tara    Sun Jun 29, 2008 22:15 
   WAC6 and Tara     áine archaigh    Mon Jun 30, 2008 03:21 
   "Early hours of Wednesday morning July 4th 2007 when THEY arrived at Baronstown ..."     Wondering    Mon Jun 30, 2008 10:35 
   Letter sent to Minister Gormley, demanding Preservation Order on Tara     TaraWatch    Mon Jun 30, 2008 11:08 
   WAC to hold new panel discussion and pass Tara resolution     TaraWatch    Mon Jun 30, 2008 12:20 
   Explosive Reading     Tara Tara Tara    Mon Jun 30, 2008 14:04 
   Getting the facts right     Seandála    Mon Jun 30, 2008 22:09 
   Response to Seandála - the trolling archaeologist     Tom O'Neill    Tue Jul 01, 2008 00:50 
   Interpretation??? Whose?     Emmacha    Tue Jul 01, 2008 01:19 
 10   WAC report     áine archaigh    Tue Jul 01, 2008 02:23 
 11   Information on new Tara session added to WAC     TaraWatch    Tue Jul 01, 2008 10:26 
 12   Panel members and protecting Tara     Ishtarcelt    Tue Jul 01, 2008 12:20 
 13   Lismullin     Tara Tara Tara    Tue Jul 01, 2008 19:20 
 14   The promised Tara summit becomes a reality     1 of IMC    Tue Jul 01, 2008 22:21 
 15   Celebrities in Support of the Tara Campaigners     Mark C    Wed Jul 02, 2008 15:00 
 16   Claire Smith (President of World Archaeological Congress)     Siobhan    Wed Jul 02, 2008 15:14 
 17   Invitation to WAC     Muireann Ni Bhrolchain    Thu Jul 10, 2008 21:04 


Number of comments per page
  
 
© 2001-2022 Independent Media Centre Ireland. Unless otherwise stated by the author, all content is free for non-commercial reuse, reprint, and rebroadcast, on the net and elsewhere. Opinions are those of the contributors and are not necessarily endorsed by Independent Media Centre Ireland. Disclaimer | Privacy