People's News - No. 139 7th Feb 2016 22:58 Feb 10 0 comments
Peoples News issue No. 110 Date: 21 – 9 – 14 22:01 Oct 01 1 comments
Peoples News issue no. 108 Date: 8 – 8 – 14 09:19 Aug 15 0 comments
PEOPLES NEWS ISSUE NO. 106 DATE: 22 – 6 – 14 16:38 Jun 23 0 commentsmore >>
A bird's eye view of the vineyard
Moveable Feast Cafe 2017/02/26 ? Open Thread Sun Feb 26, 2017 22:00 | Herb Swanson
Interesting week for Vladimir Putin and Donald Trump Sun Feb 26, 2017 06:20 | The Saker
Communists and socialism Sun Feb 26, 2017 04:24 | Scott
Russian ?Liberal? Media?s Foreign Sponsors Fri Feb 24, 2017 20:32 | Scott
CrossTalk: Revolt in the West Thu Feb 23, 2017 23:06 | Scott
Reflections on the Citizen?s Assembly (4): The Presentation of Dr. Dónal O?Mathúna Sun Feb 26, 2017 20:19 | GuestPost
Hague Justice Journal: Call for Papers Mon Feb 20, 2017 11:13 | GuestPost
Reflections on the Citizen?s Assembly (3): The Presentation of Dr. Joan McCarthy Tue Feb 14, 2017 14:01 | GuestPost
Reflections on the Citizens Assembly (2): The Presentation of Bobbie Farsides Tue Feb 07, 2017 05:44 | GuestPost
Languishing in Direct Provision: Rights in ?Reasonable? and ?Unreasonable? Times Mon Feb 06, 2017 18:10 | Liam Thornton
For lefties too stubborn to quit
Left Archive: Comment, Fortnightly, Vol.3 No.4, 1974 British & Irish Communist Organisation 02:17 Mon Feb 27, 2017 | WorldbyStorm
Brexit and TV Broadcasting 22:54 Sun Feb 26, 2017 | irishelectionliterature
In the institutions? 19:28 Sun Feb 26, 2017 | WorldbyStorm
Sunday Independent Stupid Statement of the Week 12:18 Sun Feb 26, 2017 | guestposter
?No Pasaran, the pledge that made them fight? 10:12 Sun Feb 26, 2017 | guestposter
Life should be full of strangeness, like a rich painting
Notes for a Book on Money and the Irish State - The Marshall Aid Program 15:10 Sat Apr 02, 2016
The Financial Crisis:What Have We Learnt? 19:58 Sat Aug 29, 2015
Money in 35,000 Words or Less 21:34 Sat Aug 22, 2015
THE WRATH OF KANE: BANKING CRISES AND POLITICAL POWER 09:32 Fri Jan 30, 2015
ALWAYS THE ARTISTS: WEEK THREE OF THE BANK INQUIRY 23:11 Thu Jan 22, 2015
Voting No for a reason: Lisbon Treaty OR a Europe of democracy
Further details of the Lisbon Treaty research
The purpose of the Lisbon Treaty research is to offer the voters of Ireland objective arguments on the Lisbon Treaty, with facts and evidence with substance, and an objective discussion of the legal, political, economical and social considerations of the Treaty.
In addition to presenting more details of the purpose and findings of the Lisbon Treaty research, we wish to clarify several myths regarding the very basis of taking a stand against the ratification of Lisbon Treaty.
The National Platform is represented by outstanding academic and legal professionals,e.g. professor Anthony Coughlan. They have recently opened a new blog presenting all details - with actual quotes from the text - and the legal implications of the Lisbon Treaty:
"Lisbon Treaty Irish Referendum Blog - National Platform"
In agreement with the National Platform and other relevant No campaigns, we also believe in a united Europe, which would be a Europe of free and democratic countries rather than an "empire" as projected by Commission president Barroso. We prefer a Europe of democracies in strong, democratic and voluntary alliance, rather than a federal state - as founded by the Lisbon Treaty- with one centralised, non-transparent, non-elected and unaccountable government in Brussels. To remain in a status of cooperation with Europe does NOT mean accepting the terms of a political oligarchy that unlawfully appointed itself to be the constitutional assembly for 500 million citizens without the authorisation of the citizens themselves.
It is a contradiction in terms to project the foundation of a region of security, freedom and democracy, as promised by the Lisbon Treaty, and founding a new country, a federal state on that region without the electorate, merely by the crude command of a central political core of Europe. Referendum on the Lisbon Treaty, i.e. on the old-new EU Constitution would be the absolute objective requirement in each EU-state to fulfill the objective principles of democratic constitutionalisation.
The referendum should be made a requirement by the EU itself in each EU-state, otherwise the EU eliminates its own founding principles. The referendum is an absolute requirement in the process of democratic constitutionalisation of any new state - in this case the federal EU-state - which declares itself a political unit founded on the principles of democracy and rule of law. Therefore, by implementing the Lisbon Treaty without referendums in the member states, the EU is actually breaching the Lisbon Treaty itself.
By abolishing our democratic voting rights in the very act of constitutionalisation, the EU sharply contradicts its own promise to create a region of freedom, democracy, rule of law and security. Without referendums on the Lisbon Treaty everywhere within the EU, the new EU federal state to be founded by this treaty would not only undermine its own founding principles, but by its very creation it would abolish its own legitimacy.
Furthermore, we need to eliminate another myth, which is the lack of an alternative to the Lisbon Treaty and the EU, as we know it.
Yes, there is an alternative to the Lisbon Treaty, the Eudemocrats (EUD): an alliance for a Europe of democracies.(http://www.eudemocrats.org/)
The EUD is represented by outstanding and credible politicians with the mission to offer an alternative to the Lisbon Treaty, by drafting a new constitution with a truly democratic content and form, as well as by proposing reforms to achieve a democratic institutional mechanism of the EU. Their president is Jens-Peter Bonde, a Danish member of the European Parliament, who has consistently represented the voters' rights in Europe and who first revealed the fact that the Lisbon Treaty is a product of conspiracy among the political leaders of Europe.
One of the most relevant conclusions we have recently arrived at is that the Lisbon Treaty itself admits that the EU has been committing the act of breaching international laws, because it declares that the EU has been following the practice of placing the Union law above national laws without existing contractual basis. It also claims that this practice will remain in place, despite the fact that the lack of contractual basis is still the case.
Violation of international laws on constitutional and sovereignty-related terms such as arbitrarily overriding the laws and citizens' rights of sovereign countries, entails a serious international conflict and should be treated as such.
One of the numerous reasons for voting NO to Lisbon is to revoke the permission the Union granted itself to freely violate international laws, i.e. to terminate the EU's Court practice violating our national sovereignty without the requirement of written international treaties.
Following our research findings our general conclusion is - in agreement with the other NO campaigns (e.g. http://www.libertas.org) - that voting NO to Lisbon Treaty means sending back a flawed, unreadable and undemocratic constitution and asking for another, readable treaty that would satisfy the requirements of implementing a democratic system in Europe. Voting NO means rejecting the EU's undemocratic methods of implementing the Lisbon Treaty and means calling for another, trustworthy and democratic EU-leadership. It means to express our request for restoring democracy in Europe and saying yes to the most honorable and truly democratic efforts of the Eudemocrats. Rejecting the Lisbon Treaty means asking for the chance for a meaningful debate among the voters and the leaders of Europe.
By voting NO our purpose is to defend our land, our political and economical freedom, democracy, neutrality and peace. We refuse any false accusations and labels like "nationalism" for our lawful mission to preserve democracy and freedom in Europe. We rightfully and lawfully protect our national sovereignty, our own culture, our welfare state, our own social system, educational and healthcare system, our free competition, our own control of economy and protection against globalisation, our own control over the monetary (central bank) and budgetary (tax) regulations.
We rightfully and lawfully protect our own nation’s intellectual achievements and natural resources from global privatisation and wish to preserve these as well as our own democratic voting rights and current citizens' rights.
Our new blog with a summary and all articles of the Lisbon Treaty research:
“ The Lisbon Treaty Blog - Facts about the Lisbon Treaty - what political science tells us”
A message to the voters of Ireland