Interested in maladministration. Estd. 2005
RTEs Sarah McInerney ? Fianna Fail?supporter? Anthony
Joe Duffy is dishonest and untrustworthy Anthony
Robert Watt complaint: Time for decision by SIPO Anthony
RTE in breach of its own editorial principles Anthony
Waiting for SIPO Anthony Public Inquiry >>
Parse failure for http://humanrights.ie/feed/. Last Retry Monday September 15, 2025 04:59
News Round-Up Mon Sep 15, 2025 00:57 | Richard Eldred A summary of the most interesting stories in the past 24 hours that challenge the prevailing orthodoxy about the ?climate emergency?, public health ?crises? and the supposed moral defects of Western civilisation.
The post News Round-Up appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
Britain Bans Israelis From Prestigious Military Academy Sun Sep 14, 2025 19:00 | Richard Eldred In a move slammed as a "profoundly dishonourable act of disloyalty to an ally at war", Britain has banned Israelis from its top defence college over the Gaza conflict.
The post Britain Bans Israelis From Prestigious Military Academy appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
Funerals Should Comply With Net Zero, Says Labour Sun Sep 14, 2025 17:00 | Richard Eldred The cremation industry is facing millions in extra costs and doubled cremation times as Labour pushes eco coffins and no-gas ovens in pursuit of Ed Miliband's Net Zero dream.
The post Funerals Should Comply With Net Zero, Says Labour appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
Is the Death of Reading Inevitable? Sun Sep 14, 2025 15:00 | Dr Nicholas Tate Reading is slipping away from children and adults alike, with serious literature pushed to the margins; Dr Nicholas Tate argues we need schools, universities and classics to bring it back.
The post Is the Death of Reading Inevitable? appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
Higher Taxes Will Not Raise More Money, Arthur Laffer Warns Reeves Sun Sep 14, 2025 13:00 | Richard Eldred Top US economist Arthur Laffer, the man behind the Laffer curve and once an adviser to Reagan and Thatcher, says Rachel Reeves is pushing Britain past the critical point where higher taxes actually bring in less money.
The post Higher Taxes Will Not Raise More Money, Arthur Laffer Warns Reeves appeared first on The Daily Sceptic. Lockdown Skeptics >>
Voltaire, international edition
Will intergovernmental institutions withstand the end of the "American Empire"?,... Sat Apr 05, 2025 07:15 | en
Voltaire, International Newsletter N?127 Sat Apr 05, 2025 06:38 | en
Disintegration of Western democracy begins in France Sat Apr 05, 2025 06:00 | en
Voltaire, International Newsletter N?126 Fri Mar 28, 2025 11:39 | en
The International Conference on Combating Anti-Semitism by Amichai Chikli and Na... Fri Mar 28, 2025 11:31 | en Voltaire Network >>
|
RSF not involved in proposed 'Front'
international |
miscellaneous |
press release
Friday September 01, 2006 22:01 by Seán Ó Murchú - Republican Sinn Féin - Cork

RSF not involved in proposed 'Front' -- should campaign for removal of test oath
Contrary to press reports in the past week Republican Sinn Féin was not invited to the recently postponed meeting of various groupings in Toomebridge, Co Antrim, nor has the organisation any intention of attending such a meeting.
Republican Sinn Féin
Teach Dáithí Ó Conaill,
223 Parnell Street
Dublin 1, Ireland
Sinn Féin Poblachtach
Teach Dáithí Ó Conaill,
223 Sráid Pharnell, BÁC 1, Éire
For further information contact:
Des Dalton:
Vice-President: 086-329 1809
Ruairí Óg Ó Brádaigh
Publicity Officer: Dublin 872 9747,
087-648 2061
1 Meán Fómhar / September 2006
RSF not involved in proposed 'Front' -- should campaign for removal of test oath
Contrary to press reports in the past week Republican Sinn Féin was not invited to the recently postponed meeting of various groupings in Toomebridge, Co Antrim, nor has the organisation any intention of attending such a meeting.
A spokesperson for the proposed meeting who was named, stated that Republican Sinn Féin had been engaged in "remarkable cooperation [with such groups] for the past five years". This is totally untrue.
Further he did not declare a proposed attitude to the 26-County State which has been engaged in close collaboration with British rule in Ireland since its foundation. In the absence of a rejection of that state it must be presumed that the proposed "Front" will accept it, which is contrary to Republican Sinn Féin's basic principles.
A second spokesperson, who is anonymous, is quoted as wanting "a republicanism which is open, democratic and peaceful". By democratic do they mean in a 32-County sense? Republican Sinn Féin stands by the right of the Irish people acting as a unit, to determine their own future with the British government gone from Ireland. We do not concede the Unionist Veto.
This second spokesperson appears to reject the right of the Irish people to resist English rule here. Republican Sinn Féin upholds that right.
The ÉIRE NUA programme with its maximum devolution of power and decision-making is much more democratic than any other proposals put forward by the British government or the political parties on either side of the Border.
The proposed "Front" seems to be composed of people who went varying lengths of the constitutional road with either the Provisionals or the Officials. They differ on basic principles and how can unity emerge from people who cannot agree on basics?
They propose to contest the local elections in the Six Counties, nominations for which requires acceptance of a political test oath. This precludes Republican Sinn Féin from entering the contest.
The "Front" would perform a useful service to democracy if they joined in a united call to remove this oath and campaigned for its abolition.
The failed Anti-Partition League has been mentioned. Resurrecting it for a second time will lead nowhere and will just cause confusion.
ENDS
|
View Comments Titles Only
save preference
Comments (2 of 2)
Jump To Comment: 1 2no unionist veto.
& no ulster indymedia.
go eat shrooms & beat your drums somewhere else.
Contact the organisers through a clean, private channel. Tell them of your misgivings and objections. Wait till they reply to confirm if your misgivings are founded or not, or if the problem can be remedied. If this can be ironed out, attend the meeting and win over the hearts and minds of those attending, particularly the crowd, not the one or two spokesmen you have a gripe with, giving your position and explaining why it is more effective.
Or alternatively you can brand all involved as sell-outs and traitors, and retire in blissfull isolation.
Whats the bets these 40 young ex Provos don't end up with RSF?