The Party and the Ballot Box Sun Jul 14, 2019 22:24 | Gavin Mendel-Gleason
On The Decline and Fall of The American Empire and Socialism Sat Jan 26, 2019 01:52 | S. Duncan
What is Dogmatism and Why Does It Matter? Wed Mar 21, 2018 08:10 | Sylvia Smith
The Case of Comrade Dallas Mon Mar 19, 2018 19:44 | Sylvia Smith
Review: Do Religions Evolve? Mon Aug 14, 2017 19:54 | Dara McHugh
Spirit of Contradiction >>
Interested in maladministration. Estd. 2005
Public Services Card: Some still forced to comply
Catholic Church: Dark influence still active Anthony
Tom Parlon launches new career in comedy Anthony
Presumption of innocence does not universally apply in Ireland Anthony
The poor standard of Irish political journalism Anthony
Public Inquiry >>
A bird's eye view of the vineyard
The ultimate symbolic video? (MUST SEE) Fri Jan 17, 2020 20:28 | The Saker
A column of Russian Airborne Forces passes a US military checkpoint in northern Syria. This is symbolic of what is taking place all over the Middle-East, really. Enjoy! The Saker
Could this (finally!) be the end for the Atlantic Integrationists? Fri Jan 17, 2020 19:18 | The Saker
[This analysis was written for the Unz Review] By now we all have heard the news, the entire Russian government has resigned and a new Prime Minister, Mikhail Mishustin, has
Russian FM Sergey Lavrov (acting) conducts the annual news conference evaluating Russian foreign pol... Fri Jan 17, 2020 12:08 | amarynth
Comments and Timeline : Sputnik
Moveable Feast Cafe 2020/01/17 ? Open Thread Fri Jan 17, 2020 02:30 | Herb Swanson
2020/01/17 02:30:01 Welcome to the ‘Moveable Feast Cafe’. The ‘Moveable Feast’ is an open thread where readers can post wide ranging observations, articles, rants, off topic and have animate discussions
Battle of the Ages to stop Eurasian integration Fri Jan 17, 2020 00:48 | amarynth
By Pepe Escobar – posted with permission Coming decade could see the US take on Russia, China and Iran over the New Silk Road connection The Raging Twenties started with
The Saker >>
Peter Preston - dying outside Leinster House - in his own words
crime and justice |
Thursday July 06, 2006 07:44 by Seán Ryan + Elaine
We interviewed Peter Preston and have begun to transcribe this hour-long interview, the first half of it is printed here today. The second half will continue in the comments section.
We're writing to you to wish you well on your well deserved holiday. You need it – it’s been a tough year – and we hope you enjoy it.
Hopefully you’ll be able to retire after it. It is quite obvious Mick – that the job description is well beyond your capabilities. You’re the minister for justice, yet a man outside the Gates of Leinster House, is claiming that his family and in particular his daughter have been denied justice. Yourself and every other person who frequents Leinster House have ignored this man excepting Finian McGrath, as have the media.
You’d rather this man die, than meet with him and discuss your mandate and ministerial job description with him. One should remember at this point Mick, that the PD’s are in government, not because the vote wanted it, but because the Teflon idiot desired it.
Peter Preston, on Wednesday 5th of July, was into the 45th day of the hungerstrike, that brought him seeking justice outside Leinster House. He was visited the day before by a doctor, who checked him over, and said that his heart was okay. Peter, as of today is now refusing even sugar in his tea. He told us that, the sugar intake had prolonged the issue and that if he’d “a known about this, that I’d have gone off the sugar two weeks ago.”
Peter talked about how you Mick, have in the past, castigated the likes of Gerry Adams, for giving offence to the Irish flag. He said of this, that “Ireland is not the flag, it is the citizens.”
He also gave us this: His family’s story (the first part – part two will be given later and printed as a separate interview).
Names of defendants, witnesses and solicitors and victims are not given, just in case it might interfere with any future court dates.
Like we said Mick, enjoy your holiday. It could be a very long one, your undeserved, reign could possibly be coming to an end, at least we think so, and we know anyone familiar with your reign, feels the same.
Peter Preston – transcription interview on 5th of July 2006:-
“ The em… This is very very big. I know how big this is, they know how big this is [Michael McDowell and the rest in Leinster House] and the media know how big this is. This is huge and not many people know how big this is, if you read through the lines of this… You know… But what happened was – on the second of May – Bank Holiday, 1999, my daughter was to meet a few ex-friends of hers from school at a pub on [pub and location not named], it’s a pub that the Taoiseach Bertie Ahern drinks in. And one of the girls she was to meet was after going away for the weekend to Amsterdam, and it was this girl who set up the meeting – with two other girls as well in this pub.
My daughter left my home at approximately 9.30pm, went down to the bank to take out a few… she was with her boyfriend too, took out a few quid – as a matter of fact she got a taxi down to the bank, from a next-door neighbour of ours… Took out a few quid and went up to the pub. She arrived there at about twenty to ten – there’ll be bank statements of that. So with that, two of the other girls arrived, well one girl arrived first – My Daughter’s name is D by the way, her boyfriends name is R O B – and the other girl’s name is J O G, the girl that arrived first, well after D and R O B of course. And then a couple arrived, the other girl that my daughter was to meet, J K and her boyfriend J H. These got together, and were having a drink together, well their first drink in fact, when L C arrived, and with her boyfriend, named F N. And these were the thugs that caused these injuries to my daughter and her boyfriend. Now they came over to where my daughter and her boyfriend was, but they didn’t come over to my daughter. They came over to the other three that was there – were friends of J H and J K. And this L C was after beating up this one, this other girl J G – at a taxi-rank somewhere in town, black eyes and all, she gave her. This L C one – these girls would have been terrified of her, but my daughter wasn’t.
I brought my daughter never to be bullied – to be friends with bullies… well not bullies, but those who who were victims of bullies. That’s the way I’ve brought my children up – never to let nobody bully them.
The girl who went to Amsterdam, her name is E H – she never turned up. The next day, after it happened to D, she came to my home and she told me and my wife and my other daughter M and me daughter D, that she seen L C and F N, outside her home at half nine – from her bedroom window – arguing with one and other. And she said to us that she’s not going up there [the pub] cause she knew there’d be trouble once, L C was in that frame of mind. So that’s the reason why she never turned up. So afterwards – my daughter’s boyfriend, never met F N and L C – now he knew the other three – he’d met them a couple of times before that – so, he got up to play a record on the jukebox.
Now this pub is in a residential area. And this pub’s policy is – was – at that time… They were notorious for serving drink to underaged – sixteen, seventeen. I have evidence of that; proof of that. J K was only seventeen on the night that this happened to my daughter. And J G was only a month turned eighteen. And they drank in this pub at least a year before this happened – at least! So there you’re talking between sixteen and seventeen years of age.
The next policy of the pub was… was em… was to allow these two vicious thugs, to walk past the doormen – the doormen knowing what they had done to my daughter. And walked past them – away – out – and not being held for police.
The third policy of the pub, was to allow my daughter – my daughter ended up receiving 25 stitches in the face – to allow my daughter to wait outside that pub for an ambulance, for fifteen or twenty minutes. After the pub being told on numerous occasions by J G and J K and all – screaming at them to phone for an ambulance, which they never did [the pub]. Because J G told me the next morning, when she came down to my home and J K was with her... That they were waiting outside for the ambulance to come – and the Guards came alright – the pub had phoned the Guards – didn’t phone the ambulance. They were shouting, ‘where’s the ambulance, where’s the ambulance?’ So some girl that was there – J G took her phone off her and phoned up the ambulance. ‘Where’s the ambulance?’ she said… But they said there was no ambulance phoned. So she told them to come up to the pub.
And then the final policy of the pub, was the set up of… cause I was told by a barman from that pub, some time later – I met him in January, about a week and a half before the civil case – around the second of January 2004 – he told me, that all bar staff were called into the pub early next morning – he told me…
Let’s go back to the pub. R O B told me that he got up that night to put on a record on the jukebox. Now this pub is in a residential area, not another pub within hundreds of yards of it – all homes around it. Yet this pub caters for young teenagers, with a jukebox upstairs. It’s a little dog box. In the court case, they were reckoning that it was the same size as the pub downstairs – the pub downstairs would be four or five times the size of what’s upstairs. A dog box they have for teenage kids! And we all know what underage drinking leads to. Costs the state millions of Euros – they’ve been after saying that for the last few years. Teenage pregnancies, emergency rooms packed out with drunken teenagers… And violence… All over the town – we all know the consequences of underage drinking. An inspector with the police – in the civil case – made this pub out to be whiter than white.
So R O B went up to put on a record, and was on his way back down – this pub was packed – when he bumped off L C – he’d never met L C or F N. And bumped off her – and he apologized. And D and R O B were the only two who had seats. R O B sat back down. L C said something to F N, whatever it was and the two of them started roaring and shouting and pointing fingers into R O B’s face. This went on for I don’t know how long – maybe a few seconds. And D turned around, because D knew L C – D was in her school. L C was expelled from that school, she’s been a bully all of her life. Absolutely notorious for it – all around that area. And D said to L C ‘we’re not here for any trouble. We don’t want any trouble.’ With that L C turned around and said something to my daughter – ‘Shut up you fat fuck you’ or ‘you fat pig you’ or something similar. And the way I taught my daughter – never let anyone bully you – answered her back, ‘you’d want to look at your fuckin’ self.’ And the verbal argument continued on this way for a few seconds and then it was over with – as far as my daughter was concerned. My daughter was still sitting down. My daughter turned around to take a drink. When she was lifting up her glass, to take a drink, she got a glass smashed into her face – By L C. Her hair was tore by L C and the only thing my daughter could do was to grab L C’s hair. She probably didn’t know or even think that she’d had a glass in her face at that time. And when she grabbed a hold of L C’s hair, L C said ‘Let go D, you’re hurting me.’ And D let her go. L C then pulled D down further [by the hair] and at this point it was broken up. Now I was told, the next day, by J K – her and J G came down to my home the next day – and told us – and told us exactly what happened – my family – J K was after turning around and saying to us, that when she seen the verbal argument, she’d seen L C nod at F N. A glass simulataneously went into my daughter’s face and another over R O B’s head. He ended up receiving three stitches in the head. Now there was ruptions… you can imagine what happened… D ran into the toilet screaming. Picture it – nineteen years of age she was. L C and J G came down to my home the next day – they told me what happened. Exactly what happened. And E H came down to my home a little bit later in the day – maybe in the afternoon. And E H told me that she’d seen both of them [L C and F N] arguing outside her home – she told my family – both of them arguing outside her window – her bedroom window – approximately half nine – they must have been on their way up to that pub. And that’s why she didn’t go up there. January 2002 is when the civil case came to court. We only received a letter – a little note – on the 17th of January. And this was written that night – supposedly – or the next day.”
We asked: The night of the attack?
“Yeah – the night of the attack. That L C was drinking downstairs and left that pub with drink in her hand, going upstairs. Now it transpires that E H was supposed to have said to my daughter’s solicitor, that she never came home from Amsterdam until the following day – right – that’s what they’re saying – we never seen E H more or less after that. After we were told, exactly what happened, what I’ve said – I was told – my daughters told me – that these were changing their statements. First of all L C and F N were allowed to go to Spain without being arrested, they went over to work in Spain for months and months and came back here. They were allowed to go to Spain… What was done about them?
J K and J G gave statements to an Garda Siochana in Clontarf police station. As did my daughter and R O B. My daughter had to make two statements as a matter of fact and we never seen one of them. No statements were signed whatsoever. [although Garda names appeared on them], the people who made them. J K never signed a statement, J G never signed a statement, my daughter never signed a statement – I don’t know about the second one we never seen – maybe that’s the only one that was signed – I was with her that night and was put out of the room, I never seen that statement, maybe it was signed, but we never seen it –even in the courts. They made statements to – we never seen them – now remember L C was underage. I was told then a few months later that they were changing their statements – J K and J G. So I asked for them to come to my home – to be brought up – by their parents. J K came up one night with her mother – and came in – and sat down and had tea – and starts telling me a different story. And she’d already told me [when she came to Peter’s house after the initial attack] that L C was already barred from that pub. So she started telling me a different story – that L C threw the glass from a distance. And I said, ‘That’s not what you told me.’ And she then said, that, ‘I’ll say anything you want.’ And I said ‘no – I only want you to speak the truth – the truth is all I want from you.’ A few days later J G came up to my home. She starts telling me a different story as well. I said, ‘that’s not what you told me. When you came up to my home after this happened to my daughter.’ She also said that she’d say anything I wanted her to say. I said the same thing to her – ‘no’ – she didn’t come up with her father or anyone. ‘I want you to tell the truth – I want you to tell exactly what happened.’
The way things worked out was – w thought at the start – J G, J K and J H would have been witnesses against these two. So what transpired was – my daughter – took a court action with criminal charges against L C. R O B took a criminal action against F N. And this was after people had changed their stories and all that… We were going down to L C’s mother’s home and her mother told us that ‘she was the devil.’ – her mother works in a hospital – and that she was expecting that at any time – someone would be coming in – dead on a stretcher. Her elder sister told us that they would invite L C to her 21st birthday party, and that she [L C] smashed up her mother’s home in response to this. We told all this to a young Bean Garda who was looking after this court case – a young bean Garda – I can’t even see why she was given this case. She was based in Clontarf. So F N ended up perjuring himself in the criminal case – that R O B had hit him first – and that’s how the argument started. – and everyone knew that that was lies. Cause in the civil case – the complete opposite. He wasn’t even questioned – but you said this in the criminal case – not a word! F N got off – his case got dismissed.
L C pleaded guilty. Got an 18 months suspended sentence and fined E3000 to give to my daughter. What happened was, when it came to the civil case – as far as I was concerned – the case was over – all over. When in fact F N’s case was dismissed, I said to R O B, ‘you go up and drop that case’ I said – I had a funny feeling, I didn’t know what it was, but I knew there was something funny happening here – they’d all changed their statements – I’d a funny feeling here. R O B, went up – he had the same solicitor – and R O Y went up to this solicitor, P T – went up to him and said – ‘will I drop this case?’ [P T]: ‘No keep it on.’ Six weeks before the civil case, in other words six week before the case in January 2002, my daughter, her boyfriend R O B and her little daughter – she’d had a little daughter by this stage – went up to the Four Courts to meet with the senior barrister and junior barrister, for the first time, about this case. And when they went up, D was telling them what’d happened, that they were having their first drink and the junior barrister turned around and said that they’d heard that before. And the solicitor turned around to her and told her to drop this case. Or if you are offered E5,000 – accept it. Now my wife asked this solicitor P T – why would he tell R O B to keep his case on he got three stitches in the head and tell my daughter to drop her case? Why would he say that? My daughter came home and told me, and she was upset – you’d want to see my daughter – bad enough post traumatic stress – without this. I said to D, ‘ If R O B is called first you’ll have no case. And that’s the way it proved to be.
So we went to the court on the 17th of January 2002. Me and my wife followed them up. Let me go back… There was a very good friend of my daughter – she went to school with her. And on the day of this incident, she was in an offlicense or something to buy cigarettes, and she seen L C and F N buying lots of drink that day. As far as we were concerned C C [the friend] was a witness for us. We knew the others were gone onto the pub’s side. So we went up to the court, me and and me wife – up to the high court. And we were looking around to see where they were – we couldn’t find them. We seen the Bean Garda who was looking after the case with an inspector of the police, this is the inspector that was telling that the pub was whiter than white. We were told that they were down in the conference rooms – where you speak with the solicitor about the case. We found it anyway, and we went in. D was in there, R O B was in there, C C was in there, the engineer was in there – the engineer that went and checked out the pub – he was a witness – supposedly for us – and the senior barrister was in there and the solicitor was in there. This was the first time that it transpire that I seen the note that the pub gave – that L C was supposed to be drinking downstairs, before she went upstairs. So she could be in two places at the one time. Solicitor knew all this. This was the first time the note was pulled out – the solicitor knew all this – that it happened. That was the first I’d heard of it.”
Thus ends the first part of the transcript of our first interview. This transcript will continue in the comments and the second interview will be published separately (it’s going to be a separate interview – to be taped today). Apologies to Indy readers – for doing it this way. Time restraints have left us with little or no choice.
Please check back later. This interview is not to be missed, as you can probably already guess.