Interested in maladministration. Estd. 2005
RTEs Sarah McInerney ? Fianna Fail?supporter? Anthony
Joe Duffy is dishonest and untrustworthy Anthony
Robert Watt complaint: Time for decision by SIPO Anthony
RTE in breach of its own editorial principles Anthony
Waiting for SIPO Anthony Public Inquiry >>
Promoting Human Rights in IrelandHuman Rights in Ireland >>
Reform Councillors Refuse Training on Net Zero and Diversity Tue May 06, 2025 19:09 | Will Jones Nigel Farage has said Reform councillors are refusing to do training on climate change and diversity after the?party's local election?surge saw it take control of 10 councils and win more than 600 seats.
The post Reform Councillors Refuse Training on Net Zero and Diversity appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
?British Workers Come Last in Starmer?s Britain?: Employers Who Hire Indian Workers Given Major Tax ... Tue May 06, 2025 17:16 | Will Jones Keir Starmer has been accused of putting British workers last after it emerged that employers who hire Indian workers are to be given a major tax break under Labour's new trade deal.
The post “British Workers Come Last in Starmer’s Britain”: Employers Who Hire Indian Workers Given Major Tax Break in Labour Trade Deal appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
Nicola Sturgeon Refuses to Apologise to Women Over Self-ID Gender Policy, Saying ?Trans Lives Could ... Tue May 06, 2025 15:10 | Will Jones A defiant Nicola Sturgeon has refused to apologise to women for her self-ID gender policy after the Supreme Court ruled trans women are not women, saying "trans lives could become unliveable".
The post Nicola Sturgeon Refuses to Apologise to Women Over Self-ID Gender Policy, Saying “Trans Lives Could Become Unliveable” appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
What Lucy Powell?s Grooming Gang Comments Tell Us About Labour Tue May 06, 2025 13:00 | Andrew Doyle Voicing concerns about grooming gangs is a "dog-whistle", a "little trumpet" and jumping "on a bandwagon of the far Right". That's what Labour really thinks, says Andrew Doyle, and voters will not be forgiving.
The post What Lucy Powell’s Grooming Gang Comments Tell Us About Labour appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
Merz Humiliated as He LOSES Vote to Become German Chancellor Tue May 06, 2025 11:07 | Will Jones Friedrich Merz,?leader of the German conservatives, was humiliated in Parliament today as he failed to win a majority in a secret ballot to become Chancellor. Turns out selling out to the Left has consequences.
The post Merz Humiliated as He LOSES Vote to Become German Chancellor appeared first on The Daily Sceptic. Lockdown Skeptics >>
Voltaire, international edition
Will intergovernmental institutions withstand the end of the "American Empire"?,... Sat Apr 05, 2025 07:15 | en
Voltaire, International Newsletter N?127 Sat Apr 05, 2025 06:38 | en
Disintegration of Western democracy begins in France Sat Apr 05, 2025 06:00 | en
Voltaire, International Newsletter N?126 Fri Mar 28, 2025 11:39 | en
The International Conference on Combating Anti-Semitism by Amichai Chikli and Na... Fri Mar 28, 2025 11:31 | en Voltaire Network >>
|
Search words: Bhopal
Eyewitness report from protests at Earth summit
national |
miscellaneous |
news report
Thursday August 29, 2002 14:56 by dave lordan - swp dlordan at hotmail dot com

Eyewitness report from protests at Earth summit
Eyewitness report from protests at Earth summit Naomi Klein etc More at swp.org.uk Get the corporations off our backs NAOMI KLEIN, author of No Logo, talks to Socialist Worker from the protests in Johannesburg "PEOPLE ARE on the streets here because the process since the Rio Earth Summit has clearly failed. We don't need more promises to tackle poverty and environmental destruction. We need action-action to regulate polluting multinational corporations-and we need redistribution of wealth. That can only be done by community control and democracy, and that is not on the agenda at the World Summit on Sustainable Development. The summit is a greenwash of the same things we have heard from G8 summits and the World Trade Organisation. It's about more globalisation and more privatisation. They are saying the only route to sustainable development is partnership with business and self regulation of multinational corporations. That's absurd-not just because it has failed since Rio, but because after the Enron scandal the idea that the corporations can be trusted to regulate themselves is a joke. The summit claims to be about helping the poor. But it is taking place in a compound to keep such people out. There is a giant search park. People are corralled away from the summit. There is a surveillance plane and 10,000 police. The South African government has decided that the summit is a good opportunity to promote tourism. So poor people are being cleared away from visible sites. Street vendors and beggars have been removed, and people evicted from squatter camps and moved out of sight. Particular targets have been local activists in South Africa, like the Soweto Electricity Crisis Committee and the Landless People's Movement. We marched last Saturday as international activists in solidarity with local activists. We wanted to send a clear message that they can't co-opt international activists and repress local activists. Last Saturday we marched against the repression that took place over the previous days. We got one block and were stopped by police. Without warning they fired percussion grenades. Some people got quite badly burned on the legs. We sat down in protest. Oscar Olivera, leader of the successful resistance to water privatisation in Bolivia, gave a powerful speech comparing the struggle happening in South Africa with that in Bolivia." Carnival against the Nazis-Manchester this Sunday - page 16 Durban women attack 'satans who run industry' WOMEN IN one of South Africa's poorest townships, Wentworth on the edge of Durban, issued a statement about why they are protesting at the Earth Summit. They have called their grassroots organisation the Wentworth Summit on Sickness and Death (WSSD), mirroring the official title of the world leaders' gathering, the World Summit on Sustainable Development. "Our land stolen from us through the barrel of the Bible and the tolling of big guns. Dumped in godforsaken pits on the outskirts of Durban. Exploited for cheap labour in the foul factories of Shell, Sasol, BP and Engen. Maimed, diseased and killed by pollution that rains down no matter what ill wind is blowing. Forgotten, lied to and bluffed by politicians who claim they came to liberate us. And now, in this new century, when we organise we are repressed, locked up, insulted, beaten and shot. We now say enough! We now stand up as parents with children wheezing for clean air. We stand up as wives whose husbands have cancer of the blood. We stand up as a community disgusted at the sight of what they have tried to turn us into-gangsters and gossipers, drunks and dealers. We stand up as neighbours who cannot bear to see the suffering next door any more. We stand up as human beings who demand a decent life. We say to the big polluters-Shell, Engen, Mondi, BP and Sasol-cease your dealing in our death. Stop pumping cancer and asthma into the air we breathe. Should it cost too much to clean your smoke stacks, then close down and get lost. In the meantime we demand £100 per person a month for all who suffer from asthma, and all medical costs for those with lung cancer and leukemia. We say to the ANC government coalition, you claspers of hands, you smellers of money, you cravers of applause, you hypocrites. You have done nothing for us. We will now do what is necessary, by all means necessary, ourselves. We say to you NGOs and churches and trade unions, do not tell us to be patient or swallow our rage. There can be no compromise with the satans of industry and the stooges in government. You are part of the problem unless you understand this. We are dying. You can fall off your high horses on the way to Damascus. You can turn around and join us in our struggle. We say to all other community movements and groups across the land, let's join hands. Let's forget about colour and creed. Let's fight together. Let us take our right to life in our hands." Return to index Earth SummitWorld leaders meet in South Africa, while poverty and global warming rise. Paul McGarr argues the summit will not end the sufferingANOTHER SUMMIT, and more claims from government leaders that they want to tackle world poverty and global warming. But as the delegates meet in the South African city of Johannesburg, they are likely to entrench the same forces and policies responsible for the crisis. Almost three billion people, half the world's population, live on less than two US dollars a day. Poverty brings hunger, death and disease. Some 30,000 children under five die every day from preventable causes. Diseases like Aids, TB and malaria kill more than five million people a year. And the catastrophe of global warming threatens the whole planet. Almost all reputable scientists warn that pumping carbon dioxide into the atmosphere is destabilising the world climate, despite the claim from George Bush that there is nothing to worry about. He said this week that he would not be bothering to attend the summit. He has gone along with his big business friends who have lobbied hard for him not to go to Johannesburg. When Bush first raised the idea of not attending the summit some 31 lobby groups and individuals in the US wrote to him saying, "We applaud your decision not to attend."Signatories included representatives of seven think tanks that received funding from the world's biggest oil corporation, ExxonMobil. Global warming is a serious problem. Ten of the world's hottest years on record have occurred since 1990, making extreme weather more likely. These issues were discussed at the last Earth Summit in the Brazilian city of Rio de Janeiro in 1992. The centrepiece of Rio was a massive document called "Agenda 21", which all the world leaders there signed up to. It promised action on poverty, debt, disease and much else. There were promises of action over global warming in the Framework Convention on Climate Change. Yet in the decade since then things have got worse, not better, on almost every front. "There is a gap between the goals and promises set out in Rio and the daily reality in rich and poor countries alike," admits United Nations general secretary Kofi Annan. The Rio agreement pledged a massive increase in aid from the richest countries to the poor. A target was set to boost aid from an average of 0.35 percent of economic output at the time of Rio to a still modest 0.7 percent. But by the year 2000 the average aid budget had fallen to just 0.22 percent of output, and in the US it was just 0.1 percent. At Rio government leaders pledged to slash the debt burden which devastates many countries. But the total debt burden has grown by a third, to £1,700 billion, since then. Poor countries pay almost 14 percent more of the proportion of their export earnings on debt payment than before. And half of the 26 countries receiving "debt relief" still spend more on debt payments than on health. There would be "universal access" to safe drinking water and sanitation, according to the Rio summit. Yet 1.2 billion people are still without clean water supplies and three billion without adequate sanitation. Diarrhoea, a disease from which virtually no one need die, still kills 2.12 million people a year. Yet Rio's Agenda 21 summit promised to cut deaths from preventable diseases. There has been a 25 percent rise since Rio in the numbers dying from malaria, to over one million a year. There has been a sixfold leap in AIDS-related deaths to three million, mostly in Africa. What about the other great promise at Rio, of action on climate change by slashing carbon dioxide emissions? Emissions have risen, not fallen, by almost 10 percent globally since Rio. In 1997 modest targets for cutting carbon dioxide were finally agreed with the Kyoto climate change agreement. But the US, responsible for a quarter of all global emissions, refuses to back even these modest steps. Its carbon dioxide emissions were 16 percent higher in 2000 than in 1990, and are still rising. And the Kyoto treaty itself is so full of holes that its targets are unlikely to be met. The fastest growing source of greenhouse gas emissions, aviation, is simply excluded from the deal. No wonder South African protesters have denounced the summit as a sham. "Multinational corporations are hijacking the agenda for the World Summit" Christian Aid Profit is the priorityGOVERNMENTS' commitment to corporate globalisation has systematically undermined the promises made at the Rio summit. Multinational corporations, governments that back them, and organisations like the International Monetary Fund and World Bank pushed their "neo-liberal" economic dogma. They insisted that nothing should stand in the way of the relentless drive for profit and markets. They demanded that public services and regulation of business should be sacrificed to the rights of corporations to dominate every aspect of the world. Now in the Johannesburg summit even the pretence that government action can tackle the global crisis is being sidelined. In the jargon used in the Earth Summits, treaties between governments are labelled "Type 1 agreements". There will be none of these in Johannesburg. Instead the focus will be on "Type 2 agreements" or "public-private partnerships", as the charity Christian Aid describes them. Christian Aid explains, "Type 2 agreements, public-private partnerships operating at the UN level and as official outputs of the summit, will further entrench the role of the private sector in the provision of areas vital for human, sustainable development." The Johannesburg draft declaration "reaffirms an agenda of rapid liberalisation of investments and trade, under the banner of the WTO Trade Round in Doha." Christian Aid gives a damning assessment of the Johannesburg conference as "a world summit for business development". Britain's New Labour government is among those at the forefront of championing this drive. Tony Blair is with a string of top business people in Johannesburg. He will be helping them to get a share of the money to be made from this global version of the PPP and PFI he forces on us in Britain. BP, Ford and Coke want 'strong business impact'BIG CORPORATIONS have played a key role in shaping the structure and agenda of the Earth Summit. The key force is a body called Business Action for Sustainable Development. The organisation held a meeting in Paris in October last year of 140 executives of the world's biggest companies. Bjorn Stigson of Business Action spoke openly about what they wanted from the summit."We want to ensure that the business voice is heard in a strong and cohesive manner to give a strong business impact at the summit," he said. "We have been active in interacting with the UN system and others to put across business ideas for the structure of the summit and for the agenda and arrangements which will eventually emerge." The corporations behind Business Action are among those responsible for the very poverty and environmental devastation that the summit is supposed to address. They include oil companies like BP and Shell, and car companies like Ford and General Motors.There are also food corporations such as Cargill and Coca-Cola, drugs firms like Bayer and Aventis, mining corporations like Rio Tinto and Anglo American, and genetically modified crop companies like Novartis and Monsanto. Business Action is chaired by Phillip Watts of Shell, with BP's deputy chief executive Rodney Chase also on the board. Robert Wilson, of mining company Rio Tinto, is another board member of Business Action.Wilson has also been made part of Britain's official delegation by Tony Blair. The vice-chair of the organisation is William Stavropoulos, chair of US corporation Dow Chemicals. This multinational owns Union Carbide, which was responsible for the world's worst ever industrial disaster, in Bhopal in India in 1984. The accident left 20,000 people dead. These are the firms and people the governments at the Earth Summit will be telling us will save the environment and tackle poverty and disease. Return to index
|
View Comments Titles Only
save preference
Comments (14 of 14)
Jump To Comment: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14next time don't repost the information, provide a summary and a link instead.
is there not enough room in cyberspace or something, Ray? Maybe i don't get it and there are practical reasons. If so please tell me what they are.
Dave, Indymedia editorial policy is to encourage the production and dissemination of alternative reporting and coverage. Indymedia isn't the internet - there's plenty of space and a great amount of freedom on the WWW, but to think that this one site should contain every piece of news in the world would lead to a useless site.
There is an SWP website. There's an Indymedia website. Why duplicate? when the first IMC came online in Seattle it was full of first-hand reports, speedy uploads from digi cameras and minidisc, in short, an alternative. Indymedia'
s about process not content in my mind - what I believe to be the aim of the IMC network is not to be the number one anti-capitalist news source or anything like it, but to challenge notions of publishing and reporting and to allow areas of news that are often ignored by conventional media to come to public attention.
Copying an article from a political group's website is not very radical.
Strictly speaking there shouldn't be _any_ reposting of stuff that's available elsewhere on the web. When people open articles to find they're just reading something that somebody has cut-and-pasted from elsewhere on the web its bad for the reputation of indymedia as a source of independent, original news.
Getting people to post links and summaries doesn't stop original stuff from being pushed off the front page, but it seems to have evolved as an acceptable compromise. It means people aren't confronted by reams of reposted stuff, but at the same time allows you to bring interesting material to the attention of the newswire. (This material must still be relevant, naturally)
Perhaps most importantly, it demands some effort from the poster - anyone can cut and paste an entire article, but far fewer are willing to take the time to write even a short introduction to an article. If they can't or won't make even that minimal effort, they shouldn't be posting the article in the first place.
Now, are there practical reasons why you _shouldn't_ just post a summary and a link?
Ray is the self appointed policeman of Indymedia Ireland. Let him do his job!
Why should we be any different????????????????????????????????????
I agree with Ray in general - he's taken on a shite arse role but someone has got to do it and it does lead to a more quality based initiative. I've been bollocked a few times myself and rightly so.
I'd say posting a summary with link is a fair compromise, that way the SWP get more hits and Indymedia is kept relatively ordered.
However RAY AND IMC Team might wanna consider puting a little blurb on the 'PUBLISH' and 'ADD COMMENTS' section explaining the gist of the publishing guidelines.
Also, it's fairly obvious to me, and to most, what IMC is all about but for those that haven't a notion (and start posting Celtic squad line ups etc.) then perhaps a frontpage sub banner could read something like
'IMC-Indymedia Ireland - For alternative news and discussion on the subjects others don't dare touch (or something of that sensantionalist nature).
Hopefully out of that meeting will come clearer guidelines, more obvious 'mission' statements, and more ... active ... editing. So far a lot of the work seems to have fallen to a few volunteers, and they simply can't do everything they'd want to, let alone everything that everyone else would want them to. Even as it is though, I'd say this indymedia is a lot better than a lot of others.
Ray, it seems that there is a very tight circle of activists in Ireland, and within that circle there are sub-circles galore. That therefore narrows the scope for actions and volunteers with regard to helping Indymedia, and indeed any campaign.
It's possible that the need to get new volunteers could be linked to a broader outreach agenda to bring in new activists into the 'community'.
Possibly target (for want of a better word) I.T., Politics, and Journalism students (posters,a ds on relevent notice boards, magazines etc...). They might not fully embrace radical change and actions, or indeed mightn't even know of IMC - but this could be a great chance to really offer people a practical opportunity to engage in change - relevan to their interests. At the same time the activist community can open up and Indymedia is helped as well.
It's all very well me saying all this from Canada of course (where I'm a little out of touch and of little help) but I thought these suggestions might be of some use.
also, how about just POSTING 'HELP WANTED' articles on the newswire every few days - that way the readership (many of whom only read select articles...and not necessarily one's like this were the debate of how to get help is taking place'.
Also, I presume 'helping IMC' doesn't have to be techincal or editorial - it could involve some serious promotional work and journalism - which everybody can do - from anywhere.
Perhaps a list of HOW YOU CAN HELP might be useful?
My only involvement with the IMC at the moment is that I'm on some of the mailing lists and post to the newswire. There's an IMC meeting coming up in Dublin, which will probably be advertised on here soon. I hope to be there, and anyone else with ideas/complaints/comments should try to make it too.
No surrender to the SWP!
Sad....