Why is my rent so high? Mon Oct 31, 2016 18:51 | Gavin Mendel-Gleason
Review of Capitalism: Competition, Conflict, Crises by Anwar Shaikh Sun Oct 30, 2016 16:21 | Gavin Mendel-Gleason
Electoralism vs Abstentionism (Or: Why You Should Run For Office) Fri Aug 26, 2016 17:07 | Slyvia Smith
Centrism extremism: how horseshoe-politics silences brutality Sat Jul 02, 2016 18:25 | yeksmesh
Of Tankies, Trots and Social Democrats Thu May 12, 2016 23:41 | Gavin Mendel-Gleason
Spirit of Contradiction >>
Interested in maladministration. Estd. 2005
RTEs Mary Wilson: A woman with some brain…
Irish journalism: Suffering from a serious malaise Anthony
Brian Cowen: A political idiot Anthony
Hell at the Gates: A propaganda exercise Anthony
Breaking: New minister for investigative judges to be appointed Anthony
Public Inquiry >>
A bird's eye view of the vineyard
Russia SITREP December 06, 2016 by Scott Wed Dec 07, 2016 03:19 | Scott
Russian President Vladimir Putin approved the new Doctrine of Information Security of Russia, according to a decree published on the legal information portal Tuesday. the Information Security of Russia (in
Wesley Clark Jr apologizes to the Lakota nation (UPDATED 2x) Wed Dec 07, 2016 00:02 | The Saker
An incredible moment of healing at Standing Rock: Hundreds of veterans ask Native elders for forgiveness. “We fought you. We took your land. We signed treaties that we broke. We
The ICRC should get another Nobel prize, this time for hypocrisy! Tue Dec 06, 2016 23:45 | The Saker
For context, see here: https://www.rt.com/news/369301-russia... Personal note: While there are many sincere and 100% idealistic ICRC delegates, especially the young ones (so-called “first mission” delegates), most of the folks sitting
Syrian War Report ? December 6, 2016: Militant Counter-Attack Fails in Aleppo Tue Dec 06, 2016 17:03 | The Saker
Statements of Sergei Lavrov and the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation Tue Dec 06, 2016 13:30 | Scott
LIVE: Sergei Lavrov holds joint press conference with Thorbjorn Jagland Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov held a joint press conference with Secretary General of the Council of Europe Thorbjorn Jagland,
The Saker >>
Notes on Judge Harding-Clark?s Report on the Symphysiotomy Payment Scheme. Thu Nov 24, 2016 17:50 | Máiréad Enright
The Practical Implications of Miller v SSEEU for Brexit: Nine Reflections Thu Nov 03, 2016 16:30 | Fiona de Londras
Having Our Voices Heard ? the Official Languages Act foreshadowing the Recognition of Irish Sign Lan... Wed Nov 02, 2016 09:35 | admin
Benefit Sanctions and Coercion Within the Irish Welfare System Thu Sep 22, 2016 13:38 | Cliodhna Murphy
The rights of the unborn: a troubling decision from the High Court? Wed Aug 10, 2016 12:42 | Máiréad Enright
Human Rights in Ireland >>
Review of "In the Name of the Republic"
history and heritage |
Thursday May 02, 2013 11:41 by Pádraig Ó Ruairc.
Hello All - Here is my review of the controversial TV3 Irish War of Independence documentary "In the Name of the Republic" which was presented by Prof. Eunan O'Halpin of Trinity College which has just been published in the May/June issue of History Ireland Magazine. Enjoy:
IRA leader, Tom Barry, once likened the more unsavory aspects of the War of Independence to being dragged “down into the mire”. The two-part documentary, 'In The Name of The Republic', presented by Professor Eunan O'Halpin, explored that mire by examining the uglier aspects of the period. These included the assassination of RIC men, the killings of unarmed British soldiers and the execution and secret burial of alleged British spies.
The first episode focused on Ashbrook Farm, Laois. The owner of the farm related how a predecessor, Jack Walpole, told him that three bodies were dumped there in the 1920's. Walpole, who was described as “a bit eccentric”, claimed to have buried one of the bodies himself. The supernatural was a strong feature of Walpole's tale and he stated his horse could sense the location of the graves, refusing to draw a plough over them.
There were obvious problems this information. Firstly, there was an automatic assumption that Walpole's stories were a factual account of real events rather than tall tales invented by an eccentric farmer to frighten local youngsters. Secondly, all three alleged victims were unidentified and it was taken for granted that they were victims of the IRA rather than the British forces, agrarian violence or criminality.
Whilst admitting that there was no evidence other than “local rumors”, the programme's investigation continued and a team of archaeologists began excavating. Despite using geophysics and modern scientific methods the archaeologists failed to unearth anything more sinister than a lime kiln - presumably they would have had more success with Jack Walpole's psychic horse? Next O'Halpin attempted to identify those rumored to be buried on the farm using documentary sources. He identified three possible victims, however it soon transpired that none of these were killed by the IRA. The first episode concluded with O'Halpin admitting that these revelations were “farcical rather than shocking.”
A worrying aspect of the first hour of the documentary was the reproduction of anti-republican propaganda as fact. O'Halpin stated that RIC Constable Alfred Needham was shot in front of his new bride as they left their wedding ceremony. This colourful story, which has also featured in Kevin Myers' writings, has no basis in fact. The local Civil Registration Office has no record of an Alfred Needham being married on that date. Contemporary press and police reports state that Needham was shot as he stood by a stable gate - not whilst exiting a church. Nor do these accounts mention a wedding or a wife. Surely the veracity the fantastic tales about Needham's shooting and the bodies supposedly buried in Laois should have been fully checked before being broadcast?
The second episode focused on Cork, and in particular, on suspected spies and British troops captured and killed by the IRA at Knockraha, a few miles east of Cork city. There is no question that a significant number of IRA executions were carried out in this district, but there is considerable debate about the total number killed. The programme made extensive use of recorded interviews with IRA veteran Martin Corry who claimed that about 37 people had been executed by the IRA and buried in the area.
However Corry was prone to exaggeration and is not a very credible witness. In an audio clip included in the programme Corry stated that 17 Cameron Highlanders were executed by the IRA. However British records indicate that only 3 soldiers from the regiment went missing in Cork, the programme could only identify 2 disappeared Camerons. How then are we to account for the dozen or more unidentified members of the regiment that Corry states were killed? This was the recurring problem that plagued the programme - The fate of named individuals whose deaths are confirmed historical fact were explored in grim detail, but accompanying these were sweeping statements, rumors and folklore about dozens of unidentified IRA victims for whose existence there is no reliable evidence.
O'Halpin stated that between 1920 and 1921 at least 200 of the IRA's opponents “were abducted, executed, and their bodies secretly disposed of”, and that this figure included “over 180civilians”. This figure seems far too high to be accurate. Whilst it is certain that between one and two hundred alleged British spies were killed by the IRA (a phenomenon common to guerilla conflicts internationally) the vast majority of their bodies were left in public places to serve as a warning to others, and were recovered and afforded formal Christian burials.
British documents offer far more conservative estimates of the number of 'disappeared'. The British Government's official “Missing List” names just 59 missing persons assumed to have been killed by the IRA. At least 8 of those listed later turned up alive and well, including one RIC Constable who went 'missing' to join an IRA flying column! In 1922 the British authorities issued a list of 85 missing British soldiers (Military Archives, A/07304). If we assume that all of those named on these two lists were killed and secretly buried by the IRA (which we know is not the case) this would give a grand total of 134 'disappeared'- far short of O'Halpin's figure.
The documentary concluded with a “List of The Known Disappeared”. This contained just 57 names. It was emphasized that the true figure was likely to be far higher, but that those identified were “known with certainty” to have been disappeared by the IRA. Amongst those named was William Shields, a British spy from Boherbee, Cork. For the record, Shields was never captured by the IRA and fled Ireland in 1921. During the Civil War both the IRA and the Free State Army attempted without success to locate and assassinate Shields. It is clear that when Shields disappeared it was with the assistance of the British Crown, and not into a shallow grave dug by the IRA.
Historians of the Irish Revolution are fortunate to have an abundance of documentary evidence, including veteran testimony, official records and other material from both British and Republican sources. Using these it should be possible to identify the full name, date and circumstances of each of the disappeared. Speculative estimates of the numbers killed, based on anonymous fatalities, are hugely problematic. It is simply not good enough to say that the IRA killed 200 people but we don't know who the majority of them were because “…their names [are] lost in a maze of records.” Those who want to know the truth regarding the disappeared need to navigate that maze and identify those killed instead of taking shortcuts.
Pádraig Ó Ruairc.
(Posted by Turing)