no events posted in last week
The Party and the Ballot Box Sun Jul 14, 2019 22:24 | Gavin Mendel-Gleason
On The Decline and Fall of The American Empire and Socialism Sat Jan 26, 2019 01:52 | S. Duncan
What is Dogmatism and Why Does It Matter? Wed Mar 21, 2018 08:10 | Sylvia Smith
The Case of Comrade Dallas Mon Mar 19, 2018 19:44 | Sylvia Smith
Review: Do Religions Evolve? Mon Aug 14, 2017 19:54 | Dara McHugh
Spirit of Contradiction >>
Interested in maladministration. Estd. 2005
Public Services Card: Some still forced to comply
Catholic Church: Dark influence still active Anthony
Tom Parlon launches new career in comedy Anthony
Presumption of innocence does not universally apply in Ireland Anthony
The poor standard of Irish political journalism Anthony
Public Inquiry >>
A bird's eye view of the vineyard
Moveable Feast Cafe 2019/10/15 ? Open Thread Tue Oct 15, 2019 05:00 | Herb Swanson
2019/10/15 04:00:02Welcome to the ‘Moveable Feast Cafe’. The ‘Moveable Feast’ is an open thread where readers can post wide ranging observations, articles, rants, off topic and have animate discussions of
Kurds face stark options after US pullback Mon Oct 14, 2019 20:11 | amarynth
By Pepe Escobar : Posted with Permission Forget an independent Kurdistan: They may have to do a deal with Damascus on sharing their area with Sunni Arab refugees In the
Behind Hong Kong?s black terror Mon Oct 14, 2019 12:12 | amarynth
By Pepe Escobar – Hong Kong : Posted with permission Deciphering who?s behind the violence leads to a long list of possibilities ?If we burn, you burn with us.? ?Self-destruct
Washington abandons its Kurdish proxies as Ankara and Damascus step in Sun Oct 13, 2019 21:38 | The Saker
By Aram Mirzaei Even though I have my doubts over whether Washington will actually withdraw from Syria fully, it seems as if their Kurdish proxies in northern Syria have been
The Terrorists Among US10| The IO Echo Chamber Scott Shane Joel Harding Sun Oct 13, 2019 21:35 | The Saker
by George Eliason for The Saker Blog At the beginning of October, I was contacted by the New York Times, @ScottShane for an interview about US President Donald Trump. The
The Saker >>
A Blog About Human Rights
US Holds China To Account For Human Rights Violations Sun Oct 13, 2019 19:12 | Human Rights
UN Human Rights Council Should Address Human Rights Crisis in Cambodia Sat Aug 31, 2019 13:41 | Human Rights
Fijian women still face Human Rights violations Mon Aug 26, 2019 18:49 | Human Rights
Saudi Human Rights Violation Fri Aug 09, 2019 20:41 | Human Rights
China?s LGBT Community Mon Apr 15, 2019 19:19 | Human Rights
Human Rights in Ireland >>
Stealth Planning further exposed at Shell Oral Hearing
rights, freedoms and repression |
Tuesday September 14, 2010 22:44 by Lulu - Rossport Solidarity Camp
September 1913 and The Great Gas Giveaway cross paths at Shell Oral Hearing
The Bord Pleannala oral hearing saga continued today in Bellmullet at the Broadhaven Bay Hotel, looking at the Compulsory Acquisition Orders of the present project application of the Shell Corrib Gas proposed estuary pipeline route, as well as various other aspects of the project. The various concerns raised by local objectors and the Rossport Solidarity Camp were not appeased by Shell's experts, and the question of whether the project was in 'the public interest' was once again raised by Mr Leo Mulrooney, Barrister for local land owners.
The Bord Pleannala oral hearing saga continued today in Bellmullet at the Broadhaven Bay Hotel, looking at the Compulsory Acquisition Orders of the present project application of the Shell Corrib Gas proposed estuary pipeline route, as well as various other aspects of the project.
Laurence Coyle and Patrick McAndrew, two of the land-owners under threat of CAOs, were represented by Leo Mulrooney, a Dublin-based barrister. Mr. Mulrooney thoroughly questioned Shell’s experts and called into question whether this project should be considered a strategic project in the ‘interests of the common good’, as required under the Infrastructural Act 2006 for the lawful use of CAOs. The 1976 Gas Act was also referred to, which states that CAOs should only be granted when they serve the ‘public interest’. Mr. Mulrooney comprehensively argued that the negligible benefits to the local community and the State were highly outweighed by the blatant lack of royalties from Shell to the State, and he seriously called into doubt whether Shell would ever pay any tax to the State on the gas extracted.
Mr. Mulrooney called Shell’s planning methods “Planning by Stealth” as objectors have not had the opportunity to comment on the project as a whole, due to Shell’s ‘project splitting’. Unfortunately now that the offshore pipeline and refinery are nearly complete, Shell’s team has significant leverage in the oral hearing over the onshore pipeline that totally corrupts the planning process. Mr Mulrooney stated that “Never before in Ireland, has a private company been allowed to usurp the land of a private individual in the name of profit” and urged the Board to carefully consider how this project could possibly be deemed to serve any public interests at all.
Mr. Mulrooney concluded by comparing the present tragedy unfolding in the State to the September 1913 worker’s lockout viewed as the most severe and significant industrial dispute in Irish history, and he quoted from W.B. Yeats’ September 1913 poem to much applause from the audience.
Local resident Winifred Macklin confronted Shell with their previous international record in relation to health and safety and emergency procedures, or lack thereof, in the event of an unforeseen accident, such as an explosion on the pipeline route. Ms. Macklin concluded by stating that “ It’s like me inviting an arsonist into my house without having a fire extinguisher or sprinkler system”.
Mr. Eoin Ó Leidhin from the Rossport Solidarity Camp questioned Shell on the cumulative effects of traffic disruption in the area, over the 26-month construction period of the project. Shell admitted that there would be a total of 58,415 truck movements over 26 months, averaging at 74 a day, with a further estimated 255,620 personnel movements (approximately 327 per day). Mr Ó Leidhin correctly pointed out that one of the reasons for the Board’s rejection of Shell’s 2009 route was due to the high traffic disruption (totaling at 40,673 truck movements over 12 months), therefore would not the same reason stand, to reject the present project which has an even higher traffic volume (albeit over a longer timeframe), and thus more impact on the community.
Several other local residents asked questions of Shell today regarding traffic and construction. Diane Taylor challenged Shell regarding traffic management, citing two incidents in the last month where her access to a public road was restricted, in favour of lorries going to the Shell compound. In response, Mr. Nolan essentially told Ms. Taylor that she was ‘stuck in the past’, and stated that ‘we are not looking at the history of the project’. In this writer’s opinion, the inspector seems to have tunnel vision (no pun intended), and is somehow deeming the local community’s experience with Shell in the last 10 years as irrelevant.
An Bord Pleanala Inspector Mr. Martin Nolan, was called up on by Peter Sweetman, for his unfair treatment of the ‘amateur observers’ from the Rossport Solidarity Camp by cutting their questions short, while allowing Mr. Keane, Barrister for Shell, a much lengthier time to make his case on Shell’s behalf, during the hearing.
The oral hearing continues on Wednesday in Belmullet when the Department of Energy, Marine and Natural Resources, Shell, and The National Parks and Wildlife Service will be questioned on the ecological impacts of the planning application.